Showing posts with label Phil Noyce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Phil Noyce. Show all posts

Sunday, June 04, 2023

Book review - "Did I Ever Tell You This?" by Sam Neill

 Got a lot of time for Sam Neill - he's been around so long, had a fabulous career. In the 80s he always seemed on the verge of being a big star - Omen 3, etc - but never quite happened. I think he was more a very handsome character actor, often overshadowed by big stars but holding his own eg My Brilliant Career (Judy Davis), Jurassic Park (dinosaurs), The Piano (Holly Hunter). He just sort of chugs along.

The book is touchingly written after Neill has been diagnosed with cancer and he's living alone in his flat in Surry Hills. He's very discrete about the end of his relationships (Lisa Harrow was one) and affectionate about his kids. More open about his friendships especially Bryan Brown but also Kiwi mafia members like Tim Finn. Discusses life in Ireland and NZ - Dunedin not selling out to watch the Beatles, boarding school, uni, documentary film unit, low rent theatre, leaping to stardom quite quickly via Sleeping Dogs then My Brilliant Career then a British career (with a few TV detours on the way, one of which, Reilly Ace of Spies really established him there).

An amiable enjoyable chap who found a way to consistently work with great directors, on a whole variety of material. A lot of Aussie directors made their best films with Neill: Gillian Armstrong, Jane Campion, Fred Schepisci, Phil Noyce, John Duigan. There's also John McTiernan, John Carpenter, Martin Campbell, etc.

I would have liked more gossip but that's me. Enjoyed it.

I feel a little guilty for finding those videos he did during COVID really annoying.

Friday, June 03, 2022

Script review - "Sliver" by Joe Eszterhas (warning: spoilers)

 Have never seen the film. It had a bit of a splash at the time, with Sharon Stone and that terrible UB40 cover of an Elvis track and the then hot Phil Noyce and Joe Eszterhas - but no one particularly liked it.

The script is very good. Simple, with three juicy star parts (Eszterhas often did that) plus sex, mystery and violence. Again it's about someone falling in love with someone who could be a killer, and is... but apparently in the film they changed it which ruined the point.

I actually think the key problem was the casting of Sharon Stone. Reading this, for the story to fly it really needed the lead to be played by someone who comes across as sexual inexperienced, shy... so when she calls for Zeke (the Billy Baldwin character) it's like wham, and she doesn't know how to deal with it. Like the Geena Davis-Brad Pitt relationship in Thelma and Louise. Sharon Stone always looks like she's been around the block.

The script totally makes logical sense. I'm surprised they had to reshoot it.

Thursday, June 11, 2020

Movie review - "Backroads" (1977) **1/2

A short feature - clocks under 60 minutes. Great pair of lead performances from Bill Hunter and Gary Foley. Foley should act more - he's got the looks, the intensity. Their relationship is the best thing about the movie.

There is a lot of driving. I could have done with more crime to be honest. Sometimes it had dull spots. The Julie McGregor part isn't a lot of fun - she joins the gang, and spends most of her time being manhandled by funny accent Terry Camilleri in the back seat and the others don't seem to notice or care. I wish she'd been allowed to develop more of a relationship with Hunter and Foley instead.

Thursday, June 04, 2020

Movie review - "Newsfront" (1978) ****

Maybe it's because I've been watching so many Bruce Beresford films that I found the pace for this slow. But actually it isn't slow... it's deliberate. It's a stealth movie that builds. It became more and more effective.

It would mean more to me if I remembered the times depicted, but I heard about it, and it was an interesting time in Australia - the post war idealistic recovery period, with its communism fears and ALP split and growing American influence.

Marvellously cast. Bob Ellis had a real feel for the time, people and place. Like many Australian movies it just sort of ends - there's no build to Bill Hunter telling his brother to get stuffed. Also the conflict is muted - Gerard Kennedy's brother character isn't in the movie much, he's at the beginning then disappears then comes along at the end (he and Hunter never seem like brothers); and the rivalry with John Ewart is really some squabbles and that's about it.

But that does make it realistic. Pared back. Australian. I love how Phil Noyce used Ken G Hall's know-how for this.

