Showing posts with label Nicole Kidman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nicole Kidman. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Script review - "Love Actually" by Richard Curtis

  Curtis said he restructured this in the edit maybe he did but it feels very close - Nicole Kdiman referenced instead of Claudia Schiffer and there's the African sequence which was filmed but cut.

There's a sub industry of hot takes about the flaws of this film, many from the US who I think are annoyed their country is described as a bully. And the fat jokes clunk and they could've jettisoned Colin in Wisconsin and yes flaws flaws.

But it's very sweet - grieving widow and step son have a lovely bond and satisfying pay off, the Prime Minister plot is (fat jokes aside) charming, the married woman stuff is great, no it makes no sense Sarah doesn't schtup Karl but it works, the flabby friend-in-love-with-mate's-wife story is redeemed by the cards at the end. So many iconic moments.  

Monday, October 06, 2025

Book review - "Kubrick: An Odyssey" by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams (2024)

 Fantastic book. Big subject but superbly done, great research (access to archives) very thorough and fair. Deep dives on unmade films such as Napoleon and AI. Discusses Kubrick's interest in sex, often ignored by critics. Covers his arseholeness and eccentricities. The book is really fair.

Full of interesting stuff - his battles to make things, a daughter turning into anti-Semitic neo con, his dreams of moving to Australia, James Brolin was considered for The Shining.

Splendid.  

Tuesday, December 10, 2024

Movie review - "Acquaman and the Lost Kingdom" (2023) **

 Big, loud, dumb. Who cares about Jason Mamoa and Patrick Wilson being brothers? Who cares about the random villain being bad. Some interest in seeing Amber Heard's role being minimised - I guess she'd be too heroic? They may as well have killed her. Or kidnapped her. And Nicole and Dolph.

Dull.

Friday, June 21, 2024

Donald Sutherland and Australia

Donnie was a Canadian, who are like Aussie cousins, so I thought there would be a few links and I was right.
1) Bear Island (1979) - Canadian Sutherland often returned home to make movies so it was fitting he starred in this, Canada's most expensive film made til that time, from a novel by Alistair Maclean... directed by Aussie Don Sharp. (Film isn't bad, not as good as the book, too many parkas).
2) Six Degrees of Separation (1994) - Donald Sutherland had, unlike Elliot Gould, a knack of consistently picking outstanding roles after the 70s. This was one, terrific film, directed by Australia's own Fred Schepesci.
3) Don't Look Now (1973) - this film, with yes its famous sex scene, was edited by Aussie Graeme Clifford.
4) Fools Gold (2008) - treasure hunt adventure film with Sutherland in one of his colourful support roles - shot in various spots in Queensland.
5) Cold Mountain (2003) - Donald Sutherland played a lot of dads and in this one, a film which no one much remembers any more, he was father to Nicole Kidman
6) Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1991) - he was in the original Buffy! V loose Aussie connection - the Divynyls 'Ain't Gonna Eat Out My Heart Any more' is on the soundtrack but I remember seeing it at the cinema and being v excited when I heard it in the film
7) The Kentucky Fried Movie (1977) - Sutherland has a small part in this comedy as does Australia's own George Lazenby - both in the same bit "That's Armaggedon"
8 ) Uprising (2001) - TV film about th Warsaw Ghetto Uprising where Sutherland appears opposite Australia's own Radha Mitchell
9) Court Martial (1966) - British TV series with American stars - Sutherland appeared in an epiosode opposite Aussie Kenneth J Warren
10) Donnie Sutherland - hosted 'Sounds' - not Donald Sutherland

Saturday, January 08, 2022

Play review - "Being the Ricardos" (2021) ***

 Nice patter and dialogue, interesting-ish, easy to watch, Nicole Kidman and Javier Barderm were surprisingly great (they've both been good actors... it was just the playing icons factor), JK Simmons is wonderful.

No stakes, not really. The show was never in danger and it was hard to care about the marriage. Weird subplot between Lucy and Vivian Vance about looking good. Overlong.

Some irritating historical flaws - Judy Holliday was never a threat for Lucille Ball's career until 1946 after her appearance in Born Yesterday, certainly not around the time of The Big Street in 1942 - I don't mind putting all the events on the series in one week (communism, pregnancy, cheating... all took place over different years IRL) -that Judy Holliday thing just bothered me

It went down easy. Gets points featuring an actor playing Charles Koerner of RKO. But maybe they dramatised the wrong week - getting the show up was surely more fraught with peril.

Monday, November 01, 2021

Movie review - "Flirting" (1991) ****

 This suffered a little at the time in comparison with The Year My Voice Broke but has developed its own reputation and cult following. It's more positive, less harrowing, more warm... though boarding school is clearly still horrible.

John Duigan's sense of observation is as strong as ever. This is full of recognisable scenes and moments: the dopey idiot with braces (Kiri Paramore is perfect as a true Australian type), the chubby kid with boobs talking about girl breasts, the dopey school captain hero who is dull as dishwater talking about his grazier father being "a man for all seasons", the banter, the depiction of racism, the sadism of Marshall Napier, the amiable ignorance of Jeff Truman, the bullying "Backa" Burke, the awkward chat between Newton's and Taylor's parents.

