Showing posts with label John Ford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Ford. Show all posts

Saturday, March 07, 2026

Book review - "Vera Miles: The Hitchcock Blonde Who Got Away" by Christopher McKittrick

 Miles was a solid, pretty actor who delivered solid performances over the years, including some classics - The Searchers, Psycho, The Wrong Man, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. I think it's fair to say she's no one's favourite part of these movies but she doesn't let anyone down. The most interesting thing about her career is Hitchcock was briefly obsessed with her and wanted to star her in Vertigo but she fell pregnant and he ended up using Kim Novak.

This is a conscientous, dogged book, like a Miles performance, not that gripping - her life and career wasn't that interesting. She had a few divorces, the Hitchcock interlude... that was about it. She seems like a nice person who married a few dodgy men. The book might've been better putting more dates and credits in an appendix than the text.

Friday, November 10, 2023

John Ford connections with Australia

Just finished Scott Eyman’s biography of John Ford, though I’d do a top ten. My top ten of films probably too obvious so here’s a top ten of John Ford connections with Australia

1) He directed Rod Taylor in Young Cassidy (1965), before falling ill and being replaced by Jack Cardiff - Ford and Taylor got along very well and I wish Taylor had hired Ford to make Chuka, Taylor’s attempt at producing
2) Ford was BFFs with Frank Baker, an Aussie in Hollywood (brother of Snowy Baker) - he worked for Ford for a number of years as an assistant and actor
3) Aussie John Farrow directed Hondo (1953) but star John Wayne disliked his work and got in Ford to shoot some extra footage
4) Donovan’s Reef (1963) - Ford directed South Sea shenanigans features some Australian sailors all played by Americans
5) They Were Expendable (1945) - tale of the US defeat in the Philippines includes a sequence where General MacArthur is taken off the island and sent to Australia

6) Before and during Maureen O'Hara was making Kangaroo (1952) in Australia, she says Ford sent her a series of very inappropriate love letters which O'Hara put down in part to the fact he was envisioning her in The Quiet Man (O'Hara later claims she busted Ford making out with a male actor so anyway...)

7) In the late 1940s Ford explored making a Western style film set in Australia Stingaree based on the novel of the same name

8) The Long Voyage Home (1940) had for some reason censorship troubles in Australia (https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/167432598?searchTerm=%22john%20ford%22%20director%20australia)

9) Prisoner of Shark Island has two Aussies in the cast - JP McGowan and OP Heggie

10) Australian doco Kokoda Front Line won the Oscar for Best Documentary - but had to share it with Ford's Battle of Midway (and Moscow Strikes Back and Prelude to War - they couldn't make up their mind)



Thursday, November 09, 2023

Book review - "Print the Legend: The Life and Times John Ford" by Scott Eyman

 Eyman can be counted on to do a good biography and he does very well by Ford - solid research, entertainingly written. Maybe a little easy on Ford's racism. And also doesn't cover the possibility of his homosexuality - it refers to crushes and possible affairs with women (Katherine Hepburn)... although these seem asexual. His torment, drinking, preference for male company, consistent use of Jeffrey Hunter (who is barely mentioned in the book).

I'm being salacious. The rest is well done. Ford wasn't always admirable but also was a genius. The most moving section is the end, with Ford longing to direct but also scared he'll be able to (there were some options), being feted, estranged from his son, with an alcoholic useless daughter.

Sunday, April 03, 2022

Movie review - "The Hurricane" (1937) ***** (warning: spoilers)

 Not one of John Ford's most "personal films" which means there's not a lot of annoying Irish comedy. But it is a Ford movie: there is lyricism, beautiful photography and handling, lingering over depictions of ceremonies (a wedding), a portrayal of a tight-nit outpost, a drunken Thomas Mitchell, a martinet (Raymond Massey).

This has two superb villains, both entirely believable types: John Carradine as a nasty overseer, and Raymond Massey as a self righteous "I must enforce the law" type.

Hall and Lamour are very sweet. This was Hall's best film and performance - he is full of youthful energy and charm, a bright smile, with the drama deck stacked in his favour. The injustice of his cause is excellently conveyed: picked on because he's a native, slapped in the face, punches a man who happens to be well connected, given six months harshly, ignored by pompous Massey, beaten by guards, driven to suicide, eventually escaping. Carradine's look of triumph when this happens is chilling as is Massey's look of delight when Hall kills a guard - you can see the vindication in their eyes. This is all too familiar from people we see today.

Indeed, I was kind of disappointed Massey didn't die in the hurricane - he deserved to - and that Hall didn't kill Carradine - indeed, deserved. I wouldn't have minded if Thomas Mitchell, the boozy doctor, had died and felt for nice C Aubrey Smith and his parishoners being killed in a church which is wiped out. But that's a strength of the film - it "goes there".

You could argue the island cops the hurricane from God because it helps Hall. Just saying.


Tuesday, June 08, 2021

Book review - "Five Came Back" by Mark Harris

 Excellent look at the war career of top directors. A lot I was already familiar with but some stuff was fresh. The filmmakers spent a lot of time on these documentaries. They are lively characters - George Stevens whose life was changed, party boy John Huston, angsty Frank Capra, driven William Wyler. Entertaining.

Saturday, February 20, 2021

Movie review - "The Last Picture Show" (1971) ***** (warning: spoilers)

 This could've gone wrong so easily - Texasville gives some indication how - but this just works. Every decision: location work, black and white, being set twenty years ago, a 1971 view of 1951 meaning sex and violence could be shown but it was still in present memory, the casting.

It meanders on a bit but always with point. At times I was thinking this is a four star or four and a half star film but the ending walloped me: the shocking death of Billy (Sam Bottoms) and Sonny (Tim Bottoms) going to see Cloris Leachman who goes him. Stunning.

Although specific to time and place it is universal - leaving school, falling in love, regret, the death of an old man. It focuses on two boys but the women all get a turn: Jacey is a vixen but a three dimensional one, motivated by her mother who gets a terrific monologue, Eileen Brennan the waitress gets a great monologue and Leachman's speech is divine. I love the matter of fact acceptance by Ellen Burstyn of Bottoms having a fling with Leachman ("it's a scratchy age").

So much great stuff: the plot about a preacher's son being a pedophile and the way it's dealt with (I forgot that whole storyline but it's well done), the second-rate-ness of the football team, the matter of fact nudity, John Hillerman trying to engage his school class. 

Better writers have written about this movie but it is just damn good. Why didn't Bogdanovich make more dramas?

All the actors are perfect: both Bottoms, Ben Johnson, Cybil Shepherd, the old faces, etc.

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

Movie review - "Mogambo" (1953) ***1/2

Remake of Red Dust which works on its own terms - they keep the basic story but give it a fresh location, in Kenya, and while Clark Gable is back, his age means the interpretation of the role is very different.So too does the casting of Ava Gardner as Jean Harlow and Grace Kelly as Mary Astor.