Bill Hunter is a different sort of lead. Very effective. Wendy Hughes is excellent - achingly beautiful and a good actor (doing a lot with expressions). Bryan Brown, Drew Forsyth, Don Crosby, Lorna Lesley, Angela Punch, Chris Haywood are fantastic - everyone except Kennedy he and isn't bad, not really, just not as good as original choice Jack Thompson. Mark Holden is in it. And Steve Bisley. Plus a lot of reliable 50s faces like Tony Barry, John Clayton.

Bob Ellis gave a lot of credit to the music, which has been poo-pooed but the music is very effective. I don't think this is the greatest Australian film of them all, as many do, but it' s excellent.

Could it be remade for the 1980s?

Friday, March 01, 2019

Movie review - "Attack Force Z" (1981) **1/2

Some random thoughts:
* always good to rewatch but it's never as good as you want it to be
* great opening with the foreword and troops climbing out of the sub and canoeing to the island
* action sequences are perfunctory rather than well done and I really wish Phil Noyce had done it instead of Tim Burstall - Burstall was excellent on casting and story choices but Noyce was the better director
* the cast are extremely good and deliver strong performances - Mel Gibson does well in a relatively thankless role (his one thing is being bullied into letting the Japanese diplomat live by that diplomat), but he definitely feels very Z Force
* the ending rips off The Wild Geese and is a needless bummer - the whole ending has fashionable 70s nihilism with pretty much all the goodies dead for absolutely no reason which actually is kind of more true of the typical Z Special Unit mission (those were the locals didn't betray them) but makes you feel depressed watching it and might be responsible for the film underperforming at the box office
* disappointingly little is made of Jon Phillip Law being Dutch - a great idea (could have explored the colonial issues etc), thrown away
* it's really distracting that everyone is Chinese when it should be Malaya/Indonesia/New Guinea - they just should have said "island off the coast of Taiwan"
* best role: Sam Neill - the ruthless operative who shoots John Waters but who then points out the locals will be killed if they rise up
* the Japanese are really stupid for believing that kid
* there's a lack of pace and energy - too much ambling when they get on the island when it should be fast paced
* production values are very good.

Friday, November 16, 2018

The A to Z of The Other Side of the Wind

(originally written for filmink magazine)

A conventional review doesn’t seem appropriate when reviewing an Orson Welles film, particularly one that’s getting a release more than 40 years after actually being made, so Stephen Vagg thought he’d tackle it A to Z.

A is for AFI Lifetime Achievement Award, which Orson Welles was given in 1975… and used the occasion to tub-thump for money to finish The Other Side of the Wind. To be honest, that story and all it involved and what it meant for Welles (and Hollywood) is more moving than anything in Wind itself – but the film is still fascinating, provoking and a reminder of what a talented man Welles was.

B is for Bogdanovich, Peter, perhaps the most famous acolyte and chronicler of Welles, who plays a character based on himself in the film. Bogdanovich began his career as an actor, as he often takes pains to point out, and has carved out a decent part-time career for himself as a character player. His performance in Wind is not one of the film’s best, but it doesn’t matter because he’s so spectacularly well cast and brings such fascinating baggage to the role. It’s also heartbreaking to see this early ‘70s Bogdanovich be so cocky and confident on screen, and to know what hardships were facing him down the track (several flops, the murder of girlfriend Dorothy Stratten, two declarations of bankruptcy). There’s also a “young dumb blonde girlfriend of the director” character played by Cathy Lucas based on Cybill Shepherd, which understandably annoyed Bogdanvich. Shepherd herself and Bogdanovich’s ex-wife Polly Platt can be glimpsed in the film.

C is for completion, fear of, something which (some) amateur psychologists think Welles suffered from – pointing to all the unfinished films he made in his life along with Wind (Don Quixote, The Dreamers, The Deep, Filming the Trial, It’s All True). Defenders argue Welles would’ve loved to have finished those films if he’d had the money and support – indeed, some get very touchy at any suggestion otherwise. Personally, I think it’s possible to reconcile both the view that he was let down by other people and he contributed to the problem. To me it makes total sense that Welles might put his heart and soul into a film and then get cold feet towards the end, when energy runs low, funds run out, and you fear the finished project isn’t going to be as good as you hoped. And I get the feeling he knew that had Wind been released in his lifetime there’d be a bunch of reviews that would say “another disappointment from the maker of Citizen Kane”… as they did for F For Fake and Chimes of Midnight and for everything else since Citizen Kane. It doesn’t make the fact that he didn’t make more completed movies any less tragic.

