Showing posts with label Preston Sturges. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Preston Sturges. Show all posts

Monday, May 09, 2022

Movie review - "Vendetta" (1950) **

 One of Howard Hughes' most notorious projects, with plenty of hiring and firings, a number of directors (among them Max Ophuls, Stewart Heisler and Preston Sturges, though the film is solely credited to Mel Ferrer), a Hughes starlet in the lead (Faith Domergue), a Hughes leading man featured (no one remembered them because they didn't have big breasts and/or become famous but there were a few, George Dolenz is here). There is plenty of narration.

Domergue is a Corsican determined to avenge the murder of her father and... that's about it. This is a dull slog. It stumbles long, with lousy photography and amateurish acting. Some familiar faces are competent, like Nigel Bruce and Hilary Brooke, but too much lies on the inadequate shoulders of Domergue, Dolenz and Donald Buka. 

Remarkably unsexy - there's not even Hughes-esque low cut gowns. It just stumbles on, then stops. Other Hughes films are a lot more interesting.

Wednesday, January 13, 2021

Book review - "Preston Sturges: The Last Years of Hollywood's First Writer Director" by Nick Smedley and Tom Sturges

 Sturges' career is very well covered via some solid biographies but this adds a fresh take in focusing on his last decade - the one after his Fox stint, when he made just the one film but was constantly trying to get up projects and failing, before dying relatively young.

Smedley tries to put a positive spin on this era, emphasizing how Sturges found true love with his last wife, never gave up, was always coming up with new ideas. And I'm sure Sturges when on form was marvellous company.

But he does not come across well in this superbly researched, illuminating book. He couldn't stop drinking, he loved his wife but cheated on her and ignored her, he was a lousy father (he didn't see his wife or kids for the last few years of his life), he kept spending money (once the third highest paid person in the country he managed to blow it all via idiotic decisions when all he had to do was buy real estate), he was hard to collaborate with, he whinged, he was fired from some projects and my sympathy was with the producers.

We did miss out artistically from a lack of Sturges projects - Smedley makes a case for the greatness of The Millionairess and I liked his gangster comedy idea - but some sound like terrible ideas.

Famous faces and names pop in and out -Sturges was mates with Orson Welles, he was always trying to work with Alec Guinness and Robert Donat, Errol Flynn almost starred in The French They Are a Funny Race (not sure how Errol would've gone but it would've been better than Flynn's Herbert Wilcox movies).

I think Sturges' problem was that he went from rags to riches so many times in his career, was such a successful gambler, that kept thinking his luck would turn around. And maybe it would have if he's managed to save some money and stay off the booze.

Movie review - "Unfaithfully Yours" (1948) **

 Some critics adore this one. I didn't like it. Rex Harrison is ideal as the jealous conductor who fantasizes about killing his wife. The dialogue is witty. I like Linda Darnell. The support cast is very good.

But I hated the story. Killing his wife because he thinks on thing grounds she's having an affair... I don't find that funny. Or watching three fantasy sequences. Or seeing him try to do it. I don't like him, I hate him.

That's just me, I know. I'm not surprised to see this flopped. It's mean. Darnell is nice. He's a fool. I mean, if he fantasised about killing the lover and the lover was a bully or something...

My "hot take": Sturges actually lost it after Miracle of Morgan's Creek. After that he went downhill, not when he left Paramount.

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Movie review - "The Sin of Harold Diddlebock" (1947) **1/2

 It didn't need to cost as much money as it did and the pacing is off. It needed to be tightened and brighter. But once I got used to old Harold Lloyd I didn't mind this. There's pleasant anarchy with him getting drunk for the first time, and buying a circus and winding up on a ledge with a lion among other things.

It just could've been tighter. Oh and the romance is bad. The girl is like the sixth version of another girl or something. Is that romantic?

Movie review - "Hail the Conquering Hero" (1944) **

 Wasn't wild about this. It was polished and everything and I know it's supposed to be a classic it just didn't do it for me. I think the story should be high satire but Sturges keeps pulling punches. And the justification feels strained. Eddie Bracken's goal is wholesome - to make his mother proud - but his mother doesn't need him to do it to feel proud. Ella Raines - very very miscast and unconvincing, Paramount were right to want to drop her - doesn't need him to be brave to love Bracken. The soldiers led by William Demarest go to very unconvincing lengths to sustain the lie. The townsfolk are naive but not evil. The baddies in the election aren't that bad.

Censorship and wartime sensitivity holds this back. There's not even classic sentimentality like, I dont know, visiting a veterans hospital or something. The various soldiers helping Demarest are varying in quality.

Maybe this could have worked with more sex. Bracken wants to "kiss" a girl who only dates heroes so the guys make up a story, then he's caught in a big drama and the girl's dad would threaten to shoot him otherwise. Demarest would've been better as a villain.

There's no sense of the small town feel that was so great in Miracle of Morgan's Creek.


Saturday, January 09, 2021

Movie review - "The Palm Beach Story" (1942) ****

 Bright comedy, very well done, with a lot of emphasis on female desire and desirability. Claudette Colbert's good looks get her given money by one tycoon and proposed to by another tycoon and gets frree train tickets from eccentric rich men but she can't resist struggling inventor Joel McCrea even though his idea is a little silly.

