Showing posts with label religious movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religious movies. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 05, 2026

Movie review - "Edge of Doom" (1950) *1/2

 A nadir in the career of Sam Goldwyn, this is an endless, turgid, boring, repetitve account of a young man (Farley Granger) with a chip on his shoulder who's mother is dying who kills a priest in a fit of anger and that's about it.

Full of repetitive story beats. Dana Andrews is a smug priest. There's about ten minutes of story. Dud love plot. Granger tries but has to play the same note again and again.

This film was so bad.

The photography was very good. It's polished. The acting was fine. 

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Movie review - "The Exorcist" (1973) *****

 It all clicked for William Friedkin - he got the perfect material for his documentary style of filmmaking, and also casting. Ellen Burstyn is a consistently strong actor. The X factor comes from Linda Blair (likeable, relatable, heartbreaking) and Jason Miller (often overlooked but tormented, tough, smart, soulful, excellent, I appreciate they didn't play a love story with him and Burstyn).

The film works so well for many reasons but mostly this - an outlandish story is treated totally seriously. A child is ill, the mother does everything she can, the doctors try everything they can but it doesn't work. And this is primeval because when a child is injured you feel so helpless. 

The movie Burstyn is starring in looks terrible - a campus protest film! 

Monday, February 02, 2026

Book review - "The Ear of the Heart: An Actress' Journey from Hollywood to Holy Vows" by Dolores Hart 

 Great book. Fascinating. More than half is nun stuff. I got lost in some Catholicism but there's plenty of human conflict in those abbeys. 

She seems like a nice person. Not without desire - she was up for kissing Stephen Boyd (they later clashed over his scientology). Henry Levin's wife was jealous of her and wrote a letter in the abbey calling her selfish. She had boyfriends. Said she wanted to kill Debbie Reynolds when she found out Reynolds had been cast in the film.

Full of interesting sketches - George Peppard looked down his nose at her during Pleasure of His Company,  Elvis was shy and awkward, Anna Magnani was terrifying but then nice, Where the Boys Are was a dream, Lois Nettleon became a friend as did Karl Malden and Patricia Neal, she helped Neal get back in the saddle after Roald Dahl left her, Paula Prentiss was a mate, Michael Curtiz was a bully on King Creole.

Seems like a nice person. Not in a two dimensional way. Her parents sound like pieces of work. 

Saturday, January 31, 2026

Movie review - "Monty Python's Life of Brian" (1979) *****

 Magnificent movie. It looks incredible - that production design, those costumes. It's hilarious. There's a devastating point - the satire on people who blindly fellow religion. No wonder people got upset- it's targeted at them. But they can't say that so they say it's blashemous. The ending is incredibly moving and powerful.

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Movie review - "Francis of Assisi" (1961) **

 The Francis story has a solid arc - playboy turned into Friar - but this is dull. Initial scenes feel like toy town medieval land. The transformation to true believer isn't effectively dramatised, just a lot of staring.

These films are hard to do. You need to put in action and passion and have relationships full of conflict. I didn't mind making Sister Clare in love with Francis but they pull their punches. The friendship between Francis and the warrior has potential again but is poorly done. Francis' dad isn't used as an antagonist enough. The budget was decent but not spectacle level.

Bradford Dillman tries but isn't a star - neither is Dolores Hart or Stuart Whitman. Hart was very effective, beautiful, cutting her hair off. THe film might've been better being about her and her sisters.

The film flopped as did Fox's other Biblical epic The Story of Ruth. 

Saturday, December 20, 2025

Movie review - "Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery" (2025) ***1/2

 Points to Rian Johnson changing mode, making this an examination of faith. Josh O'Connor is excellent in a tricky role. Daniel Craig hams it up. Mila Kunis feels miscast. Jeremy Renner seems unwell but it suits the part. Nice images.

Monday, April 28, 2025

Movie review - "King of Kings" (1961) ****

 For some reason this film is called a flop when it did very nicely particularly internationally - maybe MGM were expecting Ben Hur Mark Two which it wasn't but it made a strong profit.

Handsomely made. Smart. Hunter does well in a difficult role. The support cast steal the show but they always do in Jesus movies.

Friday, February 07, 2025

Movie review - "Molokai The Story of Father Damien" (1999) **

 I don't know why the hell the Belgian producers thought they'd have an easy time with Paul Cox, the man was always his own box and had a long tradition of whingeing. I'm sure the producers were annoying too.

David Wenham tries his best but the sing song accent gets on the nerves. Location filming in Moloka helps marvellously. The stuff with the lepers is very effective and it's clear that this probably should've been done a lot cheaper just with Wenham and lepers.

Various names in the cast - Kate Cebrano (very charismatic), Peter O'Toole, Leo McKern. Aden Young plays a doctor probably wishing he had the lead. There's a scene where a doe eyed native girl is hot for Cox that feels old school Oz movie Cox. 

I found it boring. None of the reationships Damien had were interesting. I kept waiting for the subplot of the leprosy local who inspired him. I guess there was Peter O'Toole and Chris Haywood.

But it doesn't touch. At least not me. Catholics might like it. They love Damien because he was such an admirable figure.