D is for The Deep, another unfinished film of Welles’, this one made in the late ‘60s. It was based on the novel which was filmed by Phil Noyce as Dead Calm, and I hope someone like Netflix puts that together too. I have a feeling that with its thriller plot it might be more accessible to non film buffs than Other Side of the Wind.

E is for editing, done by Welles and (after Welles died) Bob Murawski. Murawski did a stunning job of approximating Welles’ style – he imitated the great innovator with supreme skill, and if anyone deserves an Oscar from this film apart from Welles and Gary Graver it’s him.

F is for Ford, John, who I’d argue had as much, if not more, influence on the character of Jake Hannaford than any other figure, including Welles and Ernest Hemmingway. Like Ford, Hannaford was self-consciously macho, Irish, had a clan who would hang around him, had Peter Bogdanovich as an acolyte, John Milius as another acolyte (he inspired the Jack Simon character played by Gregory Sierra) and was possibly gay (read Maureen O’Hara’s memoirs for the dish on that).Of course, there’s a lot of Welles in Hannaford but I would say there’s more Ford.

G is for Gary Graver, the DOP of Wind, and Welles’ right hand man for the last fifteen years of the latter’s life. Their relationship was fascinating and complex – Welles was a father figure and inspiration to Graver, though the relationship was possibly abusive (Graver was rarely paid and at Welles’ beck and call). It’s rich emotional material, more interesting than any of the relationships depicted in Wind, to be brutally honest. It has to be said Graver does a brilliant job of photography on Wind, and one hopes he gets an Oscar nomination.

H is for homosexuality, a theme which interested Welles later his career – such as in his film script for The Big Brass Ring, and The Other Side of the Wind, which hints that Jake Hannaford has a crush on his leading man. Mind you, there’s a lot of straight sex in it, too. A lot. Hey, it was the seventies.

I is for Iran, the country of the film’s co-financier Mehdi Bushehri, the brother-in-law of the Shah. When the Shah was overthrown in 1979, the legal situation of the film became extremely tricky and contributed to its delay in being released. Which is classic Orson Welles – his productions didn’t just have financial troubles, they had troubles that involved revolutions.

J is for John Huston, who plays Hannaford – rather surprisingly since Welles normally nabbed the best roles in all his own productions. Huston’s performance is fine, but you can’t help wishing that Welles had taken the role – he had more of a twinkle in his eye, more humour, more fun. And of course, the scenes with Bogdanovich would have taken on an extra dimension. I do love how Welles and Huston were BFFs in real life though.

K is for Karp, Josh, whose superb book on the making of the film is required reading for anyone interested in it.

L is for legal troubles, which dogged this film even more than other Orson Welles productions. I think any creative person would have adored the chance of working with Orson Welles. I think any lawyer would have been terrified.

M is for McBride, Joseph, a noted film historian, biographer, screenwriter, author and educator, who appears as a character based on himself, and wrote one of the best books on Welles, Whatever Happened to Orson Welles, which did so much to revive appreciation in the considerable achievements of Welles’ later years.

N is for Netflix, famed for their market dominance, the high quality TV shows, and the patchy quality of their movies. The restoration of Wind is one of the best things that the company has ever done, the best “original” movie they’ve ever released, and they should be proud of it.

O is for Oja Kodar, who co-wrote and appears in the film, and was Welles’ creative and romantic partner during the latter years of his life, even while he was married to (and lived with) another woman. You old hound dog, Orson! Kodar spends a lot of Wind’s running time walking around nude – I mean a lot – and is front and centre in what is already the film’s most famous sequence, riding cowgirl on Bob Random in the front seat of a car while her necklace beads slapp against her body and rain splatters outside. Welles’ admiration for Kodar’s body clearly didn’t extend to wanting to hear her talk – she doesn’t say a line in the entire film. She was apparently a leading reason in holding up the release of this film, which is a shame, since she is an arresting presence.