Mary Astor is also full of lust. Rudy Vallee's brother, the millionaire, is pure.

The cast are extremely likeable - Vallee must be the most engaging richest man in the world in the movies. The Ale and Quayle Club bring enjoyable anarchy.

Maybe four stars is generous. It's just very well done all the way through. Funny final gag.

Movie review - "Sullivan's Travels" (1941) ***** (warning: spoilers) (re-watching)

 This classic lives up to its reputation. Great, simple idea, still relevant. Sturges pokes affectionate fun of everyone - studio moguls, pretentious directors.

My one gripe -it did repeat a lot with Sullivan trying to get away then being stopped. That happened several times.

But the romance with Veronica Lake is wonderful - sexy, believable, genuine. I really felt these two fell in love. McCrea spits out his lines with elan - I imagine Henry Fonda was an original choice but McCrea is fine, as he often was (he never let the side down, McCrea). 

The support cast are stunning, from the butlers and studio execs to the 13 year old driver who picks up Sullivan, the old lady who lusts after him (few directors of Hollywood from this time emphasised female lust as much as Sturges), the prisoners. 

The last act is incredible filmmaking - the bleak prison, the justice system, the abuse, the humanity found in the black church people letting in prisoners and the joy from cartoons.

Movie review - "The Miracle of Morgan's Creek" (1944) (warning: spoilers) ****

Sturges takes on small town Americana with a lot more affection that he's given credit for. William Demarest is crusty but loves his girls who have grown up smart and independent. Well, smart-ish.

Betty Hutton is wonderful as the sassy Trudy who gets drunk and impregnated by an unknown soldier. Diana Lynn is hilarious as her boogie-woogie playing wisecracking sister. Eddie Bracken's nerdiness is fun - he's an unsexy Sturges nerd, like Rudy Vallee in The Palm Beach Story

Pace drops around the two thirds mark but picks up. The ending is a deux ex machina but perhaps the greatest in cinematic history.

Movie review - "The Great Moment" (1944) ***

 The odd one out in Preston Sturges' Paramount directing career because it is a serious drama, albeit with comedy moments. It was cut about by the studio so auterists have been forgiving of it more than actually liked it.

I didn't mind it. It is very much of its time and genre, the medical biopic that Warners especially seemed to specialise in. Yet it is still very Sturge - an inventor worried about being ripped off. There is the Sturges stock company (William Demarest, etc), the Sturges slapstick (laughing gas), the hard edged Sturges (politics from the medical union, former partners claiming he's ripped them off), Sturges interests (worried about money, an inventor, a marriage under strain), Sturges sentimentality (deciding to give up money to help a crippled girl not feel pain... this is well done).

Maybe the bits showing what happened to McCrea weren't needed. I have read the original script. The problem with the film the way its structured is it tells this mini story about McCrea leaving the farm and trying to get recognition, then cut to wife Betty Field telling a story about how he died, then going back to the invention. Maybe they just should have shown that bit. The version I watched was 78 minutes.

It has studio benefits: handsome, production design, rich array of character actors. I wasn't wild about Betty Field - she veers from giddy little thing to whining wife to patient wife. It's not much of a part maybe. 

Joel McCrea is fine in the lead. He would soon give up non Westerns to purely be in the saddle. There's no Sturges sexiness which might have jazzed things up.

It's interesting, smart. I don't think a full success but I preferred it to Christmas in July.

Thursday, January 07, 2021

Movie review - "The Lady Eve" (1941) ****

 Perhaps this is a little over rated.There's not a lot of farce. It's mostly a sexy romance with conwoman Babara Stanwyck trying to get millionaire Henry Fonda and falling for him, then getting revenge when he discovers the truth.

I expected more to be done with Charles Coburn - he should have turned against Stanwyck or something.

But as a star vehicle this is first rate. The two leads seem to be having the time of their lives and there is genuine erotic charge. Maybe because Stanwyck has clearly been around and is active in her pursuit.

With the wrong stars though this would sink.

Movie review - "Christmas in July" (1940) **1/2

 Not as impressive as The Great McGinty - the problem is the basic story. Dick Powell is a gormless idiot who is clearly a gambling addict, constantly entering competitions. He thinks he's a chance to win a coffee slogan ("it's in the bunk"), and is tricked into believing he's successful. He acts like a complete idiot, running around and blowing all the money on expensive gifts for his girlfriend, mother and whole neighbourhood (including a crippled girl getting a doll which did get to me, I admit).

It's stressful to watch because Powell is an idiot, with no apparent talent - the sort of Gary Cooper part who would be the hero in a Frank Capra movie. He blows all his money without checkign which is dumb rather than funny and I just found it stressful.

The pace is fast and the cast strong especially the support cast. Ellen Drew is sweet as Powell's girlfriend.

Wednesday, January 06, 2021

Movie review - "The Great McGinty" (1940) **** (re-watching)

 Cynicism ages marvellously and Preston Sturges' debut holds up really well. It wasn't one of my favourites with its second tier cast but watching it years later after Trump and fatherhood it moved me more than ever.

