Showing posts with label George Marshall. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Marshall. Show all posts

Friday, December 31, 2021

Movie review - "Cry for Happy" (1961) **

 Films set in Japan were all the rage in the late 1950s but this was one at the tale end of the cycle - I think it flopped. Glenn Ford is once again an American serviceman abroad, this time working for the navy. He and some other sailors including Glenn Ford get billetted at a geisha house.

The girls, Miko Taka and Miyoshi Umeki, were both in Sayonara. James Shigeta and Chet Douglas are other sailors.

There's a really unfunny extended bit in the middle where everyone watches a film with Japanese actors in a Western. Actually a lot of this is unfunny. It reaches for charm and doesn't get there. O'Connor's role is relatively small... I felt this would be better as a straight out buddy comedy.

Apparently Bobby Darin was up for a role in this but couldn't make it work schedule wise. O'Connor's part? Douglas's?

This is one of those films where the elements are there - the concept, stars, director all seem appropriate - but it just doesn't work. Maybe it's the lack of a core romance for Ford. Maybe it was too early to have really racy fun with the subject matter. Or they were too worried about offending people. Or something. It doesn't work.

Location filming is pleasant. And it was good to see actual Japanese actors given decent parts.

Saturday, February 06, 2021

Movie review - "When the Daltons Rode" (1940) **1/2

 Presumably Universal were hoping for their own Jesse James after the 1939 success of that movie, for this shares many of the same elements: based on the story of outlaw brothers who are pushed into crime by evil developers, a worried mother. Universal splashed the cash, provided a decent cast (including Randolph Scott, Kay Francis, Broderick Crawford, Brian Donlevy and Andy Devine) and budget, as well as one of their leading directors, George Marshall.

The action scenes are well staged, particularly a train robbery and the final shoot out, and it moves at a fair clip.

It doesn't entirely work. There's a dramatic flaw at the centre of the movie: it lacks lead characters for us to hook into. I guess Randolph Scott is meant to be the star but he doesn't do much: he's a fictitious character, a childhood friend of the boys who is working as a lawyer and tries to help them but doesn't (they go to crime in the movie). There's a plot where he falls for Broderick Crawford's gal (Francis) but it doesn't mean much since Scott and Crawford spend barely any time together (the brothers don't even remember him at the beginning when he comes into town) so Scott doesn't feel torn.

Crawford is excellent. Andy Devine is effective (I like these women fighting over him) and has a moving death scene. Brian Donlevy is wasted in his part - he looks dynamic and you expect him to play an important part but he doesn't. Francis doesn't have much to do but I did enjoy seeing someone with her star power in the role - and her acting is fine, she conveys "tormented" well.

Really the film should have been about brothers in love with the same girl and they all wind up dead. I wonder if that was the original concept.

Thursday, February 04, 2021

Movie review - "The Perils of Pauline" (1947) **1/2

 I don't know much about Pearl White but this felt fictionalised... just a vibe. It does capture a spirit of silliness and fun and is ideal for Betty Hutton, as the plucky sewer who becomes an actor, isn't very good then becomes famous as a star of silent serials.

Hutton has spunk and energy. She doesn't look a great physical type - I didn't buy her doing stunts - but she's fun. 

The film focuses a lot on her relationship with actor John Lund. I dislike Lund as an actor generally - this movie didn't make me change my mind. Billy de Wolfe is ideally cast as a camp actor who works with Hutton and Lund, and William Demarest is a director. It is sweet how Hutton is mentored by an old time actor, Constance Collier - their friendship is lovely and unexpected.

Director George Marshall worked in the silent film era and the movie has a lot of engaging affection for that period. I might like this movie more if I was more familiar with the era. In 1947 it would've been very much in the common memory.

People occasionally break out into song so technically it's a musical but there aren't that many songs so it doesn't feel like one.

Wednesday, February 03, 2021

Movie review - "The Forest Rangers" (1942) ** (warning: spoilers)

 Paramount splashed a bit of cash with this - its got colour, extras, some forest fires. The film didn't quite work for me. The story is promising: Fred MacMurray is a forest ranger trying to figure out some arsonist, and also torn between two women, socialite Paulette Goddard and tomboy Susan Hayward.

But it didn't come together.

The arson mystery isn't much of a mystery: Albert Dekker is set up as the baddy and once Dekker is killed you know it's got to be Regis Toomey because Toomey is the only other character of substance. 

Also the romance isn't much because I never believed that Goddard was into Fred MacMurray or that MacMurray didn't notice Hayward wanted him or that Hayward was into MacMurray or Hayward's villanousness. Compare with Orchestra Wives another woman-marries-man-she-just-met story: I believed that because Ann Rutherford was a small town gal and George Montgomer was so glamorous. Here Goddard is glamorous and MacMurray a fire due. I mean, they could have made it work showing Goddard's life to be shallow and full of weak men so she likes he man MacMurray but we start off the story from MacMurray's point of view.

The clash between Hayward and Goddard felt contrived, in part because Hayward is so stunning, and shot stunningly, she never seems like a tomboy. I mean, that flowing hair, come on...

