Saturday, May 26, 2007

Movie review - Ladd #36 - "Boy on a Dolphin" (1957) **

Twenty years before Jacqueline Bisset in The Deep, 20th Century Fox had Sophia Loren emerge from the water in a wet shirt and seemingly no bra... and in CinemaScope. It's the highlight of a by-the-numbers treasure hunting scenery piece. For all Loren's beauty and voluptuous figure, her performance is irriating - a lot of hyperactive yelling (in Hollywood of the 1950s most Continental leading ladies had to yell a lot) - though to be fair it was her first Hollywood movie.

According to Alan Ladd's biographer, Ladd was annoyed at the attention paid by the director to Loren, giving her close ups, etc - but honestly Ladd is not in good form here, with energy in some scenes but lethargy in others. He does provide some fun when you watch scenes between Ladd and Loren and you know he's on a box or she's in a ditch. Clifton Webb can always be relief on to be a smooth villain and there are some pleasing location footage of Greece (once Daryl F Zanuck left Fox, studio president Spyros Skouras indulged in this liking for Greek material more eg this, The 300 Spartans, It Happened In Athens, the hiring of Peter Levathes). Apart from that, the film lacks excitement, which wouldn't have been too hard to fix - just get someone trying to kill Ladd or have accidents with his equipment and stuff.

Movie review - "The Aviator" (2005) ***1/2

Enjoyed this enormously and could have happily watched it for another couple of hours, with loving period detail, fascinating lead character and Leo di Caprio strong in the lead. How do you tackle the life of someone like Hughes which was so extraordinary? They've decided to focus on his career as an aviator, which is a great idea, as it gets to cover Hell's Angels, his flight records, major crash, troubles with Pan Am and the Spruce Goose attempt; it even allows to incorporate his romance with Katie Hepburn, by having him take her flying. It's a great spine.

But Scorsese (or the producers or whoever) seem to have then gone "but the other stuff is so interesting..." so they shove in a bit about Jane Russell in The Outlaw and Faith Domerge and Ava Gardner and one too many party scenes with a band playing. Cate Blanchett is marvellous as Kate H and watching it I was thinking "but of course it's a great role, easy to play"... until I saw Kate Beckingsale as Ava Gardner which you would also think "great role, easy to play"... but she's average. So snaps to Cate.

NB I enjoyed the little cameos - Jude Law as Errol Flynn (though I think it was really Cary Grant who was a closer friend), Gwen Stefani as Jean Harlow, etc.

Movie review - "Vera Drake" (2005) **1/2

A caption for this film in Filmink magazine said "Abortion rocks!" -which is entirely fair, for this is one of a swathe of recent pro-choice films. Imelda Staunton is perfect in the title role though you do get tired during the last half hour when she cries the whole time. The story sort of mosies along - she does abortions, gets busted. Some excellent acting, particularly from the husband and the son, and some seemingly spot-on period detail. The rich characters cop it, as usual (the wife of the husband's brother is a particular caricature) and somehow it seems to lack something.

Movie review - "Bride and Prejudice" (2005) **1/2

The world of Jane Austen adapts comfortably to Indian society - no kissing, and lots of class division, with mum worried about marrying off her three daughters. It's bright and colourful and a bit dim with some not very memorable songs - the lead girls are all stunners and it is good natured with a lot of Austen's dark stuff removed (even the idiot sister comes to realise the bad man is bad by the end). All the shots of the male torsos here indicate the "female gaze" from its director.

Movie review - "Hitch" (2005) ***1/2

A real delight, a total charmer with Will Smith very relaxed as the date doctor who helps men get women. Eva Mendes is a revelation as his love interest, sexy and smart, and the script and handling are consistently fresh and lovely. It almost makes you believe Amber Valetta would go for Kevin James. Just a note on the film's false morality towards the end: Hitch goes "I didn't help you get those girls you did" - we've seen the movie, he did help them get those girls. Besides what he does isn't bad it's a nice service he's providing.

Movie review - "Being Julia" (2005) **

There are some films which seem like filmed theatre and there are some films which should have been plays. This is one in particular - it deals with theatre, has a dynamic star role for a woman, who often imagines her old mentor giving advice - a device which works better on stage than on screen. It also would have been more fun to watch this live, I think- to see the actors having a ball.
Annette Bening was admired for her performance but surely she could have had more fun - I kept thinking it needed someone a bit bigger, more Bette Davis (Bening is a bit too sensible at heart). And it's a bit bigoted - for some reason its OK for Julia to get a toy boy (Shaun Evans) but not OK for that toy boy to go out with a girl his own age (Lucy Punch).
And that girl is punished -though exactly how I'm not clear: she's sort of shown to be this bad actor but they like her in the audition then Bening sabotages her on opening night and the audience loves it? I'm confused.
Also, has there ever been a case in theatre history where a star has ad libbed the play, making major changes and made a hit of it? And wouldn't Julia, who has spent years in the theatre, already know her best friend (Bruce Greenwood) was gay?
In line with many stories of slightly gay sensibility, the lead female is camp, and there is a beautiful boy(Bening's son) who acts as a sort of font of wisdom.

Movie review - "Badass" (2005) ***

The story of the making of Sweet Sweetback is inspirational on one hand- a black filmmaker overcame the odds to create a blockbuster (well, indie blockbuster)... but on the other hand is kind of a nightmare because his struggle was so hard, and came close to falling over so often, it's kind of exhausting to watch. Soon after the film came out Hollywood was throwing money at anything vaguely black (blaxploitaton was the one sure bet at the box office in the early 70s - not rom coms,not Westerns or war films or musicals or even comedies, but black films,and the studio clung on to them like a drowning man clings on to a floating esky... until around the time of Jaws when they started breathing easier again) but that wasn't the case when Melvin Van Peebles was seeking finance. He destroys his health (he loses sight), spends all his own money, wrecks his home life (this film was made by his son but Mario doesn't spare dad) as he walks over glass to get the thing financed, made, distributed then shown. Even then its only at the last minute, when Black Panthers start to attend the film does he get home.The glamour of show biz! The elder Van Peebles never made the number of films you'd think he would have after Badasss... but maybe he was just too buggered.

Movie review - "Assault on Precinct 13" (2005) **

I'm sorry, but they shouldn't have greenlighted this film until they came up with a better reason why people under siege couldn't call out on their mobiles other than "they're blocking transmission". This is one of those films where the hero does something and the villain notes it admiringly saying "that's very smart", although when you think about it, it's not smart at all.

The toughness of the 1976 version has been given a PC glean - gone is the little girl being killed, the baddies are corrupt cops (ooh, tackle those issues), the prisoner who helps out the good cops is now black and he's allowed to go away at the end (there was something heart wrenching in the original about this prisoner who'd helped save the day and went off to gaol at the end).

The director is obsessed with characters being shot in the forehead, it happens a number of times - if you're bored, try counting. The basic situation is still a good one and there is some decent action.

Movie review - "The Interpreter" (2005) **1/2

An attempt at a classy thriller which is kind of ruined by being too serious and sad. Whatever happened to a light touch? Or some Hitchcock glamour. OK I know it involves African genocide but its in a fictional country (albeit one based on Zimbabwe) so don't get all high and mighty on me. Also it's got Sean Penn in the lead as a grieving widower - you cast someone like Harrison Ford and its grieving lite, a little bit tormented but mostly interesting. But Sean suffers too much pain - its written all over his face, and he's not fun to be around. Nicole Kidman is pretty in a not-much role. 