This film needs stars to work and has great ones. Gable is perfect as an aging old rogue. I like Gardner as a shady lady off to see a Maharajah - her character is softened from Harlow, who was just a hooker; Gardner is given this backstory how her husband was killed in the war, and is basically a decent person. It's not as fun as the original but it does work on it's own terms.

Kelly is superb - the good girl with a fire in her loins. She really comes alive in her kissing scenes with Gable - she clearly wants him. It's very sexy. You can see why this turned her into a star and it's amazing MGM could never find her another role as good (she would be wasted in decorative parts and play her great roles outside the studio).

The location shooting in Kenya helps and it's nice that Kelly's husband Donald Sinden is on a science exploration not shooting people. Africa seems genuinely dangerous here - snakes everywhere, rain, hot weather. The blacks of course don't get much of a look in.

It doesn't feel obviously like a John Ford movie. But it is enjoyable.

Tuesday, August 27, 2019

Book review - "John Wayne: The Life and the Legend" by Scott Eyman

Typically excellent biography by Eyman, marred by the only occasional smart arse throw away line, and by the fact that Wayne's life has been chronicled so many times before. He doesn't really come up with super new stuff but what's here is very solid.

It's an affectionate look at the actor-producer-director - Eyman clearly likes him though recognises the man's flaws. It explores some Cold War politics, but also goes really in depth into the financial machinations of Batjac, which almost went bust following The Alamo but Michael Wayne brought it back.

Random thoughts:
- Wayne's second wife always comes across as a Carmen Miranda caricature
- Michael Wayne seems to have been a very smart guy
- Wayne was a decent father
- the affair with Gail Russell seems to have been emotional more than anything else
- Eyman is rightly suspicious of the memoirs of screenwriters when it comes to encounters with Wayne
- he disliked John Farrow and got other directors to reshoot his stuff
- he didn't have that many affairs but he did do Marlene Dietrich
- he was a smart guy but was a terrible businessman and amazingly was always short of cash
- Eyman excellently pays overdue attention to Charles Feldman and James Edward Grant as hugely influential figures in Wayne's life.

Very good book.

Saturday, July 20, 2019

Movie review - "Stingaree" (1934) **

Not a very well known movie despite being directed by William Wellman and starring Richard Dix and Irene Dunne... and being set in Australia. It's based on stories about a gentleman bushranger, which I'd never heard of - I'm actually surprised no one has ever had a crack at the Stingaree stories since.

Anyway the plot is about bushranger Dix becoming infatuated by colonial gal Dunne who is a singer - he pretends to be a gentleman of leisure to hang around her and encourages her to sing, and they fall in love, and she finds out he's a bushranger and is offended and she becomes a star but loves him.

The plot reminded me of 1940s Betty Grable musicals with their misunderstandings - only here with a bushranging element. There's a little bit of action but not much. Andy Devine is Dix's sidekick that's how authentically Australian it feels.

There's too much singing - not just Dunne but also her mother. The film feels darkly lit with low ceilings - I'm not sure Wellman was a great musicals director. There are rapey elements in Dunne's romance with Dix. Dix is too fat to be a scary bushranger though he has a little bit of charm.

John Ford apparently wanted to do the stories in the 1930s. That would have been interesting.

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Movie review - "White Feather" (1955) **1/2 (warning: spoilers)

The film that must surely have indicated to 20th Century Fox that Robert Wagner didn't have what it took as a movie star. Surely. He looks completely out of his depth as a cowboy who tries to negotiate peace with the Indians - it's based on a true story, and in case you start wondering "hey that sounds like Broken Arrow", well this too is based on a true story, has a white man marrying an Indian played by Debra Paget, was based on a script by Delmer Daves, and focuses on the friendship between a white man and an Indian (played here by Jeffrey Hunter).

It lacks the oomph of Broken Arrow. Wagner and Hunter are no James Stewart and Jeff Chandler - but in their defence their relationship isn't as well drawn. The romance between Wagner and Paget is sweet but doesn't have the kick of Arrow because neither of them die (which is nice in its own way it just doesn't have the kick).

The film weakens Wagner's character for some reason. It sets up both Jeffrey Hunter and Hugh O'Brien are anti Wagner because of the latter's romance with Paget. Both try to kill Wagner. But Wagner doesn't kill either - the Indian chief shoots O'Brien and the cavalry shoot Hunter.

There's this potentially really interesting subplot about Virginia Leith, the daughter of a storeowner - who hangs out with Wagner for a bit, and, it's hinted, was a rape victim. But she disappears from the story. Why? Why not have a love triangle? Or use the rape victim stuff? Or have her fall for an Indian? Or made her a baddy? Do something!

John Lund has a bigger role but it's pointless too. Why not make him a racist? A baddy? Or a do gooder or a comic relief or something? You could cut him out of the film.

It looks good I'll say that. It does personalise Indians and gives them characters to play, albeit by white actors. There are some lovely images of the cavalry and landscapes and what not - the influence of John Ford is clearly felt. The director was Robert Webb who doesn't get much critical love but I felt did a good job.

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Movie review - "What Price Glory?" (1952) ***

One of those "oh yeah he made that didn't he" John Ford movies - a remake of a very influential 1920s play, whose influence can be felt on Ford's work with its quarrelling soldiers.

I actually didn't mind this. It should have been made on location at this stage in the game - the colour photography doesn't look good in the studio setting. You can sense it was once meant to be a musical - Corinne Calvet sings a number in a bar, and Marissa Pavan sings (well, mimes) to Robert Wagner.

But the basic material is still strong - two experienced soldiers squabbling with each other, stealing the same woman, then being brave, and going back to squabbling.

It's a strong cast but it doesn't quite click. It was weird to watch - individually Jimmy Cagney, Dan Dailey and Corinne Calvet were fine, but... they didn't have the right chemistry. I believed Cagney and Dailey on their own but not as long term rivals. I bought Calvet as a French tavern owner - she's bright and engaging - but I never felt Cagney or Dailey were genuinely interested in her.  I just really wish John Wayne and Ward Bond were in it (they played in a stage production directed by Ford along with Gregory Peck and Maureen O'Hara!)

The best section is in a dug out when a soldier has a breakdown, and Robert Wagner dies. This has a serious element that the film could have done with more of.

It's vigorous and bright. No classic but decent enough.

Monday, February 04, 2019

Book review - "Screewriter, the Life and Times of Nunnally Johnson" by Thomas Stempel

A biography of Nunnally Johnson? Sure, why not? It helps that Stempel is a pleasant writer, who has done a number of illuminating book on screenwriting.

Johnson occupies a curious place in American film history - I'm not sure how well he is remembered. Possibly he was better known say 40 years ago when his films would have been more widely seen on television.

He was a journalist and short story writer who went to Hollywood, as so many of them did at that time (Charle Brackett, Ben Hecht etc). Like many of them he sometimes had a reputation of someone who sold out their talent - a trope which Stempel rightly mocks. Did we really lose so much from Johnson giving up his stories of small town life in Georgia for Hollywood screenplays?