Maybe the real issue for me with this film is casting. Possibly these problems would have gone away with, I don't know, Sterling Hayden or John Wayne or Joel McCrea in the MacMurray role... I didn't buy Uncle Fred as a macho dude. Maybe it was needing to see more from Goddard's POV to make clear why she'd go for him. Maybe it needed Hayward to be the baddy and to have Goddard more active, to give an extra dimension to Hayward's hostility.

There is a catchy song and it's cool that it is in colour.

Tuesday, February 02, 2021

Movie review - "The Sheepman" (1958) *** (warning: spoilers)

 A flabby sort of shaggy dog movie but it has a lot of charm, starting with its central idea: Glenn Ford wins some sheep in a poker game and tries to run them but comes up against prejudice and a cattle baron (Leslie Nielsen).

Actually more could have been done with that idea - scenes with sheep, Ford could've had a relationship with particular sheep, some shearing comedy, etc. There was more potential. I think they should have started with the game instead of telling it in reportage.

But Nielsen is fine as the villain and Shirley Maclaine adds from freshness as the girl (even if she does seem too young for Ford) and I liked seeing character types like Edgar Buchanan, Mickey O'Shaugnessy and especially Pernell Roberts, excellent as a killer.

Has an enjoyable quasi comic tone that many films from writer Bill Bowers had. I loved that Ford sold the sheep in the end because he didn't like him. The Mexican hand who then went and died was a little predictable.

Saturday, January 30, 2021

Movie review - "You Can't Cheat an Honest Man" (1939) ***

 This was probably funnier if you grew up with WC Fields and Edgar Bergen and were very familiar with their feud... I had vaguely heard of it. It inspired this plot where Bergen falls in love with Fields' daughter (Constance Moore).

There's not a lot of family stuff though - which I think was a mistake. Most of the action is set at the circus which Fields runs. Better if Moore had worked there. There's a millionaire who loves Moore and a comic table tenis game at the end.

George Marshall is credited as director but apparently Fields didn't like him and another man took over for Fields' scenes. Still, decent credit for Marshall to have.

Movie review - "Monsieur Beaucaire" (1946) ***1/2

 Fun Bob Hope movie - I enjoy seeing him in period pictures. This one is set in the court of Louis XV where he's a barber. Duke Patric Knowles, a dashing man/great fighter, etc, is sent to marry the daughter of the king of Spain... Hope gets confused for him causing comic antics and life and death struggles against baddies.

The film involves two people who I also like: director George Marshall (a new favourite) and female lead Joan Caulfield (always bright and chipper, a sort of back up Paulette Goddard). Knowles is dull and irritating - he was lucky to still get second leads in studio pictures by this stage. Sorry if any family members of his come across this. I don't mean to be cruel. I wish Knowles had turned out to be a villain.

It's in black and white but the period settings still impress.


Wednesday, January 27, 2021

Movie review - "Murder He Says" (1945) ***

 Fun comedy with pollster Fred MacMurray caught up with a family of murderous hillbillies: Margery Main, her husband, her twin sons and crazy daughter. Helen Thompson is the visitor looking for cash.

I did wish the leads were Bob Hope and Paulette Goddard but the ones we have are game, the support cast excellent. I was maybe expecting something better - this has a growing cult - but it was clever and funny. There's a Ghostbreakers injoke from director George Marshall, who also made this.

Tuesday, January 26, 2021

Movie review - "The Ghost Breakers" (1940) ****

 There's no hiding much of this humour is problematic -well, one aspect in particular, Willie Best, who plays Bob Hope's black servant. Best is very talented playing the role going and he is funny but it hasn't aged well.

Hope and Paulette Goddard have aged marvellously - a wonderful team in a comedy chiller, as Gene Wilder called them, she's pretty and game, he's cowardly but determined to pull through for her. They seem to genuinely enjoy each other's company.

Support includes Paul Lukas, Anthony Quinn (in a double role) and Richard Carlson, all of whom could be baddies which adds to the fun as does the castle on a island, genuine voodoo types.

George Marshall directed, one of many superior movies he made in an under-rated career.

Saturday, November 21, 2020

Movie review - "Houdini" (1953) ***

 A very sweet biopic of the famous escape artist - I assume hugely fictionalised. Gorgeous photography, sets and costumes and Tony Curtis and Janet Leigh are extremely likeable in the leads. They are young a fresh faced and their chemistry works a treat.

Curtis is clearly trying and gives a good performance. Leigh is lovely. No one else gets much of a look in.  Michael Pate pops up as a heckling Brit. Connie Gilchrist, who soon went to Oz to play in Long John Silver, is in it as well.

George Pal should have done more biopics. I guess tom thumb and The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm fall into that category. Directed with typical unobtrusive skill by George Marshall.

Friday, November 13, 2020

Movie review - "Beyond Mombasa" (1956) *** (warning: spoilers)

 A sort of remake of Duel in the Jungle from the same producers (Todon, company of Donna Reed), same director (George Marshall), shot on location which focuses on white people on an expedition.

