Showing posts with label Cannon Film Group. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cannon Film Group. Show all posts

Friday, January 30, 2026

Movie review - "Castaway" (1986) **1/2

 Intriguing - Oliver Reed puts ad in paper for woman to live on island with him for a year. They have sex before even going out there and the relationship is explored. 

It's patchy, erratic, always watchable. Amanda Donahue isn't as naked on screen as often as I'd been led to believe. She's excellent. Great to see Reed in a decent role for a change. 

The island is located near Australia and there are some Aussie characters in it. 

Tuesday, June 27, 2023

Book review - "The Cannon Film Guide Volume II (1985-1987)"

 The period when Cannon went for the big brass ring. They kept making their bread and butter films - Charles Bronson, Chuck Norris, plus Michael Dudikoff etc - but attacked on two other fronts: classier IP (Runaway Train, Superman 4, Masters of the Universe) and art house stuff. It came crashing down for them but also provided their biggest triumphs - Runaway Train, 52 Pick Up. If Cannon had kept their head down maybe they would've lasted, but if they could've done that they wouldn't have been Cannon. A fun read.

Saturday, May 13, 2023

Book review - "The Cannon Film Guide: Volume I, 1980–1984" by Mike McPadden

 Lovingly done. Some great interviews. I wish it had been more thorough. Lots of credit listings and plot synopses, like a pre internet book. I wish he'd done some more research on production of films. This touches on early Cannon films - the Ninjas, breakdancing, Bronsons, Norrises, some of the classy stuff (eg Love Streams).

Sunday, April 24, 2022

Movie review - "Link" (1986) **1/2

 A frustrating experience. The set up and idea is solid: student Elizabeth Shue goes to work as an assistant for enigmatic professor Terence Stamp who is doing research on chimps. As she stays she starts to worry that one of the chimps, Link, could have murder on his mind.

Jerry Goldsmith is credited for the jaunty, chirpy score which doesn't feel right. There's beautiful Scottish locations but too much of it seems shot inside a studio and that lacks atmosphere. I really wanted the atmos cranked up like with Rebecca - crashing waves, isolation, hostility. That isn't done.

Elizabeth Shue is very beautiful, likeable and chirpy - and I think her semi nude scene is justified (is that a body double in long shot?) because it does add to suspense with the creepy chimp looking at her - but maybe she's too chirpy. A more ostensibly mousy, scared actor could have brought more tension - I don't know like, say, Jennifer Jason Leigh or someone. She never seems too scared. I also think she should have been romantically interested in Stamp, leant into the Jane Eyre tropes more... Shue didn't need a boyfriend, the guys who visit at the end just could've been fellow students.

It does pick up in the last third when the chimp goes on the rampage. But it never quite conquers its case of the sillies.

Richard Franklin had a difficult time of it during the shoot. He had troubles with his crew, clashed with his producer, fidgeted with the script, fell inappropriately in "crush" with with leading lady. Maybe that's why this didn't click. It certainly was not widely seen.

Saturday, March 26, 2022

Movie review - "Dr Heckyl and Mr Hype" (1980) **

 Charles B. Griffith does a comedy-horror (I guess) based on Stevenson's famous story, updated to the present day. Oliver Reed in heavy make up plays a doctor who is nice but ugly and gets turned into a handsome cad.

It's a silly, "wacky" comedy that TBH could have done with more exploitation elements (violence, sex, nudity). Maybe it would've played better shot in the 50s with Dick Miller in the lead (Miller is in this, incidentally). 

Oliver Reed completely commits, it's got to be said - as Heckyl he's covered in make up and puts on a weird accent and as Hype does his Oliver Reed thing.

Sunny Johnson is quite good as the blonde dream girl - she died of a brain tumour not long after filming.  Griffith's old Roger Corman colleague Mel Welles pops in as a doctor.

This was an early American film for Cannon, who wanted a Love at First Bite. Didn't quite work out that way. I've got to say, it's not a dumb film, though - it is silly, very silly, but not dumb.