P is for pornography, which Gary Graver used to make to pay the bills while working free for Orson Welles. Orson even famously helped him out once, editing a shower scene in a porno called 3AM. Wind is easily Welles’ most sexy film, with plenty of nudity and copulation and even a dildo in the opening scene. I always thought Welles was a great lost maker of horror films (just look at how creepy the Xanadu scenes were in Citizen Kane) or action flicks (see the house of mirrors shoot out in Lady from Shanghai, or the battle sequences in Chimes at Midnight). After watching Other Side of the Wind, I’m convinced he would have made first rate porn and erotic thrillers too.

Q is for Q and As, which appear a lot in Wind – scenes of people standing around asking questions and replying. Did this happen to Welles in real life? Does it happen in real life? It felt weird to me watching the film but maybe this was how things were in the seventies and/or among famous directors.

R is for Rich Little, a celebrity impressionist originally cast in the role later played by Peter Bogdanovich. Little shot most of his part but then walked out on the film because he had a professional engagement. Welles promptly recast the role and no doubt stewed on the betrayal – which a lot of selfish self-centred people do, which Welles clearly was, despite all his genius.

S is for Susan Strasberg, daughter of Lee and Paula, a one-time wunderkind of Broadway whose career had become reduced to mostly appearing in guest shots on TV dramas when she got the call to appear in Wind. She plays – quite well – a figure based on Pauline Kael, who famously both defended and criticised Welles in print. Welles clearly remembered the latter – her essay Raising Kane – more than the former. The finale of Wind involves Hannaford punching this character in the face for suggesting he might be gay.

T is for They’ll Love Me When I’m Dead, a stunning documentary about the making of Other Side of the Wind, focusing in particular on Welles and his relationships with Bogdanovich, Kodar and Graver. It’s gripping, moving and captivating – a more emotionally affecting movie than Wind itself, though Wind is more innovative technically.

U is for Unknown Actors, which Welles delighted in using in his projects over the years. Sometimes it paid off – but there are some performances in Wind which are simply bad, such as Geoffrey Land as the Robert Evans style studio head, and Cathy Lucas as a Cybil Shepherd type. Gregory Sierra, a good actor, is disastrously miscast as a character that’s meant to be based on John Milius.

V is for vision, Orson Welles’, which is all over this film. A visual feast, full of ideas, erratic, overwhelming, stimulating. I know this is a flawed movie and I’ve been critical in this take, but I should also add it’s full of moments and scenes that have stayed with me, and I’ve seen it three times in a month, and each time gotten new stuff out of it. To counter balance that…

W is for writing, a skill at which Welles was never that good at, at least not compared to his abilities as an actor and director. If he had the help of a skilled collaborator like Herman Mankiewicz (as on Citizen Kane) or was adapting William Shakespeare, he was great, but he struggled more when writing on his own or with Kodar (eg The Big Brass Ring, Mr Arkadin). Wind has a great set up – a party in the last 24 hours of a director’s life – and plenty of ideas for drama: he’s gone bankrupt, his girlfriend is young enough to be his granddaughter, his leading man has quit, he might be in love with his leading man, he has to borrow money off his former protege. But none of these are really developed – the film is more interested in style and philosophical chat. There’s no confrontation with the girlfriend, or the leading man. No real resolutions, except death. And Welles fans will leap to his defence and go “oh that’s the way he intended, he’s subverting the form”. And I’m sure he intended to. But I’d also argue, looking at the whole of his career, that he simply wasn’t a very good screenwriter, and that’s reflected in Wind. And I also think it’s possible to say that, and say that the film is still fascinating and entertaining and well directed.

X is for X rated, which this film flirts with being at times. A dildo in the opening scene! (see pornography)

Y is for young Hollywood vs old Hollywood, which this film exemplifies. Hannaford is, like Welles and John Ford, very much a creature of old Hollywood, surrounded by cronies (played by old pros like Norman Lloyd, Mercedes McCambridge, Cameron Mitchell, Lili Palmer and Edmond O’Brien)… but who was so talented and such a maverick that he was immensely appealing to young Hollywood, as shown in the film (and in real life) by people like Bogdanovich, McBride and Jaglom.

