Showing posts with label Veronica Lake. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Veronica Lake. Show all posts

Thursday, May 19, 2022

Movie review - "Hold Back the Dawn" (1941) ****

 This one starts very meta with Charles Boyer arriving at Paramount to talk to director "Mr Saxon" (played by Mitchell Leisen who directed this), who is directing I Wanted Wings (which was produced IRL by Arthur Hornblow who produced this) and we see Veronica Lake being filmed, and Brian Donlevy watching.

Full of memorable bits: one refugee hangs himself in a room (briefly glimpsed), de Havilland's kids in the bus. It is stately paced, clocks in at nearly two hours. But it's of very high quality. Wilder was driven to directing by "script tweaks" on this film, but it is very well directed. Superb line up of stars: Charles Boyer was born to play a gigolo, and frequently did, ditto Paulette Goddard as the cheerful gold digger who loves Boyer and wants to move to New York with him, and Olivia de Havilland is perfect as the "plain" school teacher who finds love, and then who Boyer gets the horn for watching her in the surf.

It combines cynicism, sex, genuine romance. Walter Abel is fine as the dogged immigration inspector. The support players get a chance to shine.

Saturday, January 09, 2021

Movie review - "Sullivan's Travels" (1941) ***** (warning: spoilers) (re-watching)

 This classic lives up to its reputation. Great, simple idea, still relevant. Sturges pokes affectionate fun of everyone - studio moguls, pretentious directors.

My one gripe -it did repeat a lot with Sullivan trying to get away then being stopped. That happened several times.

But the romance with Veronica Lake is wonderful - sexy, believable, genuine. I really felt these two fell in love. McCrea spits out his lines with elan - I imagine Henry Fonda was an original choice but McCrea is fine, as he often was (he never let the side down, McCrea). 

The support cast are stunning, from the butlers and studio execs to the 13 year old driver who picks up Sullivan, the old lady who lusts after him (few directors of Hollywood from this time emphasised female lust as much as Sturges), the prisoners. 

The last act is incredible filmmaking - the bleak prison, the justice system, the abuse, the humanity found in the black church people letting in prisoners and the joy from cartoons.

Sunday, September 01, 2019

The Good and Bad Luck of Veronica Lake

Veronica Lake wasn't among the top tier of 1940s film stars - not in terms of box office status, or publicity, or earning power. Yet she's lingered in the public memory in a way few of her contemporaries have. Part of this is due to her legendary peek-a-boo haircut, immortalized by Jessica Rabbit,  Kim Basinger in LA Confidential (1997), and a sight gag in The Major and the Minor (1942). Part of it is her personal narrative of immense tragedy - from extra to film star to bankrupt alcoholic has-been in little over a decade. Part of it is the fact that more than a third of the movies she starred in were masterpieces - no kidding, more than a third, which is a pretty amazing ratio.

Veronica Lake had some of the best luck of any movie star in history.

And some of the worst.

She was born in 1922, and given the name Constance Ockelman. Her father died in an accident when she was ten; mom remarried and Constance took her stepfather's surname, Keane. The family moved to Los Angeles in 1938 where the teenager became interested in acting, appearing as an extra in a number of films, and doing some plays.

Her surge to stardom was almost absurd in its rapidity. Paramount producer Arthur Hornblow Jr was searching for an unknown to play the part of a night club singer in a military drama, I Wanted Wings (1940). He was shown footage of Constance performing a scene in a play, and was intrigued; she was tested, cast and signed to a long-term contract with Paramount, who changed her name to "Veronica Lake".

I Wanted Wings was a forerunner to Top Gun (1986), focusing on the lives and loves of air force cadets at flight school, and is homoerotic as anything in that Tom Cruise classic. The plot focuses on the friendship between aspiring pilots William Holden and Ray Milland; Holden loves Milland so much that he’s willing to marry Lake, the hussy set on nabbing Milland and wrecking his air force career and relationship with a feisty photographer (Constance Moore); of course if helps that Holden once loved Lake (until she destroyed him and sent him off to enlist).

The movie is an entirely decent piece of 1940 Hollywood hokum, mostly worth seeing today for Lake. She doesn’t appear until more than half-way through but it’s a spectacular entrance – singing in a nightclub under a spotlight - and she lifts the entire movie: pint-sized, seductive, mischievous, with a delectable voice and mien. She plays a temptress (Holden calls her "a cheap little jig"), but a sympathetic one – Lake genuinely thinks she falls pregnant to Milland and freaks out. And you feel sorry for her at the end –  when it looks as though Holden might get back in the air force, she turns up announcing she’s killed someone (!), asks Holden to help her, and winds up hiding in a plane just before it takes off on a bombing run; then when she’s on board she freaks out and sets off a flare, almost crashing the plane; she later dies in a crash, a martyred, story-generating, empathetic minx. It's a fantastic part and Lake is sensational in it.

Constance Moore, the other lead female lead, plays an unusually strong female character for the time. She's glamorous, works as a photographer, tells Milland she doesn't want to give up her enjoyable single life unless it's worth it, scolds Milland for his bad treatment of Lake (who he's slept with and then pays off with a check). But no one really remembers Moore today, or paid much attention then; while talented and beautiful, she lacks what the former Constance Keane had - X factor.

Lake had two other strokes of good fortune while making I Wanted Wings. First, during the shoot her long blonde hair accidentally fell over her right eye during a take and created a "peek-a-boo" effect - a hairstyle which subsequently swept the nation and launched a copycat craze. Secondly the movie was released just as audiences in then-neutral America were ravenous for stories about how prepared their armed services were for war (eg Dive Bomber, Buck Privates). I Wanted Wings was a huge hit, Lake stole the notices and was launched a movie star.

She hadn't even turned twenty.

Then she went and made every aspiring starlet in Hollywood have even less realistic career aspirations by starring in five classic movies in a row.

First was Preston Sturges' Sullivan's Travels (1941), about a wealthy director (Joel McCrea) who decides to pretend he is homeless in order to experience "real life". Lake was the girl - billed as The Girl - he meets on his travels. She is captivating, magical, and extremely sexy, whether sitting on McCrea's lap in a bathrobe and combing his hair or walking along the road in a hobo overcoat (Lake was six month's pregnant during production). She wasn't great with all her dialogue but Sturges made her spit it out at rapid-fire pace, and protected her limitations. It's a performance for the ages.

Paramount then put Lake in a thriller, This Gun for Hire (1942), where she once again plays a night club singer; this time she's a goodie though, helping fight Nazis. She's engaged to Robert Preston but most people forget that bit - what they remember, deservedly, are the scenes she shares with a gunman played by Alan Ladd, an actor who been paying dues for around a decade until This Gun for Hire catapulted him to stardom. He gives an electric debut star performance - cold, blonde, tough, mysterious, ruthless, cat loving, redeemable - and stole the film, but a lot of this was due to Lake, who matches him beautifully (at five foot two, she was one of the few female actors shorter than him); poor old Robert Preston is completely overshadowed. Like Sullivan's Travels, there's a scene where Lake dons her male co-star's overcoat and hat - she does look like a cutie but it's interesting she was already repeating her iconic scenes. The movie was her third huge success.