Sunday, October 03, 2021

Movie review - "Fool for Love" (1985) **

 Sam Shepherd plays aren't really for me but this might've worked really well on stage, with the actors right there, going for it. As adapted for film it's just a long slog - there's not much story and it's 100 minutes, taking 10 minutes for Shepherd (who plays the male lead) knocking on Kim Basinger's door.

The actors try. Robert Altman puts some scenes outside in a car park and in an empty diner to open it up but it's still slow moving and dull. So dull. Randy Quaid is in it, and Harry Dean Stanton. The actors are fine. The motel burns at the end. Great. Whoopee. Sorry this film put me in a bad move. Good on Cannon for trying to be arty but what about something more cinematic?

Sunday, December 13, 2020

Movie review - "Death Wish 5" (1994) **1/2

They tried for this one. It's not well known but they tried. The support cast is very good - Lesley Ann Downe, Michael Parks, Robert Joy. The characters are given stuff to do - Joy's punk-like killer, the henchman always eating food, Parks and his shades.

Script wise they do a good job of inducing fresh outrage instead of relying on it automatically. Bronson's new girl is the ex of a crime lord - she gets killed, and the crime lord takes custody of her kid, which gives it live stakes.

Some imagination in the action scenes - Bronson uses a soccer ball, a henchman dresses up in drag. There's a fashion world backdrop.

It's not a classic, Bronson was old, and it lacks delirious excess but there's some fine actors and they did try.

Thursday, November 19, 2020

Movie review - "Messenger of Death" (1988) **

 One of Bronson's starring vehicles is an attempt to do something a little different - though not too different. Here he's a journalist, and doesn't shoot that many, though he fires a gun at one stage and beats up someone at the end.

Ironically the story would have been more effective if played more typical. It's based on a novel The Avenging Angel, a Mormon thing (there was a Tom Berenger movie with that title) and is about a feud between two Mormon brothers in Colorado and an investigation into the death of a whole family.  It would have been easy to give Bronson a personal connection to that family and had his quest be a personal one - I think the movie would have been better. I understand the novel was about a cop but Bronson plays a reporter so presumably that was a requested change.

The film is fine. Solid story. A lot of old pros around - Paul Jarrico did the script, J. Lee Thompson directed, Jeff Corey and John Ireland play feuding Mormans, Trish Van Dere is the girl. A few younger faces would have helped.

I genuinely didn't guess the baddie, the Colorado locations are a treat, the Mormons gives it novelty, but really it feels like the episode of a TV series. If they wanted to make it a movie, they should have had Bronson has a former Mormon, with a personal connection (like he was raised by them or something) and it was his estranged sister who was shot. Being a reporter makes it feel like this is just another episode in his life.

Sunday, October 11, 2020

Movie review - "The Wicked Lady" (1983) **

 Michael Winner's remake of the classic is very faithful - he follows the structure - and packs the movie full of great actors and production value. But it doesn't work - at least not as well. It might have been better going off on his own path making it truly trashy. There are some boobs but they seem added - if he went soft core the whole way the film would seem to have more point.

Everything feels off. In the original it was clear Lockwood was motivated by her mother's death... Dunaway says those lines here but Winner shoots her reaction in long shot, so it doesn't have impact.

The ages of the cast is all off. Dunaway seems to old - she was 42, but Lockwood at 31 or whatever made sense. Denholm Elliot is too old at 60 to play someone truly loved by Glynis Barber who was in her late twenties. Alan Bates doesn't feel dashing enough at 50.

On one hand I liked the Barber and Oliver Tobias were f*ck buddies but then it didn't make sense for the character - if Barber was like that how did she lose Elliot to Dunaway... because in the original Lockwood seduced him. But if Barber is sexually active...? Barber and Dunaway need to be different. And why would Barber want Elliot instead of Tobias? And why would Tobias want Dunaway instead of Barber? You never feel that Barber genuinely likes Elliot or that Dunaway likes Tobias.

It's frustrating. The whip duel at least livens things up. The Barber-Tobias sex scene is not very sexy - we all have different ideas of what that is, but I don't know too many people who see it that way. It is hilarious the way they cut in her body double.

A very useful exercise to show how a remake that's very close can still fail. It should have just gone full AIP/New World/Big Bad Mama style.