It took him a little while to get going, but what made him thrive was working for Darryl F. Zanuck at the new Twentieth Century Pictures, which became 20th Century Fox. Johnson became one of Zanuck's gun screenwriters, along with Philip Dunne and Lamar Trotti. Like he eventually moved his way up to producing, more out of boredom than anything else. Like Dunne he became a director as well who isn't remembered particularly fondly - though I feel his reputation is slightly higher than Dunne's because he made Three Faces of Eve with Joanne Woodward.

He did leave Zanuck for a period, working for Bill Goetz at International Pictures, but didn't do particularly well and returned to Zanuck. He eventually retired in 1970.

It was an extremely good career, a lot of classics: House of Rothschild, Jesse James, The Grapes of Wrath, Roxie Hart, The Gunfighter, The Desert Fox, How to Marry a Millionaire. He kept relevant up until the end - in the 1960s his credits included popular James Stewart comedies like Mr Hobbs Takes a Vacation (with Fabian), as well as The Dirty Dozen and Flaming Star. He tried Broadway a few times and it didn't work but there's no shame in that.

He seems to have been a nice man, gentlemanly, perhaps a little fond of the bottle, very dedicated to work. The book hints his third wife - the marriage that lasted - wasn't perhaps entirely happy giving up her acting career.

Stempel doesn't touch on some of the more racist aspects of Johnson's work such as the depiction of blacks in The Prisoner of Shark Island. He is very strong otherwise on analysing Johnson's scripts, particularly the man's interest in writing about marriage and having married heroes.

A very interesting book.

Monday, January 07, 2019

My Top Ten Depictions of Australians in Hollywood films

1 - “Donovan’s Reef” (1963)

The last feature film teaming of John Wayne and John Ford which I’d always thought was a buddy film between Wayne and Lee Marvin is actually more a “Quiet Man”/“McClintock”/“Taming of the Shrew” Rom com between Wayne and the (surprisingly good but little known) Elizabeth Allan - which ends like many Wayne rom coms with him spanking her on his knee for comedy.

It’s set In French Polynesia and Aussies appear at the end - a visiting ship from the Australian navy turns up, resulting in the crew chasing the local women down the Main Street in a pack (not making that up) and a couple of lower ranks starting a brawl with Wayne and Marvin. They all have Irish accents - the playing is v typical of the sort of comic drunken sergeants played by Victor McLaglen who turned up in Ford movies (McLaglen was dead by this stage and Chips Rafferty off making Mutiny on the Bounty so Ford got Dick Foran to play the main Aussie) Wayne’s son Patrick turns up as an Australian officer. They all sing Waltzing Matilda and Wayne snr brings up the fact we were all on the same side during the Battle of the Coral Sea.

Well at least we were in it (at a time when v few films were made in Australia)

Nb Ford later agreed to the casting of Australian Rod Taylor as Irish playwright Sean O’Casey in Young Cassidy in part bc he figured as an Aussie Rod might be part Irish.

 2.. "Botany Bay" (1953)

Starring Alan Ladd as an American who , in the 18th century is unjustly convicted of a crime in England and sentenced to the brand new penal colony of Botany Bay... on a ship that just follows the first fleet. The director (John Farrow) was Australian and one or two bit players were as well as a few imported koalas but that's it. Some African Americans play indigenous Australians who pop up at the end to spear baddies ("they're like our Indians," says Ladd, "if we don't bother them they won't both us"). James Mason is a sadistic captain and Cedric Harwicke is Governor Phillip. Based on a novel by Nordhoff and Hall, who wrote the novel on which "Mutiny on the Bounty" was based - like that, this has sadistic captains and heroic sailors and a mutiny.

Judged by the standards of its day it's not that a great movie (the Farrow/Ladd sailing film "Two Years Before the Mast" is more interesting) but it remains the only First Fleet movie ever (I think) and it's got Dr Smith from Lost in Space in it!

3 - Captain Fury (1939).

Hal Roach, best known for comedies, occasionally made other films like this bushranger epic. Brian Aherne, a sort of poor man's Errol Flynn, the actor you'd cast when you couldn't get George Brent, Pat Knowles or Ian Hunter, plays the title role, an Irish convict sent to Australia who escapes to become a good bushranger who helps the local settlers fight against a villainous land owner (George Zucco). The Australian setting is not really emphasised, it's just the usual immigrant settlers and evil land baron that you'd see in the old West. The cast includes Victor McLaglen, John Carradine, Paul Lukas and Douglas Dumbrille, which is cool. It's awkwardly directed but interesting - bushranger films were absurdly banned in NSW for several decades so its interesting to see Hollywood's take.

Part 4  - Million Dollar Mermaid (1953) and Interrupted Melody (1955)

I grouped these together because they're both biopics of Aussies made at MGM within years at each other, both had opening scenes in Australia but drop the country pretty quick into the story after depicting it as a kind of version of England (to be fair, the films are set in MGM land rather than anywhere else), both ended up being among the best movies their stars ever made - Esther Williams plays Annette Kellerman in Mermaid, with Walter Pigeon as her dad and a cameo from a boxing kangaroo... In Melody, Eleanor Parker plays singer Marjorie Lawrence with Cecil Kellaway as her dad and Roger Moore as her brother (!).... Both are superior to other biopics of Aussies around this time made by foreigners -to wit, Sister Kenny (1946) and Melba (1952)

5- "The Man from Down Under" (1943)

To understand why this film was made, you need to know that Wallace Beery was once a film star: Beery was a beefy, big actor who specialised in playing lovable lunks who got up to comic antics with character actors and cute kids; often there was a woman who wanted to marry him. He had the vibe of James Gandolfini . Anyway for a long time his act was very popular and he was often ranked in the top ten box office stars in the US and MGM originally developed this story as a vehicle for Beery.

It's an original story but I'd love to know where the writers got their inspiration - I have a theory it might be the tale of Digger Tovell, a French orphan adopted by diggers during WW1 who was smuggled to Australia and grew up to be a young man (tragically dying in a car accident). If it wasn't that exactly it probably was a similar real life tale.

This is about Jocko Wilson, an Aussie digger who at the end of the war decides to smuggle to Belgian orphans back to Australia and raise them as his own. Then the film leaps forward twenty years or so and the kids are grown up - the girl is sent to finishing school, the boy is a boxer.

The subsequent plot goes all over the shop, in a manner reminiscent of more than a few MGM star vehicles with it's feel of a producer going "oh we should add this... and that... and I saw this movie last night and it was great and we should put that in as well." The boy/man, called Nipper, participates in a big fight and wins but is injured; his winnings enable Jocko to buy a pub in the country... really Australia's north, thus enabling it to be bombed by the Japanese when the Pacific War starts; the girl and boy have hots for each other but can't do anything about it because they think they're related; an American journalist sniffs around the girl but her "brother" jealously punches him out; there are some Catholic Priests near the pub ("quick, Catholic priests are popular, put that in"); a barmaid abandoned by Jocko in France turns up to torment him; World War Two starts and Jocko tries to enlist but is too old and unhealthy, so joins the Land Army; then the Pacific War starts and the pub is turned into an orphanage (I think) which is bombed by Japanese and the Japanese crash and some pilots attack the orphanage ("quick Mrs Miniver had them fight off enemy pilots put that in") but luckily Jocko and Nipper turn up and help fight off the Japanese (along with their friend Ginger who machine guns one to death!); Nipper and the girl discover they're not blood relatives and hook up; Jocko gets a commission in the army thanks to the intervention of the former barmaid.