The studio promptly reunited Ladd and Lake in The Glass Key (1942), based on a novel by Dashiell Hammett and directed by the un-renowned Stuart Heisler. It's another superb film noir, achingly gorgeous to look at, and less weighed down by patriotism than This Gun for Hire. Lake is clearly inexperienced but is so beautiful and enigmatic you overlook her flaws, and she once again teams marvelously with Ladd - two blonde shorties, full of mutual smirking/contempt/admiration. The core of the film is a platonic love story between Ladd and Brian Donlevy - but these actors don't have chemistry; Ladd and Lake do. She gets to go off with Ladd at the end in this one (although watching it you feel she would be better off hooking up with Donlevy who, after all, not only has money and ambition but hid the identity of a murderer to protect her - but then fans weren't clamoring for Lake-Donlevy teamings).

Lake returned to comedy with I Married a Witch (1942), playing the title deity who ensnares Fredric March in matrimony. Directed by Rene Clair, this is wickedly funny, an absolute delight - due greatly to Lake who was never more alluring, strutting around in men's pajamas, casting spells, chasing after Marsh and causing devilry. This was her only fantasy movie and it beggars belief that Paramount never tried her again in that genre - she had a vaguely "otherworld" appearance (that hair, that voice) perfect for it.

After making a cameo in Star Spangled Rhythm (1942) Lake appeared in her fifth classic, So Proudly We Hail (1943), a melodrama about American nurses during the Battle of the Philippines. She was billed after Claudette Colbert and Paulette Goddard, but still had a juicy part as a traumatized nurse who kills herself in a suicide bombing attack against the Japanese. Lake's breakdown scene shows her limitations but over all it's a splendidly effective performance, with a spectacular on-screen death - she should have played more death scenes in her career, she had a very good track record in that department.

By now, Lake had become one of Paramount's biggest stars, effective in comedy, thrillers and drama. It hadn't been an entirely smooth ride  - there were rumours of a bad temperament and a drinking problem; Joel McCrea had been originally cast in I Married a Witch but refused to work with her again; March disliked her; the US government asked her to change her hairstyle because women who imitated it were getting their tresses caught in factory machines. But she had enjoyed a dream run.

Then things started to go wrong.

Very wrong.

Paramount cast her in The Hour Before Dawn (1944), as a Nazi spy who marries a conscientious objector (Franchot Tone). Despite being based on a story by Somerset Maugham and directed by Frank Tuttle, who did This Gun for Hire, the film was egregious, flopped at the box office, and Lake copped a lot of the blame.

It wasn't really her fault.  Yes, she's not very good, uncomfortable with an accent and not really capable of conveying too much depth, but lots of other people in the movie are even worse:  Tone is less convincing as an Englishman than Lake is as an Austrian refugee, David Leland is truly shocking, John Sutton is horrendous and the actors playing Lake's fellow agents all ham it up. There is novelty in Tone playing a conscientious objector but it also means he's passive for most of the running time, unaware his wife is up to no good. There's no chemistry between him and Lake - you never feel he loves her, or she feels anything for him other than contempt.  Tuttle's direction lacks atmosphere. And what's with that ending where Tone murders Lake? Okay, yes, she's tried to kill him but she's run out of bullets so it is murder - then they cut to Tone happily flying in a bomber? Yuk. This film gets more irritating the longer it goes on. (Aside: I'm going to start spoiling the endings of the bad Lake movies from now on because I'm assuming no one's seen them or is going to. End of aside.)

On the personal front things got really rough. Lake's second child was born prematurely and died after a few days. Her first marriage ended in divorce. She began to drink heavily.

Paramount gave her a few months off then put her in a musical, Bring on the Girls (1945), about a millionaire (Eddie Bracken) who joins the navy anonymously; he is chaperoned by a friend (Sonny Tufts) and falls for a slinky dame (Lake). Sidney Lanfield directed.

After the debacle of The Hour Before Dawn and the traumas of her private life Lake was carefully protected in this film - not given too much action, not having to carry the bulk of the plot, being cast in a role which is the variation of the one she played in I Wanted Wings - to wit, a gold-digging night club girl (though Lake doesn't sing). Her character supposedly ripped off Tufts back in the day and to be honest the movie would've been better had this been true - but then it turns out, gee, she only did it because she thought he was married and wanted to send money back to his kid. She's a good girl after all! Lake winds up with Tufts and Bracken is palmed off to Marjorie Reynolds and none of it's very interesting - an opinion shared even by the movie-mad public of 1945 who turned this into a flop, Lake's second in a row

There were reports of bad behavior by Lake at a war bond drive in Boston, resulting in Paramount giving her the third lead in Out of This World (1945), supporting Diana Lynn and Bracken. This was a musical spoof of Frank Sinatra's popularity among bobby soxers, directed by Hal Walker. Lynn steps in to a role meant for Betty Hutton and her  casting throws off the whole movie - she's only nineteen, too young to be romantically matched with Bracken in a non-icky way, too pretty to be matched in a believable way, and too fresh faced and smart to be believably enmeshed in wacky schemes.

Lake is completely wasted in her part; they set her up as this unscrupulous PR person who hypes Bracken... but then she completely disappears from the movie for the middle section. The film cries out for Lake's character to be used more - to be a rival to Lynn, to romance Bracken, to cause trouble, something... But she just kind of hangs around. As if aware of the script and casting problems, the filmmakers shove in a tonne of production value - singers, dancers, pianists; there's even a cameo from Bing Crosby's kids. But the picture is appalling. Flop number three.

In both Bring on the Girls and Out of this World Lake's character should have been bad but wasn't. I'm assuming this was due to Lake's whingeing - "I don't want to be unsympathetic, my fans will hate me", etc, etc, - although it may have been studio incompetence. Whoever was to blame,  it meant she played these weird half-and-half roles - people who should have been bad, but weren't, but weren't that sympathetic, either.

Things turned around a little with Miss Susie Slagle's (1945) an utterly delightful look at a boarding house for medical students in 1910. It was produced by John Houseman, who normally made films of quality, directed by first-timer John Barry, and features charming performances from Sonny Tufts and Joan Caulfield (not making that up, both are genuinely beguiling). Lake is top billed, but it's not a very big part, as a nurse who falls for a doctor student who dies. She isn't very good: she never seems comfortable and, painful as this is to admit, is one of the worst things about the movie. But at least it didn't flop.

Paramount tried her with Bracken a third time in Hold That Blond (1945), a picture which was originally conceived as a Bob Hope vehicle and looks it. Directed by George Marshall, this is the sort of movie that should have been great fun but just isn't; Bracken flails about, Lake is dull and lacking sexiness, and together they lack the chemistry of, say, Bob Hope and Paulette Goddard. You could always see what Hope and Goddard saw in each other - both had so much energy, she was super pert and pretty, he was smart despite his cowardice and looked good compared to the villains they would come up against. In this film Lake is cute but bland; Bracken is an anxious kleptomaniac who is a pain in the backside - they're not good for each other, he has a mental health issue that isn't dealt with by the end, neither are fun to hang out with. The film was not popular.

Lake's acting seemed to be getting worse the more she did it. What was going wrong? The drinking, divorce and trauma of losing her child could not have helped. I also think Lake had a natural quality that her first films caught like lightning in a bottle, but which she lost as time went on. Untrained, she had no technique to fall back on, and really floundered without a strong script.