This one has Cornel Wilde investigating his disappearing brother, accompanied by Leo Genn and Genn's niece Donna Reed. Reed is lovely, Wilde is ideal for this sort of stuff (Aldo Ray turned down the role... why?), Genn is fun, especially at the end when he goes nutty, Christopher Lee is even more fun as a big game hunter who may be a baddy, Ron Randell is on hand as another person who may be a baddy.

Randell's voice is dubbed - poor Ron! Nice photography of Kenya. The leopard men are fun.

Monday, November 09, 2020

Movie review - "Duel in the Jungle" (1954) ***

 First film in Britain from Tony Owens, Mr Donna Reed who made a series of movies there. It was a hit and launched him on a producing career.

It's a decent adventure, with reliable Dana Andrews as an insurance investigator who sexually harrasses Jeanne Crain, then goes along with her on a trip to find her husband, David Farrar.

The cast has people like George Colouris and Wilfred Hyde White. It has African location footage - Northern Rhodesia and South Africa, some quite decent. 

Black actors barely have any dialogue. We see some British patrol officers. Farrar is an excellent louse. The basic story I think is a modern day version of the Granger-Kerr King Solomon's Mines. Crain is bland. Andrews solid. 

Good basic structure. George Marshall directs well. Decent action and adventure.

Sunday, September 01, 2019

The Good and Bad Luck of Veronica Lake

Veronica Lake wasn't among the top tier of 1940s film stars - not in terms of box office status, or publicity, or earning power. Yet she's lingered in the public memory in a way few of her contemporaries have. Part of this is due to her legendary peek-a-boo haircut, immortalized by Jessica Rabbit,  Kim Basinger in LA Confidential (1997), and a sight gag in The Major and the Minor (1942). Part of it is her personal narrative of immense tragedy - from extra to film star to bankrupt alcoholic has-been in little over a decade. Part of it is the fact that more than a third of the movies she starred in were masterpieces - no kidding, more than a third, which is a pretty amazing ratio.

Veronica Lake had some of the best luck of any movie star in history.

And some of the worst.

She was born in 1922, and given the name Constance Ockelman. Her father died in an accident when she was ten; mom remarried and Constance took her stepfather's surname, Keane. The family moved to Los Angeles in 1938 where the teenager became interested in acting, appearing as an extra in a number of films, and doing some plays.

Her surge to stardom was almost absurd in its rapidity. Paramount producer Arthur Hornblow Jr was searching for an unknown to play the part of a night club singer in a military drama, I Wanted Wings (1940). He was shown footage of Constance performing a scene in a play, and was intrigued; she was tested, cast and signed to a long-term contract with Paramount, who changed her name to "Veronica Lake".

I Wanted Wings was a forerunner to Top Gun (1986), focusing on the lives and loves of air force cadets at flight school, and is homoerotic as anything in that Tom Cruise classic. The plot focuses on the friendship between aspiring pilots William Holden and Ray Milland; Holden loves Milland so much that he’s willing to marry Lake, the hussy set on nabbing Milland and wrecking his air force career and relationship with a feisty photographer (Constance Moore); of course if helps that Holden once loved Lake (until she destroyed him and sent him off to enlist).

The movie is an entirely decent piece of 1940 Hollywood hokum, mostly worth seeing today for Lake. She doesn’t appear until more than half-way through but it’s a spectacular entrance – singing in a nightclub under a spotlight - and she lifts the entire movie: pint-sized, seductive, mischievous, with a delectable voice and mien. She plays a temptress (Holden calls her "a cheap little jig"), but a sympathetic one – Lake genuinely thinks she falls pregnant to Milland and freaks out. And you feel sorry for her at the end –  when it looks as though Holden might get back in the air force, she turns up announcing she’s killed someone (!), asks Holden to help her, and winds up hiding in a plane just before it takes off on a bombing run; then when she’s on board she freaks out and sets off a flare, almost crashing the plane; she later dies in a crash, a martyred, story-generating, empathetic minx. It's a fantastic part and Lake is sensational in it.

Constance Moore, the other lead female lead, plays an unusually strong female character for the time. She's glamorous, works as a photographer, tells Milland she doesn't want to give up her enjoyable single life unless it's worth it, scolds Milland for his bad treatment of Lake (who he's slept with and then pays off with a check). But no one really remembers Moore today, or paid much attention then; while talented and beautiful, she lacks what the former Constance Keane had - X factor.

Lake had two other strokes of good fortune while making I Wanted Wings. First, during the shoot her long blonde hair accidentally fell over her right eye during a take and created a "peek-a-boo" effect - a hairstyle which subsequently swept the nation and launched a copycat craze. Secondly the movie was released just as audiences in then-neutral America were ravenous for stories about how prepared their armed services were for war (eg Dive Bomber, Buck Privates). I Wanted Wings was a huge hit, Lake stole the notices and was launched a movie star.

She hadn't even turned twenty.

Then she went and made every aspiring starlet in Hollywood have even less realistic career aspirations by starring in five classic movies in a row.

First was Preston Sturges' Sullivan's Travels (1941), about a wealthy director (Joel McCrea) who decides to pretend he is homeless in order to experience "real life". Lake was the girl - billed as The Girl - he meets on his travels. She is captivating, magical, and extremely sexy, whether sitting on McCrea's lap in a bathrobe and combing his hair or walking along the road in a hobo overcoat (Lake was six month's pregnant during production). She wasn't great with all her dialogue but Sturges made her spit it out at rapid-fire pace, and protected her limitations. It's a performance for the ages.