But personally I couldn't wait until this film was over. It's two hours.

Saturday, November 16, 2024

Movie review - "Heaven Only Knows" (1947) **

 Angel fantasy which had more potential - Bob Cummings is an angel sent down to reform Brian Donlevy who has grown up bad as a scowly saloon owner in the old West when he's meant to be good. Cummings is ideal as a breezy angel and Donlevy as a baddy and the Western setting had potential because it's full of violence.

While the film has good moments, notably Majorie Reynolds as a saloon gal taken by Cummings and the death of Edgar Kennedy with a sobbing boy, the film never quite works. It takes itself too seriously when it needed to be lighter. It could've lent into the Western tropes more. There's a dull pastory in the town and the action screeches to a halt when boring school teacher Jorja Curtright (the future Mrs Sidney Sheldson) had scenes with Donlevy. Like, give her some life and fun.  The whole movie could've been more fun. More matchmaking from Cummings, more Donlevy-Cummings by play.

I was confused by the mum giving up the kid at the end - so he's meant to die? She gives her kid up to die? I was just a little confused.

Sunday, December 31, 2023

Book review - "The Devil's Advocate" by Morris West (warning: spoilers)

 West's big international best seller. You can see its appeal - international subject matter, British lead, World War Two, sex, big issues. A terminally ill British priest is sent to a small Italian town to be devil's advocate in an investigation as to whether a man executed by commies in the war should be a saint.

The dead man was a British deserter - because when killing a sniper in Sicily he threw in a grenade, also killed a mum and baby. He roots a horny Italian woman, conceived a child, befriended a Jewish doctor, was lusted after by a richer hornier Italian woman... gets killed by the commies because he refused to leave the town. I mean the Commie partisan leader is reasonable, gives him a chance to go, says he wants to control the town and the Englishman hurts that... why not just go? Why be a matyr? He could just go away and come back? It didn't make sense to me. Maybe it did for Catholics.

I did enjoy the book. There's a different world - investigating whether to be a saint, but in post ww2 Italy. It poesn't shy away from the problems of the Catholic Church - the greed of the Vatican, the weird dogma, the poverty of the priests.  Doesn't shy away from sex - the women want dick, there's an English painter character who is gay and grooming a kid basically (the son of the dead man)... and while he is Bad he's also given a speech that is quite sympathetic.

I kept thinking the final miracle would be the hero priest would recover, but no he dies. I didn't quite believe the dead man's conversion to God or why he didn't leave but the novel is thought provking and readable. It embraces all the contradictions of the church while then coming down on the side of God

Thursday, October 12, 2023

Movie review - "Silence" (2016) ***1/2

 It's got a fascinating world - Japanese Christians being persecuted in the 17th century - and a terrific set up two priests (Andrew Garfield, Adam Driver, both ideally cast) set out to find their mentor (Liam Neeson) who has gone missing. (Sidebar: I'm surprised WW2 Allied propaganda didn't use stories of persuctions of Christians in Japan. Maybe they did.)

There's also an intriguing Japanese character,a. former Christian who repented who is their guide. But once that's set up in the first ten minutes the film doesn't really have any more ideas. Japanese Christians are glad to meet them, but also scared. They are persecuted and killed. Martin Scorsese gets to do lots of violent scenes that he likes of Christians being crucified, burned, tortured, decapitated, in amognst the long running time and minimal female presence.

I really liked the ambiable Japanese politician who does great evil, an all too recognisable type from history. It's well acted, looks terrific, with lovely photography, sets, costumes, etc.

It just suffers from lack of structure and character development.  The last third is strong. I really liked it. It was dramatic conflict not just repetitive torture. It's just that middle section.

Garfield and Driver go full actor. Both seem like priests, Garfield goes believably nutty. I wonder if the film would've done better had they just thrown rocks at him for half an hour. (How long did Driver go without sex for?) I think it was a mistake to allow them to have Portugese accents. Also the piece could've done with some humour - it comes in the end, I guess.

I wonder if Mel Gibson ever considered filming this novel it feels right up his alley with its suffering and violence. He might've ensured a better structure too

Thursday, June 02, 2022

Movie review - "Crossbearer : a memoir of faith" by Joe Eszterhas (2008)

 I got the impression from Devil's Guide to Hollywood that Joe Eszterhas said everything he had to say in his memoir Hollywood Animal and that seems to be the case reading this. He covers old ground - the schizophrenia of his brother in law, his "redemption" via throat cancer, leading an anti smoking crusade, his mother's illness and death, his father's Antisemitism. He refers to the fact that he wrote Showgirls and Basic Instinct a lot - I sense he misses fame/being important.

To be fair there's some new stuff - about his battle to try and be a good Christian despite a lifetime of getting in conflict. He talks about attempts to make films - pitched a show about a tough priest, tried to get up another project - and none really work except Children of Glory. He says Hollywood kept at him to do violent/sexy films but he refused. He also took a $1.5 million cheque from the sequel to Basic Instinct.

He writes about his priests (including a black one from Uganda who he calls "Father Africa"), people who hassle him with scripts, his not particularly interesting domestic life, bullying a teacher who dared let his son study rap music, getting upset at religious connotations given to Le Bron James playing basketball. He mentions his admiration for Passion of the Christ and refers to Mel Gibson's arrest and Antisemitic outbursts while drunk... making his later collaboration with Gibson very ironic.