There's some liveliness in the middle section which involves the bombing of a bus but in general the film is weighed down by its African curse - sadness, misery, death. (Not even much of a romance between the leads. And you keep waiting for some comic relief from Christine Keener but it doesn't come) 

NB how does Nickers get into the "secured" area of the UN so quickly? And note also how Hollywood is comfortable enough to make films about Africa with white heroes and black villains again?

Movie review - "Hostage" (2005) **

OK Bruce Willis suspense melo with him in one of those retired-man-with-a-past characters drawn back into action in a small town. There's one lot of hostages then another. One of the psychos is shown to be a good psycho through his obsessive love for a girl. How sweet. Yada yada yada. Bruce doesn't kick much butt until then end -he's actually a bit wimpy a lot of the time but then towards the end it's like "hang on I'm Bruce Willis I've got to kick butt" and he starts taking names.

Movie review - "Downfall" (2005) *****

Stunningly good German film about the last days of Hitler. Done with empathy but you never lose track of what a nutter he is - people like that have always existed but it doesn't follow that you vote them in.Told entirely from the POV of people who survived, which increases its effectiveness. The reality of it all is shocking - we see just your typical office secretaries and clerks gossiping, hanging out,occasionally emerging to the light. Eva Braun is a cheerful dopey type,the young soldiers keen to get into it. It makes things like the Goebbels killing their children all the more horrible. A masterpiece.

Movie review - "The Extra" (2005) *

This had one of the best concepts for an Aussie comedy in recent years -Jimeoin as an extra - but they totally muffed it. How did one film make so many bad decisions? Starts with this great gladiator opening sequence, then we see Jimeoin watching in the audience - he's an extra,you see. And he sees his bit's been cut out. So he sulks. Dude, you're an extra.

Jimeoin is one the most likable stars working in Australia but here he's totally unlikeable - he just wants to be famous, by any means necessary (this is totally opposite the easy going persona the Irishman has established over the years), which is such an uninspiring lousy goal. To make it worse, he doesn't deserve to be famous - he's a lousy extra (he can't keep quiet when someone steps on his foot, which I understand is painful but those are the sort of things actors need to do when the cameras are rolling), he doesn't work hard as a stripper for ages, he's not very nice to the charming Katherine Slattery (the best thing about the movie despite the yuck factor of the STD meet cutes).

There are some funny digs about working on mammoth productions and extras being told not to make eye contact with stars and asking them how they like the country etc which you think is going to lead into some good satire of Matrix productions here... but the film is set in this sort of never never fantasy land which robs the story of its culutral context. A plot finally stars up over half way through when Rhys Muldoon decides to make his own movie and it's a great idea having the movie buff gangster, but the wheels never fully come on. So maddeningly frustrating because there are some good ideas and talent but its just a mess.

Movie review - "Melinda and Melinda" (2005) **

A terrific idea from Woody, but he doesn't quite pull it off. Radha Mitchell is alright but the role could really have used someone to make it fly, like a young Diane Keaton (Radha is a good dramatic actress but not a natural at comedy - too serious and intense). Apparently Woody wanted Winona Ryder who would have been better.
And the Woodman just can't do young people, no matter how young his wife is - everyone talks like someone of Woody's generation, they all live in incredibly lush apartments, even the "struggling" musician. Clunk, clunk, clunk - just stick to your own circle, Woods.
 
Will Ferrell livens it up a bit with a Woody type character (one of the best Woody impersonations in a Woody film in recent memory - better than say Ken Branagh or Jason Biggs) and there are some good moments but really another one bites the dust.

Movie review - "Herbie: Fully Loaded" (2005) **


Lazy film and performance from Lindsay Loan, who is dressed like a lesbian and whose large breasts make it seem like she might topple forward at any moment. The problem with Herbie movies is basically the driver only wins because of the car, so its cheating, and nothing Lohan does makes her deserve it apart from being Lindsay Lohan. She's got star quality alright but how about being a bit pickier. Michael Keaton has an OK wig (not too greedy) but is nothing in a nothing role, and Matt Dillon is OK in an easy part. Some decent stunts and tired Gen X use of old hits on the soundtrack

Movie review - "The Yes Men" (2005) **1/2

There is a special place in Heaven for left wing American activists, they're really up against it in that country, but there are sometimes perks, too - like Herb Alpert, of the Tijuana Brass Band fame, helps fund these pranksters to go around the world pulling jokes. I found this more interesting than the pranks themselves which were kind of cool but none of them "water cooler" ish - nothing really funny like Mike Moore running a tree for congress or trucking communism around the country or something the Chaser might do. And the "tension" eg the guys sleeping in, is a bit ho-hum. We don't get to know the characters that well either. Aussies will be tickled the finale involves them at an Australian WTO conference - Aussies interviewed come out of it very compassionate and kindly.

Movie review - "The Wedding Crashers" (2005) ***

For the first third of this I was in sheer heaven - its such a great idea, and Owen Wilson and Vince Vaughan are perfect. The lines are fast and funny, the opening montage brilliant, its full of fun and life then in comes beautiful Rachel McAdams and she totally makes something of what could be a throw-away role and Isla Fisher is funny, too. When they played "Stars" by Coldplay I thought - this film has been made especially for me. 

It wobbles a bit when they go visit the Christopher Walken compound (they were a bit mean to the gay brother) then it falls apart in the last third. Surely the ending should have involved Owen having to crash McAdams' wedding. 

The fiancee character is a bit trying to have it everything - I squeaky clean environmentalist who is also areal prick who cheats on her, it struck me as trying to have it both ways, and it never made sense why sensible McAdams wound up with him.But that first third is wonderful.

Movie review - "Look Both Ways" (2005) ***

Warm loving movie where the animation is a bit disconcerting at first and lacks a bit of story but when it concentrates on the characters it works really well. Justine Clarke, in the middle of a gold run for her,is likable in the lead and there are some excellent support performances. The rapid photo montage at the end was very effective.

Movie review - "The Skeleton Key" (2005) ***


Enjoyable thriller dripping in good old fashioned creepy Southern atmosphere - decaying mansions, hidden secrets, swamps, accents,cripples and a visiting nurse (Kate Hudson). Hudson is a likeable heroine and Peter Skaarsgaard offers good support though Gena Rowlands over plays. At first I though the concept of "hoodoo" as opposed to voodoo was a bit weird (it sounds weird and reminds me of that"hoodoo/you do/do what/remind me of a man" routine in The Bachelor and the Bobbysoxer) but it works. It gets a bit wonky around the time Hudson leaves the mansion but I thought the ending was very satisfying.

Movie review - "Little Manhattan" (2006) **

An eleven year old boy falls in love with an eleven year old girl, played by an actor with the story of pretty but bland expression that Winnie Cooper used to wear on the Wonder Years. It gets off to a strong start with the kid being a good cryer and New York is beautifully photographed... but we've seen New York be beautifully photographed before and there's not enough story here for a full feature

Movie review - "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" (2005) **1/2

You hear the idea - a remake of Willy Wonka from Tim Burton with Johnny Depp - and think "great"... as did large slabs of the film going public who pushed this to a big gross. Some great production designs but Depp's Wonka is a bit creepy and the script makes two bad alterations from the original - adding a back story for Wonka (as if anyone cares - and yawn snore he had troubles with his father... Hollywood filmmakers love putting these plots in they all must have problems with their father),and removing the subplot about the mysterious man who tries to get Charlie to betray Wonka. Why remove this? It added suspense. So the story gets repetitive after a while - one kid disappears, then another, then another - with no build of suspense. Tremendous production design.