Paramount then put Lake in a thriller, This Gun for Hire (1942), where she once again plays a night club singer; this time she's a goodie though, helping fight Nazis. She's engaged to Robert Preston but most people forget that bit - what they remember, deservedly, are the scenes she shares with a gunman played by Alan Ladd, an actor who been paying dues for around a decade until This Gun for Hire catapulted him to stardom. He gives an electric debut star performance - cold, blonde, tough, mysterious, ruthless, cat loving, redeemable - and stole the film, but a lot of this was due to Lake, who matches him beautifully (at five foot two, she was one of the few female actors shorter than him); poor old Robert Preston is completely overshadowed. Like Sullivan's Travels, there's a scene where Lake dons her male co-star's overcoat and hat - she does look like a cutie but it's interesting she was already repeating her iconic scenes. The movie was her third huge success.

The studio promptly reunited Ladd and Lake in The Glass Key (1942), based on a novel by Dashiell Hammett and directed by the un-renowned Stuart Heisler. It's another superb film noir, achingly gorgeous to look at, and less weighed down by patriotism than This Gun for Hire. Lake is clearly inexperienced but is so beautiful and enigmatic you overlook her flaws, and she once again teams marvelously with Ladd - two blonde shorties, full of mutual smirking/contempt/admiration. The core of the film is a platonic love story between Ladd and Brian Donlevy - but these actors don't have chemistry; Ladd and Lake do. She gets to go off with Ladd at the end in this one (although watching it you feel she would be better off hooking up with Donlevy who, after all, not only has money and ambition but hid the identity of a murderer to protect her - but then fans weren't clamoring for Lake-Donlevy teamings).

Lake returned to comedy with I Married a Witch (1942), playing the title deity who ensnares Fredric March in matrimony. Directed by Rene Clair, this is wickedly funny, an absolute delight - due greatly to Lake who was never more alluring, strutting around in men's pajamas, casting spells, chasing after Marsh and causing devilry. This was her only fantasy movie and it beggars belief that Paramount never tried her again in that genre - she had a vaguely "otherworld" appearance (that hair, that voice) perfect for it.

After making a cameo in Star Spangled Rhythm (1942) Lake appeared in her fifth classic, So Proudly We Hail (1943), a melodrama about American nurses during the Battle of the Philippines. She was billed after Claudette Colbert and Paulette Goddard, but still had a juicy part as a traumatized nurse who kills herself in a suicide bombing attack against the Japanese. Lake's breakdown scene shows her limitations but over all it's a splendidly effective performance, with a spectacular on-screen death - she should have played more death scenes in her career, she had a very good track record in that department.

By now, Lake had become one of Paramount's biggest stars, effective in comedy, thrillers and drama. It hadn't been an entirely smooth ride  - there were rumours of a bad temperament and a drinking problem; Joel McCrea had been originally cast in I Married a Witch but refused to work with her again; March disliked her; the US government asked her to change her hairstyle because women who imitated it were getting their tresses caught in factory machines. But she had enjoyed a dream run.

Then things started to go wrong.

Very wrong.

Paramount cast her in The Hour Before Dawn (1944), as a Nazi spy who marries a conscientious objector (Franchot Tone). Despite being based on a story by Somerset Maugham and directed by Frank Tuttle, who did This Gun for Hire, the film was egregious, flopped at the box office, and Lake copped a lot of the blame.

It wasn't really her fault.  Yes, she's not very good, uncomfortable with an accent and not really capable of conveying too much depth, but lots of other people in the movie are even worse:  Tone is less convincing as an Englishman than Lake is as an Austrian refugee, David Leland is truly shocking, John Sutton is horrendous and the actors playing Lake's fellow agents all ham it up. There is novelty in Tone playing a conscientious objector but it also means he's passive for most of the running time, unaware his wife is up to no good. There's no chemistry between him and Lake - you never feel he loves her, or she feels anything for him other than contempt.  Tuttle's direction lacks atmosphere. And what's with that ending where Tone murders Lake? Okay, yes, she's tried to kill him but she's run out of bullets so it is murder - then they cut to Tone happily flying in a bomber? Yuk. This film gets more irritating the longer it goes on. (Aside: I'm going to start spoiling the endings of the bad Lake movies from now on because I'm assuming no one's seen them or is going to. End of aside.)

On the personal front things got really rough. Lake's second child was born prematurely and died after a few days. Her first marriage ended in divorce. She began to drink heavily.

Paramount gave her a few months off then put her in a musical, Bring on the Girls (1945), about a millionaire (Eddie Bracken) who joins the navy anonymously; he is chaperoned by a friend (Sonny Tufts) and falls for a slinky dame (Lake). Sidney Lanfield directed.