Nicole Kidman is a little too old for her part not helped by the wig (and her dimension basically means she wants it). It's fun to see Naomi Watts and Kym Wilson as her mates though neither has much to do or play. Bartholomew Roberts is great as Noah Taylor's pompous friend, another familiar type.

Thandie Newton and Noah Taylor are superb in their roles - it does make a difference knowing that Newton and Duigan had an affair.

But it's a lovely romantic film full of excellent moments.

Thursday, October 21, 2021

Movie review - "Wills and Burke" (1985) **

 Famously released the same year as Burke and Wills this actually has a lot of good stuff in it - a very strong cast headlined by Gary MacDonald and Kym Gyngell, Peter Collingwood hilarious as a governor convinced that everyone loves him, Nicole Kidman making an early appearance as Julia Matthews.

It doesn't quite work though. Actually it just doesn't work. Mainly because I think the basic story isn't that compelling on screen - it consists of bad decision-bad decision-bad decision, as opposed to twists and turns. The best spoofs have a solid story eg Blazing Saddles, Flying High, Young Frankenstein. A colonial era spoof probably needed more of a stronger story basis - like For the Term of His Natural Life might've been funnier. Or even Robbery Under Arms.

I'm not sure there's a way of doing this story properly. Maybe from the point of view of King? Maybe Burke, like Ned Kelly, is a character best left to being a support character. Maybe it would've worked better from the point of view of Edwin Welch, who led the rescue expedition and found King. (I actually think that's the way to tell this story... from the point of view of Welch investigating what happened.)

Maybe the characterisations needed to be broader and more distinct. (Like they could've turned one of the exploring team into a woman in disguise, say, to get some females in there.) Collingwood's governor is very distinct and unique. The others less so - Gyngell's Wills is stiff upper lip, Wyn Roberts is a bushman and... that's about it, Roy Baldwin (Charles Gray) is a bit horny for Matthews and is argumentatitive and... that's it, Mark Little's King never says anything and... that's about it, Roderick Williams (as Landell) wears an Arab headdress and... that's about it, Nicole Kidman's Julia Matthews is bright and sparky but not into Burke. 

Maybe if these parts had been broader. Maybe if it had songs and/or been on stage (there's a show biz subplot with Jonathan Hardy wanting to organise a stage show with Kidman).

Maybe if it had just been funnier. A lot of the gags feel like jokes that would sound funny if pitched eg Wills always wears evening dress, King never talks, the Aboriginal plays tunes and the others try to guess it. And the big subplot of Kidman putting on a show to celebrate Burke gets annoying after the while because it doesn't really tie in with the rest ... you could cut it out of the film.

Historically it's not super inaccurate. It follows the basic facts.

There's cameo-ish appearances from Colin Hay, Los Trios Ringbarkus, Chris Haywood.

Friday, November 20, 2020

Movie review - "Bombshell" (2019) ***1/2

 A box office disappointment but I think this sort of movie just belongs on streaming now. It's an engrossing story, the exposition is well handled, and it has fun star performances - Charlize Theron, Nicole K, Margot Robbie. Very strong support cast including Kate McKinnon.

Saturday, July 27, 2019

TV review - "Big Little Lies Season 2" (2019) **

The acting is fantastic. The set design, costumes, etc is to die for. There are some good moments. But there's no overriding story. None of the leads have decent secrets or are in conflict with each other for extended periods of time. Laura Dern's part feels especially padded. The whole show is "fall out" of what happened in season 1. There's nothing new except Meryl Streep as the dead guy's mother but even then not much is done with her. Scenes feel choppy, written at the last minute, edited about. It doesn't feel like a cohesive goal. There's no strong narrative. They should have had Meryl kidnap the kids or something. A mess.

Sunday, July 14, 2019

Movie review - "Acquaman" (2019) ***

A big broad silly movie that works on its own terms. Unlike too many DC films it has a real vision - James Wan wants to pack it with cool stuff, so there's huge underwater civilisations and battles and soldiers riding sharks.

The script borrows well from the 1978 Superman and deals with the difficult DC timeline. The support cast is very strong - Patrick Wilson is a decent villain and Amber Heard suits the superhero world. Its lots of fun watching Nicole Kidman spear people with a trident though the CGI kung fu wasn't very convincing. Jason Mamosa has plenty of swagger. I wish he'd given his kingdom to Amber Heard at the end though.

Thursday, April 11, 2019

Movie review - "Windrider" (1986) **

Cheerfully dim Australian comedy which in its heart of hearts seems like a 60s pop film - something starring Frankie Avalon or Connie Francis. I kept expecting Tom Burlinson to break out into song - ironically, he would later have a career as a Frank Sinatra impersonator. Nicole Kidman did a bit of singing too and it's fun to see her as a pop star.

But I think the filmmakers were uncertain of the movie they were making. There was talk of doing a Risky Business style comedy, so you have Nickers running around nude (a fair bit) - but Risky Business' story was about sex, this isn't. It's a film called Windrider and is about a someone wind surfing - that's the climax. It's really a sports film and needed to be about that.

Add some singing, fine - but the drive needed to  be windsurfing. The plot about Burlinson at work is confusing, never seen and pointless. Just make it character.

The romance with Kidman is quite well done (apart from some rapey actions up top), the father son stuff between Burlinson and Charles Tingwell is lovely, the views of Perth are very easy on the eye. It's a cheerful film that did not deserve being torn a new one by critics at the time.