The most moving section involves his relationship with his daughter who was adopted out in the 1960s who has two girls with a degenerative condition.  I googled them (couldn't resist) and at least one is still alive and doing well, I hope the other is too. When the book was written though he was still estranged from his daughter Suzi.

There's really not enough material in this for a book. It should have been a long article. But it's of interest.

Friday, August 30, 2019

Movie review - "The Cross and the Switchbade" (1970) **

A film that's easy to mock - Pat Boone as an earnest preacher inserting himself between warring gang members going "Jesus loves you". He plays a character who is determined to save souls while his wife is home about to have a baby and there's some unexpectedly camp scenes where he tries to force himself into Erik Estrada's bedroom at 3 am when Estrada is just wearing white underpants.

It was co written and directed by Don Murray, the actor, and some of the acting is pretty good. Boone saves three main souls - a young female street kid who tries to rob him, a female heroin addict, and the leader of a Hispanic gang (Erik Estrada in his debut).

The heroin addict gets over it after one night of withdrawals - it's a female who prompts her to do this, not Boone (why not give him the hero moment?)... then the next day she's all cured, wearing a nice smart suit and singing in Church. Hallelujah!

It's not terribly convincing when all the gang members got religion at the end and grasped for bibles - I think the film would have been better off just focusing on the three who were saved.

But it does work dramatically... in part because the depiction of modern day life is full on: gangs, heroin, prostitution, crime, etc

I just wish they hadn't had Boone basically ignore his wife who is about to give birth! His performance is fine - I really liked it at the end that he cried when Estrada gave himself to God, more emotive acting like this from him through his career would've been good.

It is shot and scored like a TV show from 1970.  The young actors all commit. It's not a bad film and of course if you're very religious you'll get stuff out of it.

Sunday, August 25, 2019

The Surprisingly Interesting Cinema of Pat Boone

Pat Boone had a decent career as a movie star. He was no Elvis Presley, but he starred in over a dozen films, had a couple of huge hits, and for a few years was one of the biggest box office draws in the US. He was famous for being a "clean" teen idol on screen - a non-smoking, non-drinking church goer, he was married with three kids by the age of 22, and who insisted on finishing college even while a huge star. Few of his movies are well remembered today. But a closer look at Boone's filmography reveals a series of works that are, in fact, surprisingly complex. Stephen Vagg looks at fifteen of his most notable movies.

1) Bernadine (1957)

Boone's first film was based on a play that 20th Century Fox had optioned intending to turn into a Robert Wagner vehicle. When Elvis Presley hit big in Love Me Tender (1956) - also at Fox - Wagner was out and Boone was in. He was signed to a multi-picture deal at the studio by Buddy Adler, who had recently taken over as head of production from Darryl F. Zanuck, and was keen to turn Boone, one of the biggest singing acts in the country, into a movie star.

Bernadine is a coming-of-age piece about about a small town teenager, Sanford, who falls for a pretty telephone operator, hangs out with his friends, hoons around in jalopies and boats, struggles to pass his high school exams, and cock blocks his mother's relationship with a man he doesn't like. A good role for Pat Boone, right? Only, get this -  he doesn't play Sanford; that job is done by Dick Sergeant, a.k.a. the second Darrin on Bewitched - while Boone appears as his buddy, Beau. Boone isn't great but he doesn't have much of a character to play, and at least he has looks, charm and can sing. Sergeant is awful. The role really required a young Mickey Rooney but it could have been tailored for Boone, who is wasted in his part.

This weird casting decision was presumably made so as not to burden Pat too much on his first time out - after all in Love Me Tender Elvis plays a support role to Richard Egan, and later in Hound Dog Man (1959) Fabian would support Stuart Whitman. But those were good parts - Pat Boone's role is lousy. The main thing he does in the movie is sing (including "Love Letters in the Sand" which became a huge hit), and introduce an elder brother (James Drury) who runs off with Terry Moore. Boone's presence even throws the movie off a little - he gets this screen time his character doesn't deserve, and when he sings love songs despite not having an on screen love interest it feels weird.

Fox gave Bernadine all the trimmings - colour, Cinema Scope, a support cast that included Janet Gaynor (in her last movie) and Dean Jagger, and old pro Henry Levin behind the camera - but it's the sort of story that needed love and care (and perfect casting) to really work... and it didn't get it. The end result is awkward, unfocused, and not a little creepy, especially in the relationship between Sergeant and his mother. However the public were keen to see Boone on the big screen and his popularity turned this into a box office success.

2) April Love (1957)

Boone's second film is much  more satisfactory, in part because it puts him front and centre, but also because the material is more fool-proof. It's a remake of an earlier Fox hit, Home in Indiana (1944), with Pat stepping into a part originally played by Lon McAllister, an actor who had a brief heyday in the forties playing All-American types like Pat.

