Showing posts with label Star Trek. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Star Trek. Show all posts

Thursday, March 06, 2025

Book review - "The Director Should've Shot You" by Alan Dean Foster

 Memoir of a novelist - but someone better known for novelisations. Most film buffs had a Foster on their shelves back in the day - I'm glad he's still at it. Lively account of his life and times. A lot of hours spent in front of the typewriter so not a huge amount for a personal life, at least according to this. 

Some interesting experiences - the challenges of John Carpenter's Dark Star, the generosity of George Lucas giving a percentage on Star Wars, disliking Alien 3 and changing the story (letting Newt live) and being scolded by Walter Hill, getting involved in a actor-director fight on Chronicles of Riddick, working for JJ Abrams (no goss he sounds decent). Too much whining over lack of science in sci fi. But the talk of craft is interesting. Made money from Star Trek log books in the seventies.

Saturday, November 23, 2024

Movie review - "Star Trek Beyond" (2016) **

 Gets off to a bad start by coming in on the Enterprise more than half way through its deep space expedition, and showing Kirk as... bored. Come on, he was hanging out for it. Then they run into a space station which robs from the "deep space exploration" feel because it's a huge base. Then they help out a alien person in distress, and there's a baddy and the Enterprise breaks up.

It feels like the episode of a TV series.

Why not use the deep space stuff? Isolation, loneliness, mutiny, cannibalism, primitive-ism? What happened to Alice Eve's character - why not give Kirk a romance and/or son?

The villain is dull - an ex Starfleet officer.

It isn't a very good script. The cast don't seem that into it.

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Movie review - "Star Trek Into Darkness" (2013) ***1/2 (warning: spoilers)

 Extremely good sequel. Inevitably lacks the surprise and freshness of the 2009 version but full of life, mixes the tropes well, and I really liked how there's two villains, nasty Peter Weller and enigmatic Benedit Cumberbatch.

I was surprised that Bruce Greenwood's Captain Pike survived the first movie so it wasn't a shock to see him killed her. Alice Eve - an It Girl at the time - doesn't really add much and has to do a scene in her underwar. They struggle to give Zoe Saldana stuff to do. Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto are excellent.

There's the usual bloat but on the whole I enjoyed this.

Wednesday, November 20, 2024

Movie review - "Star Trek" (2009) **** (rewatching)

 Really fun. Starts with a bang and keeps it up. High drama.

I maybe had some reservations at wiping out a planet to give stakes for Spock - I mean, the whole planet? Felt heavy. Winona Ryder is only in two scenes really but it's nice to see her in a hit. Ben Cross is fun.

It's spectacularly well cast. Beautifully so. Chris Pine and Zachery Quinto have the biggest shoes to fill but Karl Urban is fun and Simon Pegg and... everyone really. Eric Bana is fine as the villain. Leonard Nimoy steals the show. I didn't really follow the time travel stuff but I'm sure it holds.

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Movie review - ""Star Trek: Nemesis" (2001) ** (warning spoilers)

 This gets off to a flying start and I was excited to see it but then slows down and becomes sluggish. Next Gen films really only focused on Picard and Data and that's the case here.  The film kills off Data but it doesn't really matter since he's got a clone. Young Tom Hardy is on hand as the evil Picard clone a young version which had potential but it's not developed. Hardy gets too much screen time where he chats rather than doing anything cool. The regulars don't seem into it.

Monday, November 18, 2024

Movie review - "Star Trek Insurrection" (1998) **1/2

 The only one with much to do in these is Picard and Data - the other characters don't pop, or maybe it's different in the series. This feels like an episode of a TV series but it's well done, I liked Picard's romance, the fountain of youth always works. F Murray Abram does decent villainy.

Saturday, November 16, 2024

Movie review - "Star Trek First Contact" (1996) ***1/2

 Solid entry which involves going back in time to find the Inventor of the Thing (James Cromwell) and his friend (Alfred Woodard). The Borgs are strong villains and Alice Krige is fun.

It's entirely smart and respectible. I miss the lunatic fun of William Shatner and the originals, I admit.

Friday, November 15, 2024

Movie review - "Star Trek: Generations" (1994) ***1/2 (warning: spoilers)

 Smart, very well done, has an ace up its sleeve in that it allows Kirk to meet Picard and shows the death of Kirk. Those are great "posts" for the film to swim towards.

Malcolm McDowall has played this sort of villain role a lot but what they heck. Starts strong with Kirk, Chekov and Scotty and some action - plus Alan Ruck as the guy taking over from Kirk! Then cuts to the new gang. Some talk and action... there's decent spectacle. Strong last third.