She could still be effective, though, if handled in the right way. After five bad performances in a row in four dud movies, her career was revived when reunited with Alan Ladd in The Blue Dahlia (1946), produced by Houseman and directed by Marshall, based on a script by Raymond Chandler. It's a fantastic film noir, full of atmosphere, intrigue, crackling dialogue and sensational performances, which was recognized as a classic almost immediately and made a tonne of money. Lake's part is relatively small, though effective, as a slinky dame who you first think might be bad but turns out to be good.

Lake then made her first film outside Paramount since she became a star: Ramrod (1947), a Western directed by Andrea de Toth, who was her second husband. Lake is a tough dame living on the range who is picked on by nasty tycoon Preston Foster, so she hires gunslinger Joel McCrea as her "ramrod". But McCrea isn't the only hero - that duty is split with Don De Fore as a ruthless drifter who also fights on Lake's side, and, to be honest, overshadows McCrea.

This is a story full of shades and moral ambiguities - Lake is kind of a goodie but also a baddie. She's keen to flirt with men to get them to do what she wants and encourages De Fore to create a stampede so McCrea will be more on her side; she genuinely falls for McCrea but he ends up dumping her because she's a bad girl.. even though she's not really bad, she just did what she had to do to defend her ranch (mind you, that was typical of Hollywood during the post war years, when independent women had to be put in their place). As a result, the movie is a bit out of kilter - you have more sympathy for Lake, who has more at stake than McCrea, who is just a hired hand. It also might have more impact if McCrea had genuine feelings for Lake but he seems quite happy to go off at the finale with bland Arleen Whelan. Ramrod isn't perfect but it is interesting, and it's fun to see Lake in a Western, riding a horse, ordering cowboys off her land and the like; it's one of her best later performances. The picture was a box office success.

Back at Paramount she was reunited with Ladd and her old hair style in Saigon (1948).  Directed by Leslie Fenton, it's the least effective of the four films they made together (not counting the all-star musicals where they both cameo-ed as themselves - Star Spangled Rhythm, Duffy's Tavern, Variety Girl) which starts off excellently but tails away in its second half. The storyline feels cobbled together from elements of previous Paramount hits, particularly ones starring  Ladd: he's a war veteran in the third world (as in Calcutta, China); he's a pilot tight with members of his bomb crew (Calcutta, The Blue Dahlia); one of the flyers is terminally ill (You Came Along); there's a dodgy criminal, his henchman and mysterious police chief (The Blue Dahlia, The Glass Key); Ladd is kind of in love with his best male friend and they also both love the same girl (The Glass Key). There are some superb support performances and Lake's acting is solid - she totally suits the world of backlot studio exotica, with its back projection, smoke-drenched nightclubs and intrigue. Saigon is commonly referred to a flop but it actually performed reasonably well at the box office and demonstrated Lake still had appeal with the public.

Her next film at Paramount, however, was abysmal. To understand why Isn't It Romantic (1948) was even made in the first place you need to know that nostalgic family pieces in historical settings were all the rage in the 1940s - Meet Me in St Louis, Life with Father, I Remember Mama, etc. This load of old codswallop is set in Indiana during Reconstruction, and focuses on three sisters - Lake, Mona Freeman and Mary Hatcher - whose idiotic father is obsessed with the Civil War (he runs around in a Confederate uniform) and won't get a job; I think he's meant to be lovable ol' dad but he just comes across as a lazy, racist separatist, uncharmingly played by Roland Culver. We're supposed to feel for him at the end when he realizes he got swindled; I wanted him to shoot himself, like that Confederate officer in The Ox Bow Incident (1943). These sort of movies are hard to pull off for directors - Henry King and John Ford could do it, but it's beyond Norman McLeod here. Lake seems awkward. Maybe with colour and more elaborate musical numbers it might have gone over. But it doesn't.

Lake followed this with The Sainted Sisters (1948), directed by William D. Russell, which  sounds like it could be fun - the tale of two female con artists on the lam in the 1890s (more nostalgia!). Okay the 1890s isn't an inherently funny period, but female con artists is at least different, and Richard Maibaum wrote the script, and maybe this would've worked if Betty Hutton had been able to play the lead, as originally intended. Instead Paramount went with Lake who is disastrously miscast, lacking sparkle and verve in a part that needs, well, Hutton - or even Diana Lynn.  Joan Caulfield has some game as her sister but is mostly just pretty. Mind you, neither have much of a character to play - you never get the sense these two are con artists or how they came to be con artists.

Why do the filmmakers introduce the millionaire scammed by the girls (Harold Vermilyea) at the beginning and never see him again? Why don't they have the local bitch (Belulah Bondi) do something really bad? Why don't they have someone chasing after the girls - a detective, say? They set up a sheriff (George Reeves) but he never seems to suspect the girls - he just falls in love with both and struggles to make up his mind between them, which makes him an idiot and ensures the love story is unsatisfactory. They establish Lake as the more ruthless and greedy of the sisters, which is fine, but instead of making her a villain and Caulfield the goodie, as they should, Lake again is a-bit-bad-but-really-good in a way that undermines the story's drama; she comes good, falls for Reeves (no chemistry, no build up, he's clearly better suited to Caulfield), and Caulfield has a conveniently invented alternate love interest. If you haven't seen the movie, and I'm guessing you haven't, none of this will make any sense but trust me - it's not worth seeing, another misfire from Paramount who subsequently refused to renew Lake's contract.

Lake had some incredible luck early in her career, but karma came around and got her back in spades. Yes, she wasn't a very good actor. Yes, she had to be carefully used. Yes she had a problematic private life and no doubt an erratic attitude. But most of the Paramount films she appeared in during the second half of her career were simply ineptly made - they helped killed the careers of Eddie Bracken, Joan Caulfield and Diana Lynn as much as Lake.

It's a shame she wasn't teamed with Ladd more - she could've easily slipped into, say, OSS  (1946) (as she did on radio) or Wild Harvest (1947) or Calcutta (1947). She may have refused these parts, to be fair, I don't know - it's just a pity since Ladd was rarely as effective with another girl.

There was also a curious reluctance from Paramount to use her as an out-and-out vamp. Lake looked like a bad girl but rarely played one - there was always some excuse or redemption for her behavior. Sometimes this made the film more interesting (eg The Blue Dahlia) but often it weakened the drama - several of her pictures would've been better had she played a flat-out villain eg The Sainted Sisters, Bring on the Girls, Out of This World, Miss Susie Slagle's. She was a natural femme fetale who they kept trying to soften.

Maybe it was simply bad luck. But it's as hard to slog through Lake's last films at Paramount as it is a pleasure to watch her first few. And that's a shame because for all her many flaws she still had more individuality than the bulk of starlets under contract to the studio at the time like, say, Mona Freeman or Wanda Hendrix.

Lake didn't immediately slide into obscurity once she left the studio. De Toth cast her as the second lead in Slattery's Hurricane (1949) at Fox, playing a woman who is kind-a-sort-a meant to be a drug addict, but it's hard to tell due to censorship. Lake, billed third after Richard Widmark (channeling Dana Andrews) and Linda Darnell (good value), gives a poor performance  - the sexy bombshell of Alan Ladd pictures looks like a bland wallflower doormat - she's got no spunk or life, she's a colorless nothing.