This is a sweet, wholesome tale where Pat is a "juvenile delinquent" i.e. he stole a car... though we never see the theft. He's sent out to a country town, where he has to take lifts from people (which is actually a jolt to see, such is our conditioning that movie heroes should drive) and falls for Shirley Jones. He also gets lectured to by Arthur O'Connell, who played an on-screen paterfamilias for most of the screen teen idols during this era, from Elvis and Fabian to George Hamilton and Sandra Dee.

This was the film where Boone refused to kiss Jones on the lips for fear of upsetting his wife. He was about to do the kiss then realised he hadn't checked with Mrs Boone; he asked to postpone the scene, then got his wife's approval overnight... but by the next day the story had leaked, Buddy Adler was furious, he and Boone fought, and Boone arced up and refused to do any kissing. So Jones goes in for a kiss but he pushes her away (this is motivated by story at the time), and at the end he goes to kiss her but they are interrupted. It feels odd - these sort of movies are so wholesome you need a kiss as a form of release and you don't get it.

But it has nice colour and charm, Boone sings a few pleasing tunes and he teams marvellously with Jones, who had a similar all-American image (though she was a lot raunchier in her private life than her co-star). Boone loved the movie and later said he wish he could have made twenty more of them: "a musical, appealing characters, some drama, a good storyline, a happy ending." Why didn't he? The film was a hit - it helped Boone be voted the number three box office star in the country at the end of 1957. And it wasn't as if Fox lacked Americana stories in their back catalogue that they could remake: Kentucky (1938), Maryland (1940), Margie (1946), Smoky (1946), Scudda Hoo! Scudda Hay! (1948), etc. The only other remake he'd wind up doing was State Fair and that wasn't even a star vehicle. Why didn't someone put him together with Jones again?


3) Mardi Gras (1958)

Pat Boone became a famous homophobe so it's ironic to see him in a movie based on a story by gay Curtis Harrington and directed by bisexual Edmund Goulding who was notorious for hosting orgies.  Mind you, gays were hard to avoid in Hollywood - Boone's first co star, Dick Sergeant, was one, as was Lon McAllister, and Shirley Jones' husband during the making of April Love, Jack Cassidy, was bisexual. And Boone has always denied accusations of homophobia, saying some of his best friends were gay (he and his wife did Bible readings at Rock Hudson's house when the latter was dying of AIDS), and co-writing two books about gays who gave up the "lifestyle", Joy: A Homosexual’s Fulfillment, and Coming Out: True Stories of the Gay Exodus. So that's settled, then.

Mardi Gras is a three-servicemen-on-leave musical, a subgenre that prospered in the fifties after On the Town (1949); the plot also borrows liberally from The Fleet's In (1942) and Roman Holiday (1953). Producer Jerry Wald liked the chance to showcase Fox's contract talent - Tommy Sands and Gary Crosby play Boone's fellow West Point grads while Christine Carere, Sheree North and Barrie Chase are the girls.

The film is bright enough but is hampered by its casting - Boone is fine but Carrere looks like a stunned mullet for most of the running time. (Boone kisses her on the cheek, incidentally - still no mouth!) Goulding shoots a scene where Boone, Sands and Crosby have an extended shower together... presumably this was a fun day at the office for the director, whose last film this was. It was a minor hit at the box office, though not as successful as Boone's first two movies. His box office ranking dropped to number eleven in 1958, which was still pretty good.

4) Journey to the Centre of the Earth (1959)

Boone was reluctant to be part of this fantasy adventure, well aware he would be a support player (the film was originally conceived as a vehicle for Clifton Webb before he became too ill and James Mason stepped in). He was persuaded to sign by a healthy fee and was rewarded with the biggest hit of his career.

And it's no surprise - for this is an utterly magical, charming adventure that works on every level. It's restrained, intelligent and enchanting - easily the best film for both director Henry Levin and Boone (and, come to think of it, co-star Arlene Dahl).

As in Mardi Gras, Boone's physical beauty is exploited - he walks around shirtless a lot and takes a shower that's as gratuitous as any that had to be performed by a starlet in the fifties. He originally performed several songs in the film but they were cut when it was seen how they slowed up the action. And his role brushes up uneasily with that of Peter Ronson - it's like these two parts should have been combined in one.

But that's griping. This is the one Boone film I can recommend unreservedly and it remains a mystery why Boone never appeared in another fantasy/sci fi adventure in his entire career. He was believable in them, he could easily sing a song over the credits if he wanted, he wouldn't have to worry about kissing any of his co stars, or "morality" issues. And it wasn't as though Fox weren't making them - when he was under contract they turned out The Lost World (1960), Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (1961) and Five Weeks in a Balloon (1962)... the last two even featured pop stars, Frankie Avalon and Fabian respectively. But no Boone. Was he too expensive? Did the dates not work out? Did he insist on playing the lead? Whatever the reason it was a great shame... for me the biggest misstep Boone made in his film career.

The second biggest was he never again supported a star like James Mason, at least not during his prime. Boone could have benefited from being teamed with an older "name," like say John Wayne in The Comancheros (1961) (he could've played the Stuart Whitman part) or Frank Sinatra in Can Can (1960) (he could've played the Louis Jourdan part). But he didn't - at least not until Goodbye Charlie by which stage he really wasn't a movie star any more. Was it cost? Ego? Dates not working out? Anyway, it was silly of him.