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Movie review - "Star Trek 6 The Undiscovered Country" (1991) ***1/2 (warning spoilers)

 Nick Meyers' return to the series acts as a tonic - it's a first rate story and done wittily, with solid stakes (Kirk arrested for murder). It could have done with extra pesonal connection. -like maybe the traitor should have been Kirk's ex, mother of dead son, as well as or instead of Kim Cattral.

It feels low budget - has a TV episode feel. Like it lacked an extra $5-10 million to do the action or something. Star Trek 4 had whales, I don't know, felt bigger. Maybe a romance would've helped. Or a relative.

But it's very enjoyable. Tight, Fun. Christopher Plummer adds dash as does Kim Cattrall, Iman, Brock Peters. The film loses some poionts having Shatner do a Bodyguard style dive at the end. Maybe this is more a three star movie. But it's the last one with the old gang, so...

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

Movie review - "Star Trek 5: The Final Frontier" (1989) **

 Not very good. Some good bits. Interesting ideas. Starts evocatively on that desert plant. I enjoyed the Star Trek crew being challenged by trauma. But there's too many "bits". Some just don't work - sorry, Kirk rock climbing... he's not Tom Cruise he's too tubby. Not much continuity for the previous films. (2 to 4 really are the proper trilogy). Unfocused. Laurence Luckenbill isn't much of a villain - no Ricardo Montalban and not even Christopher Lloyd. Taking on death and religioun was a decent idea but the film can't package it.

Fun to see Harve Bennett make a cameo as an admiral. Jerry Goldsmith's music is wonderful. But it's not a good movie.



Monday, November 11, 2024

Movie review - "Star Trek IV: Voyage Home" (1986) ****

 Deserves its high reputation. Warm, funny, smart, exciting. Catherine Hicks isn't just the girl. Other crew members are given something to do. Nick Meyer's combination of wit and literacy is perfect for Star Trek.

Saturday, November 09, 2024

Movie review - "Start Trek III: The Search for Spock" (1984) *** (warning: spoilers)

 Direct pick up from part 2 with Kirk trying to save Bones, and retrieve Spock by stealing the Enterprise. Because they're looking for Spock, his absence until the end isn't noticed. The film has learned from Part 2 to keep the regulars at the forefront - the plot is about rescuing Bones, and finding Spock, and the Enterprise blows up, and Kirk's boring son is in danger and dies (he doesn't even get a close up the poor guy).

Kirstie Alley's replacement as the female Vulcan isn't as good. I like Chris Lloyd's nasty Klingon - Shatner gets to beat him up and throw him off a cliff presumably to make up for not doing with the Khan.

Some nice lines, Shatner has a fine old hammy time. Sorry these stories are a little silly. Why didn't Nichelle Nichols go on the mission? It seems weird just with Scoy, Sulu and Chekov.

Nice to see Australia's own Judith Anderson at the end.

Movie review - "Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan" (1982) ***1/2 (warning: spoilers)

 I saw this at the cinema and didn't like it -too slow. I still find it a little slow although I totally respect the love the fans have for it. It's much better than the 1979 film - less enamoured of its special effects, tighter, faster, but most of all: it puts the emotions of its regulars front and centre. One of the people on the planet is Chekob, Kirk deals with an ex and his son, Spock dies, Khan is after Kirk. It doesn't talk down to its audience.

Friday, November 08, 2024

Movie review - "Star Trek The Motion Picture" (1979) **1/2

 The fans don't like this even though they did turn up and it's got the cast. The special effects are pretty snazzy - maybe lingered over too long. I think the core problem is the big emotional stakes - the spirit of the bald lady being possessed (Persis Khambatta) and the man who loves her (Stephen Collins) being affected - are "guest stars". This issue needed to be given to our regulars.

Still it's not bad. It's smart. Talky. Nice to see everyone, although only Spock has much to do.

Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Book review - "The View from the Bridge: Memories of Star Trek and a Life in Hollywood" by NIcholas Meyer (2009)

I've always liked Meyer since reading an interview with him in a book of screenwriting interviews - he came across as smart and down to earth with a relatively high brow (for Hollywood) group of credits: the good Star Trek movies, Time After Time, Sommersby, The Seven Percent Solution, The Human Stain.