The handling is wonderfully confident for a first timer but that's one of the benefits of the studio system - beautiful photography, fast editing, solid players.

The joy though is the script. Its matter of fact acceptance of corruption, use of sex (Donlevy shakes down what is clearly a brothel and is asked "why don't you go up and get your fortune read", when he discusses an arranged marriage he glances at the legs of a woman who asks "what's that got to do with it"), and the way it tackles serious issues: slum lords, child labour. It's also very moving at the end when Donlevy has to give up the women and children he's come to love. The woman does have a heart of gold but I loved her swimming skilfully in the waters and getting Donlevy to marry her without mentioning her children.

Terrific.


Sunday, September 01, 2019

The Good and Bad Luck of Veronica Lake

Veronica Lake wasn't among the top tier of 1940s film stars - not in terms of box office status, or publicity, or earning power. Yet she's lingered in the public memory in a way few of her contemporaries have. Part of this is due to her legendary peek-a-boo haircut, immortalized by Jessica Rabbit,  Kim Basinger in LA Confidential (1997), and a sight gag in The Major and the Minor (1942). Part of it is her personal narrative of immense tragedy - from extra to film star to bankrupt alcoholic has-been in little over a decade. Part of it is the fact that more than a third of the movies she starred in were masterpieces - no kidding, more than a third, which is a pretty amazing ratio.

Veronica Lake had some of the best luck of any movie star in history.

And some of the worst.

She was born in 1922, and given the name Constance Ockelman. Her father died in an accident when she was ten; mom remarried and Constance took her stepfather's surname, Keane. The family moved to Los Angeles in 1938 where the teenager became interested in acting, appearing as an extra in a number of films, and doing some plays.

Her surge to stardom was almost absurd in its rapidity. Paramount producer Arthur Hornblow Jr was searching for an unknown to play the part of a night club singer in a military drama, I Wanted Wings (1940). He was shown footage of Constance performing a scene in a play, and was intrigued; she was tested, cast and signed to a long-term contract with Paramount, who changed her name to "Veronica Lake".

I Wanted Wings was a forerunner to Top Gun (1986), focusing on the lives and loves of air force cadets at flight school, and is homoerotic as anything in that Tom Cruise classic. The plot focuses on the friendship between aspiring pilots William Holden and Ray Milland; Holden loves Milland so much that he’s willing to marry Lake, the hussy set on nabbing Milland and wrecking his air force career and relationship with a feisty photographer (Constance Moore); of course if helps that Holden once loved Lake (until she destroyed him and sent him off to enlist).

The movie is an entirely decent piece of 1940 Hollywood hokum, mostly worth seeing today for Lake. She doesn’t appear until more than half-way through but it’s a spectacular entrance – singing in a nightclub under a spotlight - and she lifts the entire movie: pint-sized, seductive, mischievous, with a delectable voice and mien. She plays a temptress (Holden calls her "a cheap little jig"), but a sympathetic one – Lake genuinely thinks she falls pregnant to Milland and freaks out. And you feel sorry for her at the end –  when it looks as though Holden might get back in the air force, she turns up announcing she’s killed someone (!), asks Holden to help her, and winds up hiding in a plane just before it takes off on a bombing run; then when she’s on board she freaks out and sets off a flare, almost crashing the plane; she later dies in a crash, a martyred, story-generating, empathetic minx. It's a fantastic part and Lake is sensational in it.

Constance Moore, the other lead female lead, plays an unusually strong female character for the time. She's glamorous, works as a photographer, tells Milland she doesn't want to give up her enjoyable single life unless it's worth it, scolds Milland for his bad treatment of Lake (who he's slept with and then pays off with a check). But no one really remembers Moore today, or paid much attention then; while talented and beautiful, she lacks what the former Constance Keane had - X factor.

Lake had two other strokes of good fortune while making I Wanted Wings. First, during the shoot her long blonde hair accidentally fell over her right eye during a take and created a "peek-a-boo" effect - a hairstyle which subsequently swept the nation and launched a copycat craze. Secondly the movie was released just as audiences in then-neutral America were ravenous for stories about how prepared their armed services were for war (eg Dive Bomber, Buck Privates). I Wanted Wings was a huge hit, Lake stole the notices and was launched a movie star.

She hadn't even turned twenty.

Then she went and made every aspiring starlet in Hollywood have even less realistic career aspirations by starring in five classic movies in a row.

First was Preston Sturges' Sullivan's Travels (1941), about a wealthy director (Joel McCrea) who decides to pretend he is homeless in order to experience "real life". Lake was the girl - billed as The Girl - he meets on his travels. She is captivating, magical, and extremely sexy, whether sitting on McCrea's lap in a bathrobe and combing his hair or walking along the road in a hobo overcoat (Lake was six month's pregnant during production). She wasn't great with all her dialogue but Sturges made her spit it out at rapid-fire pace, and protected her limitations. It's a performance for the ages.