The pacing is a little off too. The acting not as good as the original.  Nice tunes.

Movie review - "Little Fish" (2005) **1/2

Made with much love, care and talent it might have been more enjoyable(and popular) if it was a bit schlockier i.e. just accepted the fact that it was basically a story about Cate Blanchett having to raise $X in three days or whatever, and done all the character stuff in and around that. But Rowan Woods wants to go the long way round, so there are lots of scenes and bits of stuff which is all excellently done it just sort of meanders. (Like did we need to see the whole school reunion thing.)There are a few too many shots of Cate (who is quite good though she can't quite shed the Hunters Hill aura) walking around Cabramatta looking wistful. Noni Hazlehurst is totally perfect as is Martin Henderson and Hugo Weaving and I also loved the actor who played the corrupt cop, he's a real find. Very suspenseful ending, makes you wish they'd just turned it all into a thriller, and put everything else in the confines of the genre, I think it would have been a terrific movie.

Movie review - "Cinderella Man" (2005) ***

Didn't quite storm the box office despite its credentials - Rusty as a boxer, a true life story about a man who was an underdog and fought hi sway to the world championship. How come a film had never been made of it before?

Maybe the story does lack a certain something - happily married men with loving spouses does get a bit boring (and Zegger's botox in a depression-set film is distracting) and perhaps it needed a reversal in the third act or more comedy or there's too much misery and poverty during the Depression sequences or something, I don't know, couldn't quite put my finger on it.
 

Rusty is perfect and the boxing scenes really good. Note how Max Baer is portrayed as evil  by having two women on the go! (That used to be a reward for your heroes - but not under Ron no-nonsense Howard). While Baer's rellies whinged about him being slandered in this film, he did kill people in the ring.

Movie review - "Serenity" (2005) ***1/2

This has a fan base of super hard core fans, which is a little surprising - you'd think sci fi fans of all people would be the first to know that the concept of Western style outlaws in space isn't exactly anew one - Battlestar Galactica was Wagon Trail in space, there was also Buckaroo Banzai, elements of Star Wars. Nathan Fillion is OK as the hero (don't think he's got big screen chops but he's fine as a small screen one), Summer Glau is the young Buffy like superhero with doe eyes and long legs created (one can't help thinking) with one eye very much on the lecherous teenage fan base and Chiwitel Ejiofor shines as the baddie. Plenty of twists and turns - you wonder why Hollywood didn't give this the hundred million dollar treatment, but there you go.

Movie review - "The Stepford Wives" (1975) ***

A much better film than the remake, if only because it is a whole piece of work. Katherine Ross was never the best actor in the world, but was pretty (you still wish original choice Diane Keaton had done it). The film falls into the trap of being a bit too obvious about the appeals of robot women (I'm with original adapter William Goldman who thought that the girls had to be sex bombs to make the men go through with it - being polite and making dinner and tea isn't quite enough). Very scary last sequence.

Movie review - "The Stepford Wives" (2004) **

This sounds like a great idea - Nickers in a remake of The Stepford Wives - but it's a total mess. The original film wasn't a masterpiece but it knew exactly what it was doing - a thriller about men's fear of women. This doesn't know what it's about - a comedy, but it's scared of it's basic black nature... I mean, the women should be killed, but they're afraid of that so they just have the silly idea of a microchip in the brain. And it doesn't ring true that these dorky men could have pulled these super achieving women in the first place, and that horrible"men can be strong by liking women" ending. The are all these campy moments and gags throughout, something which marred In and Out by the same writer-director team.

 Roger Bart and Bette Midler are funny,Nickers could have been, but there's no guts or idea here. Chris Walken and Glenn Close have played these sort of roles too many times before.(I thought of a possible alternate ending - the men are killing the women, but Nickers triumphs and sets up her own Stepford... with the men as robots).

Movie review - "Spartan" (2004) **1/2

David Mamet is a man of awesome talent but sometimes he tries to reinvent the wheel when what you need is merely to put a new twist on an old twist. Kidnapping the president's daughter is a totally adequate if familiar concept ditto the tormented hero.

Mamet tries to get some mystery happening by not revealing what's going on until a fair way in - but come on, Dave, we've seen the previews and read the trailers we know what the film's about.

And the twists aren't much - ooh, they really want her dead... ooh, it's a conspiracy. (The problem with geniuses working on a low-brow genre is that often they're not that familiar with the films of that genre - the audience for this sort of stuff is familiar with these twists).
 
His dialogue and characters are pretty strong (at least they provide something a bit different) and it has an effective spooky deserted "look", but momentum is lost when the action shifts to the Middle East.
And Kick Gurry as an Australian mercenary - I know there are Aussies who are mercenaries, but it's Kick Gurry. He looks like he's on his way to the Old Fitz after having a coffee at Bondi.
 
The action sequences are handled quite well, I didn't mind Val Kilmer as the super hero (though it might be time for him to lay off the sauces) - but do we ever believe Val could be really devoted to anything?

Movie review - "King Arthur" (2004) ****

I am the only person I know who really likes this movie. I know its got flaws - Keira Kneightly is a bit too smug, the comic relief support characters are clunky. But it's got such an inherently interesting world and story - the Romans are fleeing Britain, the Vikings are on their way and some soldiers have to make a decision whether to stay or leave.
That's a fantastic concept, set in a time which we see all too rarely on screen, and Antoine Fuqua excels with "guy on a mission" stories. Clive Owen has some unfortunate dialogue (mooning about an idealistic world of his dreams - actually a lot of the dialogue clunks) but he's got star quality and Ioan Gruffud-whatever-his-name-is compliments him nicely as Lancelot.
More perhaps could have been made of their conflict over Guinevere (Keira) - i.e. does she really like any of them? You get the feeling she likes Lancelot more but goes for Arthur due to political expediency - which is powerful stuff, could have been developed even further. There are strong action sequences, particularly the stuff with the ice. When Mads Mikkelsen takes on the head baddy at the end you want to go "don't do it - you're only a support actor, there's no way you'll survive this!"

Movie review - Ladd #32 - "The McConnell Story" (1955) **

The 50s were an anxious time for the Yanks, unsure in their position as world leader, worried about the Commies coming to attack, but very proud of their military. There were a rash of movies that promoted devotion to duty and military readiness.
This is a bio about a war ace and later test pilot who ended up dying ("so that others may learn"). It's very pro military - during the Korean War sequence James Whitmore encourages them to slaughter the opposition because the battle is a trial run for the reds and we have to show them who's boss.
 It's easy to laugh at the June Allyson perfect wife character she played in these movies but she was very good at it and is here. Alan Ladd is erratic - he's lethargic and too old in the early scenes, with him as a private who wants to fly but keeps getting in trouble with authorities. He is better in his scenes with Allyson (the two had so much chemistry Ladd was separated from his wife for a period) and James Whitmore.
The best moments are a dogfight sequence in Korea and the final test flight - one wishes there was more of these and a little less "pressures of the job on the marriage" stuff between Ladd and Allyson (though to be fair Allyson was then almost as big a star as Ladd).