Incidentally, in Journey Boone kisses Diane Baker on the forehead then is about to kiss her on the lips when they're interrupted... but at the end he kisses her briefly on the lips. His first lip kiss. Awww.

Despite the film's success, his box office ranking dropped to 22 in 1959. He kept that the following year despite appearing in no movies that year, and thereafter did not make any of the lists.

5) All Hands on Deck (1961)

Boone took a break away from movies for a few months, studying acting with Sanford Meisner, before returning to the screen in this service comedy. He plays a naval officer who has to babysit a madcap Native American sailor (Buddy Hackett in brownface) whose family are rich on oil money. The racism against native Americans here is both casual and formal, but it's a rare Hollywood film at the time where they are shown to have some status in the modern world.

Towards the end of the movie the writers got bored with that plot and make the story about a turkey, which tends to make for a patchy storyline... but it is all done with high spirits and Boone is quite animated; it's a relaxed performance, and his best to date - the Meisner training did pay off. Director Norman Taurog worked several times with Elvis Presley and this feels like it could have been a Presley vehicle. Barbara Eden plays Boone's love interest and again he struggles to kiss her on camera; he comes close a few times but they pull away, which is distracting.

6) State Fair (1962)

Fox blew the dust off another old property for Pat Boone, in this case the 1945 musical State Fair, which had originally been filmed in 1935. Boone (who is top billed) plays the son of a family who have various adventures at a state fair; he gets to romance singer Ann Margret and it's heavily implied they sleep together... the film goes from them embracing then cuts to a shirtless Boone lying in her lap. He also gets drunk on screen for the first time. Way to go, Pat!

This movie has its fans but was a financial disappointment and I think that's because it just doesn't work. It's not the material - sure, it's cheesy, but The Sound of Music (1965) was cheesy and that came along three years later. I feel the main problem is too many key people were miscast. Jose Ferrer was not the right director and most of the cast fall short of their 1945 counterparts:  Tom Ewell seems too urban to play "paw" compared to Charles Winninger; Pamela Tiffin looks like an urban ditz rather than a sweet naive country girl like Jeanne Crain; Bobby Darin (another pop star turned actor) comes across as sleazy rather than sharp like Dana Andrews; Ann-Margret was always better as good girls who looked as though they wanted to be naughty (Viva Las Vegas, Bye Bye Birdie) rather than straight-out naughty girls; Alice Faye looks like Alice Faye coming out of retirement (it was her last film) whereas Fay Bainter felt like a character.  The one exception is Pat Boone who is far better than Dick Haymes - but he can't save things.

Everyone assumed this would be a big hit but it wasn't. Still, Fox signed Boone to a new three-picture contract, although his next movie would be made for MGM-Seven Arts.

7) The Main Attraction (1962)

Pat Boone would later talk how he turned down a chance to star with Marilyn Monroe in an adaptation of William Inge's play Celebration because he felt the material was immoral (it later became The Stripper (1963) with Joanne Woodward and Richard Beymer). However two box office disappointments meant Boone was susceptible to overtures from producer Ray Stark, suggesting the actor change his image.

The Main Attraction was a tale of an amoral drifter (Boone) who lives out of wedlock with an elder circus performer (Mai Zetterling), then falls in love with a bareback horse rider (Nancy Kwan). This was racy stuff for Boone, who says he was attracted by the moral of the picture where his no-good character is redeemed by The Love Of a Good Woman.

Boone says in the original script his character resisted having sex with Kwan, which he liked because he felt it showed his character was growing emotionally. He claims when it came to filming this had been changed so that they slept together. Miscegenation and sex! There was a stand off, Boone complained to the press, and Stark agreed to re-shoot the scene so it's implied Boone and Kwan sleep together instead of showing it. They did this in order to get Boone's co operation publicizing the movie.

It's a weird film, not quite successful, but interesting, which benefits from being shot in Europe and a catchy theme tune. The public didn't particularly like it. Pat Boone said it was because it was too sexy for something starring him, and he's probably right. It was a role that needed an Elvis.

8) The Yellow Canary (1963)

While Elvis Presley was turning out three films a year that were all basically the same, Boone was continually changing genres. In The Yellow Canary he agreed to play another anti-hero, an egotistical singer whose son is kidnapped. A script was prepared by Rod Serling and Boone was going to make it under his new three-picture contract with Fox at $200,000 a film... but then the studio changed management. Daryl F. Zanuck returned to take over and did an audit of all projects. He disliked The Yellow Canary and would have shut it down completely but since Boone had a pay or play contract (as did Serling and co stars Barbara Eden and Steve Forrest), Zanuck flicked it over to Fox's ""B" unit, run by Robert L. Lippert, whose regular director, Maury Dexter, shot it in ten days on a below-the-line budget of $100,000 - less than Boone's fee.

Boone whined about Fox's cheapness but you know something? Zanuck was right. Serling's script isn't very good with too much flowery dialogue. Because it's a thriller the low budget didn't necessarily have to hurt in the hands of an imaginative director - but Dexter was a second-rater. It is interesting to see Boone play someone unpleasant who proves his manhood by shooting someone dead - this was a rare film where the actor used a gun. The movie flopped at the box office.