Z is for Zabriskie Point, the 1970 Michelangelo Antonioni film which featured a house that is used in Other Side of the Wind. Welles mocks Antonioni’s film-within-a-film in Wind – lots of arty shots of Oja Kodar walking around naked not saying anything. Welles fans claim this is brilliant satire, which it is, but there’s so much of it. Kodar walks around not saying anything in the “real” section of the film, that you wonder how much he was sending it up, and how much he was simply having fun doing it himself.

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Movie review - "Attack Force Z" (1981) **1/2 (warning: spoilers)

I remember seeing this film in the video store when I was a kid and thinking it was so cool - an Aussie guys on a mission action movie, how awesome! - then being disappointed when I saw it. Re watching it years down the track the same feelings remain. This should have been could, it could have been good, but it's never more than average.

It starts well - the terrific title, a scroll explaining what Z Force was, touching on their two famous missions, then listing the cast with their characters full name and rank. And there's a great opening of a submarine dropping off the men - and the beginning sequence where one of the gang shoot their own is striking. But then it gets bogged down with too many scenes of people peering over ridges and firing machine guns. That sounds exciting, even writing it, but not as you see it.

It's a fairly rudimentary trudge through the jungle. They could have done great things with Jon Philip Law being a Dutchman from the area whose family was killed by the Japanese, but its thrown away. (Is this island meant to be a former Dutch colony? It's never clear.) His romance with local Sylvia Change is very chaste (they snuggle, not have sex), and there are some silly bits like local resistance leader going all kung fu fighter on the Japanese. And the ending rips of The Wild Geese with the human McGuffin carking it at the last minute.

I will say this for it - the cast is great, and they all have distinct roles to play: callow Mel Gibson, who is bullied into the final battle by the Japanese diplomatic (who looks like a caricature of a Japanese from a war comic); ruthless Sam Neill who nonetheless has sympathy for the villagers; cheery Chris Haywood; sensitive Jon Philip Law. It's a great opportunity missed- they should look at remaking this.

Thursday, June 02, 2011

Movie review – “Rabbit Proof Fence” (2002) ***

When directors left Australia saying “yes I just want to work on some big films then I’ll come back and make passion projects” it became fashionable to go “yeah, whatever” but Phil Noyce definitely did. At the height of his Hollywood career, he elected to come home and return to the world of social issues with which he’d started his career. And what’s more the result was a big local hit, the most popular film in which aboriginals had leading roles (as supposed to sidekicks, like Crocodile Dundee).
A moving story on a worthy subject – three girls who, after being torn away from their mother to go live on a mission, escape and try to rejoin her. (The scene of them being taken away is the best in the film, full of power and emotion). The adventures are unavoidably episodic, but there is enough variation: meeting the housekeeper (Deb Mailman) who is basically a sex slave, the guy who betrays them, etc. The script has Neville (Ken Branagh) espouse his point of view, but Branagh’s performance teeters over into caricature land. Fine acting, especially from the young girls, and good Peter Gabriel score.

Monday, March 07, 2011

Script review – “Clear and Present Danger” (1991 draft) by John Milius

Interesting to compare with the later film, and much more faithful to the novel: it’s got a longer introduction, discovering the murders on the boat, including the fake hanging sequence from the book; the part of Jack Ryan is greatly reduced (he isn’t in the ambush – actually he’s not really needed for the story to work, Clark could have done it all); Dan Murray doesn't die; the ending is different – actually it’s all different. The best bit is when the Americans go on their mission and start shooting people then it goes haywire. I also really liked the ending where Cortez kills Cutter in Washington out of revenge or what Ryan's done, but is then killed himself by some drug addicted kids who mug him. Other than that it’s not too involving – I liked the film, and believe they were right to make the changes they did, especially departing from the novel.