It's a complete mess really, with the film never settling on what it wants to be about. I felt the real focus should have been on Jocko smuggling the kids back into Australia - there's a movie in just that - but that was only the starting point. There's all this narrative, the big romance plot being yucky because most of the time Nipper and the girl believe they're related but still want to hump each other. I so didn't want them to get together.

Still it is a perfect role for Wallace Beery - ex boxer, brave, rowdy, tough, prone to brawling, irreverent, running away from a woman who wants to marry him (the Marie Dressler part), doing lots of schtick with kids and dodgy mates, gambling, running pubs, mugging.

The only problem is Charles Laughton plays the role. Now Laughton was a brilliant actor, and his Aussie accent attempt here isn't bad, and he makes a decent rogue. But he's never convincing as an ex boxer, or successful former soldier (I know Laughton was one in real life but he doesn't look like the tough two fisted hero described here). Throughout the whole movie he feels like a superb performer who is miscast.

No one has a decent Aussie accent though people do try - mostly people sound cockney, though the priests are Irish. For Aussies this is fascinating because of it's depiction of Australia and Australians - most of the movie is set in Australia: Melbourne at first, where Jocko has a pub, then where Nipper fights his bout, then somewhere in north Australia. We get to see some pubs, a boxing venue, the country, lots of priests.

Dramatically it's a mess. There are lots of good actors and decent production values so it's easy to watch. Historically its fascinating. (And you know something, at least Hollywood made a film set in Australia during the war - Australians hardly ever did).


6 - Random Australians Who Pop Up in War Films

Mark Hartley would never forgive me if I didn't bring up Richard Harris' accent-strangling performance as the RAAF pilot at the beginning of "Guns of Navarone" but he was only one of a series of Aussie characters who popped up in war films of the 50s and 60s... a little reminder of our contribution. Most of you have probably seen James Coburn in "The Great Escape" (1963) (accent wrong but dialogue and attitude first rate... maybe the contribution of Aussie Paul Brickhill who wrote the book?) there was also John Gregson in "Above Us the Waves" (1955)... sometimes real Aussies would play them too like John Meillon in "Guns at Batasi" (1964)... and we get a whole film about an Australian platoon in "The Desert Rats" (1953) (although it focuses on two Poms, Richard Burton and Robert Newton), Chips Rafferty in "The Wackiest Ship in the Army" (1960), Peter Finch in "The Wooden Horse" (1950), Michael Pate as the coastwatcher who rescued a young JFK in PT 109 (1963)

It wasn't much of an acknowledgement, but then that's why we need our own industry - and it was a lot more recognition than that given to say, African or Indian troops who fought for the Allies

7 - Australia as a place to escape to

In the mid 1940s there was a subgenre of American war film called "stories of glorious defeat" - for the one time in Hollywood history it made a series of movies about a bunch of battles that America lost, mostly because during the early days of the war America lost all its battles (something the film constantly puts down to "treachery"). And in the bulk of these movies you had the characters trying to escape to Australia - "So Proudly We Hail" (1943) (which has Allied nurses as suicide bombers), "Air Force" (1943), "The Story of Dr Wassell" (1944). Australia does feature at the end but pretty much just as a back drop.

(A flip side to this - "The Sea Chase" (1955) which features John Wayne as a German sea captain (!) fleeing Sydney in 1939 to escape the allies.)


8 - Famous Australian Stars

Prior to Mel Gibson, the biggest Australian film star was probably Errol Flynn who only played an Australian twice on screen in his career - "Desperate Journey" (1942) a war film, where he plays an Australian pilot shot down in occupied Europe. He whistles "Waltzing Matilda" and at the end of the film says "now for Australia and a crack at those Japs". That's about as Australian as it gets. In "Montana" (1950), a Western, he plays a sheep farmer who grew up in Australia. In his one Australian film, "In the Wake of the Bounty" (1933), he played the British Fletcher Christian.

The biggest star after him was Rod Taylor who only played an Australian on screen four times in his entire career (which went for over fifty years) - "The VIPs" (1963), "The High Commissioner" (1968), "On the Run" (1982) and "Welcome to Woop Woop" (1996). He made three Australian films where he played foreigners - "King of the Coral Sea" (1954), "Long John Silver" (1954), "The Picture Show Man" (1977) (I write about this at length in my book on him).

The big star after him was Peter Finch, who got to play Aussies a bunch of times, in Australian movies and overseas - notably "A Town Like Alice" (1956) and "The Shiralee" (1957)... I think because he was based in Britain, which cared a little more about Australia than the US.

Of course along with other Aussie stars at the time (eg Judith Anderson, Mary Maguire, Ron Randell) it's still fun to hear the Aussie accent slip in no matter what role they're playing.

9 - Unfilmed Australian stories.

Very very occasionally an Australian novel/play will get the Hollywood treatment - "Stingaree" (1934), "On the Beach" (1959), "Summer of the Seventeenth Doll" (1959), "The Sundowners" (1960)... (I'm talking stories set in Australia, not films based on novels by Australians which are a separate thing, eg The Great Escape, The 7th Dawn, The Shoes of the Fisherman)

But several novels were contemplated back in the day. 

"The Fortunes of Richard Mahoney" by H H Richardson, that classic novel a lot of Australians feel guilty about not having read yet, was bought by MGM who wanted to turn it into a Greer Garson vehicle in the late 1940s. The film never happened (though MGM did turn another Richardson novel into the Elizabeth Taylor film "Rhapsody" in 1954.) 

Diane Cilento bought the rights to Darcy Niland's novel "Call Me When the Cross Turns Over" in 1962 and Fox were going to film it with her then husband Sean Connery but it didn't happen. 

Neither did a proposed version of "Careful He Might Hear You" which Josh Logan wanted to make with Elizabeth Taylor in the 1960s (it was later filmed in the 1980s). 

Joseph Kaufman wanted to make a film of "Come in Spinner" in the 1950s (it was filmed in the 1980s).

Its fascinating to wonder what these films would have been like and how they would have depicted Australia - in the hands of a good director, as in "The Sundowners" it probably would have been good - I'm more inclined though to think they would have grabled it... which is why its important to have our own industry, etc etc

10 - Point Break

There's a lot I could have chosen (the Aussies in "Pacific Rim") but I thought I'd end with my favourite... the bit part actor at the end of Point Break (1991 of course) when it goes to Bells Beach Australia... No not Peter Phelps but the cop at the end who goes "What the f*ck, Utah? You let him go!" Gary Roberts and Owen Rutledge are listed in the credits as cops. I don't know who said what line but honestly these two should be household names.