After the debacle of The Hour Before Dawn and the traumas of her private life Lake was carefully protected in this film - not given too much action, not having to carry the bulk of the plot, being cast in a role which is the variation of the one she played in I Wanted Wings - to wit, a gold-digging night club girl (though Lake doesn't sing). Her character supposedly ripped off Tufts back in the day and to be honest the movie would've been better had this been true - but then it turns out, gee, she only did it because she thought he was married and wanted to send money back to his kid. She's a good girl after all! Lake winds up with Tufts and Bracken is palmed off to Marjorie Reynolds and none of it's very interesting - an opinion shared even by the movie-mad public of 1945 who turned this into a flop, Lake's second in a row

There were reports of bad behavior by Lake at a war bond drive in Boston, resulting in Paramount giving her the third lead in Out of This World (1945), supporting Diana Lynn and Bracken. This was a musical spoof of Frank Sinatra's popularity among bobby soxers, directed by Hal Walker. Lynn steps in to a role meant for Betty Hutton and her  casting throws off the whole movie - she's only nineteen, too young to be romantically matched with Bracken in a non-icky way, too pretty to be matched in a believable way, and too fresh faced and smart to be believably enmeshed in wacky schemes.

Lake is completely wasted in her part; they set her up as this unscrupulous PR person who hypes Bracken... but then she completely disappears from the movie for the middle section. The film cries out for Lake's character to be used more - to be a rival to Lynn, to romance Bracken, to cause trouble, something... But she just kind of hangs around. As if aware of the script and casting problems, the filmmakers shove in a tonne of production value - singers, dancers, pianists; there's even a cameo from Bing Crosby's kids. But the picture is appalling. Flop number three.

In both Bring on the Girls and Out of this World Lake's character should have been bad but wasn't. I'm assuming this was due to Lake's whingeing - "I don't want to be unsympathetic, my fans will hate me", etc, etc, - although it may have been studio incompetence. Whoever was to blame,  it meant she played these weird half-and-half roles - people who should have been bad, but weren't, but weren't that sympathetic, either.

Things turned around a little with Miss Susie Slagle's (1945) an utterly delightful look at a boarding house for medical students in 1910. It was produced by John Houseman, who normally made films of quality, directed by first-timer John Barry, and features charming performances from Sonny Tufts and Joan Caulfield (not making that up, both are genuinely beguiling). Lake is top billed, but it's not a very big part, as a nurse who falls for a doctor student who dies. She isn't very good: she never seems comfortable and, painful as this is to admit, is one of the worst things about the movie. But at least it didn't flop.

Paramount tried her with Bracken a third time in Hold That Blond (1945), a picture which was originally conceived as a Bob Hope vehicle and looks it. Directed by George Marshall, this is the sort of movie that should have been great fun but just isn't; Bracken flails about, Lake is dull and lacking sexiness, and together they lack the chemistry of, say, Bob Hope and Paulette Goddard. You could always see what Hope and Goddard saw in each other - both had so much energy, she was super pert and pretty, he was smart despite his cowardice and looked good compared to the villains they would come up against. In this film Lake is cute but bland; Bracken is an anxious kleptomaniac who is a pain in the backside - they're not good for each other, he has a mental health issue that isn't dealt with by the end, neither are fun to hang out with. The film was not popular.

Lake's acting seemed to be getting worse the more she did it. What was going wrong? The drinking, divorce and trauma of losing her child could not have helped. I also think Lake had a natural quality that her first films caught like lightning in a bottle, but which she lost as time went on. Untrained, she had no technique to fall back on, and really floundered without a strong script.

She could still be effective, though, if handled in the right way. After five bad performances in a row in four dud movies, her career was revived when reunited with Alan Ladd in The Blue Dahlia (1946), produced by Houseman and directed by Marshall, based on a script by Raymond Chandler. It's a fantastic film noir, full of atmosphere, intrigue, crackling dialogue and sensational performances, which was recognized as a classic almost immediately and made a tonne of money. Lake's part is relatively small, though effective, as a slinky dame who you first think might be bad but turns out to be good.

Lake then made her first film outside Paramount since she became a star: Ramrod (1947), a Western directed by Andrea de Toth, who was her second husband. Lake is a tough dame living on the range who is picked on by nasty tycoon Preston Foster, so she hires gunslinger Joel McCrea as her "ramrod". But McCrea isn't the only hero - that duty is split with Don De Fore as a ruthless drifter who also fights on Lake's side, and, to be honest, overshadows McCrea.

This is a story full of shades and moral ambiguities - Lake is kind of a goodie but also a baddie. She's keen to flirt with men to get them to do what she wants and encourages De Fore to create a stampede so McCrea will be more on her side; she genuinely falls for McCrea but he ends up dumping her because she's a bad girl.. even though she's not really bad, she just did what she had to do to defend her ranch (mind you, that was typical of Hollywood during the post war years, when independent women had to be put in their place). As a result, the movie is a bit out of kilter - you have more sympathy for Lake, who has more at stake than McCrea, who is just a hired hand. It also might have more impact if McCrea had genuine feelings for Lake but he seems quite happy to go off at the finale with bland Arleen Whelan. Ramrod isn't perfect but it is interesting, and it's fun to see Lake in a Western, riding a horse, ordering cowboys off her land and the like; it's one of her best later performances. The picture was a box office success.