Where it could have been better:
* more focus on windsurfing in the story
* better incorporating the singer into the windsurfing
* have a good female windsurfer for the female audience to have someone to latch on to
* do more with the villain to make him really bad
* have better songs

I also feel Burlinson was simply miscast as an arrogant yuppie - he was most effective as a soulful young man. But I get why he was cast and he does have good chemistry with Kidman.

Tuesday, January 08, 2019

Script review - "Destroyer" by Matt Manfriedi and Phil Hay (warning: spoilers)

Great script which hasn't gotten the attention it deserved from critics - sparse, tight, yet rich, with a knock out central character but some nice support ones too like the super manipulative Silas (the villain) or the FBI agent who goes to Bible readings or the gang member trying to redeem himself with good legal work or the rich girl gone wrong.

I loved the structure which has a twist in that we're not investigating a murder, it's about seeing how the murder came about. Some great action sequences like two bank robberies, one which you know is going to end badly, the other which you're not sure.

Really great work.

Monday, October 02, 2017

TV review - "Bright Little Lies" (2017) ***1/2 (warning: spoilers)

Enjoyable melodrama - that's not a back handed compliment. It's well done though perhaps stretched out at 7 one-hour eps... there's lots of filler, with scenes of kids running around and other such montages.

It reminded me of Ross Hunter/Douglas Sirk 1950s melodramas, with its combination of lust, unhappy marriages, aspirational lifestyles (the Monterey coast), good female roles. Instead of Lana Turner and Jane Wyman there's Nicole Kidman, Reese Witherspoon and Shailene Woodley - plus Laura Dern and Zoe Kravitz.

It's extremely well done across the board - acting, costumes, etc. Nicole gets the juiciest part, being slapped around and having self destructive sex. Her scenes with the shrink are particularly well done and must have been what got her the Emmy.

Dramatically really Reese's character could have had the affair on screen - I'm guessing they made it flash back so she'd be more sympathetic? Builds to a tense ending. Still I kept feeling it could and should have been condensed into a great two hour movie. Such is modern Hollywood!

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Script review - "Lion" by Luke Davies

I'll put my hand up and admit I didn't think the idea of the film was that amazing - absolutely, a decent story... but was there enough for a feature? You've got the getting lost sequence, the Google Earth sequence, then.... what?

But I was wrong. The opening sequence is a punch to the solar plexus - every small kid/mum/family's worst nightmare, getting lost on a train. The adventures being lost are pretty good too (how much of this was made up?). Things slow down when the story moves to Tasmania - inevitably in part because the stakes are lower but also because the characters, based on real people, are not that interesting. The girlfriend remains pretty much "the girlfriend" (although there is charming dialogue), and dad is "dad" - mum does get one really great scene, which is presumably how Nicole Kidman agreed to sign on. The last "act" for lack of a better word - tracking down via Google Earth - doesn't take very long. But things are fleshed out by mum and unexpectedly the story of the main guy's adopted brother. This is what really elevated this work for me. A very moving, well written piece.

Saturday, April 02, 2016

Movie review - "Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief" (2015) *****

Engrossing film about Scientology from Alex Gibney, who made that excellent film about Enron. It has some awesome footage: the mysterious L Ron Hubbard chatting away to camera, ditto the just-as-mysterious David Miscaviage. There's inhouse Scientology videos including their own attempt at an anthem, footage from conventions, home movie footage of adventures on the boats with L Ron. There's also hidden camera stuff of Scientology thugs trying to shake down people.

There's also some great "talking heads" - Paul Haggis would be the best known, but there's also some former top level Scientology people (one an Aussie whose accent can still be heard). It also discusses the role of Tom Cruise and John Travolta in the Church.

My two cents on this topic: Scientology is no sillier than any other religion, and should never be banned, it just needs to be subject to the rule of law. Like other religions it is susceptible to exploitation from particularly controlling/charismatic people, which seems to be what is happening with Miscaviage. Like many other businesses they keep their competitive edge via exclusionary business practices, suppressing criticism, use of ground troops and relentless effort.

It's a classy documentary with some excellent photography. Miscavige would make a great Bond villain - a Sejanus or Philip the Arab who managed to hang on to his power. Fascinating stuff.


Friday, March 04, 2016

Australian Film Stars

It's my contention that one of the big problems of the Australian film industry is too many people don't understand what constitutes a film star. The term "star" gets flung about with great abandon and winds up over-used and distorted. Entire books have been written on the concept of movie stardom but I think Ken G Hall had it best when he referred to movie stars being people who were actually worth something at the box office, i.e. actors who helped draw a significant number of people into theatres by virtue of their presence alone.

The Australian film industry is so small that the most successful movie stars are ones who have made their names in other mediums - usually theatre, radio, and/or TV. They develop popularity there, transfer to film, and their public follows them. It is possible to be a film-only star, it is just extremely difficult. I thought I'd run through a list of some actors who I consider to have been genuine stars - plus a few others who sometimes described as such, but aren't, really.

Silent Era

Definite box office draws:

* Nellie Stewart - she's little remembered today but in her day was an internationally famous stage actor and singer. Her most popular role was the title part in Sweet Nell of Old Drury and repeating it on screen helped turn that film into a monster hit.