9) The Horror of It All (1963)
 

 Zanuck doesn't seem to have been a fan of Boone's; the next film he put the actor in was another cheapie for the Lippert unit, this time filmed in England. It was a "comedy chiller" set in an old dark house, directed by Terence Fisher and is populated by a fine supporting cast of English character actors playing various eccentrics (doddery inventor, sexy dame, etc). Boone is a solid straight man and the film lively. It's not up to something like The Cat and the Canary (1939) which it was clearly aping, but those films are harder to do than they look. It's not bad. It could have done with colour and songs.

10) Never Put It In Writing (1964)

Boone's next film was his third cheapie in a row, this time a screwball comedy for Seven Arts. It was written and directed by Andrew L. Stone, best known for his realistic thrillers but who actually started his career with comedies; based on the results here, he had gotten rusty at making them. This is a sluggish, underwritten effort about a man who writes an abusive letter to his boss in pique then tries to retrieve it.

The most interesting thing about this is part of the action was shot in Ireland and there was an accident involving planes while filming at Shannon Airport that led to questions being asked in the Irish parliament. This is the sort of movie that needed songs and colour to compensate for the script; it has neither. Boone's performance is fine, by the way.

By 1963 Boone's albums weren't selling as strongly as they used to (his last top ten hit was in 1962), but it's a mystery why he allowed himself to appear in the three low budget films in a row.  It was this run more than anything that ended his reign as a film star. He did have one more studio picture to go, but it would be as a supporting actor...

11) Goodbye Charlie (1965)

This was gender bending comedy based on a play by George Axelrod that really needed to star Marilyn Monroe and be directed by Billy Wilder - instead it got Debbie Reynolds and Vincent Minnelli. The plot is about a womanizing man who is shot dead and reincarnated in the body of woman (Reynolds) and has to fend off advances from Tony Curtis and Pat Boone. It's not that shocking to see the star of Spartacus (1960) and Some Like It Hot (1959) make moves on a woman not knowing she's a man, but it is a surprise to see Boone to do it. He later admitted to having a drinking problem around this time and shot some scenes for the movie while drunk. You can't tell.

This film remains resolutely undiscovered by queer/feminist film analysts, despite its subject matter and bisexual director (Boone's second!)... I think in part because Reynolds' performance is so utterly sexless it holds any feeling of kinkiness at bay. But there's no denying it - Boone plays a guy who effectively tries to make out with a dude.

The film does have another point of distinction - the opening scene involves a long tracking shot at a party that results in a middle aged man getting annoyed at his wife having sex with a younger hunk, taking out his gun and shooting at the guy...just like in Boogie Nights (1997). The movie was a financial disappointment (though not a flop) and Boone made no further films for Fox.

12) The Greatest Story Ever Told (1965)

After all the sexual confusion in Goodbye Charlie it must have been a relief for Boone to go into his first religious film.  He's one of many star cameos in this George Stevens epic, playing an Angel at the Tomb.

Boone (who is perfectly fine in the role, by the way) was proud of his association with the movie, making you wonder why he didn't appear in more Biblical stories. After all, Fox made a bunch in the early sixties - The Story of Ruth (1960) with Stuart Whitman, Esther and the King (1960) with Richard Egan, and Francis of Assisi (1961) with Bradford Dillman. It might be because shortly after Mardi Gras Boone turned down a role in a film Buddy Adler wanted him to make - The St Bernard Story, where Boone would play a monk who falls in love with a woman. After much soul searching, Boone turned the part down because he felt he couldn't play a Catholic. The film was never made - but if he wouldn't play a Catholic, would he play a Jew? There weren't many Protestants around in Jesus' day. Maybe an angel was the only sort of part he was interested in.

13) The Perils of Pauline (1967)

One of the mysteries of Boone's career was why he didn't support major stars more like say John Wayne or James Stewart - I'm assuming this was due to ego and/or cost. But by the late sixties he was willing to play the leading man alongside the little known Pamela Austin, who is really the protagonist of this silly light hearted adventure. It  was a pilot for a TV series that didn't sell, so was released as a theatrical feature by Universal. It was Boone's fifth comedy of the sixties - he just kept trying to make them.

The basic story has Austin and Boone as childhood sweethearts at an orphanage - he goes off to make his fortune in order to marry her, and spends the rest of the running time of the movie trying to be reunited with her.  They are constantly thwarted by the fact men keep falling in love with Pauline.

There's a surprisingly strong emotional undercurrent to the story - Austin and Boone are soulmates, and just want to get married, but others stop them: lecherous sheiks, pukka sahibs (Terry Thomas!), Russian secret agents, Italian film directors, cosmonauts, gorillas, etc. It's a repetitive storyline, though - Boone and Austin are about to get together, but something stops them - and has the cheerful racism of films of this era (horny Arabs, midgets in Africa).

It is is full of energy and never lets up. The movies it most reminded me of were the 60s AIP beach party comedies, with Frankie Avalon and Annette Funicello. Boone throws himself into his silly role with much enthusiasm  and little kids will like it, especially girls who might identify with Pauline. Incidentally Boone was starting to lose his hair by now and the hair pieces would soon kick in... for all this later talk about the importance of being honest, Boone, like many a star, was cagey about the reality of his hair.