Paramount then put Lake in a thriller, This Gun for Hire (1942), where she once again plays a night club singer; this time she's a goodie though, helping fight Nazis. She's engaged to Robert Preston but most people forget that bit - what they remember, deservedly, are the scenes she shares with a gunman played by Alan Ladd, an actor who been paying dues for around a decade until This Gun for Hire catapulted him to stardom. He gives an electric debut star performance - cold, blonde, tough, mysterious, ruthless, cat loving, redeemable - and stole the film, but a lot of this was due to Lake, who matches him beautifully (at five foot two, she was one of the few female actors shorter than him); poor old Robert Preston is completely overshadowed. Like Sullivan's Travels, there's a scene where Lake dons her male co-star's overcoat and hat - she does look like a cutie but it's interesting she was already repeating her iconic scenes. The movie was her third huge success.

The studio promptly reunited Ladd and Lake in The Glass Key (1942), based on a novel by Dashiell Hammett and directed by the un-renowned Stuart Heisler. It's another superb film noir, achingly gorgeous to look at, and less weighed down by patriotism than This Gun for Hire. Lake is clearly inexperienced but is so beautiful and enigmatic you overlook her flaws, and she once again teams marvelously with Ladd - two blonde shorties, full of mutual smirking/contempt/admiration. The core of the film is a platonic love story between Ladd and Brian Donlevy - but these actors don't have chemistry; Ladd and Lake do. She gets to go off with Ladd at the end in this one (although watching it you feel she would be better off hooking up with Donlevy who, after all, not only has money and ambition but hid the identity of a murderer to protect her - but then fans weren't clamoring for Lake-Donlevy teamings).

Lake returned to comedy with I Married a Witch (1942), playing the title deity who ensnares Fredric March in matrimony. Directed by Rene Clair, this is wickedly funny, an absolute delight - due greatly to Lake who was never more alluring, strutting around in men's pajamas, casting spells, chasing after Marsh and causing devilry. This was her only fantasy movie and it beggars belief that Paramount never tried her again in that genre - she had a vaguely "otherworld" appearance (that hair, that voice) perfect for it.

After making a cameo in Star Spangled Rhythm (1942) Lake appeared in her fifth classic, So Proudly We Hail (1943), a melodrama about American nurses during the Battle of the Philippines. She was billed after Claudette Colbert and Paulette Goddard, but still had a juicy part as a traumatized nurse who kills herself in a suicide bombing attack against the Japanese. Lake's breakdown scene shows her limitations but over all it's a splendidly effective performance, with a spectacular on-screen death - she should have played more death scenes in her career, she had a very good track record in that department.

By now, Lake had become one of Paramount's biggest stars, effective in comedy, thrillers and drama. It hadn't been an entirely smooth ride  - there were rumours of a bad temperament and a drinking problem; Joel McCrea had been originally cast in I Married a Witch but refused to work with her again; March disliked her; the US government asked her to change her hairstyle because women who imitated it were getting their tresses caught in factory machines. But she had enjoyed a dream run.

Then things started to go wrong.

Very wrong.

Paramount cast her in The Hour Before Dawn (1944), as a Nazi spy who marries a conscientious objector (Franchot Tone). Despite being based on a story by Somerset Maugham and directed by Frank Tuttle, who did This Gun for Hire, the film was egregious, flopped at the box office, and Lake copped a lot of the blame.

It wasn't really her fault.  Yes, she's not very good, uncomfortable with an accent and not really capable of conveying too much depth, but lots of other people in the movie are even worse:  Tone is less convincing as an Englishman than Lake is as an Austrian refugee, David Leland is truly shocking, John Sutton is horrendous and the actors playing Lake's fellow agents all ham it up. There is novelty in Tone playing a conscientious objector but it also means he's passive for most of the running time, unaware his wife is up to no good. There's no chemistry between him and Lake - you never feel he loves her, or she feels anything for him other than contempt.  Tuttle's direction lacks atmosphere. And what's with that ending where Tone murders Lake? Okay, yes, she's tried to kill him but she's run out of bullets so it is murder - then they cut to Tone happily flying in a bomber? Yuk. This film gets more irritating the longer it goes on. (Aside: I'm going to start spoiling the endings of the bad Lake movies from now on because I'm assuming no one's seen them or is going to. End of aside.)

On the personal front things got really rough. Lake's second child was born prematurely and died after a few days. Her first marriage ended in divorce. She began to drink heavily.

Paramount gave her a few months off then put her in a musical, Bring on the Girls (1945), about a millionaire (Eddie Bracken) who joins the navy anonymously; he is chaperoned by a friend (Sonny Tufts) and falls for a slinky dame (Lake). Sidney Lanfield directed.

After the debacle of The Hour Before Dawn and the traumas of her private life Lake was carefully protected in this film - not given too much action, not having to carry the bulk of the plot, being cast in a role which is the variation of the one she played in I Wanted Wings - to wit, a gold-digging night club girl (though Lake doesn't sing). Her character supposedly ripped off Tufts back in the day and to be honest the movie would've been better had this been true - but then it turns out, gee, she only did it because she thought he was married and wanted to send money back to his kid. She's a good girl after all! Lake winds up with Tufts and Bracken is palmed off to Marjorie Reynolds and none of it's very interesting - an opinion shared even by the movie-mad public of 1945 who turned this into a flop, Lake's second in a row

There were reports of bad behavior by Lake at a war bond drive in Boston, resulting in Paramount giving her the third lead in Out of This World (1945), supporting Diana Lynn and Bracken. This was a musical spoof of Frank Sinatra's popularity among bobby soxers, directed by Hal Walker. Lynn steps in to a role meant for Betty Hutton and her  casting throws off the whole movie - she's only nineteen, too young to be romantically matched with Bracken in a non-icky way, too pretty to be matched in a believable way, and too fresh faced and smart to be believably enmeshed in wacky schemes.