Movie review - "I, Robot" (2004) **

The most clunky product placement in modern cinema? Set in the future,so Will Smith is into retro gear, like old music and converse shoes.Well, I guess you gotta do what you gotta do. They still don't seem to have enough money left over from Smith's salary and the sfx bill to pay for a decent support cast. Bruce Greenwood was so excellent in 13 Days I thought he'd have a really strong career but he's been sidetracked into this ordinary villain roles. Bridget Monyahan is pretty to watch, but doesn't have much chemistry with Smith and we needed a few more interesting humans. Yes, there are the robots and boo-hoo isn't it sad the robots want feelings... but you know, what's going to happen when they start asserting themselves. Doesn't anyone remember The Terminator? And don't go pulling the "that's the same argument used to keep black people down" thing - black people are humans, robots are robots. So the ending gave me the creeps.

Movie review - "Farenheit 9/11" (2004) ***1/2

A real movie of its time, provided an angry loud left wing voice when there didn't seem to be too many around. If you sort of follow politics it's not going to overly shock you (thing was it shocked a lot of people). The humour feels a bit tacked on at times - like they do something hard hitting then Mike Moore goes "oh I'm Mike Moore I want to be entertaining I might add something flippant here". And so what if politicians put on make up before they go on television? Not as much"gold" as in Bowling for Columbine but some powerful scenes: I particularly loved those two Marine recruiters (they are really good pressure salesmen - they should go into the private sector and make a lot of money), following the soldiers on a night raid in Iraq (this is really scary and exciting and would make a great movie, fictional or not, on its own), the scene where a woman is protesting against the war and an idiot comes along and goes "this is all made up" and protester reveals her son has died (I hope that idiot woman feels awful- but I should add, though I have sympathy for the mother who was all for her kids going in the army then got upset when one died... didn't she consider that might happen one day?)

Movie review - "Suddenly 30" (2004) **1/2

The return of the body swapping comedy, with Jennifer Garner waking up aged thirty. It doesn't quite push the envelope as much as Big (in which after all Tom Hanks had sex and was terrified of being killed) bu tit is quite sweet with the star in good form and gets points from having Mark Ruffalo play the romantic lead. They couldn't quite seem to get the ending right - I know, how else do you do it, but it's not totally satisfying.

Movie review - "Dodgeball" (2004) ***1/2


The concept of people throwing balls at each other is inherently funny and really helps this film along. This takes a while to get into its stride - the old film with Hank Azaria about the history of Dodgeball feels like a slightly clunky bit from The Simpsons, and the "we need$10,000 in three days" a bit too Syd Field (as indeed the whole structure is). 
 
But things are cliches for a reason - it works, and once the story gets going it develops its own mad momentum. You'd normally imagine Vince Vaughan as the baddie and Ben Stiller as the goodie but it works the other way round - Vaughan in particular has an engaging off-key quality that brings freshness. And even Christine Taylor may be Ben Stiller's partner in real life but she's very effective in these sort of roles (the straight love interest - they're not as easy to play as you might think). 
 
Sometimes the random tangents don't quite pull off(eg the pirate man) but more often than not they do (eg cameos from the Hoff and Chuck Norris). And the climactic battle is actually quite exciting.

Movie review - "Somersault" (2004) ***

Would have made a really, really, excellent 30 minute film. The acting is superb, particularly Abbie Cornish in the lead, the atmosphere of Jindabyne lustrous (its wonderful to see this on film), the handling sensitive, it's obviously made by people of great talent. But after awhile it's like "and is there anything else?" For instance, did we need two scenes of Abbie hitting the turps in a nightclub while "Shazam"plays on the soundtrack? Watching this I kept thinking of the Britney Spears song "Not a Girl Not Yet a Woman" - for that encapsulates the story as much as everything else. And the gay farmer feels a bit Bondi."Hmm... there's this character... he's a farmer... and he's gay." Having said that, the film didn't deserve the backlash its gotten since - it was just over-hyped by a media desperate to report some positive news about Australian cinema.

Movie review - "Open Water" (2004) ***

Low budget films need a gimmick to help them along and this one's got a terrific one - actually chucking the actors in the water with sharks!(One shudders to think of the OHS issues on this). That alone makes the film worth while - they're in there and the sharks are circling around and you feel this tension. The middle third of the film is best. The rest isn't as strong, waiting for them to die. The waiting is actually more effective than the deaths when they come. The opening scenes,which could have easily been used to flesh out the characters are bit,don't really (I note there is some gratuitous nudity to keep the punters watching til they get in the water). And sometimes the footage really is amateur hour - I mean, I know it was low budget, and understand why,say, the stuff in the water looks a bit rough at times - but even the scenes where they are getting in the car from a house are whited outwith poor sound. Surely these could have been done a bit better. Why couldn't Aussies have made this story?

Movie review - "Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism" (2004) ***

Fox News deserves a shell-acking for the atrocities its committed in the name of journalism (how many "noose tightens on Osama" headlines scrolled past during the post Sept 11 period?) but the filmmakers here let their passion get away with themselves and they resort to Fox news like tactics themselves - distorting evidence, having second rate people on as experts, using scary music. The most effective moments are the testimony from some people who worked there, and simply letting the images and stories speak for themselves (such as when Bill O'Reilly gets stuck into a man whose father died on Sept 11). A little more effort at objectivity - saying maybe one or two good things about Fox news, say -and a little less posturing would have made the digs more effective. As it is supporters of this ghastly news network can simply point to the more hyper arguments, shrug and say "well they have an agenda" and ignore the more substantial criticisms.

Movie review - "Collateral" (2004) ****


No one directs LA at night like Michael Mann - all shimmering neon lights and empty roads. Tom Cruise is actually quite convincing as a killer - more so, perhaps, than Jamie Foxx. 
 
It's the support roles here which are stronger - Mark Ruffalo as a pony tailed cop and that fat black dude as a victim. 
 
Solid, intelligent script - though at the ending it can't help itself and turns Jamie Foxx into an all-conquering superhero. Also it's too much of a coincidence to have Jada Pinkett Smith being in Foxx's cab then turn out to be a key player in the drama.

Movie review - "Shaun of the Dead" (2004) ****

Wonderful take on zombie movies - what would happen if they'd arrived in Britain where people didn't have ready access to guns? The filmmakers cleverly take on Hollywood models (eg zombie movie) without leaving their own strengths (eg Gen X slackers finding their way in the world,quaint British life).

Simon Pegg is a wonderful thirty something Gen X leading man and Nick Frost is perfect as his sidekick. Kate Ashfield is a bit bland and harsh as the love interest - you can help wishing the warmer and lovelier Dawn from The Office played this role.

It's not a spoof - there are some quite emotional scenes like when Pegg's mum gets bitten and the relationship between Pegg and Bill Nighy. Another point - just like Night of the Living Dead the "great idea" of the hero (to take refuge in the pub) is actually the wrong one.

Movie review - "Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason" (2004) **

The first Bridget was a lovely surprise, with some risks (at the time)ultimately working out brilliantly - Renee Zellweger pulled off the lead even though she wasn't Kate Winslet, Colin Firth transferred his Darcy act to the big screen, and most of all Hugh Grant re-invented himself asan on screen cad. This one seems going through the motions. It repeats segments from the first film - most irritatingly another fight between Grant and Firth (here very poorly motivated), shenanigans involving mum and dad, and the use of "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" at the end as Bridget is rushing to Colin Firth. There is a major improvement in the novel by bringing back Hugh Grant's character. But Bridget is a lot less likeable. In the first film you got the impression she actually like Firth - but here it's as though she only likes him because (a) he's a boyfriend and (b) he's a human rights barrister so she can brag about him. And when he doesn't propose straight away she goes into a ridiculous sulk. Zegger's botox doesn't help. Indeed, Bridget is such a prat here that you don't believe Grant mooning over her, or Firth, or Jacinda Barrett. (Though she does have a funny moment when she winds up in Thai prison and gets all the girls singing).