Back at Paramount she was reunited with Ladd and her old hair style in Saigon (1948).  Directed by Leslie Fenton, it's the least effective of the four films they made together (not counting the all-star musicals where they both cameo-ed as themselves - Star Spangled Rhythm, Duffy's Tavern, Variety Girl) which starts off excellently but tails away in its second half. The storyline feels cobbled together from elements of previous Paramount hits, particularly ones starring  Ladd: he's a war veteran in the third world (as in Calcutta, China); he's a pilot tight with members of his bomb crew (Calcutta, The Blue Dahlia); one of the flyers is terminally ill (You Came Along); there's a dodgy criminal, his henchman and mysterious police chief (The Blue Dahlia, The Glass Key); Ladd is kind of in love with his best male friend and they also both love the same girl (The Glass Key). There are some superb support performances and Lake's acting is solid - she totally suits the world of backlot studio exotica, with its back projection, smoke-drenched nightclubs and intrigue. Saigon is commonly referred to a flop but it actually performed reasonably well at the box office and demonstrated Lake still had appeal with the public.

Her next film at Paramount, however, was abysmal. To understand why Isn't It Romantic (1948) was even made in the first place you need to know that nostalgic family pieces in historical settings were all the rage in the 1940s - Meet Me in St Louis, Life with Father, I Remember Mama, etc. This load of old codswallop is set in Indiana during Reconstruction, and focuses on three sisters - Lake, Mona Freeman and Mary Hatcher - whose idiotic father is obsessed with the Civil War (he runs around in a Confederate uniform) and won't get a job; I think he's meant to be lovable ol' dad but he just comes across as a lazy, racist separatist, uncharmingly played by Roland Culver. We're supposed to feel for him at the end when he realizes he got swindled; I wanted him to shoot himself, like that Confederate officer in The Ox Bow Incident (1943). These sort of movies are hard to pull off for directors - Henry King and John Ford could do it, but it's beyond Norman McLeod here. Lake seems awkward. Maybe with colour and more elaborate musical numbers it might have gone over. But it doesn't.

Lake followed this with The Sainted Sisters (1948), directed by William D. Russell, which  sounds like it could be fun - the tale of two female con artists on the lam in the 1890s (more nostalgia!). Okay the 1890s isn't an inherently funny period, but female con artists is at least different, and Richard Maibaum wrote the script, and maybe this would've worked if Betty Hutton had been able to play the lead, as originally intended. Instead Paramount went with Lake who is disastrously miscast, lacking sparkle and verve in a part that needs, well, Hutton - or even Diana Lynn.  Joan Caulfield has some game as her sister but is mostly just pretty. Mind you, neither have much of a character to play - you never get the sense these two are con artists or how they came to be con artists.

Why do the filmmakers introduce the millionaire scammed by the girls (Harold Vermilyea) at the beginning and never see him again? Why don't they have the local bitch (Belulah Bondi) do something really bad? Why don't they have someone chasing after the girls - a detective, say? They set up a sheriff (George Reeves) but he never seems to suspect the girls - he just falls in love with both and struggles to make up his mind between them, which makes him an idiot and ensures the love story is unsatisfactory. They establish Lake as the more ruthless and greedy of the sisters, which is fine, but instead of making her a villain and Caulfield the goodie, as they should, Lake again is a-bit-bad-but-really-good in a way that undermines the story's drama; she comes good, falls for Reeves (no chemistry, no build up, he's clearly better suited to Caulfield), and Caulfield has a conveniently invented alternate love interest. If you haven't seen the movie, and I'm guessing you haven't, none of this will make any sense but trust me - it's not worth seeing, another misfire from Paramount who subsequently refused to renew Lake's contract.

Lake had some incredible luck early in her career, but karma came around and got her back in spades. Yes, she wasn't a very good actor. Yes, she had to be carefully used. Yes she had a problematic private life and no doubt an erratic attitude. But most of the Paramount films she appeared in during the second half of her career were simply ineptly made - they helped killed the careers of Eddie Bracken, Joan Caulfield and Diana Lynn as much as Lake.

It's a shame she wasn't teamed with Ladd more - she could've easily slipped into, say, OSS  (1946) (as she did on radio) or Wild Harvest (1947) or Calcutta (1947). She may have refused these parts, to be fair, I don't know - it's just a pity since Ladd was rarely as effective with another girl.

There was also a curious reluctance from Paramount to use her as an out-and-out vamp. Lake looked like a bad girl but rarely played one - there was always some excuse or redemption for her behavior. Sometimes this made the film more interesting (eg The Blue Dahlia) but often it weakened the drama - several of her pictures would've been better had she played a flat-out villain eg The Sainted Sisters, Bring on the Girls, Out of This World, Miss Susie Slagle's. She was a natural femme fetale who they kept trying to soften.

Maybe it was simply bad luck. But it's as hard to slog through Lake's last films at Paramount as it is a pleasure to watch her first few. And that's a shame because for all her many flaws she still had more individuality than the bulk of starlets under contract to the studio at the time like, say, Mona Freeman or Wanda Hendrix.