Thursday, January 06, 2011

Movie review – “Salt” (2010) **

This had a decent idea, plus some good names working on it, so it’s a disappointment to find such a dreadful movie. The basic concept isn’t bad – Angelina Jolie is a CIA worker accused of being a double agent… which she finds out is true. But it’s full of stupidity – why does the KGB guy tell them? (They try to explain this at the end, but it doesn’t make sense, it would be better for them if the CIA were unaware of what was going on). The actions of the lead characters doesn’t make sense either – and the action sequences aren’t very well thought out. Jolie seems to be phoning it in (they don’t even give her some sexy outfits to wear), Liv Schreiber continues to underwhelm on screen and it’s just all… dumb.

Sunday, October 29, 2006

Book review – “The Devil’s Guide to Hollywood” by Joe Eszterhas

“By” Joe Eszterhas is a bit rich – it really should be “edited by”. Oh, OK, there is some original material, about a chapter’s worth, where Joe suggests what sort of routine to use to write a screenplay, and gives some advice about what to do. But most of this book consists of him quoting others, in particular others about Hollywood, especially screenwriting – William Goldman is quoted extensively, so is Robert McKee (who Eszterhas sometimes makes fun of, sometimes seems to approve what McKee says), also John Gregory Dunne’s Monster, the autobiographies of Zsa Zsa Gabor and Swifty Lazar, the books of William Froug, other books on screenwriting, Phil Noyce’s book. 

This is an irritatingly lazy book. Eszterhas already wrote a brilliantly entertaining memoir on his life and career, Hollywood Animal (material from which he re-hashes here). Why another one? It must have been the money. He hasn’t had a screenplay credit since he moved back to Cleveland, is what why? But his books have sold well.

Reading this you can’t shake the feeling that part of Eszterhas wishes he could wind the clock back to the early 90s, when he was still smoking and drinking and making millions with his spec scripts (many of which had basically the same plot: person falls in love with person so obviously guilty of murders that they must be innocent and they turn out to be guilty) and bragging about being a great family man by living in Marin County and commuting to Hollywood, rooting around on his wife pretty much non-stop, including with Sharon Stone, telling execs to get stuffed, writing blockbusters, making records. Since then he got re-married (he says he’s faithful), had a new family, quit smoking after a bout of cancer, moved from LA, returned to prose – but he keeps looking back at Old Joe with one suspects a touch of wistfulness.

Thursday, August 31, 2006

Bob Evans

The NY Times ran a fun article on Robert Evans who is still plugging away at 70 odd years. It doesn't quite pinpoint why he's still so beloved: the guy is cool. Retro chic, what you will - but in modern Hollywood with its MBAs and Scientologists, Evans is a glorious throwback to an earlier hedonistic age: all the cocaine and prostitutes and a beautiful actress wife and legions of famous lovers (including Grace Kelly and Lois Chiles) and also producer of some striking credits as well as being a head of studio whom people remember. Evans perpetrated his legend with his book and the movie made from it - but also the memoirs of Joe Eszterhas and Phil Noyce. I mean, who wouldn't want to work with Bob Evans, even if only for a bit? It would be worth it for the stories alone. And his credits post 1991 comeback aren't bad - it seems he does little hands on producing but he obviously still has an eye for a "property".

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Great unmade Australian Films

Great unmade Australian Films

The Sydney Morning Herald recently reprinted a Guardian article about great unmade films – Kubrick’s Napoleon, Welles’ Don Quixote, etc. What about Australian cinema? Are there any unmade masterpieces that have been lost over the years, or have we used up all our good ideas? If the list of projects given development funding by the AFC is any guide there are a probably an awful lot of them out there. Stephen Vagg has a look at some of the better known ones.

Barry McKenzie III
In his autobiography, Barry Crocker said there were plans for a third Barry McKenzie film, where Bazza would take on America. Box office receipts for Barry McKenzie Holds His Own were not quite enough to warrant it – but I’m sure Crocker would be up for another go if anyone could ever raise the cash.