*Snowy Baker - one of the most renowned sportsman of his era, Baker represented his country in swimming, boxing, rugby, diving, etc etc before trying his hand at the movies. He stuck to action/adventure tales (five in all) most of which appear to have been greeted with public enthusiasm. Baker has a clear claim on the title of Australia's first action movie star.

See him in "The Man from Kangaroo" here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8ht1lwY2Nk

Maybes:

* Lotte Lyell - she was often described as Australia's first film star and certainly played the lead role in a number of popular movies: The Fatal Wedding, Margaret Catchpole, The Sentimental Bloke, etc. Her contribution to Australian cinema was immense, as an actor, director, writer, editor and producer. However I would hesitate to classify her as an out-an-out star - she lacked a defined screen persona, she was too versatile, too under publicised. She didn't have a great stage reputation, her name was given respectful but not prominent billing in advertisements; even her death was not overly publicised, which you assume it would be for someone so young. I don't get the impression from reading about this time that Lotte Lyell was a genuine box office draw. Maybe if she'd specialised in more of the one kind of role or genre, eg the squatter's daughter - but she didn't. I feel Lyell was more a respected leading lady and filmmaker. Still a giant our industry.

* Arthur Tauchert - a vaudevillian who became nationally famous after being cast in the role of a lifetime, The Sentimental Bloke. This led to Tauchert playing the lead in a number of other movies which put him in similar parts, kind of Australia's Wallace Beery. One contemporary account described him as the biggest box office star in Australia in the 1920s. I think he has more claim to being a genuine draw than Lyell, if only because he tended to play the same kind of role - a lovable knockabout - so audiences knew what they were getting with him. A modern day equivalent would be Michael Caton.

You can see Lyell and Taucher in The Sentimental Bloke here - https://archive.org/details/Sentimental_bloke

Not Reallys:

*Alfred Rolfe and Lily Dampier - a married couple who played opposite each other on stage many times, usually in support of Alfred Dampier, Lily's father. They recreated their stage roles in several movies, including Captain Midnight and Captain Starlight, and thus received prominent billing - especially Lily - but I would not count them as stars.

Sound Era Until the Revival

Definite box office draws:

*George Wallace -  one of the most popular theatre performers of his day, Wallace brought his audience with him to the cinemas for several movies in the thirties. The first ones, by FW Thring, weren't very good but still made money; the later ones from Ken G Hall, were better and also lucrative. Eventually Wallace grew old, and his later appearances in Rats of Tobruk and Wherever She Goes are sad rather than funny, but in his heyday he was the biggest thing in Australian films.

See a copy of His Royal Highness here - https://archive.org/details/HisRoyalHighness

*Bert Bailey -his films were even more popular than Wallace's, though his range was more narrow - people were only interested in Bailey if he played Dad Rudd. The result were four highly popular films which cashed in on the years Bailey spent playing Rudd on stage around the country. Bailey did have a stab at a non-Dad Rudd role in South West Pacific but it was still pretty Rudd-esque. He was a genuine box office draw, in the way no other actor who played the role (and there's been a few) have been.

See On Our Selection here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1SjeWCuyDk

*Cecil Kellaway - Kellaway was a popular theatre star who appeared in three Australian films, two of which were specifically constructed as a vehicle for him: It Isn't Done and Mr Chedworth Steps Out. He was a little battler type, less broad than Wallace, quieter than Bailey, more dramatic. A minor star with a less strongly defined public persona it was still there (dim, decent, a father) and he appears to have been a box office draw.

A clip from It Isn't Done is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/it-isnt-done/clip1/

*Pat Hanna - like Wallace, Bailey and Kellaway, Hanna spent years and years plugging away at his act on stage, which meant there was a ready made audience for his first features. Hanna's three movies were not massive successes but his popularity saw them perform well enough and he clearly constituted a genuine draw at the box office.

A clip from Diggers is at https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/diggers/clip1/

Maybes:

*Chips Rafferty - a gangly type who seemed destined for a career as comic relief support until thrust into the lead of The Overlanders, and he was put under contract to Ealing Studios. Any lasting box office pull this and Bush Christmas gave Rafferty was undermined by subsequent miscasting in Eureka Stockade and failure of Bitter Springs. Still, Rafferty had enough of a name to raise money to make his own movies in the 1950s which exploited his persona - The Phantom Stockman, King of the Coral Sea, Walk into Paradise - and were reasonably successful. He then stopped doing that and the films failed - in particular he should've played the lead in Dust in the Sun. Rafferty was unlikely to ever be a convincing romantic lead and he was hampered by opportunities at the time but you get the sense he could've been a bigger star if handled better - he would've been great as a comic lead, and an action hero. Still he was definitely the closest thing we had to a home-grown movie star in the fifties.

A clip of him and Grant Taylor is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/forty-thousand-horsemen/clip1/

 *Roy Rene - his one film is regarded as a failure, Strike Me Lucky, but Rene's tremendous stage popularity initially brought in sizeable audiences. It was a shame Ken G Hall never had another go at making a Rene vehicle because I think he, of all filmmakers, could have eventually cracked it, and Rene's later success on radio proved his appeal had "legs". Admittedly this doesn't change the fact that Strike Me Lucky is hard to sit through.