Lake didn't immediately slide into obscurity once she left the studio. De Toth cast her as the second lead in Slattery's Hurricane (1949) at Fox, playing a woman who is kind-a-sort-a meant to be a drug addict, but it's hard to tell due to censorship. Lake, billed third after Richard Widmark (channeling Dana Andrews) and Linda Darnell (good value), gives a poor performance  - the sexy bombshell of Alan Ladd pictures looks like a bland wallflower doormat - she's got no spunk or life, she's a colorless nothing.

She appeared in Stronghold (1951), an independently financed Western shot in Mexico with Zachary Scott and Arturo de Cordova - a film that has a good story buried underneath confused execution. Lake is wooden but at least looks fine. That was her last Hollywood-ish movie.

Lake's last few decades were sad. She and De Toth filed for bankruptcy (the IRS seized their home for unpaid taxes), and got divorced; she was sued by her mother for financial support; she left her children in the custody of their fathers and became estranged from them. She did a little TV and a lot of theater, was arrested for public drunkenness, worked as a waitress, and got married and divorced again. She wrote her memoirs and did the interview circuit, not always appearing sober; and made two last films, Footsteps in the Snow (1967) and Flesh Fiend (1970).  She had mental health issues that were not always properly dealt with, did a lot of traveling and too much drinking. There were some good times. She died in 1973 of kidney failure and hepatitis.

Her career as a star is fascinating, because it began with such a bang and ended with such a whimper. Films such as Sullivan's Travels, I Married a Witch, This Gun for Hire, The Glass Key, So Proudly We Hail and The Blue Dahlia retain their power to enchant and delight. Her appearance in I Wanted Wings remains captivating. She and Alan Ladd formed one of the all time great screen teams.

She was never a good actor - she could be downright terrible - but was a star.

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Movie review - "Hold That Blonde" (1945) **

Eddie Bracken made a big splash in a few Preston Sturges films but never managed to stabilise his stardom. This was a vehicle for his talents - although it feels like something Bob Hope passed up. He's got a pretty "straight woman" (Veronica Lake), Willie Best in support, George Marshall as director, and a decent concept - a kleptomaniac gets involved with jewel thieves - but it just doesn't work.

I don't know what went wrong. Marshall has some excellent comedies on his resume, Bracken could be fantastic, so could Lake (see Sullivan's Travels and I Married a Witch). But the result is flat and dull. Bracken flails about. Lake is dull and lacking sexiness. Maybe the two of them required really special handling of Preston Sturges or Rene Clair. They're definitely no Bob Hope and Paulette Goddard.

Bracken and Lake have zilch chemistry. You could always see what Hope and Goddard saw in each other - both had so much energy, she was super pert and pretty, he was smart despite his cowardice and looked good compared to the villains and dodgy types in the film, and would stick by Goddard. Lake is pretty but dull; Bracken is an anxious kleptomaniac who is a pain in the backside - they're not good for each other, he has a mental problem that isn't dealt with by the end. Neither have much pep.

Maybe it would have helped if there's been some spooky ghost angle - or something involving spies, where the stakes were bigger (eg national security). Jewel theft feels so light. The script isn't particularly good - it lacks strong gags.

Albert Dekker is an investigating cop; George Zucco appears as a shrink; Frank Fenton is the head baddie. Everyone on this film has a strong resume, but it just doesn't work.


Friday, January 29, 2016

Movie review - "The Blue Dahlia" (1946) ****

I've seen this film a bunch of times now and the first half is easily the most vivid - Alan Ladd, William Bendix and Hugh Beaumount as veterans back in LA; Bendix ordering "bourbon with a bourbon chaser" and showing off the metal plate in his head; Ladd meeting his wife Doris Dowling and seeing she's got a lover Howard da Silva; Dowling telling Ladd how she accidentally killed their son; Ladd being picked up as a hitchhiker by Veronica Lake; Will Wright as the slimy hotel detective; the revelation of Dowling's murder.

The second half of the film things get murkier - Raymond Chandler supposedly wrote this while drunk and while I thought that was a Hollywood urban legend the film does feel like a movie written by a super talented man getting increasingly drunk. Ladd gets abducted and is slapped around a lot; the police sort of become protagonists; Bendix thinks he dunnit; the cops shoot the killer plain dead.

It all gets messy but because its Raymond Chandler it's always entertaining - the dialogue is first rate, George Marshall's handling is vigorous and the cast is sublime. Warner Bros did the best tough guy movies of the 30s and 40s but Paramount grouped together their A team for this one: Ladd, Lake, Bendix, da Silva, Dowling, and Wright stealing the show at the eleventh hour. Lots of booze, infidelity and corruption but also mates looking out for each other and the "cleanest" Ladd-Lake romance out of their four main teamings. Easy to watch.