Movie review - "Bad Santa" (2004) ***1/2

Billy Bob Thornton in a role made for him - a drunken red neck who uses his Santa act to rob stores. Because he's such a low down varmint you know he's got to come good one day - it's a movie, right? And he befriends a fat kid and you go "here we go". But the filmmakers manage to keep sentimentality at bay (although surely the ending was re-shot?It feels tacked on). Occasionally the concept of "this guy's Santa but he's really foul" does get a bit tiresome.

Movie review - "Team America: World Police" (2004) ***1/2


Like the Austin Powers movies I was a bit let down when I first saw this but it's one of those films you enjoy more on re-viewing because you ignore the flaws and concentrate on the good bits, of which there are many. On a basic level its wonderful to see a big budget movie with puppets, and the basic Bruckheimer-like structure totally works even if they are making fun of it (the best spoofs are the ones that would work as drama eg Flying High). Many hilarious songs - "Everyone's Got AIDs","The End of an Act", "Montage", "I'm so Rone-ry" - and Matt Damon is one of the funniest things ever (also loved Burkha Burkha Burkha-stan). As in"South Park", sometimes the characters get a bit tired and the plot over reliance on shock to get a laugh. Because the film makes fun of America's gung ho attitudes, many people didn't seem to pick up this is actually a rare pro-Iraq war film - it ultimately endorses over-reactions to possible threats to America.

Movie review - "Stage Beauty" (2004) **

Terrific idea - what happens to male female performers when women are allowed on stage - never quite hits the mark. Maybe it works better onstage, where we get to see the "female"performances in a longer form. Also the film never seems quite able to reconcile its sexual politics -Billy Crudup is gay, OK I get that, but then he has this sort of romance with Clare Danes (a bit vanilla) - but that would mean that playing a man turns him butch, and the film flinches away from that and sort of comes up with an open ending. It's like it wants to be Hollywood but also PC. It also bucks against the inherent tragedy/sadness of the situation (many of these actors will never find work again, like the coming of sound), by having him re-invent himself as a director who discovers method acting which is a bit irritating. Indeed, despite the bright set up the film never seems to get in its stride. Rupert Everett is fun as Charles II.

Movie review - "A Very Long Engagement' (2004) ***1/2


Jodie Foster pops up in this French movie speaking the lingo fluently which is a lovely surprise. The title is perhaps not the best in the world (anything with "a very long" in it is asking for trouble). This looks terrific and is full of interesting little scenes and "bits" - eg lighting a match while seducing someone - and anything to do with World War One makes you angry and furious at the loss of life even if done only half-well, and this is much better than that. Occasionally the main drama gets lost with all the peripheral characters (though I understand why - they were aiming more for a novel-type kaleidoscope). The "clever bits" nature of the piece also adds to this.

Movie review - "The Incredibles" (2004) ****

The concept of Super heroes in their everyday life is a bit tired now but this one just swooped in under the wire, helped by a fast pace and some unconventional animation. It's lively and skilled but does go on for a bit too long.

Movie review - "Kinsey" (2004) ***1/2


The life of the sex researcher who so livened up the 50s (and inspired a generation of novelists writing racy airport novels) treated with warmth, humour and compassion. There's lots of sympathy for Kinsey, who did much to shed light on sex research (solving a bunch of problems...but with his information, creating a whole bunch of new ones). Liam Neeson is strong as the dogged, near-fanatical Kinsey - watching him with the child molesterer, the time where Kinsey says "I never said you should go do everything" feels a bit tacked on. Wasn't Kinsey's big thing is his non-judgemental attitude? (A bit more conflict about this,making him less a hero, might have made the film for interesting). Very good acting from the support cast. Laura Linney is always so warm and loving that she makes the slightly unconventional Kinsey marriage seem so natural.

Movie review - "Finding Neverland" (2004) **1/2


I get what they're doing - the struggles of J M Barrie to write Peter Pan, the way he retreats into a fantasy world... but watching it you can't help but think "this isn't the real story"... then you find out the real story and go "now that's an interesting film" - more believable too (Barrie's probable pedophilia links, the kids were warped by Barrie's interest in them, one of them killed himself, one died in WW1 -NB as an aside, lots of sons/wards of famous people died in WW1, eg Kipling, Oscar Wilde). You don't ever really get a sense Barrie is keen on Kate Winslet, it's a way to access the kids. Did enjoy Dustin Hoffman, though, and the moment where the kids come to Peter Pan and their enjoyment gets the jaded adults enjoying it - this is very true (even if it didn't happen exactly as depicted here, I mean the concept). Julie Christie is ferociously imposing and the kid are great, especially the main wing nut one. Like a few bios recently I couldn't help feeling at the time this might be better as an episode of an anthology television series rather than a feature.

Book review - "My Wicked, Wicked Ways" by Errol Flynn

The only fan letter I wrote to an author in my life was to George MacDonald Fraser, who kindly wrote back to me answering some of my questions. One of them was who was the ideal actor to play Flashman, and he said "the late Errol Flynn by a mile". Errol never played Flashman type characters on screen, really, except for arguably in The Adventures of Don Juan and Crossed Swords, but he certainly was one in real life if his memoirs are to be believed. Handsome, sex-crazed, funny, charming and a real prick - yep, that's Flashman. Errol never seemed to suffer from Flashman's cowardice or ability to avoid bad headlines, but he was a similar bully and bigot. (He even had a woman hit his backside with a hairbrush during love making, just like happened to Flashman in Royal Flash).

Like Flashman, he is more enjoyable a character the more he suffers in his adventures. For instance, I didn't particular admit to enjoying reading about Flynn's time in New Guinea - he goes black birding, cons natives, shoots people, is lazy at his job, always tries to take short cuts. He's not particularly engaging here. But his other adventures are more fun - fixing cockfights in Manila, joining the police in Hong Kong, running around on the stage in Northampton,suffering various encounters with women.

My favourite story is where he and John Barrymore talk about their fears of winding up on skid row - then decide to see what it's like so they put on make up and pretend to be bums! I also enjoyed his account of love making with Lupe Valez, who could rotate one breast and interrupted action to pray to saints. (Errol was supposed to be a self centered selfish person but he writes with warmth and affection on his friends such as Koets, Fred McEvoy, Barrymore and Raoul Walsh - it's a shame there weren't more sketches such as these throughout the book).

He certainly seems to hate women - but there is an underlying(admittedly very deeply buried underneath a lot of hate) affection for the vivacity of Lily Damitina, who seems to have been a handful and a half, but then so was Errol. (And she helped him be cast in Captain Blood through her friendship with Ann Warner so in a way she did deserve all that alimony).

It's a funny thing that in many ways Errol's erratic life before discovering acting was the perfect training for it - it developed a devil may care adventurer "air" which came across so vividly on screen. So all those years in New Guinea running low on money, discovering joy in native women, were in a way a trial run. Admittedly the time he went from professional actor to stay was very short - but he'd had eight years or so of adventures learning to be a star. It reminded me of Burt Lancaster's career - who was spotted merely walking along a corridor,then cast on that basis in a Broadway play, then given a star role in a film - but he had years of plugging away in a circus before that.

Errol copped a lot unfairly in his life - the rape allegations were unfounded, ditto the Objective Burma fiasco, and the treatment from his first wife. But you know I think it was karma - he could be cruel and mean, had sex whenever he could, didn't like women very much. To a degree, you get out of life what you put into it - and I like Errol Flynn movies, what a great star, but he put a lot of bad vibes out into the cosmos. He got everything he wanted - fame, money, fortune, women - even acting challenges, even book deals, even a paradise (Jamaica, boats)... he just never could hang on to it, or enjoy it.