Lake is completely wasted in her part; they set her up as this unscrupulous PR person who hypes Bracken... but then she completely disappears from the movie for the middle section. The film cries out for Lake's character to be used more - to be a rival to Lynn, to romance Bracken, to cause trouble, something... But she just kind of hangs around. As if aware of the script and casting problems, the filmmakers shove in a tonne of production value - singers, dancers, pianists; there's even a cameo from Bing Crosby's kids. But the picture is appalling. Flop number three.

In both Bring on the Girls and Out of this World Lake's character should have been bad but wasn't. I'm assuming this was due to Lake's whingeing - "I don't want to be unsympathetic, my fans will hate me", etc, etc, - although it may have been studio incompetence. Whoever was to blame,  it meant she played these weird half-and-half roles - people who should have been bad, but weren't, but weren't that sympathetic, either.

Things turned around a little with Miss Susie Slagle's (1945) an utterly delightful look at a boarding house for medical students in 1910. It was produced by John Houseman, who normally made films of quality, directed by first-timer John Barry, and features charming performances from Sonny Tufts and Joan Caulfield (not making that up, both are genuinely beguiling). Lake is top billed, but it's not a very big part, as a nurse who falls for a doctor student who dies. She isn't very good: she never seems comfortable and, painful as this is to admit, is one of the worst things about the movie. But at least it didn't flop.

Paramount tried her with Bracken a third time in Hold That Blond (1945), a picture which was originally conceived as a Bob Hope vehicle and looks it. Directed by George Marshall, this is the sort of movie that should have been great fun but just isn't; Bracken flails about, Lake is dull and lacking sexiness, and together they lack the chemistry of, say, Bob Hope and Paulette Goddard. You could always see what Hope and Goddard saw in each other - both had so much energy, she was super pert and pretty, he was smart despite his cowardice and looked good compared to the villains they would come up against. In this film Lake is cute but bland; Bracken is an anxious kleptomaniac who is a pain in the backside - they're not good for each other, he has a mental health issue that isn't dealt with by the end, neither are fun to hang out with. The film was not popular.

Lake's acting seemed to be getting worse the more she did it. What was going wrong? The drinking, divorce and trauma of losing her child could not have helped. I also think Lake had a natural quality that her first films caught like lightning in a bottle, but which she lost as time went on. Untrained, she had no technique to fall back on, and really floundered without a strong script.

She could still be effective, though, if handled in the right way. After five bad performances in a row in four dud movies, her career was revived when reunited with Alan Ladd in The Blue Dahlia (1946), produced by Houseman and directed by Marshall, based on a script by Raymond Chandler. It's a fantastic film noir, full of atmosphere, intrigue, crackling dialogue and sensational performances, which was recognized as a classic almost immediately and made a tonne of money. Lake's part is relatively small, though effective, as a slinky dame who you first think might be bad but turns out to be good.

Lake then made her first film outside Paramount since she became a star: Ramrod (1947), a Western directed by Andrea de Toth, who was her second husband. Lake is a tough dame living on the range who is picked on by nasty tycoon Preston Foster, so she hires gunslinger Joel McCrea as her "ramrod". But McCrea isn't the only hero - that duty is split with Don De Fore as a ruthless drifter who also fights on Lake's side, and, to be honest, overshadows McCrea.

This is a story full of shades and moral ambiguities - Lake is kind of a goodie but also a baddie. She's keen to flirt with men to get them to do what she wants and encourages De Fore to create a stampede so McCrea will be more on her side; she genuinely falls for McCrea but he ends up dumping her because she's a bad girl.. even though she's not really bad, she just did what she had to do to defend her ranch (mind you, that was typical of Hollywood during the post war years, when independent women had to be put in their place). As a result, the movie is a bit out of kilter - you have more sympathy for Lake, who has more at stake than McCrea, who is just a hired hand. It also might have more impact if McCrea had genuine feelings for Lake but he seems quite happy to go off at the finale with bland Arleen Whelan. Ramrod isn't perfect but it is interesting, and it's fun to see Lake in a Western, riding a horse, ordering cowboys off her land and the like; it's one of her best later performances. The picture was a box office success.

Back at Paramount she was reunited with Ladd and her old hair style in Saigon (1948).  Directed by Leslie Fenton, it's the least effective of the four films they made together (not counting the all-star musicals where they both cameo-ed as themselves - Star Spangled Rhythm, Duffy's Tavern, Variety Girl) which starts off excellently but tails away in its second half. The storyline feels cobbled together from elements of previous Paramount hits, particularly ones starring  Ladd: he's a war veteran in the third world (as in Calcutta, China); he's a pilot tight with members of his bomb crew (Calcutta, The Blue Dahlia); one of the flyers is terminally ill (You Came Along); there's a dodgy criminal, his henchman and mysterious police chief (The Blue Dahlia, The Glass Key); Ladd is kind of in love with his best male friend and they also both love the same girl (The Glass Key). There are some superb support performances and Lake's acting is solid - she totally suits the world of backlot studio exotica, with its back projection, smoke-drenched nightclubs and intrigue. Saigon is commonly referred to a flop but it actually performed reasonably well at the box office and demonstrated Lake still had appeal with the public.