A clip from Strike Me Lucky is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/strike-me-lucky/clip3/

Not reallys:

*Shirley Ann Richards - she got a lot of publicity as a star, including being put under long term contract, but she wasn't. She almost always played the ingenue, rarely driving the plot and mostly being called upon the flirt with the leading man. Her best part, in Dad and Dave Come to Town, was a support role. She was delightful, charming, pretty and talented but she never got the chance to carry a movie. (NB This applied in Hollywood as well.) The One That Got Away for me was 100,000 Cobbers - a terrific short and it's a shame it wasn't expanded into a feature with Richards pairing marvelously with Grant Taylor.

100,000 Cobbers is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oalKwbuQDKI

*Grant Taylor - a dazzling star debut in Forty Thousand Horseman meant Taylor really should have inherited Snowy Baker's mantle as local action star. And war time meant his persona - the cocky, brave digger - should have been showcased in a number of films. But feature production almost ceased altogether and Taylor only starred in a few other movies.  He still had charisma in 100,000 Cobbers and Rats of Tobruk but he aged rapidly (he was fond of a drink) and his time as a cinematic leading man was really over by the 1940s. Taylor was really the forerunner of the tough Aussie star that would later be picked up by Rod Taylor, Mel, Bryan, etc and it's a real shame he didn't get to make as many star vehicles as say George Wallace because I think they would've done well.

*Peter Finch - an unusual case. During his Australian years I got the impression everyone respected Finch's talent as an actor, which saw him play numerous lead roles in radio, film and stage... but that he was never that popular with the public. He was a "prestige star", say like Cate Blanchett would be later. However when he began starring in British films in the 1950s, there was a period where he seemed to have genuine pull at the box office, making some popularity lists - in particular starring in some Australian themed works: A Town Like Alice, The Shiralee, Robbery Under Arms. So while he wasn't a genuine film star in Australia, he was playing Australian roles in Britain.

Peter Finch in Dad and Dave Come to Town is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/dad-and-dave-come-to-town/clip1/

The early years of the revival (1970s-1990s)

Definite stars:

*Jack Thompson - In the late 1970s Ken H Hall declared that Thompson was the one actor whose name actually meant something at the box office in Australian cinema, and there was something to it, his hits including Petersen, and Sunday Too Far Away. These were star vehicles, as was the less popular Scobie Malone, pushing an image of Thompson - tough, ocker, sexy - that had been developed on TV in Spyforce, very much in the vein of Grant Taylor. Thompson did not follow this up though, and quickly went into character/support parts, though often in quality works - Caddie, The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith, Breaker Morant, The Man from Snowy River. The one film to be built around his persona, The Journalist, was a disaster. Was the Australian film industry of the 1970s capable of supporting "Jack Thompson, star"? Could a real impresario like, say , Ken G Hall made it work? Was Thompson even interested? His career and persona remains an under-studied topic in Australian cinema.

See him in The Journalist here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGw9iF7qf7o

*Mel Gibson - Gibson had "star" written all over him from the early days, on stage as well as the screen, and enjoyed one of the few guaranteed home grown franchises in Mad Max. He has one of the best Aussie CVs of all time: three classics (the first two Mad Max movies, Gallipoli), some damn fine movies (The Year of Living Dangerously, Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome), an entirely decent weepie (Tim) and some cult faves (Summer City, Attack Force Z). Rare in that he is a film-only star too (although he appeared a lot on stage).

He's in Summer City  here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvdoQKiXDnc

*Paul Hogan - an incredibly popular comedian, whose appeal saw big audiences for not just the Crocodile Dundee flicks but also later, less well remembered films, such as Lightning Jack, Strange Bedfellows and Charlie and Boots. He's lost a lot of lustre but in the right role I think Hogan could still draw them in.

A trailer for Lightning Jack is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWkFm6FKLEY

*Yahoo Serious - unlike the other comics on this list, Serious came out of nowhere with Young Einstein but it was so successful (in part because of a massive marketing push) that for a time he was a genuine box office draw via Reckless Kelly and Mr Accident (the audiences weren't as large as for his first film but they did come). Not prolific enough to maintain his following.

The Reckless Kelly trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIZ5xAXo-Y0

Maybes

*Russell Crowe - Russell Crowe had "next Mel Gibson" stamped on his forehead since The Crossing  and he eventually came good but it's useful to be reminded how many of his Aussie movies made little noise - The Crossing, Love in Limbo, Hammers over the Anvil, Heaven's Burning. He kept getting cast because everyone knew he was going to be a star, then he was one... just in Hollywood, not here. The Water Diviner however has shown there is a lot of appeal left among local audiences for Rusty in the right sort of role. He's made too many odd sort of movies for me to classify him as a definite local star though.

The trailer for The Crossing is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBfxerP68Ss

*Tom Burlinson - star of the two biggest hits in 80s Australian cinema, The Man from Snowy River and Phar Lap, showed that Aussie audiences adored Burlinson with a horse. When he strayed from this however - Windrider, The Time Guardian - they stayed away in droves and Man from Snowy River II seemed to kill off his career as an Australian leading man. To Burlinson's credit, he's revived his career as a singer. But still, one can't help thinking he might have had a few more hits in him if he'd been more carefully managed - he had a boyish earnestness and likeability that surely could've been better exploited. Moral of story - who cares if you're typecast if the projects are good?