Friday, December 21, 2018

Movie review - "Donovan's Reef" (1963) **1/2

I always thought this film was a buddy movie about John Wayne and Lee Marvin but actually it's a romance between Wayne and Elizabeth Allan, who I'd never heard of but who does a fine job - she's pretty, spirited, can act. And there's hardly any Wayne-Marvin stuff - far more important is Jack Warden, who plays Allan's estranged father, and who prompts the visit.

Really Maureen O'Hara should have played the Allan part. The film is like The Quiet Man, a romance between contrasting types, which is fine. I'm guessing it was either money, availability or the fact they wanted someone younger because (a) Hollywood and (b) in the story they wanted Allan to be the daughter of a friend of Wayne. Which mean Wayne romances someone young enough to be his daughter.

They could have adjusted the last bit - she could have been his sister, or cousin, it didn't really matter for the story. The main things you needed were (a) the culture clash of the uptight gal being charmed by the islands (b) fear she'll worry about miscegenation of the dad, which could have worked just as well for a brother.

Dramatically it feels wonky because we spent most of the film with Wayne and Allan then over an hour in we have to invest in the estranged relationship on Allan and her father Jack Warden. Warden's character is a real sh*t - another in a long, long line of absent fathers in John Ford films. He let his daughter grow up without spending any time with her. What a terrible person!

There are some pleasing shots of Hawaii. Everyone seems to have had a good time. Wayne and Allan have nice chemistry - mind you, Wayne had good chemistry with most of his co stars - it's one of the reasons he became a big star.

It's under-cast in some roles - it's a great idea to have someone chase after Allan for her money but instead of having someone who would be a real threat they cast Cesar Romero who is even older than Wayne and always depicted like an idiot.

Marvin and Dorothy Lamour is wasted, though Lamour gets to sing a few songs. It's a shame they had Wayne throw Lamour in a lagoon for comedy.

It's even more of the shame the climax consists of Wayne throwing Allan over his lap and spanking her then forcing her to kiss. Of course she gives in. Sometimes that happens in marital rape!

Australians will get a kick out of the end when an Australian Navy ship arrives on the island. The soldiers comically chase women down the street (to rape them?) while a couple of lower ranks hang out in the bar, all with Irish accents - one played by Dick Foran in what is clearly a Victor McLaglen style role. One sings "Waltzing Matilda", words are exchanged with Lee Marvin, John Wayne tries to calm things down by invoking the Battle of the Coral Sea ("we were ll on the same side") but a fight takes place... technically between the locals and the Aussies though Wayne and Marvin seem to punch each other. A local police officer, played by Mike Mazurski (in a role which must have been intended for Ward Bond) comically doesn't intervene. The officer in charge, played by Patrick Wayne, John's son, turns up and doesn't seem surprised, sending his men off to be disciplined.

Friday, November 16, 2018

The A to Z of The Other Side of the Wind

(originally written for filmink magazine)

A conventional review doesn’t seem appropriate when reviewing an Orson Welles film, particularly one that’s getting a release more than 40 years after actually being made, so Stephen Vagg thought he’d tackle it A to Z.

A is for AFI Lifetime Achievement Award, which Orson Welles was given in 1975… and used the occasion to tub-thump for money to finish The Other Side of the Wind. To be honest, that story and all it involved and what it meant for Welles (and Hollywood) is more moving than anything in Wind itself – but the film is still fascinating, provoking and a reminder of what a talented man Welles was.

B is for Bogdanovich, Peter, perhaps the most famous acolyte and chronicler of Welles, who plays a character based on himself in the film. Bogdanovich began his career as an actor, as he often takes pains to point out, and has carved out a decent part-time career for himself as a character player. His performance in Wind is not one of the film’s best, but it doesn’t matter because he’s so spectacularly well cast and brings such fascinating baggage to the role. It’s also heartbreaking to see this early ‘70s Bogdanovich be so cocky and confident on screen, and to know what hardships were facing him down the track (several flops, the murder of girlfriend Dorothy Stratten, two declarations of bankruptcy). There’s also a “young dumb blonde girlfriend of the director” character played by Cathy Lucas based on Cybill Shepherd, which understandably annoyed Bogdanvich. Shepherd herself and Bogdanovich’s ex-wife Polly Platt can be glimpsed in the film.

C is for completion, fear of, something which (some) amateur psychologists think Welles suffered from – pointing to all the unfinished films he made in his life along with Wind (Don Quixote, The Dreamers, The Deep, Filming the Trial, It’s All True). Defenders argue Welles would’ve loved to have finished those films if he’d had the money and support – indeed, some get very touchy at any suggestion otherwise. Personally, I think it’s possible to reconcile both the view that he was let down by other people and he contributed to the problem. To me it makes total sense that Welles might put his heart and soul into a film and then get cold feet towards the end, when energy runs low, funds run out, and you fear the finished project isn’t going to be as good as you hoped. And I get the feeling he knew that had Wind been released in his lifetime there’d be a bunch of reviews that would say “another disappointment from the maker of Citizen Kane”… as they did for F For Fake and Chimes of Midnight and for everything else since Citizen Kane. It doesn’t make the fact that he didn’t make more completed movies any less tragic.

D is for The Deep, another unfinished film of Welles’, this one made in the late ‘60s. It was based on the novel which was filmed by Phil Noyce as Dead Calm, and I hope someone like Netflix puts that together too. I have a feeling that with its thriller plot it might be more accessible to non film buffs than Other Side of the Wind.

E is for editing, done by Welles and (after Welles died) Bob Murawski. Murawski did a stunning job of approximating Welles’ style – he imitated the great innovator with supreme skill, and if anyone deserves an Oscar from this film apart from Welles and Gary Graver it’s him.

F is for Ford, John, who I’d argue had as much, if not more, influence on the character of Jake Hannaford than any other figure, including Welles and Ernest Hemmingway. Like Ford, Hannaford was self-consciously macho, Irish, had a clan who would hang around him, had Peter Bogdanovich as an acolyte, John Milius as another acolyte (he inspired the Jack Simon character played by Gregory Sierra) and was possibly gay (read Maureen O’Hara’s memoirs for the dish on that).Of course, there’s a lot of Welles in Hannaford but I would say there’s more Ford.

G is for Gary Graver, the DOP of Wind, and Welles’ right hand man for the last fifteen years of the latter’s life. Their relationship was fascinating and complex – Welles was a father figure and inspiration to Graver, though the relationship was possibly abusive (Graver was rarely paid and at Welles’ beck and call). It’s rich emotional material, more interesting than any of the relationships depicted in Wind, to be brutally honest. It has to be said Graver does a brilliant job of photography on Wind, and one hopes he gets an Oscar nomination.

H is for homosexuality, a theme which interested Welles later his career – such as in his film script for The Big Brass Ring, and The Other Side of the Wind, which hints that Jake Hannaford has a crush on his leading man. Mind you, there’s a lot of straight sex in it, too. A lot. Hey, it was the seventies.