14) The Pigeon (1969)

Boone played a support role in this TV movie starring Sammy Davis Jr - the billing says he made a "special appearance". He did it for the chance to do a dramatic role and says he was surprised to be offered. Was this true? Had he really become so unfashionable that the only role going was supporting Sammy Davis Jr in a TV movie? Boone did seem out of step in the swinging sixties but it's still surprising he wasn't signed up to make, say, a family sitcom. This was The Brady Bunch era after all.

15) The Cross and the Switchblade (1970)

This was Boone's last role as a leading man in a feature until the 2010s. It was a religious themed biopic about a pastor who goes to the streets and teaches gang members about Jesus. It was done very cheaply and looks it but was widely seen among its target audience - I actually think a major studio would've make money out of this had they picked it up.

The film ended Boone's career as a leading man though he's remained active as an actor, guest starring on TV series like Owen Marshall and Moonlighting. He returned to films in the 2010s in Christian themed tales like Boonville Redemption (2016) and A Cowgirl's Story (2017). He continues to sing, and regularly commentates on cultural matters, such as promoting the theory that Barak Obama was born in Kenya and is a Muslim.

His film career remains a fascinating grab bag of genres and missed opportunities with one unadulterated classic, Journey to the Centre of the Earth, one sweet romance, April Love, and two films which spoke very much to his personal beliefs, The Greatest Story Ever Told and The Cross and the Switchblade.

It's completely bizarre that Boone never tried to repeat these movies. It's also weird there are no war films in his oeuvre (he must have been one of the few Fox contract players to not appear in The Longest Day), no Westerns, no adaptations of a Broadway musical - genres that might have given him an extra lease of life as a movie actor. He could have taken roles played by Stuart Whitman, Tom Tryon, Al Hedison but didn't. He wondered why Hollywood no longer made family films but never appeared in any - Fox made some, like Mr Hobbs Takes a Vacation with James Stewart, but also Disney and filmmakers like Joe Cap... yet Boone was MIA.

But to be fair, movie making was just one chapter of Boone's life. He's devoted more time and attention to his efforts as a singer, TV presenter, writer, real estate developer and cultural commentator. But he was the most successful fifties pop star turned movie star after Elvis and that deserves some respect.

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Movie review - "Rain for a Dusty Summer" (1971) *1/2

Called a spaghetti Western but it's not really. It's a Spanish film set in the 1917 Mexican Revolution where Ernest Borgnine shouts a lot as a general who really really hates the Catholic Church. Borgnine's role is only small - he doesn't leave the one set. The star is some actor who plays a smiling guitar playing priest who escapes from the authorities. Some times the tone is light - the priest is in drag - other times it's serious - the army is always shooting innocent people and at the end the priest is killed by a firing squad.

It looks cheap and is badly dubbed. This was the last film from director Arthur Lubin. Catholics may like it. And Lubin/Borgnine completists.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Movie review - "The Devils" (1971) ****1/2

A remarkable film - over the top, intense, moving. Perhaps Russell's masterpiece - I haven't seen all his movies but feel his over the top flamboyance perfectly matched the story.

It's a powerful true story. People get stuck into Russell for twisting and dramatising but the fact is much of what he does is truer than many Hollywood/British versions of historical stories. And I think part of the heated reaction to many about what they saw on screen was the depiction of how corrupt the Church was and how people can get whipped up into frenzies.

It's a film that retains it's power. Nuns going crazy, taking off their clothes and masturbating; priests having their heads shaved and being burnt to death.

It's very biased towards the Oliver Reed character. Russell has written about how it's a man who finds redemption but as he has it Reed's character is admirable from the get go - he's studly, bedding all these women, Gemma Jones (Bridget Jones' mother - quite saucy) falls for him, all the nuns want him, he's smart and wise and brave standing up to the troops to keep the independence of his city state. It's a fairly glamorised depiction of a priest, very heroic, even before he stands up to prosecution and is horribly tortured.

The torture scenes are full on - it's painful and mean, with the witch hunter hysterical. A priest holds up the priest's baby child to watch his father die painfully and cackles. Reed dies in great pain.

And the thing is, this sort of stuff happens in real life - happened a lot, continues to happen, and you see it resurfacing all the time.

There could've been a bit more nuance in Vanessa Redgrave's character - she starts mad and gets more mad. Jones doesn't do much but pant over Reed. However Dudley Sutton (he of the affro) and especially Michael Gothard are superb as baddies - Gothard's deranged, yelling witch hunter is fantastic.

All the acting works - everyone commits. It's an extremely effective film.

Saturday, May 25, 2019

Movie review - "Whistle Down the Wind" (1961) ***

Very simple, sweet, effective film about three kids from the north who believe an escaped convict hiding in their barn is Jesus. The eldest girl is Hayley Mills, Bernard Lee (M from the Bond films) is dad, Alan Bates is excellent as the crim, but the show is stolen by Alan Barnes as the youngest kid.