The best bit is John Gielgud and Dunaway - they match well.

Friday, August 28, 2020

Movie review - "Kinjite: Forbidden Subjects" (1989) **

 Historic in a way - the last feature from J. Lee Thompson and the last feature lead from Charles Bronson. This was his contribution to Hollywood's late 1980s in Japan - and it does provide a point of difference.

There's memorable bits - Peggy Lipton is his wife, Nicole Eggert is his daughter, Bronson forces a baddy to eat a watch, Bronson and a fellow cop hold another baddy over a ledge to get him to talk and accidentally drop him.

The villains are Latino and black, with Japanese sort of half and half. Bronson goes on a racist rant but the film doesn't seem to endorse it. A Japanese character (James Pax, quite a large role) thinks it's okay to grope women on public transport because he sees it done in Japan so he tries it on Eggert, and she goes him - which is nice character stuff (Eggert is very good actually - fresh faced, strong actor).

The movie never seems to quite get its groove. Really it should be about tough cop Bronson whose daughter is sold into sex slavery a la George C Scott in Hardcore and Bronson blows away everyone. That feels like where it wants to go.

But instead Bronson divides up protagonist duties with James Pax and the Pax storyline is bitsy.

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Movie review - "Death Wish 4: The Crackdown" (1987) ** (warning: spoilers)

 Everyone was on their last legs here - Cannon, Bronson, J. Lee Thompson. Thompson took over from Michael Winner - the movie is less offensive, less memorable, more sensible. The bulk of the villains are still dark skinned, and there are moments of flourish like Bronson killing John Ryan with a rocket launcher.

He starts this one off with a girlfriend (Kay Lenz) whose daughter (Dana Barron) dies from a drug overdose, causing Chuck to go on a rampage. I like the Yojimbo element with him playing the two gangs off against each other.

The film feels routine - Bronson blowing people away and so on, which probably plays better in a packed cinema full of drunks than on the small screen. Bronson is quite active but his heart doesn't seem really in it.

The movie forgets Lenz for a bit then brings her along to be held for random, and she's killed - which surprised me - thereby justifying the rocket launcher.  Ryan hams is up with flaring nostrils. Lenz gives a nice restrained performance.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Movie review - "10 to Midnight" (1983) *

 Horrible movie. Part cop film part slasher. We see lots of POV of the slasher killer, often naked, chasing and stabbing screaming naked women. This is horrible. It probably made the movie profitable.

In the middle section though it turns into this other movie , and a decent one - Charles Bronson rigs evidence to frame a killer, causing a crime of conscience for partner Andy Stevens who is dating Bronson's daughter, Lisa Eilbacher. This is strong drama helped by good actors.

Then the end becomes about a naked man stabbing screaming scantily clad women at the end. I did enjoy Bronson shooting him.

This movie is a mess. A clearly rewritten lowest-common-denominator movie with an actual decent story inside struggling to get out.

Saturday, May 09, 2020

Movie review - "Lifeforce" (1985) **

I would've liked this more if I'd seen it as a kid - the nudity and nuttiness would have made more of an impact. Watching it years on it's another redo of Alien with a spaceship picking up some dodgy aliens... only the bulk of this is set in England in the present day. How did it cost $25 million? There's a bunch of effects at the start and the end but most of it looks drab.

Steve Railsback acts away with hammy integrity, there's too much Peter Firth and Frank Finlay. Firth becomes the hero in the second half and Raisback drops out and it's annoying. The constantly naked Mathilda May is fun It's also a hoot to see Patrick Stewart.

It has no pace and precious few scares. It's not exciting or scary or even that sexy. This should be great junky fun but I found it annoying.

Friday, May 01, 2020

Movie review - "Appointment with Death" (1988) ***

There's not a lot of kind words for this late period Peter Ustinov Poirot... in part because I guess Michael Winner directed it but also because it was Cannon Films and the cast lacks real star power. There's nothing wrong with Carrie Fisher, Laren Bacall, Hayley Mills, Jenny Seagrove, David Soul... but really every part needed to be played by someone at that level, there's too many unknown.