She appeared in Stronghold (1951), an independently financed Western shot in Mexico with Zachary Scott and Arturo de Cordova - a film that has a good story buried underneath confused execution. Lake is wooden but at least looks fine. That was her last Hollywood-ish movie.

Lake's last few decades were sad. She and De Toth filed for bankruptcy (the IRS seized their home for unpaid taxes), and got divorced; she was sued by her mother for financial support; she left her children in the custody of their fathers and became estranged from them. She did a little TV and a lot of theater, was arrested for public drunkenness, worked as a waitress, and got married and divorced again. She wrote her memoirs and did the interview circuit, not always appearing sober; and made two last films, Footsteps in the Snow (1967) and Flesh Fiend (1970).  She had mental health issues that were not always properly dealt with, did a lot of traveling and too much drinking. There were some good times. She died in 1973 of kidney failure and hepatitis.

Her career as a star is fascinating, because it began with such a bang and ended with such a whimper. Films such as Sullivan's Travels, I Married a Witch, This Gun for Hire, The Glass Key, So Proudly We Hail and The Blue Dahlia retain their power to enchant and delight. Her appearance in I Wanted Wings remains captivating. She and Alan Ladd formed one of the all time great screen teams.

She was never a good actor - she could be downright terrible - but was a star.

Thursday, December 27, 2018

Movie review - "Stronghold" (1951) **

I'd like to know a bit more about the background of this film because the script was credited to Wells Root who has a lot of credits and it is a decent story but the result is really garbled and confusing.

Veronica Lake, in her last film before a hiatus, is a woman who arrives in Mexico to escape the civil war. That's a good idea - you've got Emperor Maximilian and Carlotta and revolutionaries. It was shot in Mexico. Zachary Scott is good value as a nasty aristocrat and Arturo de Cordova is fine as noble who is secretly a revolutionary albeit with the requisit amount of sexual harasment of the heroine. It's Robin Hood set in Maximilian Mexico with Lake as Maid Marian - that should work.

But it gets confusing with people being captured and escaping and recaptured. One minute de Cordova is on top then it's Scott and I wasn't sure where Lake's loyalties lay. Then thisre mine got flooded and people were being captured.

Its frustrating because all the ingredients are there - a sword fight in a cave, a mine flooding, romance, peasants uprising, a last minute reprieve from a hanging. Production values are fine, especially in the second half. Lake is wooden - her acting got worse as she went on - but she looks okay. Scott is good.

A curio. There's narration at the beginning and dubbing - these feels cut about.

Tuesday, December 25, 2018

Movie review - "Miss Susie Slagle's" (1946) ***

An unexpected delight - the cinematic output of Sonny Tufts doesn't have the best reputation but this was produced by John Houseman, who has many fine films on his resume. It's a loving, sweet depiction of some doctor students in 1910... kind of like Doctor in the House... though really they may as well updated it (there's always something creepy about watching medical period pieces because characters are constantly falling sick from things that will be routinely repaired down the track).

Tufts was very winning as the awkward, shy student - it plays to his strengths (seems like a nice guy, gangly, not too demanding a role, a little bit of romance, some doctoring, no big words). The real surprise for me was Joan Caulfield, who is bright and pretty and great fun as a gal who decides to marry Tufts straight away.

Veronica Lake is in it too - top billed but in not a very big part and she's not very good as a nurse who falls for a doctor student who dies. She never seems comfortable.

There's other doctors too - Billy de Wolfe does comic stuff, and there's some other guy. The men are kind of bland. I got confused who they were - the star power is B list. Ray Collins and George Colouris, old Mercury cronies of Houseman, props up the support.

Lilian Gish plays Miss Susie who runs the boarding house. She's a bit creepy actually - not very good, not that warm, IMHO anyway. I couldn't help laughing at her initiating men - I couldn't help imagining her sneaking into the boys room after dark for some special services. I know that's low hanging fruit but you try watching that scene and not thinking of it, either.

But it's sweet. Director John Berry does a good job in his first feature.

Saturday, August 06, 2016

The odd career of Veronica Lake

I don't think anyone had better luck than Veronica Lake when starting out. Her first decent part was a choice, showy support role in a big hit, I Wanted Wings - a military romantic drama released just as America was gearing up for a war.

She followed this with great parts in five fantastic films:
* Sullivan's Travels - a classic Preston Sturges comedy;
* This Gun for Hire - an exciting thriller which teamed her with Alan Ladd;
* The Glass Key - another top thriller with Ladd;
* I Married a Witch - delightful Rene Clair comedy with Lake at her sexiest as a witch;
* So Proudly We Hail - gripping war story with a very flashy part for Lake as a Bataan nurse.

Lake made a notable contribution to all five films - being effective, her limitations protected.

Then the tide turned. She cut her hair, lost a baby, developed a bad reputation, and was in a series of duds:
* The Hour Before Dawn
* Bring on the Girls
* Hold That Blonde
* Out of This World

Things turned around a little with Miss Susie Slagle's, The Blue Dahlia and Ramrod. But then it was back to crap:
* Saigon
* The Sainted Sisters
* Isn't it Romantic?

Then she left Paramount, and could never recover her previous position.

What happened? Was it inevitable?

Well, Lake wasn't a very good actor - she had to be carefully used. She couldn't survive bad material (unlike, say, Alan Ladd).

You could say "Paramount shouldn't have put her in comedies" - but she'd had success in Sullivan's Travels and I Married a Witch.

Most of the films she appeared in during the second half of her Paramount career were simply ineptly made - they helped killed the careers of Eddie Bracken, Joan Caulfield and Diana Lynn as much as Lake.

It's a shame she wasn't teamed with Ladd more - she could've easily slipped into say OSS (as she did on radio) or Wild Harvest or Calcutta. (She may have refused these parts, to be fair - it's just a pity since Ladd was rarely as effective with another girl.)

There was also a curious reluctant to use her as an out and out vamp. Lake looked like a bad girl but rarely played one - there was always some excuse or redemption for her behaviour. Sometimes this made the film more interesting (eg The Blue Dahlia) but often it weakened the drama - several of her films would've been better had Lake played a flat out villain eg The Sainted Sisters. Also she would've seemed a natural for film noir as a femme fetale, but she didn't - noirs, yes, but as good girls.

Maybe it was simply karma. But it's as hard a slog to get through Lake's last films at Paramount as it is a pleasure to get through her first.

So anyway a Lake top ten

1) I Wanted Wings
2) This Gun for Hire
3) Sullivan's Travels
4) The Glass Key
5) I Married a Witch
6) So Proudly We Hail
7) The Blue Dahlia
8) Ramrod
9) Miss Susie Slagle's
10) Saigon (not very good but at least with Ladd)

Movie review - "Isn't it Romantic?" (1948) **

To understand why this was made you need to remember that nostalgic family pieces in historical settings were all the rage in the 1940s - Meet Me in St Louis, Life with Father, I Remember Mama, etc.