I is for Iran, the country of the film’s co-financier Mehdi Bushehri, the brother-in-law of the Shah. When the Shah was overthrown in 1979, the legal situation of the film became extremely tricky and contributed to its delay in being released. Which is classic Orson Welles – his productions didn’t just have financial troubles, they had troubles that involved revolutions.

J is for John Huston, who plays Hannaford – rather surprisingly since Welles normally nabbed the best roles in all his own productions. Huston’s performance is fine, but you can’t help wishing that Welles had taken the role – he had more of a twinkle in his eye, more humour, more fun. And of course, the scenes with Bogdanovich would have taken on an extra dimension. I do love how Welles and Huston were BFFs in real life though.

K is for Karp, Josh, whose superb book on the making of the film is required reading for anyone interested in it.

L is for legal troubles, which dogged this film even more than other Orson Welles productions. I think any creative person would have adored the chance of working with Orson Welles. I think any lawyer would have been terrified.

M is for McBride, Joseph, a noted film historian, biographer, screenwriter, author and educator, who appears as a character based on himself, and wrote one of the best books on Welles, Whatever Happened to Orson Welles, which did so much to revive appreciation in the considerable achievements of Welles’ later years.

N is for Netflix, famed for their market dominance, the high quality TV shows, and the patchy quality of their movies. The restoration of Wind is one of the best things that the company has ever done, the best “original” movie they’ve ever released, and they should be proud of it.

O is for Oja Kodar, who co-wrote and appears in the film, and was Welles’ creative and romantic partner during the latter years of his life, even while he was married to (and lived with) another woman. You old hound dog, Orson! Kodar spends a lot of Wind’s running time walking around nude – I mean a lot – and is front and centre in what is already the film’s most famous sequence, riding cowgirl on Bob Random in the front seat of a car while her necklace beads slapp against her body and rain splatters outside. Welles’ admiration for Kodar’s body clearly didn’t extend to wanting to hear her talk – she doesn’t say a line in the entire film. She was apparently a leading reason in holding up the release of this film, which is a shame, since she is an arresting presence.

P is for pornography, which Gary Graver used to make to pay the bills while working free for Orson Welles. Orson even famously helped him out once, editing a shower scene in a porno called 3AM. Wind is easily Welles’ most sexy film, with plenty of nudity and copulation and even a dildo in the opening scene. I always thought Welles was a great lost maker of horror films (just look at how creepy the Xanadu scenes were in Citizen Kane) or action flicks (see the house of mirrors shoot out in Lady from Shanghai, or the battle sequences in Chimes at Midnight). After watching Other Side of the Wind, I’m convinced he would have made first rate porn and erotic thrillers too.

Q is for Q and As, which appear a lot in Wind – scenes of people standing around asking questions and replying. Did this happen to Welles in real life? Does it happen in real life? It felt weird to me watching the film but maybe this was how things were in the seventies and/or among famous directors.

R is for Rich Little, a celebrity impressionist originally cast in the role later played by Peter Bogdanovich. Little shot most of his part but then walked out on the film because he had a professional engagement. Welles promptly recast the role and no doubt stewed on the betrayal – which a lot of selfish self-centred people do, which Welles clearly was, despite all his genius.

S is for Susan Strasberg, daughter of Lee and Paula, a one-time wunderkind of Broadway whose career had become reduced to mostly appearing in guest shots on TV dramas when she got the call to appear in Wind. She plays – quite well – a figure based on Pauline Kael, who famously both defended and criticised Welles in print. Welles clearly remembered the latter – her essay Raising Kane – more than the former. The finale of Wind involves Hannaford punching this character in the face for suggesting he might be gay.

T is for They’ll Love Me When I’m Dead, a stunning documentary about the making of Other Side of the Wind, focusing in particular on Welles and his relationships with Bogdanovich, Kodar and Graver. It’s gripping, moving and captivating – a more emotionally affecting movie than Wind itself, though Wind is more innovative technically.

U is for Unknown Actors, which Welles delighted in using in his projects over the years. Sometimes it paid off – but there are some performances in Wind which are simply bad, such as Geoffrey Land as the Robert Evans style studio head, and Cathy Lucas as a Cybil Shepherd type. Gregory Sierra, a good actor, is disastrously miscast as a character that’s meant to be based on John Milius.

V is for vision, Orson Welles’, which is all over this film. A visual feast, full of ideas, erratic, overwhelming, stimulating. I know this is a flawed movie and I’ve been critical in this take, but I should also add it’s full of moments and scenes that have stayed with me, and I’ve seen it three times in a month, and each time gotten new stuff out of it. To counter balance that…

W is for writing, a skill at which Welles was never that good at, at least not compared to his abilities as an actor and director. If he had the help of a skilled collaborator like Herman Mankiewicz (as on Citizen Kane) or was adapting William Shakespeare, he was great, but he struggled more when writing on his own or with Kodar (eg The Big Brass Ring, Mr Arkadin). Wind has a great set up – a party in the last 24 hours of a director’s life – and plenty of ideas for drama: he’s gone bankrupt, his girlfriend is young enough to be his granddaughter, his leading man has quit, he might be in love with his leading man, he has to borrow money off his former protege. But none of these are really developed – the film is more interested in style and philosophical chat. There’s no confrontation with the girlfriend, or the leading man. No real resolutions, except death. And Welles fans will leap to his defence and go “oh that’s the way he intended, he’s subverting the form”. And I’m sure he intended to. But I’d also argue, looking at the whole of his career, that he simply wasn’t a very good screenwriter, and that’s reflected in Wind. And I also think it’s possible to say that, and say that the film is still fascinating and entertaining and well directed.

X is for X rated, which this film flirts with being at times. A dildo in the opening scene! (see pornography)

Y is for young Hollywood vs old Hollywood, which this film exemplifies. Hannaford is, like Welles and John Ford, very much a creature of old Hollywood, surrounded by cronies (played by old pros like Norman Lloyd, Mercedes McCambridge, Cameron Mitchell, Lili Palmer and Edmond O’Brien)… but who was so talented and such a maverick that he was immensely appealing to young Hollywood, as shown in the film (and in real life) by people like Bogdanovich, McBride and Jaglom.

Z is for Zabriskie Point, the 1970 Michelangelo Antonioni film which featured a house that is used in Other Side of the Wind. Welles mocks Antonioni’s film-within-a-film in Wind – lots of arty shots of Oja Kodar walking around naked not saying anything. Welles fans claim this is brilliant satire, which it is, but there’s so much of it. Kodar walks around not saying anything in the “real” section of the film, that you wonder how much he was sending it up, and how much he was simply having fun doing it himself.