It's got to be said though the acting is pretty good - it's fun to see Ustinov doing his thing, and Gielgud, and Piper Laurie being a bitch, and Bacall being a bitch, skinny Carrie Fisher. I enjoyed the Israeli locations and period touches like the discussion of Palestine and Mrs Simpson. It moves fast and Christie narratives kick in during the second half as they tend to do. Like most Winner movies it's very fast. It does lack star power but this was unfairly picked on.

Monday, August 26, 2019

Movie review - "Runaway Train" (1985) ****

I have vivid memories of seeing this in the cinema which haven't left - the yelling and papers on fire at the prison, the boxing match, Eric Roberts incessant yet strangely comforting nattering, Jon Voight speaking through clenched teeth and a bloodied hand, the sense of freezing cold, the train operator who has his head shoved in the toilet.

It remains a powerful, arresting film - they didn't make many movies like this back then and they don't now. Rebecca de Morney is nearly unrecogniseable but adds warmth and human feeling as a third person on the train.

There's not actually that much action i.e. jumping around on a train. You can see how they keep the budget down - lots of scenes inside the caboose and inside the train HQ. The film maybe could have done with another sequence and maybe another baddy for them to overcome. John Ryan's arrival on the train feels a little anti climactic - Voight easily bests him.

Magnificent ending. Good editing. Great prison scenes - Eddie Bunker works on the script and also appears. It feels so real.

Still would've loved to have seen the Kurosawa version. 

Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Movie review - "King Solomon's Mines" (1985) ***

Fun, broad, silly. It's much hated but I liked it - the filmmakers had a vision and they executed it. It's not terribly faithful to the original story but it has some elements. Dick Chamberlain is clearly having the time of her life and Sharon Stone is acting her arse off. Her success in Basic Instinct surprised people but not those of us who saw her shine in this and Irreconcilable Differences. She and Chamberlain are a likeable duo - I'm always hesitant to read too much into actor's sexualities but there's a safeness about Chamberlain with her which means he doesn't give off a rapey or lecherous vibe.

The antics are colourful and the energy levels high. Sometimes it just gets silly like with the airplane sequence and when they're in a cooking pot.

There's a decent budget, the African locations help, as does the rousing music score and a cast that includes Herbert Lom, John Rhys-Davies and Ken Gampu. I liked this! (Admit it may be in part because I watched it at the cinema when I was young.)


 

Monday, July 15, 2019

Movie review - "Allan Quatermain and the Lost City of Gold" (1987) *1/2

Shot simultaneously with King Solomon's Mines this has an even worse reputation but I found it amiable.... for the first half hour. Then it just got sillier and sillier and in the end was a chore.

Okay the positives:
* location filming in Africa
* it surprisingly faithful to the novel Allan Quatermain
* I always enjoy Richard Chamberlain and Sharon Stone
* James Earl Jones pops up as Umslopogaas - and we see Umslopogaas
* Elvira pops up as a sexy vicious queen
* Henry Silva is in it

Now for the negatives:
* the lost civilisation just looks stupid full of white people and everyone walking around in robes - I know this is in the novel but surely there was a way of doing it that was less dumb
* the conflict between the sisters is undercooked, the mechanisms in the kingdom was confused
* Henry Silva looks ridiculous in a turban and brownface
* they go nothing with Umslopogaas they may as well cut him out of the film
* there's no romance when people get there - Chamberlain and Stone are coupled up giving Stone nothing to play
* Chamberlain's brother is played by Martin Rabbett with toothpaste model teeth and shiny blonde hair who looks like a cardigan model... and his presence only makes sense when you realise he was Chamberlain's partner in real life (Chamberlain does seem particularly animated in their scenes together) - Rabbett's romance with Aileen Marson is really undercooked
* they waste Elvira
* Robert Donner's comically cowardly Arab feels like typical Cannon Film anti-Arab bias
* the action scenes and jokes are dumb.

Ugh. It's just bad. I liked the first movie! Not this.

Movie review - "Assassination" (1987) *

A decent enough set up - secret service man Charles Bronson has to defend first lady Jill Ireland. You can see the opportunities for conflict - he's rough she's hoity toity, he protects her, they develop a respect... it's The Bodyguard.