This load of old codswallop is set in Indiana during Reconstruction, and focuses on three sisters - Veronica Lake, Mona Freeman and Mary Hatcher. Their idiotic father is obsessed with the Civil War (he runs around in a Confederate uniform) and won't get a job. I think he's meant to be loveable ol' dad but he just comes across as a lazy, racist separatist, uncharmingly played by Roland Culver. We're supposed to feel for him at the end when he realises he got swindled; I wanted him to shoot himself, like that Confederate officer in The Ox Bow Incident.

These sort of movies are hard to pull off - director Henry King was one who could, as was John Ford, but Norman McLeod fails. He's not helped by a B level cast. Lake seems uncomfortable; Freeman and Hatcher are B list. There's a few musical numbers - maybe with colour and more elaborate musical numbers it might have gone over.

Billy de Wolfe is tiresome as Lake's love interest; Patric Knowles un-charming as the guy who romances then swindles Lake. This film just annoyed me. There were cute period detail I suppose like going to see an early silent film.

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Movie review - "The Sainted Sisters" (1948) **

This sounds like it could be fun - the story of two female con artists who are on the lam in the 1890s. Okay the 1890s isn't an inherently funny period, at least not to men, but female con artists is at least different. And maybe this would've worked if original star Betty Hutton had been able to play the role. Instead Paramount went with Veronica Lake who is disastrously miscast.

I've watched a bunch of later-Paramount-era Lake movies recently and not liked her in any of them. She's all wrong here - lacking energy and verve in a part that needs, well, Hutton - or say Diana Lynn.  I know that Lake was meant to play vamps but she is flat - and even worse, not sexy.

Joan Caulfield has some game as her sister but really is pretty and that's about it. Mind you neither have much of a character to play - you never get the sense these two are con artists or how they came to be con artists. I guess you assume it's because its the 1890s and women had it hard - which gives you automatic sympathy for them. Not ideal.

The plot has Barry Fitzgerald blackmail the two women into helping out, which has kind of yuck overtones since women were so enslaved during this time. I think it's easier to handle if you find Fitzgerald loveable. The girls are converted to niceness by the town - Fitzgerald gives away their money to people, and they love them for it. I'm sorry but that's a bit yuck, it's their money, even if it's stolen, and Fitzgerald stole it off them. 

Why do they introduce the millionaire scammed by the girls (Harold Vermilyea) at the beginning and never see him again? Why don't they have the local bitch (Belulah Bondi) do something really bad? Why don't they have someone chasing after the girls - a detective or something?

They set up a sheriff (George Reeves) but he never seems to suspect the girls - he just falls in love with both and struggles to make up his mind, which makes him an idiot and ensures the love story is unsatisfactory.

They establish Lake has the more ruthless and greedy of the sisters, which is fine. But instead of making her a villain and Caulfield the goodie, as they probably should, Lake again is a-bit-bad-but-really-good in a way that undermines the film; she comes good, falls for Reeves (no chemistry, no build up, he's clearly better suited to Caulfield), and Caulfield has a conveniently invented alternate love interest.

It's another misfire from Paramount. Lake had some incredible luck early in her career, but karma came around and got her back in spades towards the end of her contract.

Movie review - "Out of this World" (1945) **

Betty Hutton and Eddie Bracken were so well liked in Miracle of Morgan's Creek that Paramount decided to reunite them in this musical. Then Hutton went off on another film so the studio went "what the hell" and replaced her with Diana Lynn, the younger sister from Morgan. Lynn was pretty, bright and talented (she can play the piano and sing) but her casting throws the movie off - she's only 19, too young to be romantically matched with Bracken in a non-icky way, too pretty to be matched in a believable way, and too fresh faced and smart to be believably enmeshed in wacky schemes.

The plot of this involves Lynn putting singer Bracken under contract for a cheap rate then over-selling interests in said contract - like The Producers. That sort of silliness makes more sense with Hutton - she's an older woman, she seems dumb, desperate. Lynn comes across as too sensible, with too many years ahead of her.

Not that the plot makes sense. Bracken is meant to have this superb voice (Bing Crosby dubbed) - no one's noticed before? Why does Lynn listen to him and go "oh he's not going to make it, I'll over sell his contract"? He can sing! No one's interested until Veronica Lake whips up publicity? I get that they're making fun of the bobby soxer craze (the lust for Frank Sinatra etc)... but Bracken can sing. Why not have him as a singer who's tried to get noticed for a while, but is too shy or something and it's not until the girl fainting thing comes along that people go for him? Or something that made sense?

A spoof of the bobby soxer craze would be fun - you could have stunts, girls paid to fall for Bracken who genuinely do, irate boyfriends and fathers, publicists in cahoots. But the film ignores these possibilities, forgets the satire focuses on a plot where Lynn sells off excess interest in the contract, thinking Bracken will flop. Even that could have been fun - as The Producers showed - but it doesn't make sense because Bracken's character has talent... and the writers don't do anything much with it except Bracken finding out he hasn't got money and Lynn didn't believe in him.

Veronica Lake is completely wasted. Apparently Paramount were punishing her by casting her second to Diana Lynn... But she could've been used for a good purpose. She's set up as this unscrupulous PR person who hypes Bracken... but then completely disappears from the movie for the middle section. The film is crying out for her character to be used more - for her to be a rival to Lynn, to romance Bracken, to cause trouble... But they don't. There were a few movies around this time where Lake's character should have been bad but wasn't eg Hold That Blonde. I'm assuming this was due to Lake's whingeing - "I don't want to be unsympathetic". But it meant she played these weird half and half roles - people who shouldn't have been bad dramatically but weren't, but weren't that sympathetic either.

As if aware of the script and casting problems, the filmmakers shove in heaps of production numbers - singers, dancers, pianists. There's even a cameo from Bing Crosby's kids. But the movie is crap.

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Movie review - "Bring on the Girls" (1945) **

You don't get a more sure fire musical concept than a millionaire who wants to pretend to be a normal person - Norman Krasna used it countless times, and this was a remake of a French movie, The Man who Seeks the Truth.

Eddie Bracken isn't terribly believable as a millionaire though you can buy him as someone who is worried people only love him for his money. He enlists in the navy and his family insist he's accompanied by Sonny Tufts.

Tufts' name became a joke in later years but he has an amiable, easy going presence and a surprising amount of talent - he plays a musical instrument, and sings a number on a piano and does a good job - it's not cringe inducing at all.

The problem is with his character. I think the writers made a mistake turning his character so dumb - he thinks that the girl Bracken is wooing is good girl Marjorie Reynolds instead of who is actually is, gold digger Veronica Lake. Then later on he blabs to Bracken's family about what's happened, and then he tries to pinch Lake off Bracken, which isn't very nice.

The movie was Lake's first in a number of months as she got over the death of her child and end of her marriage. After the debacle of The Hour Before Dawn she's been carefully protected - not given too much action, not having to carry a movie, being cast in a role which is the variation of the one she played in I Wanted Wings - to wit, a gold digging night club cigarette girl (though Lake doesn't sing). Her character supposedly ripped off Tufts back in the day and to be honest the film would've been better off had she remained a threat - but then it turns out, gee, she only ripped off Tufts because she thought he was married and wanted to send money back to his kid (the real villain was some band leader we never see).