Her next film at Paramount, however, was abysmal. To understand why Isn't It Romantic (1948) was even made in the first place you need to know that nostalgic family pieces in historical settings were all the rage in the 1940s - Meet Me in St Louis, Life with Father, I Remember Mama, etc. This load of old codswallop is set in Indiana during Reconstruction, and focuses on three sisters - Lake, Mona Freeman and Mary Hatcher - whose idiotic father is obsessed with the Civil War (he runs around in a Confederate uniform) and won't get a job; I think he's meant to be lovable ol' dad but he just comes across as a lazy, racist separatist, uncharmingly played by Roland Culver. We're supposed to feel for him at the end when he realizes he got swindled; I wanted him to shoot himself, like that Confederate officer in The Ox Bow Incident (1943). These sort of movies are hard to pull off for directors - Henry King and John Ford could do it, but it's beyond Norman McLeod here. Lake seems awkward. Maybe with colour and more elaborate musical numbers it might have gone over. But it doesn't.

Lake followed this with The Sainted Sisters (1948), directed by William D. Russell, which  sounds like it could be fun - the tale of two female con artists on the lam in the 1890s (more nostalgia!). Okay the 1890s isn't an inherently funny period, but female con artists is at least different, and Richard Maibaum wrote the script, and maybe this would've worked if Betty Hutton had been able to play the lead, as originally intended. Instead Paramount went with Lake who is disastrously miscast, lacking sparkle and verve in a part that needs, well, Hutton - or even Diana Lynn.  Joan Caulfield has some game as her sister but is mostly just pretty. Mind you, neither have much of a character to play - you never get the sense these two are con artists or how they came to be con artists.

Why do the filmmakers introduce the millionaire scammed by the girls (Harold Vermilyea) at the beginning and never see him again? Why don't they have the local bitch (Belulah Bondi) do something really bad? Why don't they have someone chasing after the girls - a detective, say? They set up a sheriff (George Reeves) but he never seems to suspect the girls - he just falls in love with both and struggles to make up his mind between them, which makes him an idiot and ensures the love story is unsatisfactory. They establish Lake as the more ruthless and greedy of the sisters, which is fine, but instead of making her a villain and Caulfield the goodie, as they should, Lake again is a-bit-bad-but-really-good in a way that undermines the story's drama; she comes good, falls for Reeves (no chemistry, no build up, he's clearly better suited to Caulfield), and Caulfield has a conveniently invented alternate love interest. If you haven't seen the movie, and I'm guessing you haven't, none of this will make any sense but trust me - it's not worth seeing, another misfire from Paramount who subsequently refused to renew Lake's contract.

Lake had some incredible luck early in her career, but karma came around and got her back in spades. Yes, she wasn't a very good actor. Yes, she had to be carefully used. Yes she had a problematic private life and no doubt an erratic attitude. But most of the Paramount films she appeared in during the second half of her career were simply ineptly made - they helped killed the careers of Eddie Bracken, Joan Caulfield and Diana Lynn as much as Lake.

It's a shame she wasn't teamed with Ladd more - she could've easily slipped into, say, OSS  (1946) (as she did on radio) or Wild Harvest (1947) or Calcutta (1947). She may have refused these parts, to be fair, I don't know - it's just a pity since Ladd was rarely as effective with another girl.

There was also a curious reluctance from Paramount to use her as an out-and-out vamp. Lake looked like a bad girl but rarely played one - there was always some excuse or redemption for her behavior. Sometimes this made the film more interesting (eg The Blue Dahlia) but often it weakened the drama - several of her pictures would've been better had she played a flat-out villain eg The Sainted Sisters, Bring on the Girls, Out of This World, Miss Susie Slagle's. She was a natural femme fetale who they kept trying to soften.

Maybe it was simply bad luck. But it's as hard to slog through Lake's last films at Paramount as it is a pleasure to watch her first few. And that's a shame because for all her many flaws she still had more individuality than the bulk of starlets under contract to the studio at the time like, say, Mona Freeman or Wanda Hendrix.

Lake didn't immediately slide into obscurity once she left the studio. De Toth cast her as the second lead in Slattery's Hurricane (1949) at Fox, playing a woman who is kind-a-sort-a meant to be a drug addict, but it's hard to tell due to censorship. Lake, billed third after Richard Widmark (channeling Dana Andrews) and Linda Darnell (good value), gives a poor performance  - the sexy bombshell of Alan Ladd pictures looks like a bland wallflower doormat - she's got no spunk or life, she's a colorless nothing.

She appeared in Stronghold (1951), an independently financed Western shot in Mexico with Zachary Scott and Arturo de Cordova - a film that has a good story buried underneath confused execution. Lake is wooden but at least looks fine. That was her last Hollywood-ish movie.