And for all his complaints about "I wanted to act and they wouldn't let me", Warners did give him the chance at a variety of genres - for instance after San Antonio they tried him in a comedy (Never Say Goodbye), weepie (Escape Me Never) and film noir (Cry Wolf). So they did try and they would have more if Warners hadn't gone into a decline after WW2 - like many of the studios, admittedly, but they seemed to struggle with their star vehicles more than most.

In hindsight, it's a shame Errol never made a more permanent transition over at MGM - I think he would have fitted in there in the early 50s, he certainly would have been able to take the swashbuckler roles Robert Taylor played (I would have loved to see dissipated Errol as Lancelot in Knights of the Round Table)

Interestingly enough Flynn never seems to have been too involved with his co-stars - he squabbled with Bette Davis, had a crush on Olivia de Havilland, learned how to inject vodka into oranges from Ann Sheridan, married Patrice Wymore... but the rest you don't hear a lot, which is odd from a womaniser (i.e. nothing on Brenda Marshall, Alexis Smith, Miriam Hopkins, Ros Russell). He admits his leading ladies tended to be overawed by him which I think I can believe.

From a nationalistic point, Errol often doesn't appear very"Australian". Although he lived here for most of the first seventeen years of his life (there was a brief stint in England), he refers of himself more as a Tasmanian, Irishman or Englishman - never seems to have felt a nationalistic pang, not even during WW2. New Guinea seems to have really been the formative experience of his life, as I guess it would be - he keeps referring to it.

Particularly beautiful are the diary entries from Errol around 1952-53 towards the end of the book where he sets out some of his thoughts about life, the universe and everything. I can't see Errol's life as a tragedy, unless you count getting everything you want as a tragedy (which you may do).

What gives this book extra resonance is the fact Flynn died shortly after it was finished - it goes right up to just before he died. I'm sure a lot of the stories are made up or exaggerated, but reading it you do get a sense of what Flynn was like - tormented, insecure, neurotic, a spoilt baby capable of good, a permanent juvenile, a man for whom the movies he made were only a chapter in a very exotic life.

TV series review - "Rome" (2005) - 1st three episodes

Typically impressive HBO offering with gratuitous nudity and violence inserted every ten minutes or so... honestly, it's basic Roger Corman principles at work here. The series is set around Julius Caesar's rise to power following his conquest of Gaul (first episode we see the Gaulish chief kiss Caesar's sword - a long way from the image of the noble throwing his weapons at Caesar's feet defiantly at the beginning of the Asterix comics). It tries to tell from the POV of two "common soldiers" who are involved in various historically important incidents -but keeps drifting back into the corridors of power (Cato, Pompey,Antony, Caesar, etc) because they are clearly more interesting. And besides the common soldiers are super heroes - in the first episode they wipe out a whole gang, just the two of them. It looks fantastic, it is watchable.

Sometimes it seems to be nihilistic for no other reason than "hey, this is for HBO, let's make a show where innocent people die". I know the arguments and stuff and I'm sure life was cheap back then etc etc - I just get upset by the casual killing.And even though one of the leads, Ray Stevenson, is revealed in episode three to have some humour and a soft side, he admits to raping and we see him kill... I know the arguments to flawed characters and not judging people by today's morality, it just makes him uncomfortable company to watch on screen. (I had the same problem with the Ian MacShane character in "Deadwood". I know people aren't all black and all white but there sure as Hell as people who are dark grey.)

Polly Walker is good form as the often naked temptress, Octavian's mother - who apparently in real life was moral, but this is an Ancient Rome story and you've got to have a sexy temptress in there somewhere.Some strong acting but you know I think the show could have handled an American actor or two. There are Yanks who can pull this stuff off.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Book review - "Errol Flynn: Satan's Angel" by David Bret

Errol Flynn's life has inspired a number of particularly lazy cut and paste bios (Michael Freedland's leaps to mind). This one at least has the benefit of a particular angle - namely, to list all the people Bret reckons Flynn had sex with. Brett doesn't seem to have done manyinterviews or researched primary sources, but he read up on Flynn - particularly gossipy tomes like The Sewing Circle and Sex Lives of Hollywood Stars (oh, he got his info from Marlene Dietrich and Tallulah Bankhead - let's face it, can you get more authoritative?) So pretty much everything needs to be taken with not just a grain of salt, but a mine of the stuff.

The book should be subtitled "Everyone's Gay" - not only was Flynn bisexual, his conquests included Tyrone Power, Bruce Cabot, Edmund Goulding and David Niven (David Niven????), and he had a crack at Patric Knowles, Helmut Dantine and Robert Taylor. Many Flynn fans get hot and bothered over allegations of their hero sleeping with men - as far as I'm concerned it's never been clearly proved one way or the other; Flynn had so much sex he may have liked to vary his targets a little, if only for something different... but I'm sorry, David Niven. Calm down, Bret.

Incidentally, for what it's worth, Brett doesn't buy into the Errol-was-a-Nazi claims of Charles Higham - though, as an aside, no one seems to have denied Erben/Koets was a Nazi, so Higham deserves some points on that score. The book is fairly crappy on the whole,sensationalistic and a bit tiresome in pages. Bret's "research" receives a fairly strong shell-acking here.

Comic review - Asterix #20 - "Asterix in Corsica"


Marvellous Asterix adventure, one of the best in the series. The opening pages are a treat for long-running fans with cameos of some friends of previous adventures. They are visiting the Gauls to take part in anniversary celebrations of the victory of Gergovia, where they beat up local Roans (the Romans slink away and go on manoeuvres - their nervousness is very funny). They come across a Corsican bandit who is held prisoner and accompany him back home. What makes this so good are the gentle digs at Corsicans - proud, independent, determined to have their siesta, not too keen on hard work, non-emotional, prone to havelong-standing feuds at the drop of a hat, very protective of their women. The portrayal of Corsica itself is fun, too: a beautiful island with troublesome natives, garrisoned by the worst in the Roman army (one of them is a Corsican - a hilarious face), run by a corrupt governor. I love how the Corsicans take to Obelix because he is touchy, loves to stuff his face and likes naps. I still get a chuckle from one of the lines at the end: "Let's have a party!" "Oink!" (I know this doesn't sound funny here, but in the book it is.)

Monday, May 21, 2007

Movie review - "MacBeth" (2006) ***

No masterpiece but not as bad as some have said - I think the thing is with this film, people were expecting a masterpiece, and chucked a tantrum when it didn't quite hit the mark. Watching the first half hour or so the film reminded me of a wayward Steve Harmison spell of bowling- obviously done by a man of great talent, but who couldn't quite bring it together, spraying deliveries all over the place... yet you kept watching because when it clicked it would be tremendously effective.

You can see Geoffrey Wright stretching and stretching - occasionally he gets there, some times he doesn't. For instance, the idea of the witches as sexy bad school girls works - their seducing MacBeth is hot - but the actors don't quite 100% pull it off (they are a bit too "play at the Old Fitz" - which is what the film feels like at times, too - I mean, I like plays at the Old Fitz, it's just if this had been done under a million you might have been more forgiving - it probably needed a few more million to really fulfil its ambition). The HD photography looks good -but maybe too good (i.e. too clean and pretty)... which draws attention to the fact it's HD (maybe it should have been a bit dirtier, like Miami Vice.