So the movie lacks a baddie. It also lacks decent conflict. Bracken falls for Lake who knows he is rich all along (why the deception then?) and wants his money. But she's not really bad, she's only bad because she was mistaken by Tufts - something that could be cleared up by a quick chat (as it is they drag it out until the end of the film before she believes it). Why didn't they have Bracken fall in love with a girl who loves him because she is poor and wouldn't like him being rich?

They have Marjorie Reynolds, who is rich but likes to sing, which is kind of interesting, but they barely give her any scenes. You think she's going to romance Tufts but she doesn't; she's not mates with Lake, which would have given the film some emotional pull; she doesn't get many song numbers; she meets Bracken and they fall in love very unconvincingly. You never really see why Reynolds would like Bracken and vice versa other than they're both rich which might be true to real life but isn't dramatically interesting.

The movie also lacks star power. There are four star roles - Bracken, Lake, Tufts and Reynolds - but no one is an A lister. No Bob Hope, or Betty Hutton, or Bing Crosby or Dorothy Lamour. Lake could be fantastic but also wooden and musicals weren't her natural milieu. Bracken needed stronger material. Reynolds simply wasn't a star.

But the real problem here is the script. The plot kicks off with a deception but that's never used because Lake knows Bracken is rich. Reynolds worries about people loving her for her money too but we never see anyone after her. There's no friendship between Bracken and Tufts and Lake and Reynolds. There's no sense of fun. No complications. They throw in another deception with Bracken pretending to be deaf but that isn't followed up either.

There is technicolor and some decent numbers. It's bright and colourful. But the "book" fails and as a result so does the movie.

Movie review - "Hold That Blonde" (1945) **

Eddie Bracken made a big splash in a few Preston Sturges films but never managed to stabilise his stardom. This was a vehicle for his talents - although it feels like something Bob Hope passed up. He's got a pretty "straight woman" (Veronica Lake), Willie Best in support, George Marshall as director, and a decent concept - a kleptomaniac gets involved with jewel thieves - but it just doesn't work.

I don't know what went wrong. Marshall has some excellent comedies on his resume, Bracken could be fantastic, so could Lake (see Sullivan's Travels and I Married a Witch). But the result is flat and dull. Bracken flails about. Lake is dull and lacking sexiness. Maybe the two of them required really special handling of Preston Sturges or Rene Clair. They're definitely no Bob Hope and Paulette Goddard.

Bracken and Lake have zilch chemistry. You could always see what Hope and Goddard saw in each other - both had so much energy, she was super pert and pretty, he was smart despite his cowardice and looked good compared to the villains and dodgy types in the film, and would stick by Goddard. Lake is pretty but dull; Bracken is an anxious kleptomaniac who is a pain in the backside - they're not good for each other, he has a mental problem that isn't dealt with by the end. Neither have much pep.

Maybe it would have helped if there's been some spooky ghost angle - or something involving spies, where the stakes were bigger (eg national security). Jewel theft feels so light. The script isn't particularly good - it lacks strong gags.

Albert Dekker is an investigating cop; George Zucco appears as a shrink; Frank Fenton is the head baddie. Everyone on this film has a strong resume, but it just doesn't work.


Saturday, January 30, 2016

Movie review - "The Hour Before the Dawn" (1944) ** (warning: spoilers)

Veronica Lake had a hot streak matched by few other actresses in the early 1940s - she became a star very quickly with I Wanted Wings then appeared in a series of classics - Sullivans Travels, I Married a Witch, This Gun for Hire, The Glass Key. Her hair was a natural phenomenon, but the government asked her to cut it off because apparently it was harming productivity; she did, then gave hints she had potential as a dramatic actress in So Proudly We Hail.

This movie was her big shot as a proper drama star - it flopped and she was shuttled off to comedies and noirs. It's a crap movie but it's not really her fault - yes she's not very good, uncomfortable with an accent and not really capable of conveying too much depth, but lots of other people are bad too. Franchot Tone is less convincing as a Pom than Lake is as an Austrian refugee; the kid actor David Leland is truly shocking; John Sutton, a super wet drip got on my nerves something fierce as Tone's brother; the actors playing Lake's fellow agents all ham it up. There's some painful plucky Britons acting during an air raid.

There is novelty in Tone playing a conscientious objector but it also means he's passive for most of the running time, unaware his wife is up to no good. There's no chemistry between him and Lake - you never feel he loves her, or she feels anything for him other than contempt.  Frank Tuttle's direction lacks atmosphere. And what's with that ending where Tone murders Lake - okay yes she's tried to kill him but she's run out of bullets so its murder - then cut to him happily flying in a bomber? This film is more irritating the longer it goes on.

Friday, January 29, 2016

Movie review - "Saigon" (1948) (re-viewing) **1/2

A film that feels cobbled together from elements of previous Paramount hit films, particularly ones starring Alan Ladd: he's a war veteran in the third world (as in Calcutta); he's a pilot tight with members of his bomb crew (Calcutta, The Blue Dahlia); one of the flyers is terminally ill (You Came Along); there's a dodgy criminal (Morris Carnovsky), his henchman (Luis Van Rooten) and mysterious police chief (Luther Adler); Veronica Lake is co star (The Glass Key, The Blue Dahlia); Ladd is kind of in love with his best male friend and they also both love the same girl (The Glass Key).

Normally Ladd's co stars are William Bendix and Howard da Silva and John Farrow directs. Here his best friends are played by Wally Cassell and Douglas Dick and the director is Leslie Fenton. Actually everyone does a decent job - Cassell is no Bendix but is amiable and Dick is effective in the most sympathetic role (the terminally ill friend who falls for Lake. Ladd's performance is a solid star effort - the role fits him like a glove, a tough guys guy who has had his heart broken in the past.

The story is better than I remembered, or at least starts off that way: Ladd finds out that Dick is terminally ill and decides to show him a great time; to finance it they take an expensive job from Carnovsky and winds up flying from Shanghai to Saigon with Carnovsky's secretary, Lake, and a mysterious suitcase.  Dick falls in love with Lake but she loves Ladd. So far so interesting, and the film throws in a mysterious French policeman (Adler).

Then the movie gets murky. Ladd discovers that Adler and Lake are smugglers, which should come as a shock to no one, especially Ladd who clearly took the job to make easy cash - it feels unfair he doesn't return the money to Carnovsky; he agreed to do a job, why not do it?  Carnovsky stays out of the action far too long - he appears at the beginning and then at the end, and the movie lacks a villain for the in between bit. I kept expecting Adler to do this but he's actually a decent copper when the film needed someone more enigmatic (or another character). There's too much stuff of our characters chugging along down river chatting when another complication was needed (a former Nazi, another baddy).

Wally Cassell sees Lake and Ladd kiss but there's no dramatic pay off - then Cassell saves Ladd's life and dies, which is a downer. The final fight where Carnovsky fights Dick who is conveniently killed feels underwhelming.  Dick never finds out that Ladd and Lake have fallen in love so there's no confrontation.

The movie feels chopped up a bit, the victim of rewriting and or editing/shooting. Carnovsky has this great entrance talking about how he's a coward and pays his employees well, then never does anything interesting again. It seems as though Ladd is going to con Van Rooyen to betray his boss but he never does.