The Boney Series
Arthur Upfield’s internationally popular series novels of about a half-caste aboriginal detective were discovered by Michael (The Red Shoes) Powell when he came here in the 60s to make They’re a Weird Mob. He got Paramount interested in adapting the books as a series of films, starting with The Bone is Pointed. They never resulted, but two TV series did: Boney in 1971-3 (where the title role was played by a Kiwi, James Laurenson, with dark make-up) and Bony in 1993 (where the character was changed to a white raised by aboriginals role and was played by Cameron Daddo). Incidentally, while out here Powell also unsuccessfully tried to make film versions of two other classic Australian stories later filmed by others – Picnic at Hanging Rock and The Magic Pudding.

Breakout
This feature film about the Cowra breakout by Japanese POWs in World War 2 was to have been made by Bruce Beresford in the late 70s under his contract with the SAFC, but he went on to Breaker Morant instead. Kennedy Miller made a mini series on the incident in the 1980s.

Call Me When the Cross Turns Over
Adaptation of the novel by D’Arcy (The Shiralee) Niland was announced in 1964 as a big budget 20th Century Fox project to be filmed in Australia. Niland did the script and Sean Connery and his then-wife, Aussie Diane Cilento, were mooted as possible stars.

Clean Straw for Nothing
Based on the novel by George (My Brother Jack) Johnston, this is a long-standing project of producer Pat Lovell (Picnic at Hanging Rock) and very nearly got made in the 80s with Mel Gibson; Gillian Armstrong was also attached at one stage. As Lovell tells it in her autobiography, a film was on the cards until Gibson hit pay dirt in Lethal Weapon… and we ain’t seen him in an Aussie story since.

The Drums of Myrrh
Sandy Harbutt’s debut feature, Stone, was one of the most successful Australian films of the 70s and it one of the most beloved Australian films of all time, inspiring the terrific documentary Stone Forever (only Mad Max would have as many lunatic fans ). Harbutt’s follow up project was to be The Drums of Myrrh, based on the 1933 novel by Ion Idriess about goings on in the Torres Strait. It never got made and Harbutt has never directed another feature film.

Goodbye Adelaide
Goodbye Paradise was a 1983 film noir set on the Gold Coast; based on a script by Bob Ellis and Denny Lawrence it featured Ray Barrett in perhaps his greatest role as the world-weary private eye Mike Stacey. A wonderful film, but not a spectacular box office performer, which is presumably why this mooted sequel (where Stacey goes to the Adelaide Festival) was not made.

King Hit
This proposed feature film attracted a lot of attention in the late 70s due to it’s subject matter: the’75 dismissal of the Gough Whitlam government by Governor General John Kerr. Written by Erwin Rado and Bruce Grant, it was considered by Phil Noyce and then, later, Paul Cox (!). It was to get around potential defamation problems by being about the making of a film about Whitlam. No film resulted; Eventually Kennedy Miller got in first with their mini-series The Dismissal. (Incidentally, British producer David Puttnam was planning on making a film of the 1932-33 Bodyline cricket series in the early 1980s, but Kennedy Miller got in there first, too, with the mini-series Bodyline.)

The Last Bus to Banjo Creek
In the early 1960s, Helen Wilson’s short story was turned into a script by English TV legend Lord Ted Willis (Dixon of Dock Green) about a prim English girl and a sweaty Aussie male travelling through the Outback, finding love on the way – kind of like an Aussie African Queen only without any war. Rod Taylor was mentioned as a possible star in 1964 and for the next ten years he tried on and off to get it made but it never happened.

The Long Green Shore
John Hepworth’s novel based on experiences fighting in New Guinea during the last days of WW2 was not published until after he died in the 90s. Bob Ellis wrote a script, and a few years ago Russell Crowe expressed interest on the film making his directorial debut. The great Aussie WW2 film is yet to be made – maybe this could be it!

Lord Kitcheners’ Little Dummer Boys
Not really an Aussie film but it was to star the Bee Gees! In 1968 this project, a Boer War story set in Africa, was announced but no film resulted, so Barry, Maurice and Robin had to limit their film career to soundtracks.

Mad Max 4: Fury Road
George Miller and Mel Gibson can’t surely need the money but there’s been rumours around on this one for ages (Heath Ledger as Max Jnr? Return of the feral kid?) Apparently it was to start filming in Namibia in 2003 but called off. Now who knows? Check the internet for further gossip.