The Time Guardian trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fN0InnC2POo

*Sigrid Thornton - there's few more iconic images of 80s Australian cinema than Siggie being feisty in period costume: Man from Snowy River, All the Rivers Run. Even at her peak however she was wasted in girlfriend roles - Street Hero, The Lighthorsemen - her career is a great argument that Australian cinema had even less idea what to do with female stars than male ones. It was different on TV where Siggie at least got some of the roles she deserved, especially in Sea Change. She's still around and remains a draw on stage and the small screen

All the Rivers Run trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsstHWyC49s

*Graeme Blundell - Blundell's casting helped turn Alvin Purple into a box office phenomenon, turning into a temporary sex comedy star eg Pacific Banana, all those Alvin sequels. A very fine actor, he's remained in demand, but I don't think anyone wants to see him in a sex comedy any more.

Melvin the Son of Alvin's trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qu5G0gGhqw

Not reallys

*Bryan Brown - in the 80s it was common to call Bryan Brown a film star but was he, really? People seemed to like him best in showy support roles - Breaker Morant, Two Hands, Dirty Deeds, Australia - rather than as the lead. On TV he was a definite draw as proved by the popularity of A Town Like Alice and The Shiralee but feature films starring Brown tended to tank - The Empty Beach, Sweet Talker, Dear Claudia, Dead Heart. An icon, absolutely, a good actor, yes, a charismatic leading man, certainly, loved in supporting roles (eg Two Hands) yes, but a real film star...?

A clip from The Empty Beach - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFcXHTurWNw

*Judy Davis - there was a period there in the 80s when Davis was a "prestige" star, someone who would ensure your film would get looked at: Winter of our Dreams, Kangaroo, Hide Tide. She's never been hugely popular, though always respected - I wish she'd work more.

Here she does a scene with Baz Luhrmann in Winter of Our Dreams - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TTPaHXWSRk

*Wendy Hughes - Bob Ellis once claimed he needed to cast Hughes in Warm Nights on a Slow Moving Train to get it financed, such was her reputation in the 1980s. She was incredibly beautiful and talented and did appear in some hits (Careful He Might Hear You, My First Wife, Return to Eden, Lonely Hearts) and there was that late 80s period when it seemed she might brake through interntionally (she had the lead in a Hollywood film Happy New Year) but this ended with a rash of flops: Warm Night, Echoes of Paradise, Boundaries of the Heart, Luigis Ladies. Still, she remained in demand as an actor until her depressingly early death.


Here's a trailer from Touch and Go - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXxLXSRfkXA

Later Years (1990s - present)

*Nick Giannopolous - perhaps the biggest stage star in 90s Australia, his immensely popular Wog shows saw an impressive box office for the highly mediocre Wog Boy. As is far too common in Australian cinema, he waited too long to make a sequel, but nonetheless figures for Wog Boy 2 weren't bad. Giannppolous' appeal in non-Wog roles is doubtful, though The Wannabes actually had a terrific idea, it was just terribly executed. If I ran an Aussie film studio, one of the first this I would do is see if Giannopolous would make a third Wog Boy movie - but only if he toured the country with a stage show immediately before release and kept the budget down.

A clip of him is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xql6L85GEk

*Mick Molloy - the break out star of The Late Show, he grew even bigger when he and Tony Martin became radio giants, then he became a film star via the cleverly crafted Crackerjack. Having established himself as a genuine box office draw, Molloy fumbled with his next two films, Bad Eggs and Boy Town, though both had good things and could (and should) have been awesome. Bad Eggs badly needed to have put Molloy opposite Tony Martin instead of the talented but little-known-outside-Melbourne-comedy-circles Bob Franklin; Boy Town didn't live up to it's concept. Molloy remains kind of well known but is probably no longer a box office draw; a shame since he had genuine broad appeal and with careful handling he could've starred in five-to-six big local comedy hits.

A Boytown clip is here - http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2008/boytown-i-cry/

*Jimeoin - a very likeable actor with a national profile, he brought them in with The Craic but struck out with The Extra even though it had a fantastic central idea. Jimeoin still tours heavily, keeping him in the public eye and I actually think people would still turn up to see him in the right vehicle.

The Craic trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYG9YXSPqds

*Paul Fenech - perennially unfashionable but he has a devoted following who have ensured decent box office figures, although they dropped off a little for Fat Pizza vs Housos. Fenech keeps his budgets down and his audience in mind, using live shows to supplement his filmed ones. He remains a decent draw at the local box office.

Fat Pizza vs Housos trailer - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udTm5CejuCo

*Cate Blanchett - is Cate Blanchett a film star? She's too beloved, wins too many Oscars, is too famous, too beautiful, and has been in too many hits to not be a star. On a local level though, she seems to be the queen of expensive, critically acclaimed box office disappointments - Oscar and Lucinda, Charlotte Grey, Paradise Road, Little Fish, The Turning - which may explain why she doesn't make too many Australian films. I do think however her name does guarantee at least a certain amount of audience which would qualify her as a local star... she just doesn't justify her budgets.