So for the first half I was going 'hey this is pretty good' then it goes down hill.

Movie review - "The Blue Dahlia" (1946) ****

I've seen this film a bunch of times now and the first half is easily the most vivid - Alan Ladd, William Bendix and Hugh Beaumount as veterans back in LA; Bendix ordering "bourbon with a bourbon chaser" and showing off the metal plate in his head; Ladd meeting his wife Doris Dowling and seeing she's got a lover Howard da Silva; Dowling telling Ladd how she accidentally killed their son; Ladd being picked up as a hitchhiker by Veronica Lake; Will Wright as the slimy hotel detective; the revelation of Dowling's murder.

The second half of the film things get murkier - Raymond Chandler supposedly wrote this while drunk and while I thought that was a Hollywood urban legend the film does feel like a movie written by a super talented man getting increasingly drunk. Ladd gets abducted and is slapped around a lot; the police sort of become protagonists; Bendix thinks he dunnit; the cops shoot the killer plain dead.

It all gets messy but because its Raymond Chandler it's always entertaining - the dialogue is first rate, George Marshall's handling is vigorous and the cast is sublime. Warner Bros did the best tough guy movies of the 30s and 40s but Paramount grouped together their A team for this one: Ladd, Lake, Bendix, da Silva, Dowling, and Wright stealing the show at the eleventh hour. Lots of booze, infidelity and corruption but also mates looking out for each other and the "cleanest" Ladd-Lake romance out of their four main teamings. Easy to watch.

Friday, January 22, 2016

Movie review - "This Gun for Hire" (1942) ***1/2 (re-viewing) (warning: spoilers)

Alan Ladd is so stunningly good as a hired killer in this thriller its remarkable he played so few baddies in his subsequent career - and a great shame. While he's only given the "and introducing" credit and the top line billing goes to Robert Preston and Veronica Lake, this is Ladd's movie through and through.

He is helped by beautiful photography and carefully constructed scenes and one of the all time great introductions - Ladd wakes up tousled haired from a nightmare, then goes out to work in his trenchcoat, is nice to his cat, is mean to a nasty land lady who is cruel to the cat goes a visits a man who he shoots dead, then he shoots dead the man's girlfriend because she just happens to be there, passes a little girl sitting on the steps who identifies him who he should shoot... but he can't go through with it. Then he meets up with his boss Laird Cregar who is alternatively fascinated and/or repulsed by what Ladd has done.

Then the movie gets a bit odder and war conscious, with it turning out that Cregar invests in nightclub shows on the side, and he goes to see Veronica Lake perform a number... and she's asked to go undercover by a kindly senator who thinks Cregar is a fifth columnist and needs evidence. It just so happens that Lake is the boyfriend of cop Robert Preston, who is investigating the murders committed by Ladd.

The Lake-as-undercover-agent plot sits uneasily alongside the Ladd-getting-revenge-on-Cregar-for-betraying him story. Its as though it was shoved in to build up Lake's part (she sings two songs), or else to placate the censor.

The movie slows down in between the half way and two thirds mark with Lake and Ladd on the lamb. I couldn't put my finger on it - it needed another complication or something, maybe some double dealing - or maybe it would've worked if Lake and Ladd had been able to enjoy more of a romance or they'd given Robert Preston more to do.

But then it perks up and becomes more like a Hitchcock action film a la The 39 Steps, with Lake pretending to be a guy to help Ladd from the police and Ladd leaping on to trains and then breaking into the baddy's mansion. This is effective and Ladd gets to redeem himself before perishing.

So the result is a mixture of film noir, WW2 propaganda and Hitchcock thriller, with a brilliant Ladd star performance, excellent support from Cregar, Tully Marshall and Preston, top notch female star work from Veronica Lake. Frank Tuttle isn't known as a top director and no doubt benefited considerably from the in house team at Paramount (eg John Seitz the DOP) but I thought he did a very good job.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Movie review - "The Glass Key" (1943) **** (re-viewing)

I recognise this isn't among the top notch of 40s black and white classics - like say Casablanca or The Maltese Falcon - but it remains enjoyable because so many of its pleasures are no longer available from films: a fresh faced Alan Ladd at his most handsome, tough best - when he was in shape, and trying to do the best job he could (something not the case from the mid 50s onwards), inexperienced but very charismatic, doing some great anger; Brian Donlevy being top billed but really supporting Ladd as a tough political boss trying to go straight (surprisingly common in 40s cinema eg Meet John Doe, Mr Ace); William Bendix in a stunningly good performance as a henchman, homoerotically keen on slapping Ladd around in an extended sequence); supporting actors like Bonita Graville and Joseph Calleia; tough dialogue; stunningly good black and white photography.

It has a remarkable sophistication when it comes to sexuality and corruption - the world is so corrupt that Ladd can bully a district attorney how to work; Lake's father tells his daughter to romance Donlevy to help his political career and she doesn't mind; Ladd seduces Margaret Hayes in front of her husband Arthur Loft, even making out with her on the couch while Loft comes down and whines for her to go to bed, then she tells her husband to go away and the guy goes and kills himself (the hero drives a man to suicide by cuckolding him!!); Bonita Granville is clearly having sex with Denning despite being 18 ("I've been to his apartment lots of times"); Ladd destroys a will and arranges for a trial to be rigged; Bendix is forever keen to kill, shoot, torture people, and putting his hands all over Ladd; Ladd flirts with a drunk Bendix to get a confession from the latter; Ladd's delight as he whips Bendix up into a frenzy against Calleia then watches on silently as Bendix strangles Calleia; Ladd bullies the DA into arresting the wrong woman (Lake).

Hammett gets a lot of credit, deservedly, but I think some should go to screenwriter Jonathan Latimer, whose name is on so many classic movies. Stuart Heisler isn't a very well known director (neither was Frank Tuttle who did This Gun for Hire) but on the evidence available here anyway he did a good job.

Veronica Lake is beautiful and enigmatic - you've got so much goodwill towards her (or at least I do) that you over look her flaws. She and Lake are very effective, two blonde shorties, whose mutual smirking/contempt is effective. Re-watching this I felt Lake would've been better going off with Brian Donlevy who, after all, not only has money and ambition but hid the identity of the murderer to protect her.

The film is less effective as a love story between Ladd and Donlevy, which it kind of has to be to justify a plot where Ladd was so devoted to Donlevy and him to Ladd. The two don't have great "mates" chemistry (whereas Ladd and Bendix have chemistry) but the film has so many other things in it's favour I forgave it.

Monday, January 18, 2016

Book review - "Ladd: A Hollywood Tragedy" by Beverly Linet (1979) (re-reading)

Why was Alan Ladd so sad? It's hard to fathom - he was so determined to be an actor for so long, putting in years upon years of plugging away, scraping together his pennies to attend acting school, playing all sorts of small parts, refusing to give up even though he had a wife and small baby to feed, finally getting regular work in radio and earning the devotion of Sue Carol, who pushed his career to the next level and eventually the career defining role in This Gun for Hire.