Lake's last few decades were sad. She and De Toth filed for bankruptcy (the IRS seized their home for unpaid taxes), and got divorced; she was sued by her mother for financial support; she left her children in the custody of their fathers and became estranged from them. She did a little TV and a lot of theater, was arrested for public drunkenness, worked as a waitress, and got married and divorced again. She wrote her memoirs and did the interview circuit, not always appearing sober; and made two last films, Footsteps in the Snow (1967) and Flesh Fiend (1970).  She had mental health issues that were not always properly dealt with, did a lot of traveling and too much drinking. There were some good times. She died in 1973 of kidney failure and hepatitis.

Her career as a star is fascinating, because it began with such a bang and ended with such a whimper. Films such as Sullivan's Travels, I Married a Witch, This Gun for Hire, The Glass Key, So Proudly We Hail and The Blue Dahlia retain their power to enchant and delight. Her appearance in I Wanted Wings remains captivating. She and Alan Ladd formed one of the all time great screen teams.

She was never a good actor - she could be downright terrible - but was a star.

Saturday, August 06, 2016

The odd career of Veronica Lake

I don't think anyone had better luck than Veronica Lake when starting out. Her first decent part was a choice, showy support role in a big hit, I Wanted Wings - a military romantic drama released just as America was gearing up for a war.

She followed this with great parts in five fantastic films:
* Sullivan's Travels - a classic Preston Sturges comedy;
* This Gun for Hire - an exciting thriller which teamed her with Alan Ladd;
* The Glass Key - another top thriller with Ladd;
* I Married a Witch - delightful Rene Clair comedy with Lake at her sexiest as a witch;
* So Proudly We Hail - gripping war story with a very flashy part for Lake as a Bataan nurse.

Lake made a notable contribution to all five films - being effective, her limitations protected.

Then the tide turned. She cut her hair, lost a baby, developed a bad reputation, and was in a series of duds:
* The Hour Before Dawn
* Bring on the Girls
* Hold That Blonde
* Out of This World

Things turned around a little with Miss Susie Slagle's, The Blue Dahlia and Ramrod. But then it was back to crap:
* Saigon
* The Sainted Sisters
* Isn't it Romantic?

Then she left Paramount, and could never recover her previous position.

What happened? Was it inevitable?

Well, Lake wasn't a very good actor - she had to be carefully used. She couldn't survive bad material (unlike, say, Alan Ladd).

You could say "Paramount shouldn't have put her in comedies" - but she'd had success in Sullivan's Travels and I Married a Witch.

Most of the films she appeared in during the second half of her Paramount career were simply ineptly made - they helped killed the careers of Eddie Bracken, Joan Caulfield and Diana Lynn as much as Lake.

It's a shame she wasn't teamed with Ladd more - she could've easily slipped into say OSS (as she did on radio) or Wild Harvest or Calcutta. (She may have refused these parts, to be fair - it's just a pity since Ladd was rarely as effective with another girl.)

There was also a curious reluctant to use her as an out and out vamp. Lake looked like a bad girl but rarely played one - there was always some excuse or redemption for her behaviour. Sometimes this made the film more interesting (eg The Blue Dahlia) but often it weakened the drama - several of her films would've been better had Lake played a flat out villain eg The Sainted Sisters. Also she would've seemed a natural for film noir as a femme fetale, but she didn't - noirs, yes, but as good girls.

Maybe it was simply karma. But it's as hard a slog to get through Lake's last films at Paramount as it is a pleasure to get through her first.

So anyway a Lake top ten

1) I Wanted Wings
2) This Gun for Hire
3) Sullivan's Travels
4) The Glass Key
5) I Married a Witch
6) So Proudly We Hail
7) The Blue Dahlia
8) Ramrod
9) Miss Susie Slagle's
10) Saigon (not very good but at least with Ladd)

Friday, October 05, 2012

Movie review - "Easy Living" (1937) ***1/2

Although Sturges didn't direct this film his fingerprints are all over it (he wrote the script) - shenanigans amongst the rich, rapid rise to fame, pratfalls and slapstick, a great array of character actors. Full of joyous coincidences and a light but effective plot - a fur coat falls on Jean Arthur, everyone thinks she's Edward Arnold's mistress, she falls for his son (Ray Milland). Arthur is very likeable - all the cast are. I didn't buy the stock market crashing and rising so easily - didn't feel real. I know that might have been the point but it felt shallow. Bright fun and it doesn't go for too long either.

Saturday, December 03, 2011

Movie review – “The Beautiful Blonde from Bashful Bend” (1949) ***

Preston Sturges last film for a Hollywood studio was a deliberate attempt at making a box office hit: Daryl Zanuck gave him technicolour, Betty Grable at her box office peak, and a handsome budget. The resulting film lost money and isn’t particularly well remembered today.
It starts marvellously, with Grable in bright, animated form and very sexy as a saloon singer with a hot temper and quick to shoot her cheating boyfriend (Cesar Romero). She accidentally shoots a judge in the backside and hot tails it to a small town where she and her mate are mistaken for school teachers and she sets her cap at a rich miner (Rudy Vallee). So far so fun – a terrific set up, the action is bright and breezy, and Sturges can’t get enough scenes of Grable changing in and out of clothes.
 