The Turning trailer - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U1r401xxSQ

Maybes:

*Hugh Jackman - it's hard to judge Hugh Jackman as a local film star because he makes so few Australian films. His first ones, Erskinville Kings and Paperback Hero were not massive hits and since then he's belonged to Hollywood, with the exception of Australia. I think if Hugh did make something close to home audiences would turn up in droves, such is his popularity, but because he doesn't, I classify him as a "maybe".

The Erskinville Kings trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECwdc-7Z5IY

*Shane Jacobsen - became nationally famous with Kenny and has managed to sustain his appeal since then with some great choices: Charlie and Boots, Oddball. I don't know if the words "Shane Jacobsen starring in" would automatically mean a certain amount of punters turning up on that opening weekend, but if he keeps choosing well it may do.

Oddball trailer is here - http://www.shanejacobson.com.au/projects/film/oddball.html

*Nicole Kidman - in the right role, they'll come, as The Railway Man and Australia proved, but there is a limit, as shown in Strangerland. I know, you could say that about any star but Nickers has never been a massive draw in local films - even her classics (BMX Bandits, Dead Calm) weren't that big. But she's a superb actor who is normally associated with quality.

The Strangerland trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3Kj1VmbJiw

*Michael Caton - he's not often thought of as a star, but he's nationally known/loved and people do tend to come to his movies: The Castle, Strange Bedfellows, Last Cab to Darwin.

The Last Cab to Darwin trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hypCdpjTMDI

*Toni Collette - obviously an outstanding character actress, her limits as a box office attraction were proven by Diana and Me and Lilian's Story. Because she's so good and gets some great parts, she'll stick around a long time, and a lot of her movies do some business - eg Mental, Japanese Story.

*Eric Bana - if there's anyone who should come back here and make a good Aussie film it's Eric, who probably has some residual popularity here. For a while he was genuinely popular off the back of Chopper with Romulus My Father doing ok and Love the Beast performing well. Personally I think he's wasted doing American films though presumably his accountant disagrees. Hopefully The Dry will lead to more roles here.

Chopper's trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKgvs9uqPJo

My conclusions from the above? Australian filmmakers are probably better off getting the rights to some awesome material rather than a star - say a best selling book like Red Dog, or popular play like Last Cab to Darwin. The exception is comedy, where the popularity of a Paul Hogan or a Nick Giannopolous will help your returns. Of course I could be wrong about all of the above - like so much in the film industry, it's just an educated guess...

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Movie review - "Strangerland" (2015) * (warning: spoilers)

A story that could (possibly) have made a decent enough ep of say Water Rats is dragged out to feature length with some big name actors and nice shots of the desert. A family moves to a small town - two kids go missing but no one seems particularly worried. Okay that's unfair - mum does stress but dad seems more worried about the family's reputation, which doesn't make sense (I get maybe he thinks that the daughter has simply run off... but the young son?)

The townsfolk don't seem to worry either even though surely the disappearance of two kids would be news. Hugo Weaving is the detective on the case, and he doesn't seem to worried either. There's a remarkable lack of tension... not to mention the absence of believable character development or narrative satisfaction (spoiler: we don't even find out what happened to the girl).

Would Nicole Kidman really forgive Joseph Fiennes for having kept quiet about seeing the kids leave for so long? Would Joe Fiennes never mention when he saw the kids leave? Would he really keep things secret? What happened to the subplot with the teacher played by Martin Dingle-Wall? What is the story of the relationship between the married couple? Is he a molesteror or did they just grow apart?

Okay, so I get that they didn't want to tie up everything in a neat bow and certainly films like Picnic at Hanging Rock and Walkabout didn't spell everything out. But they offered other compensations - shots of the landscape, evocative performances. Strangerland is mostly set indoors, in the country town - we hardly ever go out into the desert. The landscape which could have been another character like, say, Hanging Rock, isn't.

The filmmakers try to pump up the spookiness by throwing in some wind sounds and storms but it's not enough. This is a movie that reeks of film school: lots of scenes of people sitting around the breakfast table speaking flat naturalistic dialogue, endless shots of the horizon, self conscious reference to aboriginal people and culture, passive heroes, reference to a young teenage girl's sexual awakening.

I can imagine the screen studies assignment that would accompany this - lots of talk about landscape, and depiction of women in the country, and the place of women in Australian society.

Maybe this would have been creepier if set in 1962 or something. Or if the family had been aboriginal. Or if only the teenage daughter had gone missing not the kid as well. Or if Nicole Kidman had gone completely bonkers at the end instead of whimping out.

There is some good acting from Kidman, Meyne Wyatt and Hugo Weaving. Fiennes isn't much but it's a terrible role.

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Movie review - "Days of Thunder" (1989) **

For the first half hour of watching this I thought "this holds up well" - with it's montages, and luscious photography and Tony Scott stylistics - plus the dramatic heavyweights of Robert Duvall and Randy Quaid acting away, and the camp factor of Tom Cruise arriving on his motorcycle being Cole Trickle, clashing with Michael Rooker (remember when he was the up and comer in Hollywood) and so on.

A lot of this has been mocked over the years but the things that are normally held up for ridicule are actually charming: John C Reilly appearing in a support part (when he'd later send up the film in Talledega Nights), Nicole Kidman as a hilariously young neurosurgeon, Don Simpson playing a race driver, all the late 80s excess (big hair, sunglasses). There are plenty of memorable bits, like zooming around the race track to 'Gimme Some Lovin', the rental car race between Rooker and Cruise, the meet cute between Kidman and Cruise.