Wednesday, November 07, 2018

Movie review - "The Other Side of the Wind" (2018) ****

I saw this twice, on Netflix and in the cinema, to get my film buff points. Random thoughts:
* big screen better than small because there's so much detail and visual/sound stuff to take in that you can appreciate it better on the big screen but...
* on both big and small screens the story problems remain
* the central idea is rich with drama - the last day (or night, really) of a director's life... he's fighting with the head of the studio, he's going bankrupt, his former acolyte is now far more successful than he is and he needs to borrow money off the guy, he's got a girlfriend young enough to be his granddaughter, he's got a bunch of cronies, his leading man has quit the film he's making and the director may be in love with him - all fantastic stuff but...
* Welles was never as good a writer as he was a director - he was okay if he had help from say Shakespeare or Herman Mankiewicz or Booth Tarkington or the life of William Randolph Hearst... but either on his own or with Oja Kodar he struggled... plenty of good ideas and moment but he/they struggled to shape scenes and exploit the drama. Opportunities are missed wholesale - the character of Jake Hannaford's girlfriend is thrown away, the male lead never comes to the party except at the end and he just stands there and it's not resolved or developed in any way. And Welles fans will probably argue "oh he's subverting expectations" but I think it was just beyond his abilities as a writer, and would point to the similarly flawed script for The Big Brass Ring to back this up
* the character of Hannaford is clearly autobiographical but there was also a hell of a lot of John Ford in it, perhaps more than Welles - the group of cronies, the Irish history, the hard drinking, the fact one of his acolytes was a filmmaker as well who seems to have been inspired by John Milius, the fact Bogdanovich wrote books on Ford as well, the guns
* no critic seems to be commenting the climax includes a moment where Hannaford punches a female critic for suggesting he's gay
* interesting to see Susan Strasberg, whose career so did not live up to its early promise, pop up as the Kael type figure - she's not too bad, though I admit I would have loved to have seen Polly Platt doing it (she was originally cast)
* fascinating to see Peter Bogdanovich, so cocky at that stage in his career, doing his annoying impressions, with a handsome yet slightly pudgy face, his acting not really up to the role but it's compensated for the fact he's playing himself and so much of it is based on their relationship - the fact he was a critic turned filmmaker, his very quick success, the deal he has with a Robert Evans type head of studio (similar to the one the Directors Company had at Paramount)
* Cybil Shepherd can be glimpsed super briefly - there's also super quick appearances from people like Curtis Harrington, Henry Jaglom and Dennis Hopper and apparently Cameron Crowe is there too - and Les Moonves!
* I get the film within a film is meant to be a spoof on Antonioni but Welles spends an awful lot of time on it - I mean we see a lot of this film, way after its satirical point has been made, and get the impression it was also there to show off his girlfriend's hot body (she walks around nude a LOT) -also the opening boobs and bums in the sauna seem really not needed
* the blankness of the actors in the film within in a film makes sense but it makes no sense, to me at any rate, that the actor characters played by Kodar and Bob Random, are similar dull blank slates - I think this is a major problem with the film especially as a crucial plot is that Random has betrayed Hannaford by leaving the film, but he's given no character, nothing... and I get the feeling Welles realised these actors simply weren't up to it... I could be wrong, but I don't think I am because...
* there's a fair few actors in the film who aren't up to it - some get away with it because they're cast so beautifully, eg Bogdanovich and Joseph McBride - but Geoffrey Land, the guy who plays the head of the studio isn't up to it (I wish they'd cast someone like Edmond O'Brien or Cameron Mitchell who are in the film but feel under-used... but I guess they were too old and Welles wanted to have someone do Robert Evans, not that the exec is presented unreasonably... Hannafort doesn't attend the screening) - neither is Cathy Lucas who plays the girlfriend
* the old dudes and dudettes like Norman Crane, and Mercedes McCambridge and Lili Palmer are magnificent (though you can sense Palmer was meant to be Marlene Dietrich)
* I love that there was a rival acolyte for Hannaford based on John Milius but Gregory Sierra is super miscast - too skinny and not faux-macho enough
*Technically its stunning - the editors and team at Netflix did a marvellous job - it has a magic about it - I did start to zone out around the two thirds mark
* parts of it felt weird, the people standing around having philosophical chats in front of a big crowd and going off to the drive in at the end.
Had this come out I feel it would've flopped - the story isn't up to it. But I'm so glad it was finally released and I hope Welles, Gary Graver and the editor get Oscar noms.

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Book review - "Girl Next Door: The Life and Career of Jeanne Crain" by Rupert Alistair

Crain is one of those movie stars whose reputation has not aged well, to put it mildly. She was a big star in her day and appeared in some genuine classics: State Fair, Leave Her to Heaven, Pinky and A Letter to Three Wives. She was nominated for an Oscar. She worked with Joe Mankiewicz, Elia Kazan and Otto Preminger.

But when the tide turned her career went downhill very fast and she never got it back - she went to work on stage and TV and as a character actress, but there was no late career appearance to make people appreciate her.

Crain was very pretty and not very good as an actor. I get the impression even Alistair felt this after analysing her career but was too polite to say so (I may be completely wrong).

But she had a look that was perfect for the time - the war and post-war era. This period is better remembered for its sultry film noir stars like Ava Gardner, or feisty heroines like Kate Hepburn, or exotic actors like Dorothy Lamour, or musical legends like Judy Garland, and they were definitely around, but so too "good girls" like Crain, June Allyson and Janet Leigh. Wholesome types who GIs could dream about on the front, who reassured people in a world gone mad that there were still nice, clean decent people out there.

Crain's dad shot through at an early age, and she wound up in California and started entering and winning beauty contests. She was spotted by a talent scout and her rise was fairly rapid. Orson Welles, of all people, seriously considered her for the role of Lucy in The Magnificent Ambersons, of all things before going with Anne Baxter. She was signed to 20th Century Fox who gave her a small part in The Gang's All Here then she was given the lead in Home in Indiana and - bang - she was away.

In hindsight Fox was ideal for her because Zanuck liked making Americana (eg Kentucky, State Fair) - you can imagine Crain would've played Will Rogers' daughter a lot had Rogers still been alive. State Fair remake was a huge hit as was Leave Her to Heaven (even though you might be likely to forget she was in it) and Margie. She made some unsatisfactory films with Otto Preminger and wound up in Letter to Three Wives because Zanuck insisted. Zanuck also refused to let her play the role of Clementine in My Darling Clementine because she was too big a star (a shame, I think she should have done it, but not doing it didn't hurt her career).

Pinky was a massive hit and she was in another Mankiewicz film People Will Talk but then in the early 50s her career hit a snag - Dangerous Crossing, Vicki, City of Bad Men - and she left Fox. She never regained her career momentum, being relegated to "the girl" parts like in Fastest Gun Alive and Guns of the Timberland. She did some TV (including a version of The Great Gatsby with Rod Taylor) and theatre and cabaret, as well as the obligatory films in Italy.

What happened? Admittedly Crain lost out on some roles because she was pregnant a lot - seven kids! She had four then she and her husband separated, then they got back together and had three more! She often lost roles to Anne Baxter, and missed some parts which would've suited her like the Jean Simmons part in The Robe. She wasn't suited for musicals, not really being a singer or dancer. I also think she was hurt by the emergence of Susan Hayward, who became Fox's go-to star for dramas.