But then it runs into trouble – Cesar Romero comes back, but instead of having him as a false love interest he’s the real love interest – which is troublesome since you know he and Grable have problems that will never reconcile (the ending makes a gag along these lines but it means the ending has hollow emotion). You keep expecting him to reform a la the Great McGinty but it doesn’t happen. 
 
Also there are these two over acting character actors as trouble some brothers, whose supposed death prompts the villain to want to hang Romeo and Vallee – but if he thinks his sons are dead that doesn’t make him that villainous, you feel sorry for the guy. So it lacks a real hero and villain, and heart (which the best Sturges films all had) – and the fact they impersonate school teachers isn’t really paid off. There’s a sort of funny teaching scene, and a sheriff checks if she’s a fugitive… but that’s about it. So it’s a real shame. Still, lots of racy dialogue and good energy.

Movie review – “The Great McGinty” (1940) ***1/2

Preston Sturges became the patron saint of all writers who wished to direct by making such an impressive splash with this film. It still holds up today, as cynical tales where everyone is out for themselves tend to do. The girl who plays his wife isn’t that good looking but does her best and I loved the moment where they’re discussing marriage, he glances at her legs and she says “what’s that got to do with it?”
 
Brian Donlevy is lively and good value as the down at heel bum who becomes mayor (although if he was so clever how did he get so poor?) - his scuzzy persona and not-handsome-enough-for-traditional-leading-man looks work well. Akim Tamiroff is terrific fun as his boss and there is, as would become usual for Sturges, a rich gallery of supporting characters. 
 
Genuine pathos which works too - McGinty feeling ashamed because his step kids get in fights over him, McGinty talking about going to work when he was young (all the better because this is done wittily), and most of all the finale, with McGinty having been arrested but being allowed to escape... presumably the censor didn't mind this because he is parted forever from the women and children he loves.

Thursday, January 06, 2011

Book review – “Mitchell Leisen: Hollywood Director” by David Chierichetti

Before reading this book I knew Leisen best as a director who inspired two top screenwriters to go into directing: Preston Sturges, Billy Wilder. Not due to Leisen’s kindness, but because they weren’t happy with what he did to their scripts. This is a little unfair since Leisen did a good job – I think he just didn’t do the job that Sturges and Wilder envisioned. But for many years Leisen was a top Hollywood stylist, who flourished at sophisticated Paramount. Words like “stylist” and “sophisticated” are often used as code for gay – well, Leisen was gay, but he was also stylish and sophisticated.
 
He started as a designer, and must have been a very good one – he worked for Cecil B de Mille – before going into directing. He later made some films at MGM where you would have thought he would have thrived, but he clashed. His career went into decline with the demise of the studio system and the loss of his team – things also seem to have gone a little haywire in his private life (a lover killed himself, he became an increasingly dirty old man). He would up directing television, losing a lot of his money and a leg, then denying not very well remembered in 1972 – although this book is an excellent tribute to him, full of terrific interviews.
 
 Lots of interesting bits and pieces: Fred MacMurray, star of numerous Leisen films, refused to give him a gig on My Three Sons because of the director’s lecherous reputation and MacMurray's concern for the welfare of the young boys in the cast; Leisen was forced to make a bunch of films with MacDonald Carey, who Paramount were trying to build into a star; Leisen clashed with Richard Maibaum several times, and had an unhappy experience on the Alan Ladd film, Captain Carey USA; he directed the last film made at RKO, The Girl Most Likely. Well worth reading if you’re interested in the director’s films, or the history of Paramount during the Golden Years.

Friday, October 08, 2010

Radio review – Lux – “Strictly Dishonorable” (1952) *

I’ve never read or seen Preston Sturges’ hit play – the one that launched his career – but I bet it’s balls were cut off by this MGM adaptation. A subsequent perusal of its synopsis after listening to this proved me correct. MGM turned this into crappy pro-virgin fluff about an opera singer who offends a hopeless student and has to fight off a scandal involving a dopey fan. No real funny lines or situations, and bad playing from Fernando Lamas (replacing Enzio Pinza, whose film career was killed off by the failure of this and Mr Imporium) and Janet Leigh, neither known for comedy.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Radio review - Lux - "I'll Be Yours" (1950) ***

Silly but fun version of a Deanna Durbin musical, which was a remake of a Margaret Sullivan vehicle written by Preston Sturges. When listening to this I thought Norman Krasna must have had a hand in the script since it felt similar to many Krasna scripts: a variation on the Cinderella story, use of mistaken identity, a dreamy female heroine, rich person saves the day. But no - although regular Krasna collaborator Bob Cummings is on hand to play the rather thankless part of the principled lawyer helped by the girl (Ann Blyth steps in for Deanna Durbin); Cummings would have been better value playing the rich old guy. William Bendix reprises his film role as Blyth/Durbin's good hearted friend.

(NB on the edition of this I heard, there's an interview with an older Bob Cummings who talks about how he was the godson of Orville Wright. He sounds like he has one foot in the grave but still has all his marbles.)