Sam Worthington isn't bad as MacBeth - he doesn't really make the transition from "I'm not sure I should take over" to "hey I might takeover" to "I'm gonna take over", but then I've never seen any actor play MacBeth do this well; he's got charisma and he's certainly better than Orson Welles or Jon Finch. You just can't help wishing at times Russell Crowe was in the lead. Victoria Hill is excellent as Lady MacBeth, Gazza Sweet is an ideal Duncan, ditto Lachy Hulme as MacDuff and Mick Molloy as a killer (I think Wright lingers a little too long on Molloy's face).

The setting in the Melbourne underworld really works (the whole movie feels very Melbourne - black jackets and skivvies and overcast skies, and everyone looking as though they'd know a lot about coffee). But the biggest problem, I think, in the long run wasn't Wright's fault - MacBeth simply doesn't translate that well to the screen. MacBeth is a greedy prick,his tragedy isn't a real tragedy. It's never really worked on film despite the quality of directors involved (Welles, Polanski) and it doesn't here.

Comic review - Asterix #19 - "Asterix and the Soothsayer"


A strong entry in the series, which capitalises on a major weakness of the Gauls - namely, their superstition. Getafix is away, and they fall under the influence of a creepy soothsayer, who soon has them eating out of his palm (except for Asterix.) The Soothsayer is a cunning enemy - he actually succeeds in getting them to leave the village - although he does turn into a wimp at the hands of the Romans for the last third. Some funny satire about fortune telling - the Soothsayer "reading" entrails and so on. And also its great to see the women get to have some magic potion this time and take part in bashing up the Romans.

Comic review - Asterix #18 - "Asterix and the Laurel Wreath"


Really top notch adventure which benefits greatly by not having the Gauls over-use magic potion to get out of satire. Vitalstatistix,showing off to his brother in law, drunkenly promises to make a soup featuring Caesar's laurel wreath. It's a clever unusual set up and sets Asterix and Obelix off on one of their funniest adventures, getting themselves sold as slaves, then convicted as traitors, so they can get the wreaths. The slave markets are hilarious (dancing girls, egotistical Greeks), as is the Roman household they get sold to (orgies at the drop of a hat - this is quite an adult tale) and the circus. And the ending is very satisfying.

Comic review - Asterix #17 - "The Mansions of the Gods"


Julius Caesar comes up with a genuinely clever plan to drive out the Gauls - turning the neighbouring forest into a real estate development,leading to some bright satire, especially if you've spent time in a real estate obsessed place like Sydney. This is particularly good when the Gaul's economy becomes dependent on Romans and the slaves have to finish the job to get home - more of this would have been good. As usual, all problems in the end are simply fixed via magic potion. A highlight includes a double page brochure of the new development which is given out at the circus.

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Movie review - Ladd #10 - "Calcutta" (1947) ***1/2 (warning: spoilers)

Another unregarded Alan Ladd melodrama set in the third world - he's a pilot in Calcutta (though it could easily have been Mozambique or Aden or Sumatra), a war veteran with two good buddies, a womaniser who's dating a night club singer (June Duprez) but who won't get tied down to no dame no sir, who is the sort to go investigating on his own when one of his mates is killed, hangs out in slinky casinos run by dodgy foreign businessmen and charms exotic shonky women.

There's some excellent black and white photography, plenty of plot (which doesn't quite hide the fact you've seen it all before - gambling dens, jewel smuggling rings, femme fetales) and John Farrow handles it all brisk fashion.

Alan Ladd is ideal in the role but lacks a little energy - I understand he's supposed to be an "I don't care" kind of guy but he doesn't care a bit too much, especially in his scenes with the romantic interest. (It's possible to do a gay reading of this film - he is so misgoynistic and devoted to his buddies, when sexy Duprez lies on top of him in a dressing gown he barely registers attention and he tells Duprez that the end "you're a great guy" - makes you go "hmmmm...")

Gail Russell is an excellent femme fetale - so sweet and innocent looking it really works. Her last line "I would have hated to have killed you" is really chilling. William Bendix is also very good as Ladd's best mate - the two have very strong chemistry. I also enjoyed the support cast, including a chubby female version of Sidney Greenstreet and various shady types. I've seen this movie a few times now and always enjoy it - there was something very appealing about these studio backlot recreations of exotic hot spots (Casablanca is the best known but there's also Mr Moto films and so on).

NB Although released in 1947 when India became independent, this is set in a time when the British were still in charge.

Movie review - Ladd #22 - "Thunder in the East" (1953) ***

This piece of Alan Ladd third word exotica is often poo-pooed by film fans, partly because it was the film he made immediately prior to Shane and tends to suffer in comparison, but I really enjoyed it. Very suspenseful set up: Ladd fles into an isolated corner of India in 1947, with the British having pulled out and native tribespeople ready to overthrow the local maharajah. Ladd wants to sell his guns but the maharajah's second in command (Charles Boyer, not a bad substitute for an Indian) is a believer in passive resistance.

Ladd is in good form here, full of bounce and liveliness (perhaps excited by the thought Shane was coming up); although he's "hard bitten" we know down deep he's a softy because he has a double barrelled 'pat the dog': he romances a blind girl (Deborah Kerr, making a potentially nothing or mawkish part into something special) and is nice to an orphan boy.

The tension builds up pleasingly: cut off from communications to the outside world, people who try to get out are killed. Although the film is basically about the fate of Westerners during this time, there is some criticism of the British (especially in a scene where they are whining about Indians going into their club), and Boyer's pacifism is not treated as a joke. Indeed, the ending is kind of horrible - Boyer grabbing a machine gun and firing away. It's not really inspirational. There is a sweet moment where Ladd and Kerr get married. The main debit is all the Indians are played by non Indians which starts to get irritating after a while.

NB The film has two Aussie links: it was based on a novel by the Australian correspondent Alan Moorehead, and features Cecil Kellaway in the cast (as Kerr's dad).

Friday, May 18, 2007

Book review - "Alma Hitchcock: the Man Behind the Woman" by Pat Hitchcock

Really sweet look at life with Alma and Alf Hitchcock but their daughter Pat. They seem to have been a loving family, with holidays and lots of times together, even after only child Pat married. The title is a bit misleading - while the book purports to be a bio of Alma, and the first few chapters are devoted solely too her, it is really about growing up with the Hitchcocks. It's not entirely Pat H's fault - Alma was such an integral part of Hitch that the two became one, really - to get a better appreciation of her specific contribution you'd have to go through all her particular notes, etc (supposing their were any). Alma and Alfred were two nerds who found each other. Pat is understandably a bit touchy about dad's reputation as a bit of a kink - he obviously was, you only need to look at his movies, but we all have that side to our nature, he just channelled it into his art for the world to see. Incidentally, Pat H turned in a number of fine comic relief performances in dad's films, she was never a passenger (specialising as the less attractive side kick to the heroine) - I was unaware she had a few decent Hitchcock-less stage credits before her film role. She mostly gave up acting after her marriage (to a chubby man - just like dad) - I don't think this was a major tragedy but she could have had a decent career as a character actor. A stronger picture of Alma does emerge than in most bios of Hitch - formal but with a twinkling sense of humour, loved cooking more than eating. A million dollar question is not answered (namely, what was it liked being married to such a fat man?) But this is lovely and moving and a real feel-good book.