I think the big thing is she wasn't very good. No actor could ask for more than a part in something like Pinky, Letter to Three Wives or People Will Talk. Crain always gave a similar performance - nice, polite, pert. When she was young and fresh she brought those qualities as well; over time they faded and she didn't have anything else.

Maybe that's unfair - she seems to have been a professional and worked hard. I'm sure she was a decent actor. She's not terrible in her films. But she never had the fire or spark of the great stars. (Admittedly I haven't seen every Crain performance.) Both Mankiewicz and Kazan disparaged her ability in their memoirs.

She could have been distracted by her love life. This book is good on Crain's career but fascinating on her marriage - she married Paul Brickman, a businessman so handsome he was briefly under contract to Warner Bros as a back up to Errol Flynn. They were together a long time, until her death, but it was not an easy marriage. They almost got divorced - she claimed he drank and hit her several times. He had affairs; he claimed she did too with friends (which seems true - doesn't excuse the hitting). They got back together. Despite seven kids they constantly went to parties and worked all over the place.

I don't think they were particularly focused parents - maybe that's not true but two of their children predeceased her, one a son who drank himself to death, the other son (a musician who would jam with the founder of Jane's Addiction!) who died of a heroin overdose. Crain and her husband did separate towards the end and lived in separate residences for the last part of their lives, but they never divorced. It's like something out of Mad Men - all those nannies looking after kids while the parents go to parties, drink and have affairs over cocktails.

It's an interesting book - probably more interesting than Crain on screen.

Friday, June 02, 2017

Documentary review - "Five Came Back" (2016) ****

Lots of books get written about Hollywood, but only a few get the deluxe documentary treatment - I'm guessing this got up because it focuses on directors who were so idolised by A list baby boom directors who agreed to appear on camera - this has Steven Spielberg, Francis Ford Coppola, Guillermo de Toro, Lawrence Kasdan, Paul Greengrass.

It is a good story - some leading Hollywood directors going off to war and being affected by the experiences: John Huston, John Ford, George Stevens, William Wyler, Frank Capra. All were characters of very different stripes: Huston was an adventurer, who couldn't help bucking against army authority, making several masterpieces including one on PTSD; Ford loved the military, probably had a high old time but was affected by it - took great delight in tormenting John Wayne while making They Were Expendable, and saw action; Wyler was a Jew, very conscious of the Jewish issues underlying the war; Capra was an Italian-American patriot (well they were all patriots), determined to show his new country how loyal he was; Stevens a great liberal.

The war affected them in several ways: Capra never really recovered his former position; Stevens lost his sense of humour.

The fact this is a documentary means you can see the films, especially important for the war films. The directors interviewed, not surprisingly, are good communicators. It's very touching how much del Toro feels a kinship for Capra, and Spielberg and Coppola's enthusiasm is always winning. Kasdan is a very bright analyst.

Sunday, May 21, 2017

Movie review - "Cheyenne Autumn" (1964) **

A terrible movie - long, dull, lacking insight or interesting/empathetic characters, full of actors doing "bits". I think even the hardest core John Ford fans struggle to enjoy this.

There are one or two good things. An impressive cast. The colour, A few stylistic compositions of Indians and cavalry standing in line. There's a bad ass moment where James Stewart shoots a cowboy in the foot through his pocket with a hidden gun. And it's John Ford, and you always get something out of a John Ford movie.

But by god was it heavy going. 154 minutes long! You feel every day of that Indian trek.

You get the feeling at the beginning it's going to be a hard slog, with Richard Widmark's narration not really explaining anything we can't figure out, and endless shots of Indians standing around in the hot sun, and badly written and staged love scenes between Widmark and Carroll Baker (I did like him writing his proposal on the blackboard, but there's no heat, no affection, no chemistry between them).

Eventually the Indians make a bolt for it but it's a dull slog. Widmark doesn't have a character so much as a bunch of lines about how much the Indians have suffered and what good fighters they are. Baker just gets lines about how much they have suffered; she accompanies them, basically a saint in training. Gilbert Roland and Ricardo Montalban give interchangeable performances as stoic, noble Indians. Montalban is more of a fighter than Roland I think and there's a plot about Montalban's second wife having the hots for Sal Mineo, which threatens to be vaguely interesting... but Ford trims that to the bone and instead gives us endless - and I mean endless - scenes of men on horses travelling through Monument Valley, or standing on crests of hills.

We also get characters doing "turns". Widmark has a bit of a go at the beginning, then along comes Mike Mazurski (playing the Victor McLaglen role) and he's given a drunken Polish sergeant bit, and some other random actor is given a drunken Irish surgeon bit, then Jimmy Stewart and Arthur Kennedy get an extended bit as Wyatt Earp and Doc Holiday. Edward G Robinson comes along and does a bit. Ford completists will enjoy seeing people like John Carradine, Ben Johnson and George O'Brien.

There's some action, none of it too memorable - the Indians are said to be good fighters but are never given the opportunity to kick some arse. Their only real victory comes because gung ho Patrick Wayne (in a wooden performance) stuffs up (he doesn't even die). They march and starve, and are saved at the end by white men.

I thought at the least they'd get the chance to get some revenge at the viciously racist Texan cowboys who shoot two starving Cheyenne just for fun (an affecting scene even if the cowboys over act). But it never happens. One of them later gets shot by Earp but not because of what they did to the Indians - only because they pick a fight with Earp.

It's an inherently depressing story - the Indians are treated badly, escape north, starve, most of them are massacred at Fort Robinson, and give up. But surely it could have been more interesting/entertaining? It feels like Ford was bending over backwards to show how liberal he had become about the Indians - the main issue is he'd become more dull about them.

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Movie review - "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance" (1962) ***1/2

I was surprised by the emotional reaction I had to this film. My expectations were so low going in - I'd seen clips with Jimmy Stewart and John Wayne far too old to play young things in the old west, heard that the film's heart apparently laid with Wayne's gunslinger as opposed to lawyer Stewart.

But it got me in the gut. It's very sympathetic to Stewart, who wants to bring law and education to the West - he's got book learnin', teaches at the school. He's brave but gets bullied by Lee Marvin's Liberty Valance, the sort of thug who always threatens the world (for instance he brutally attacks Edmond O'Brien). The film is about the conflict between Marvin and Stewart, with Wayne looking on... he understands Marvin and can deal with him; can see that Stewart can't, knows that Stewart stands for a better future. Both love the same woman (Vera Miles).

It's not a perfect film - there are all these sequences which don't feel needed, like the final election sequence (included to give John Carradine the chance to barnstorm?) which went on forever. The bit where Marvin confronts Stewart and his cronies at an election meeting didn't feel true - Marvin was scarier operating out of the shadows and in the dark. And Stewart and Wayne are too old.

But age aside they are well cast. The themes of bullying still have resonance. Its about being brave and the importance of myth and about realising the world is going to pass you by and it's sad and quite lovely.