Thursday, June 06, 2013

Movie review - "Texas" (1941) ***

William Holden and Glenn Ford are oh so young in this quite elaborate post Civil War Western. There's plenty of action and solid production values (it looks like an expensive movie) and it's always moving, even if it feels episodic - Ford and Holden are two ex Confederate soldiers who become friends and then split up, eventually winding up on opposite sides of the law. Of the two Holden probably comes off better although he has the better role, going bad. Claire Trevor I guess is alright as the love interest but Edgar Buchanan is memorable as a dentist who moonlights as a rustler. This probably would have been a better movie had it been made ten-twenty years later when the leads had more gravitas but it's fun.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Movie review - "Pillars of the Sky" (1955) ** (warning: spoilers)

Apparently at one stage John Ford was going to direct this, and you can definitely see Fordian themes: it looks at a cavalry regiment, there's Ward Bond in the cast (as a preacher), the Indians' troubles are sympathetically depicted (you have a mixture of them - old die hards and uncle Toms) yet they are also clearly a scary threat, the cavalry is led by a pompous officer, there's comic Irish soldiers (Lee Marvin!). It doesn't take much to picture John Wayne in the lead either - instead we have Jeff Chandler, who actually isn't too bad (he was a much more relaxed actor by now) even if he is no Duke.

The film also explores religion in a way few Hollywood westerns did: Bond is converting the Indians to Christians (not that it helps turn them into peace loving people); Chandler was brought up with the Bible and although he's gone off it since when Bond goes "I'd love you to take over my work one day" you can guess that (a) Bond's going to die and (b) Chandler will take over; the human drama is about Chandler being in love with a married woman (sexy Dorothy Malone) and Bond tsk tsks over this and eventually Malone goes back to her husband (because you know adultery is the most evil thing in the world); Bond sacrifices his life at the end in a Christ like gesture. It's got to be one of the most Catholic westerns I've never seen. (It also gets novelty points for being set in Oregon.)

It badly lacks Ford touches in the direction however; the acting is mostly uninspired, the action not particularly interesting (when the cavalry are in grave danger you never feel it), the love story feels poorly done, the Christian propaganda is irritating, Lee Marvin's death scene goes on forever, Chandler's drinking feels like an after thought character note. 

Not a run of the mill Western by any means, though.

Friday, June 08, 2012

Movie review - "Hell Bent for Leather" (1960) **

This Western has some pretty locates and a decent enough idea - Audie Murphy is mistaken for a killer and lazy marshall Stephen McNally decides to kill him and collect the reward because he couldn't be bothered chasing the real killer. He takes Felicia Farr hostage and they fall in love. But there's not much more to it: they go over the mountains, some nasty cowboys turn up and threaten them.

Audie made a series of above-average Westerns but this isn't one of them. The pacing is slow, the action unexciting, there's no real personal drama. I always like seeing Felicia Farr in things (she's got this great voice) and she's good here but Audie doesn't have much of a character to play (he's just a regular guy). Director George Marshall isn't on fire, the budget feels low (three aren't many characters), McNally hams it up, the character of the real killer could probably have been used more. It does have a kinky title but that's about it.

Sunday, June 03, 2012

Movie review - "The Guns of Fort Petticoat" (1957) ***1/2

A really excellent Audie Murphy western - I'm probably overpraising it but it's quality took me by surprise. Come to think of it, I don't know why it should - the more of his films I'm seeing the more I realised he should be better known as an actor (I think it's because (a) too many of the films he made were Westerns and (b) he didn't work with enough famous directors).

This one as Audie as a Texan serving with the Union Army during the Civil War, who deserts in the wake of the Sand Creek Massacre in order to warn his old neighbours that the Indians are coming. They hate him because his conscience made him fight for the Union, so response is slow. Also, all the guys are away fighting so it's mostly all women. But a corpse makes them pick up their pace and soon the action turns into a siege story.

There are lots of entertaining subplots: the women are an interesting combination of dance hall girls, Christians, former flames, tomboys, old crones; there's also a little boy who hates traitor Murphy, and a treacherous man who has impregnated one of the girls. (Throw in a no good man who impregnated one of the girls and some Mexicans who are convinced there's gold in the fort.) 

Well handled by director George Marshall, lots of good action (siege stories almost always work) and the supporting cast are good too.  Audie has fun bossing the women around as if they're soldiers. 

It's not a feminist tract by any means (one of the women say that they don't expect men to tell them how to raise babies and she doesn't expect them to tell men about strategy) but it offers a greater variety of roles for women than you normally see in Westerns.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Movie review - "Destry" (1954) **

This remake of Destry Rides Again (which in itself was a remake) normally gets short shrift by critics, and certainly Audie Murphy and Mari Blanchard are no James Stewart and Marlene Dietrich, but it's still an enjoyable 90 minutes. 

The basic story has hardly been changed so that's good, it's in colour, the support cast impresses (including Thomas Mitchell, Lyle Bettger and Alan Hale Jnr) and I am fond of Murphy. He's not bad casting: a cherub-cheeked kid who looked like the boy next door but actually was a secret killer. He's not in Stewart's league as an actor (he doesn't have the voice, confidence or charm) but he works on his own level, and it's one of his best performances.

He's certainly more effective than Mari Blanchard, who does her best, is quite sexy and has black hair (so she must be a tramp), but isn't a star. You wish Universal had stumped up the cash for someone with more of a name to play against Murphy - Maureen O'Hara or someone like that. For some reason Joe Butterfly is considered Audie Murphy's only comedy, when this is clearly one too - I guess it's because it was a Western as well.