His rise was relatively rapid though like all Hollywood memoirists he's keen to paint himself as an underdog -he went to a midwest college, was a film critic, got a job working as publicity for Paramount, wrote a book about the making of Love Story which financed a move to Los Angeles, got his first screen credit with Invasion of the Bee Girls, did some TV movies, wrote a novel during the Writers Guild strike that became a best seller which was filmed, became a director with Time After Time, moved into Star Trek land and also directed the TV classic The Day After.

There's plenty of Star Trek stuff in here - Meyer's no dummy, he knows who the key audience is. The making of these movies was remarkably confrontational - Gene Rodenberry whinged from his death bed, Paramount politics, egos of Nimoy and Shatner, getting the tone and the story right while not being steeped in series lore. The lesser known Part 6 gets a guernsey which is good and he's nice about Star Trek The Motion Picture which is classy.

He doesn't neglect his other movies and books though - writing The Seven Percent Solution (leading to a little essay-ish bit on how to write a pastiche),  writing and directing Time After Time, the difficulties of The Day After (a nightmare with a big personal pay off), directing Volunteers in Mexico and The Deceivers in India, his script doctoring of Fatal Attraction, the mess that was Company Business, writing Sommersby and The Human Stain (where he was rewritten by Robert Benton).

He is less forthcoming on the personal tragedies in his life - the death of his mother from ovarian cancer in her forties, the death of his wife from breast cancer just as young (which derailed his directing career) - though there is a marvelous anecdote of him and Pierce Brosnan having a widower lunch, both crying in grief, then being distracted by a large breasted woman walking past... that is a very male story.

There's interesting digressions on the nature of creativity, where ideas come from, and so on, as well as the general whingeing that Hollywood has gone to sh*t. Meyer is a fine writer and the book is a pleasure to read.

Friday, August 17, 2018

TV review - "Star Trek episode 5 - The Enemy Within" (1966) ***

Another outbreak on The Enterprise - the crew get doubles. Kirk's tries to rape Janice (who is in a surprisingly large number of eps) in a shocking scene. Richard Matheson wrote this. It's smart and good and thought provoking because down deep Kirk wants to rape.

Monday, August 13, 2018

TV review - "Star Trek episode 4 - The Naked Time" (1966) ***

The Enterprise gets infected with a space disease and sends everyone ga-ga. Lots of fun for fans - Spock uses the Vulvan nerve pinch, Kirk smacks out Spock, a woman lusts after Spock who is turned on, Sulu runs around with a rapier bare-chested, McCoy is jumpy, Scotty complains about the engine (my memories of this show as a small kid are mainly how stressful it was... the engine was always overheating).

Sunday, July 29, 2018

TV review - "Star Trek" - Season 1 ep 4 ""Where No Man Has Ever Gone Before" (1966) ***

The second pilot is a good ep - Shatner is much better than Hunter, warm and energetic, and they have the bright idea of focusing on his relationship with Spock (there's no McCoy here). Strong story about crew members being possessed - first Gary Lockwood, and then shrink Sally Kellerman (another decent female role). These two give good performances.

There's some action, a moral question, wacky eye make up. It's good stuff.

Sunday, July 22, 2018

TV review - "Star Trek ep 2 - "Charlie X" (1966) ***

A really good episode, anchored by a very strong performance by Robert Walker as a strange kid picked up off the planet. He has weird powers and starts hitting on a crew member Janice Rand - it's quite a good ep on the issue of creepy stalkers.

There's camp factor with a shirtless Kirk wearing tights teaching Charlie/Walker how to fight. Spock gets beaten up. Uhura sings at a cafe. Ah, the 60s... But a strong episode.

TV series - "Star Trek" - "The Cage" (1966) **

The original pilot for the classic series is of interest to see how it differentiates from what became famous. There is Spock but none of the other crew - however there is a crew. Instead of Kirk there's Captain Pike, played by Jeffrey Hunter, who supposedly turned the role down in a decision that in hindsight can be seen to be a major mistake.

I think Hunter would've been absolutely fine - he wasn't as talented as William Shatner and lacked the intensity and humour, but he had his own conviction.

It's a good solid story with imagination - Pike winds up on a planet where aliens want him to breed with a hot blonde. It does dip in the middle - there's a strong start with Pike and the others going on the planet and meeting the mysterious women, and the aliens, etc, but it gets bogged down with too much chat. I can see why executives were wary of this.

All the raw material is there though - it just needed finessing, which they did. More character interaction among the leads, more dramatisation of the themes, etc.

There's two women officers on the ship but their characters are disappointingly sketchy (one is a bit cold which has promise). There's too much Pike to be honest - maybe Gene Rodenberry was hedging his bets making it a solo vehicle. At least it's smart.