The big problem with it is the story, which is hopelessly murky. In Top Gun the dramatic lines were clear - Maverick was haunted by the ghost of his father's reputation, he had a best friend who died which causes him a crisis that he had to get though, he struggled to be a team player but learned in the end, he had a competition with Ice Man which was resolved, he learned to let love into his life.

Here it's more confusing. Cole Trickle is basically a good kid who wants to be liked, there's something in his past with his dad but nothing really; he has an at times difficult relationship with Duvall but not really; he becomes mates with Michael Rooker who can't recover from an accident and so Cole drives his car but Duvall says he shouldn't or something and Rooker doesn't die; Cary Elwes comes in as a villain but never does anything that villainous, does he - he's aggressive on the track, sure, but no more than Rooker or Cruise/Cole, but we're supposed to hiss at him because...? His girlfriend has short hair whereas Rooker and Cruise have girlfriends with long hair? Randy Quaid seems set up to become villainous by preferring Elwes to Cruise but then at the end helps Cruise compete in the race, so you wonder what point he has in the whole movie?

It's like a whole bunch of script decisions were made because of fear of being too close to Top Gun - "oh we don't want Rooker to die because that's too close to Top Gun", "we don't want Cruise to be haunted by his past because that's too close to Top Gun", "we dont want him to go on an egomaniac to team player journey because that's too close to Top Gun" - but they haven't replaced it with anything as interesting/compelling. Cruise is a danger on the track at the beginning and by the end of the film hasn't really learned his lesson (at one stage he even takes off after a taxi driver with a terrified Kidman as a passenger.... she dumps him because of his, understandably... but then just all of a sudden forgives him and there's no problem).

Still, it's hard not to feel affection for this movie, with Simpson and Bruckheimer running loose, and Robert Towne selling out, and Nickers and Tom having little on screen chemistry despite hooking up in real life. I think when you mention it's name most movie fans smile, and that's worth something.

Friday, January 10, 2014

Movie review - "Malice" (1993) *** (warning: spoilers)

The sort of thriller they used to make a lot in the 90s which seem to have gone out of fashion now. Watching this I kept thinking "they're so young" - there's a super slim and darkly sexy Alex Baldwin (far more comfortably cast here as a egomaniacal bastard than he would be in his nice guy hero roles), emerging Hollywood name Nicole Kidman, baby faced Gwyneth Paltrow and still-looks-the-same Bill Pullman.

This goes on for too long, you'll probably pick the twists early, and it's been supplanted a lot by TV and other thrillers but it remains a decent thriller, with a strong story (even if there's an entirely jettison-able serial killer subplot). Nicker's American accent slips a bit but she is sexy and makes an ideal femme fetale, Bill Pullman does his dull hero thing well, Baldwin is outstanding, particularly kicking goals with his "I am God" speech which smacks of Aaron Sorkin, who worked on the script. 


It's a shame there aren't more verbal flourishes in the script like this - but I guess Sorkin hadn't reached rock star status yet. It's also a shame Baldwin and Sorkin haven't combined more because Baldwin does his dialogue so well.

Excellent support cast including George C Scott, Anne Bancroft, Peter Gallaher and Bebe Neuwirth. Apparently William Goldman worked on the script.

Friday, October 26, 2012

Movie review - "BMX Bandits" (1983) ***1/2

After being pillorised for making Turkey Shoot Brian Trenchard Smith bounced back into critical favour with this delightful children's film - although interesting enough both movies have a lot in common: fast paced, full of action, a lively sense of humour, good production value, strong performances. The main difference is that this movie has a good heart whereas Turkey had a black one.

It's also a hell of a lot more positive in its depictions of women than Turkey Shoot: Nicole Kidman admittedly is kidnapped by the baddies twice and has to be rescued but she is brave and smart, gets to ride the bike, is part of the gang and is lusted after (in a cute tween way) by her two men; the only vaguely competent police officer is a woman.

I know this is in hindsight, but Nickers has terrific charisma from the get-go - her appearance really lifts this movie, with her frizzy hair and distinctive voice. No wonder she was rarely out of work in Australia (her stunt bike double does look a bit too much like a man). Her two co stars aren't as good but aren't bad - James Lugton is funny (even if his voice always sounds dubbed) and Angelo d'Angelo quite engaging - the three of them have a solid camaraderie. David Argue is hilarious as one of the crooks whose pursuit of the kids provides the plot. I also felt for the fat rich kid who teased Nickers, calling her moll - he's supposed to be a sort of villain but I looked at him and kept wondering he is probably full of self loathing, scoffing that chocolate milk and hating himself.

The film does bog down in a middle with yet another chase sequence (nothing wrong with the sequence, it just feels like yet another chase sequence), but rallies for an inspiring finale. The locations are well used - Manly looks beautiful (and so clean!). People who've lived there will get a kick out of seeing the wharf, Tanya Park, the mall, etc. There are some funny lines as well as daggy funny ones, and a few risqué (of the Are You Being Served kind - there a few English actors in the cast.) To be blunt some of the BMX stunts look a little lame but it's a really fun and nice film.