Mr Burke and Mr Wills
Before the 1985 release of Burke and Wills (not to mention Wills and Burke) this unrelated British-Aussie project about Australia’s most famous bad explorers was supposed to go into production in the early 70s. Based on a script by Terrence Rattigan, Charlton Heston and Trevor Howard were discussed as possible stars.

The Riders
Tim Winton novel which Ray (Bliss) Lawrence was having little luck getting funding for. But it had a happy ending or sorts: working on the screenplay was Andrew Bovell, and Lawrence went to see Bovell’s Speaking in Tongues one night and that eventually became Lantana.

Robbery Under Arms
Rolfe Bolderwood’s classic novel has been filmed several times, never entirely satisfactorily – 1907, 1911, 1920, 1957 and 1985. Ken G Hall, whose Cinesound Studios dominated local production before World War 2, had dreamt of filming this since the 1930s but could never make it happen: problems with rights, question of the ban on bushranger films, etc. He kept on trying after WW2, attempting to do a co-production with Rank. It eventually fell through; Rank went ahead and made their own version in 1957 which despite expat legend Peter Finch in the lead fell a bit flat.

The Siege of Sydney
A project floated by Brian (The Man from Hong Kong, BMX Bandits) Trenchard-Smith in the late 70s about rogue CIA agents who threaten Sydney with destruction – years before The Rock. The hero was to be a politician based on Neville Wran, so government co-operation couldn’t have been the reason why this didn’t happen.

Sweetlip
Another Ray Lawrence project that couldn’t get up in the late 80s and early 90s. Robert Drewe wrote the script based on one of his short stories and Sam Neill was attached to star. They almost got funding – then Sam Neill pulled out.

The Thorn Birds
The blockbuster success of Colleen McCulloch’s novel inevitably attracted the attention of Hollywood who, after original director Herbert Ross left the project, approached none other than Peter Weir to direct it. In the end he turned it down and made Gallipoli instead. One is intrigued to think of what Weir would have done with The Thorn Birds; as it was the novel was subsequently turned into a highly successful mini series that shot in Hawaii and had no Aussies except Bryan Brown.

Something Great
Every couple of years someone promises to make a film about Les Darcy. This effort came in the late 80s courtesy of Frank Howson and Jonathan Hardy, with Richard Franklin mentioned as a possible director. Howson later tried to get it done as a mini series with Pino Amenta attached; it didn’t happen and Howson and Amenta made Boulevard of Broken Dreams instead.

Total Recall
Before Arnie and Paul Verhoven came along this was to have been an Aussie movie. Well, made in Australia anyway - with Bruce Beresford as director and starring Patrick Swayze. It was to be one of the first productions at the Gold Coast film studio built by Dino de Laurentis in the 1980s which later became Warner Brothers Movie World. De Laurentis’ finances were never that great at this time and in hindsight it is not that surprising the project didn’t go ahead.

Tracks
Robyn Davidson wrote a book about her experience crossing the Australian desert with four camels. In the late 1980s Ray Lawrence tried to get this up. At one stage Julia Roberts was mentioned as being interested in the project.

The Unknown Industrial Prisoner
Film version of David Ireland’s novel was to have been the first feature film made by Film Australia, with director Arch Nicholson and producer Richard Mason attached. In 1978 Minister for Home Affairs John Ellicot stepped in and the film was not made despite having been approved by the board of the Australian Film Commission (the script dealt with industrial relations and foreign ownership issues). This decision led to the Australian Film Commission's Act being amended to require ministers to table their reasons for blocking film proposals.

Voss
A multi-million dollar film of Patrick White’s novel was a dream of Harry M Miller in the 70s, and it very nearly happened. Ken Russell (Women in Love) then Joseph Losey (The Caretaker) were to direct. The big budget and troubles with unions were among the reasons why it did not proceed.

The Year My Voice Broke III (for lack of a better title)
John Duigan always intended his highly successful The Year My Voice Broke to be the first part of a trilogy. After Flirting, however, no third film has resulted. In the late 90s, Duigan said he intended to do a third part of the trilogy and had “half-written” several versions, one being set in Paris in 1968 and one set in Kenya and Uganda. Noah Taylor is probably too old now.