After a decade of effort he became an "overnight" star and remained a star, really, until he died - for the last few years he was a second tier star, for sure, but still a name capable of headlining movies. This was in part because Ladd tended to be co-operative and professional, but also because he made so many easily commercial films - Westerns, noirs, gangster flicks. He had several healthy children and step-children, a keen brain which meant he earned money with his investments and films, his own production company, a seemingly happy, devoted spouse... why did he become an alcoholic? Why did he get so puffy and so depressed he tried to kill himself in 1962 and take a (possibly accidental, possibly not) overdose of tranquilisers shortly afterwards?

No one ever really knows but Linet's excellent look at Ladd's life - I've read it a few times now and it holds up - offers clues: a father he never really remembered dying of a heart attack, guilt from burning down a house accidentally when he was young, lack of extended family (no grandparents, aunts, uncles), a poverty stricken childhood in the depression, a step father who died young of a heart attack, an alcoholic mother who killed herself in front of Ladd, guilt from divorcing his devoted first wife in favor of the ambitious Carol, crippling insecurity from his seeming lack of acting ability.

Ladd had enough drive to become a star but lacked the ability to enjoy it when he arrived. He was looked after pretty well by Paramount, who cast him in some decent vehicles - The Glass Key, The Blue Dahlia, Whispering Smith, even The Great Gatsby - but left them over money. In hindsight he probably should have stayed, where he was comfortable, although some of his movies for Warners and Warwick were entertaining. He definitely should have tried to push his range and work with better directors, because when he did - with George Stevens in Shane - it resulted in the biggest success of his career.

But he wanted to play it safe - when he should've tried cutting his price and/or pushing his name forward to work with people like John Ford, Howard Hawks, Hitchcock or Anthony Mann, he stuck with old professionals like Frank Tuttle and Gordon Douglas. He foolishly turned down the role of Jett Rink in Giant because it wasn't the lead, wasn't a particularly bold producer (unlike say Burt Lancaster) and just made more and more crap. He physically disintegrated, didn't appear enough times against a star of equal popularity, and his films got worse. Watching his last few movies is almost uncomfortable.

But in his day there was no one like Ladd - cold, ruthless, with considerable grace, blonde hair and that imposing voice. At his best he was a compelling star and it's a damn shame he didn't enjoy acting more.

Sunday, July 07, 2013

Movie review - "Slattery's Hurricane" (1949) **1/2

Herman Wouk's disapproval of those who engage in sex outside marriage is well know to those familiar with his novels, so it's no surprise to see a heavy tsk-tsk-ing of adultery in this romantic-action-drama set in Florida after World War Two.

It stars Richard Widmark in one of his earliest hero roles, although he's very much an anti-hero, as a tormented pilot who has a steady girlfriend (Veronica Lake) but can't resist the lure of his ex (Linda Darnell), despite the fact she's married to an old mate (John Russell, who I was not familiar with but he's not bad). If this were a trashier film Darnell would be up for it, but she's dragged into an affair and everyone goes tsk tsk to Widmark.

It's kind of a shame there's this moralising because it's a decent movie inside here - the action moves along at a fair clip, there's some impressive plane and hurricane footage, a strong cast (Gary Merrill pops up as man at air control tower, a position he'd often be seen in), an intriguing subplot about Widmark's employer being involved in drug smuggling. But too much of it is watered down - Widmark being all regretful, and Lake meant to be having a drug addiction but we don't see much of it (it's hinted at).

Widmark is okay in a role that seems more made for Dana Andrews; Darnell is good (if only she'd been given more to do) but Lake is poor. The sexy bombshell of Alan Ladd movies here looks like a dull doormat wallflower - she's got no spunk or life, she's a bland nothing. And this film was directed by her then husband, Andre de Toth. This needed a bit more trash.

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Movie review - "So Proudly We Hail" (1943) ***1/2 (warning: spoilers)

Hollywood movies traditionally like to celebrate victories but for a period there in World War Two they were about defeat, because that's all America suffered during it's early days: Bataan, Cry Havoc, Wake Island, Corregidor. This is a very good movie, stylishly made, expertly created for the female audience: it has great roles for three female stars, who are three different archetypes (sensible Claudette Colbert, sassy and flirty Paulette Goddard, bitter Veronica Lake); it introduces two new hunks (both having their opening scenes with their shirts off and both who who had tragic lives off screen, interestingly enough - George Reeves and Sonny Tufts); it tells the story of war from the female point of view, deals with female-leaning struggles (e.g., a mother loses a son, career vs marriage, wanting to heal vs wanting to kill Japanese).

Colbert does her idealised nurse thing very well - sensible, always shot in one profile, not panicking as the Japanese come on in and her fellow nurses lose it. Goddard is enormous fun as a flirty nurse, keen to wear her negligee to keep up morale, with several men on the go, falling for Tufts (whose limitations work here as he plays a lummox) - she feels real, and works very well with the other actors. Lake isn't the greatest actor in the world (her break down scene shows her limitations) but its a marvellous part, she has that charisma and a terrific suicide bombing last scene (even if it is half way though the film).

It's an impressive script by Alan Scott which starts off with a bang (a plane load of nurse survivors arrive in Melbourne Australia, and are met by a British sounding officer - Colbert is traumatised), and juggles its several plots expertly; ditto the changes in tone (romance, comedy, flirting, seriousness, war action). The war experience thought female eyes - they're active, important, vital. No wonder if was a big hit.

Friday, August 10, 2012

Movie review - "Ramrod" (1947) **1/2

Veronica Lake's career never really recovered from getting her hair cut off, so it's said - other influencing factors may be her difficult temperament, some poor films and a persona that wasn't always easily castable. But she was still busy at this stage - she'd just come off The Blue Dahlia and apparently this Western was quite popular.

Ronnie is a tough woman living on the range who is picked on by nasty tycoon Preston Foster. Her useless fiancee takes off so she hires Joel McCrea as her "ramrod". But McCrea isn't the only hero - that duty is split with Don De Fore as a ruthless, enigmatic drifter who also fights on Lake's side, and overshadows McCrea's character (even if they do make McCrea an alcoholic).

This is a story full of shades and moral ambiguities - I guess it's pretty clear that Preston Foster is a baddie but Lake isn't necessarily a goodie. She's keen to flirt with men to get them to do what she wants and gets De Fore to create a stampede so McCrea will be more on her side. She genuinely falls for McCrea but he ends up dumping her because she's a bad girl. Well, she's not really bad, I felt she just did what she had to do - but that was Hollywood during the post war years, women had to be put in their place (something similar happened in Forever Amber). As a result the movie is a bit out of kilter - you have more sympathy for Lake, who has more at stake, than McCrea, who is just a hired hand. It also might have more impact if McCrea had genuine feelings for Lake but he seems quite happy to go off with bland Arleen Whelan.

And De Fore has a great character - he's on the side of the "goodies" but he quite sadisitically goads a baddie into drawing so he can kill him. He also seems to fall in love with McCrea, as a lot of anti heroes do in Westerns, and there's a triangle with Lake. It probably would have been a better movie if they'd gotten rid of McCrea's character.

The film was directed by Andre de Toth who has a bit of a critical reputation - as a lot of B western directors seemed to at one time. This isn't perfect but it is interesting and it's fun to see Lake even if she isn't that sexy in Western garb. Great support cast too including Donald Crisp and Lloyd Bridges.