All the acting is superb - it really was clever for Bryan Forbes to pick this for his debut as a director, because I think it really helped having an actor in charge. The performances are excellent. It's a fine role for Mills, whose casting help get the film financed (her mother wrote the original book). The northern atmosphere is well evoked.

I did feel the story could have done with another twist/development/complication - maybe that would have over complicated things though. I love that this was a box office hit.

Friday, November 17, 2017

Script review - "Mother" by David Aaronofksy (warning: spoilers)

I get why this is polarising - it's a bit wanky, it's very confronting that a baby is killed - but I'm surprised it got such squeals of shock. I guess I'm more used to it having seen all that "in your face" British theatre of the nineties and noughties. At least it has the guts to go there - and is full on and hard core and tries to be different.

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Movie review - "The Prodigal" (1955) * (warning: spoilers)

Dore Schary tried to get MGM in on the biblical craze in the mid 50s, throwing a bunch of money and Cinemascope at this attempted epic. It lost a bundle, and no wonder, for it's pretty bad.

There's no reason why the parable of the prodigal son couldn't have made a good movie. Although it is only a short tale, there's three strong characters - good brother, wastrel brother, strict but loving dad - and a decent three act structure: son goes and blows money, gets forgiveness. You can easily see the chance for a female role - someone to tempt the prodigal.

The writers of this throw away the guts of the story. There's no brotherly conflict- John Dehner, who plays the brother, is hardly in it; he's upset for five seconds then forgives his brother. The dad, played by Walter Hampden, is barely in it too - he pops in at the beginning and the end.

Instead you've got Edmund Purdom making friends with a mute slave, James Mitchell, who used to be owned by Louis Calhern. Purdom gets the hots for priestess Lana Turner, and asks for his money and dumps dull but pretty betrothed Audrey Dalton for her. Then there's this subplot about Purdom and some beggars rising up against oppressors.

I was confused by this film. What should have been a simple story was needlessly complicated, bringing in this mute servant, and beggars, and priests. I wasn't sure what religion people were - I get that Purdom was Jewish but what was everyone else? Why were the baddies bad? Why did Turner have to die? She didn't do anything bad except be a priestess; she seems to like Purdom and was nice to that little girl. Why not use the brother/dad/good girl more? Why not be clearer what was going on? Why not redeem Turner?

The cast aren't up to it. Turner has a suprisingly small role and looks good but is too sympathetic - she needed to be a real vamp. As it is, when she's killed by a mob you feel depressed, and you hate Purdom. Purdom is weak and made me have fresh appreciation for Charlton Heston.

The production design is fantastic, costumes brilliant and Richard Thorpe keeps it banging along. But it's an awful story and I'm really starting to resent Dore Schary at MGM - he simply didn't have the knack for this sort of thing.

Thursday, September 08, 2016

Movie review - "Shoes of the Fisherman" (1968) **

Why did they give this the blockbuster treatment? I get that it was a bestseller, but surely in the late 60s MGM must have given pause as to whether a story of the Vatican set in the near-future deserved to be road-showed. At its heart this is a film about a bunch of character actors talking in rooms. It doesn't require spectacular locations or stars.

For instance, was there really a point for the opening sequence of a Siberian mining camp where we meet priest Anthony Quinn? Sure it looks cool but the film could've started with him arriving from prison. Actually the story doesn't really start until 50 minutes in when the Pope dies. 

Not that it's much of a story: Quinn becomes Pope, gets asked to mediate between Communist Russia (in the form of Laurence Olivier) and Red China (in the form of Bert Kwouk). Quinn solves the problem by promising to give away all the Church's money. The end. There's a subplot about a priest mate of Quinn's, Oskar Werner, having controversial beliefs.

Opportunities for drama are missed wholesale. Quinn as a priest in a Siberian prison might have made an interesting story - but the movie starts with him getting out. Quinn as a Pope giving away all the Church's money (Mr Deeds Goes to the Vatican) could've been interesting (what would cardinals do, etc) - but the movie ends with that. Quinn as a Pope fighting dark forces in the Vatican could've been interesting - kind of hinted at by Leo McKern's political seeming cardinal - but it isn't really developed. Quinn having a friendship with a troublesome priest Oskar Werner could've been interesting - but I didn't get what the beliefs were, and there's no consequences because Werner dies of a convenient hemorrhage. Quinn as pope ducking out to meet ordinary people could've been interesting (Henry V, Roman Holiday) but he just meets one lady, gives her a homily and that's it.

There's an awful subplot about the marriage troubles of TV journalist (David Janssen, giving basically the same performance he did in The Green Berets), complete with a visit to a "fast" party with dancing extras and sixties music.

The inside-the-Vatican stuff was interesting to a non-Catholic - what happens when a Pope dies, the procedure when a priest is under attack for his teachings (Oskar Werner). Some of the visuals are striking - the final Papal procession, the voting cardinals.

I liked the cast. There's no compromises, really - Quinn is ideal as the cardinal, John Gielgud is an effective pope, Werner was excellent, Olivier can do this stuff in his sleep, McKern is an imposing cardinal who deserved a better film. The women are weaker but they have terrible characters to play.

The sheer fact this film exists is fascinating - a multi million dollar look at Vatican politics. I just wish it had been better.