Comic review - Asterix #16 - "Asterix in Switzerland"


Asterix helping out the Romans? A Roman official investigating the provinces is poisoned by a corrupt officer who is fleecing the populace(and constantly holding orgies - some very funny scenes here), so he calls in Getafix who requires a special flower from Switzerland for the necessary potion. I think the motivation for this needed to be stronger- he was an old friend of Getafixes or something. (I did like how Caesar mentions the village whenever he has an epileptic fit). But its worth it to get to Switzerland where the adventures are cheery and the digs at the Swiss consistently sweet and funny - they always clean and punctual,love their banking system and cuckoo clocks and food, tend people they have beaten up, hold international conferences, etc There is of course a William Tell gag too and Asterix inadvertently invents bobsledding and a form of mountaineering. The art work is in top form, particularly all the flowing cheese and wine in the orgy scenes.

Book review - "The Last Empire: Essays 1992-2001" by Gore Vidal

The received opinion on Gore Vidal seems to be that he is a better essayist than novelist - I admit to being of that received opinion, too,although as Dennis Altman, a biographer of Vidal's has asked, "have you ever read any of the novels?" (Only two, I confess - Myra Breckinridge and Washington DC). This collection shows him to be in decent though declining form - it reminded me of the last decade of reviews from Pauline Kael where it sometimes felt she was going through the emotions. Vidal is always worth reading when he's on a few topics in particular - reminisces about famous people he has known or vaguely knows, and literature. Here there are lovely pieces on Isabel Bolton, Lindbergh, Albert Gore and his family and C P Cavafy. However when he's on politics Gore Vidal becomes increasingly boorish - whining about increased military spending, the military superstate, how evil America is, the impositions on the bill of rights, etc, etc - I know this sort of stuff has its place, its just that Vidal's treatment is dull, repetitive and gets annoying after a while. (He reminds me of Bob Ellis, a similar renaissance man and mostly brilliant essayist who gets de-focused through his anger down on the topics of the evils of the world. I'm not saying don't write about them, just don't forget your humour and fresh insight that you bring to other topics.) The biographer of Vidal I mention above pointed out Vidal is a very American left winger - in that, he is still being a self centered American because he thinks America is responsible for all the ills of the world. The thing that most annoyed me about this book was Vidal going on about how FDR provoked Japan into World War Two - because, he had the audacity to want them to stop invading China??? George W Bush, OK, Cold War shenanigans,OK - but provoking World War Two?? "Japan had no choice". Yeah, right.Maybe that's an interpretation you can put on it, if you consider trying to limit the amount of countries invading other countries. But then Vidal redeems himself with a thoughtful piece on his correspondence with Timothy McVeigh after the Oklahoma bombings. In addition there are some killer one liners, such as (I'm paraphrasing) as "everyone remembers what they were doing on the day Herbert Hoover died).

Sunday, May 13, 2007

Movie review - "My Mother Frank" (2000) **

A middle aged women goes back to uni. This isn't the best plot in the world but it might have worked. Only the stakes are so low - in the 90s surely it would be cool in posh suburbs for a widow to go back to uni, not a drama? (Maybe if the story had been set in the 60s.) And uni is so big - mum isn't going to run into her son a lot. And art degrees are really easy - and art tutors not scary. Writer-director Mark Lamprell tries to compensate by offering a sort of magical realism portrait of university (lots of colours and dancing bands) which is not quite convincing but is still the most unique thing about the film. Rose Byrne is pretty enough as the love interest - Lamprell gets her to show the side of her boob a few times so if you're into Rose Byrne try this out.

Movie review - "Royal Wedding" (1951) ***

Not one of the classic MGM musicals but it has heavyweight talent: Fred Astaire, Stanley Donen, Arthur Freed, Alan Jay Lerner. Astaire's co-star is Jane Powell, not the most charismatic musical star, but she tries really hard - she's like Debbie Reynolds only not quite as charismatic.

None of the songs are particularly classics but there are a couple of strong routines - two Astaire solos (especially the one where he dances on the roof and ceiling) and a fun vaudeville one between Astaire and Powell. The main problem with this is Lerner's script - the plot as Astaire and Powell as a brother and sister team who both find romance in England while watching the 1947 Royal Wedding of Prince Phillip and Princess Elizabeth. Both fall in love, he with Sarah Churchill (Winston's daughter and you can tell but she isn't bad and can dance quite well), she with Peter Lawford (they hint that Powell is a bit of a party girl which is kind of interesting). So what's the conflict? Well, both go "maybe we shouldn't get married it might ruin our careers", then they go "no we change our mind" and everyone winds up together. Er... that's not much of a plot.

Nonetheless, pretty and cheerful. Why is this out of copyright? Did someone forget to fill in the right form or something?

Movie review - "Kansas City Confidential" (1953) **1/2

I love it how in crime films everyone talks as though they're in a crime film - tough, slangy dialogue, gritted expression. 

I also love it when the villain has a decent plan, which the Mr Big (Preston Foster, who played a mountie in Northwest Frontier) does here - blackmail a bunch of crims into robbing a bank, then bust them and collect the reward money. Only problem is an ex-con who was blamed for the robbery (John Payne, best known as a 20th Century Fox featured lead but not bad here as a tough guy) goes looking for the real culprit. 

This gets off to a dynamic start, is very well directed by Phil Karlson, has some wonderful "faces", especially the baddies - Lee Van Cleef, Jack Elam (without a beard) and Neville Brand, that's a top line up in any book. Also the action confrontations, with brief spurts of violence are well done. (Post-Kefauver hearing gangster films all have a particular "vibe" to their violence - corrupt cops, slightly more sadistic, eg The Big Heat). 

But the script does get repetitive, particularly the last section in Mexico - there's a confrontation, then another confrontation, then another. 

Colleen Gray plays Foster's daughter with a sort of steely-eyed intensity reminiscent of untalented yet determined graduates from acting school you run into every year around the traps of co-op theatres.

Friday, May 11, 2007

Comic review - Asterix #15 - "Asterix and the Roman Agent"


The village comes up against one of their most formidable enemies, a slimy character who has a knack for turning everyone against each otherwherever he goes. This makes for an interesting, entertaining story -actually a bit traumatic at times seeing the villagers all turn on each other (they resort to physical violence very quickly!) This was thefirst book in the series where a couple of women in the village have a decent role - its fairly misogynistic caricature, though, with all of them being wives who want their husbands to be chief, and who do little more than bitch and shop (maybe the writers were going through domestic strife at the time) - having said that it is funny to see them smash each other in the face with fish. And one of them asks the loaded question - why is Asterix still a bachelor at his age? There is quite a tense finale with Getafix racing to prepare the magic potion before all the legions attack.

Comic review - Asterix #14 - "Asterix in Spain"


I have fond memories of this one as it was one of the first Asterixes Iread but on re-reading it doesn't hold up that well. Just like Asterix in Britain there's a village in Spain holding out against the Roman Empire so Julius Caesar holds hostage the son of the chief and spirits him off to Gaul. Wouldn't that be, like, a dangerous place? At least, Gaul near where our heroes live? Asterix and Obelix take him back. The kid is a big brat which results in some decent comedy (particularly as Dogmatixbecomes attached to him and giggles at Obelix) and there is some bright satire at tourists who like to visit Spain - but the writers seem to goeasy on taking on the Spaniards (maybe wary of Spanish response?). Other highlights include Obelix dancing at a gypsy camp, a Don Quixote gag andAsterix having to take on a bull without magic potion (the constant cheating by using magic potion gets on my nerves after a while) thereby inventing bullfighting. But I would rate it around the middle rank. Thiswas the first decent role for Unhygenix the fishmonger character.