Only for some reason they don't play the love story. Bronson has a romance with a female secret service agent - Asian American, so at least it's diverse. He and Ireland develop respect but that's it.

And the story is lame. The person behind the assassination attempts is... the Chief of Staff (Michael Ansara) because... he wants the president to be single. WTF?

The assassination attempts are stupid. There's all these outlandish sequences where the killers try to get Ireland via helicopter, and Bronson zips around on a motorcycle. There's uzis and explosives. None of it feels real. It's so dumb.

Bronson is ideally cast. He seems more animated and lively than other films - maybe because he's doing so many scenes opposite his then wife Ireland who was recovering from breast cancer.

Ireland is terrible - she's given too much dialogue and too much to do. I didn't mind her in other Bronson films but she's really bad here.

It was the last feature directed by Peter Hunt who did such a marvelous job on On Her Majesty's Secret Service. His work here is poor.

Wednesday, July 10, 2019

Movie review - "Sahara" (1983) **

One of the (several) attempts by Cannon to crack the big time, this is a cheerful big budget adventure movie which doesn't quite work though you can see what they were going for. It's a 1925 car race across Africa with Brooke Shields as a woman who enters a man in order to win it.

That's not a bad idea for an adventure film but Shields - who is very beautiful and does try - wasn't up to the role then. I think a decade later, or even a few years later, she would have knocked it out of the park... she later developed a genuine flair for comedy. But here she was too inexperienced - the tinny voice is too annoying.

She's too young. now this could have worked if they film was written accordingly but it's constructed to be played by an older actress - there's scenes where she takes a waterfall shower and her nipples are seen through a wet shirt, and she has sex with Lambert Wilson, who is too old for her. Her having sex very young was the point of The Blue Lagoon and Endless Love so that didn't feel weird but it's uncomfortable here, to me at any rate. Having cast her I think they should have just played her as a teenager - no sex with the Sheik, no nipples are more age appropriate co star. In some bits Brooke is effective - driving the car, flinging her male make up away - and she looks fantastic.

The film needed decent support characters and subplots like The Great Escape. It's got Horst Bucholz hanging around - I wondered why they didn't give his role to a proper comic. Lambert Wilson is effective as the dashing sheik and Jon Rhys Dvies is fun as a bad sheik - these two enter into proceedings in the right spirit of fun.

But there's not enough race. The race gets forgotten and the middle slab is about shenanigans among the sheiks, as if anyone cares. They periodically cut to some other race people but I'd forgotten who they were.

Also the plot about Brook pretending to be a man is used for about five minutes. Then she reverts to being a woman and it never becomes an issue.

The film needed more focus on the race, better support characters, race characters who wanted Sheilds to lose, more stakes on her winning the race.

It's mostly inoffensive though. I don't know why it's received such hate. An easy target I guess.

Monday, July 08, 2019

Movie review - "Firewalker" (1986) **

The turning point in Chuck Norris' career - he never had a really solid film hit after this (although Walker Texas Ranger had a long run). It's a shame because I loved how he wanted to broaden his range and do something a bit different that was still in the action arena.

The basic idea of this isn't bad - searching for treasure in Mexico. And director J Lee Thompson had done a decent tongue in cheek adventure for Cannon with King Solomon's Mines and it benefits from a cast that includes Jon Rhys Davis, Sonny Landham, Lou Gossett Jnr and Melody Anderson.

But it makes some key errors. A simple story is muddled with random things that jut out, like Anderson being affected by a spirit. It lacks decent stories to cut away to - you don't get a sense of impending danger or threat. Rhy Davies pops up, looks as though he's going to play a major role, then disappears. There's not enough Landham. It could have done with another subplot - someone else after the treasure, say.

Most damagingly all the lead characters are the same - amiable nice people who make the occasional joke. There's no character deliniation that you got in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid or Romancing the Stone or even King Solomon's Mines (the Cannon version). Why not say have Gossett chatty and Norris taciturn? But they're both quite chatty. Why not have Anderson hoity-toity or virginal or something? Give her something to play...

It's not terrible. Nice scenery in Mexico. The direction is a bit flat. Thompson didn't do as good a job as he did in Solomon.