Showing posts with label Randolph Scott. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Randolph Scott. Show all posts

Saturday, December 28, 2024

Movie review - "Ride the High Country" (1962) ****1/2 (warning spoilers)

 Terrific film. It just works from its opening credits, beautifully shot and haunting melacholic theme tune. Joel McCrea and Randolph Scott are perfectly cast in the leads (did this inspire Larry McMutry's Lonesome Dove), Mariette Hartley is a different female heroine (still pretty but smart, unconventional), the brothers are a terrific rogues gallery: handsome but sketchy James Drury, LQ Jones, Warren Oates, etc. Ron Starr is a little more stock as the kid but that's fine.

The location work looks gorgeous (mines, snow, towns with cars). It's got these old 1950s trappings with Peckinpah's freshness (brothel scene, end of West). The story is simple but effective - great jolt when Hartley's father is killed - and the ending is guy cry nirvana.

Wednesday, December 04, 2024

Movie review - "The Spoilers" (1942) **** (rewatching - warning: spoilers)

 Much better than the 1930. Much clearer. Better dialogue. Acting. The lot. Okay the blackface scene isn't great - Wayne putting on boot polish to rob a bank.

But the other stuff is good. The set. John Wayne young and sexy playing off against Marlene Dietrich. Harry Carey, who I expected to die. Richard Barthemless shines as Dietrich's offsider. Randolph Scott, firm and tough, a surprise villain. Margaret Linsday lots of fun.

Everyone wants to have sex in this. Dietrich and Linsday want to have sex with Wayne. Wayne wants to have sex with Dietrich and Lindsay. Barthemless and Scott want to have sex with Dietrich. Dietrich wouldn't mind having sex with Scott.

Sunday, September 15, 2024

Movie review - "Ride Lonesome" (1959) ***1/2

 James Coburn's film debut and Randolph Scott's third last. Scott plays a bounty hunter tracking James Best. They come across a duo - enigmatic Pernell Roberts and gangly grinning James Coburn, both of whom are superb. Lee Van Cleef adds tang as Best's dodgy brother. Best is great fun.

The dialogue is tangy, the photography beautiful, the plot full of twists. It's low budget but that doesn't matter. Karen Steele is a little silly with her peroxide blonde hair but her performance isn't bad. She's outshone by the men but they do have better roles.

Saturday, March 23, 2024

Movie review - "Badman's Territory" (1946) **1/2

 I'm not super familiar with the mid-period Randolph Scott cycle - the ones after his first Westerns, where he normally co starred with bigger names, and before the Renown cycle. This was a solid hit for RKO, who had a decent record making Westerns. The copy I saw had a gloomy feel to it but it may have been the print. 

Scott is a marshall chasing outlaws into a lawless territory. The feisty local newspaper editor is a woman - Australia's own Ann Richards, who was under contract to RKO. I think this is the only movie she made for that studio. There is definite novelty seeing her introduced on a horse with a gun. She's not entirely comfortable but is at home in a newspaper office. I like how she had a character to play - brave, crusading editor; jealous of Belle Starr.

The gimick of the story involves Scott trgint to find his brother who has been taken by real life outlaws - the Jameses, the Daltons,  Belle Starr. There's also some Indians.

Plenty of plot and action and spectacle. Shiny support cast including Lawrence Tierney, very good as Jesse James, and Tom Tryon as Frank.

Gloomily shot but I enjoyed it more as it went on.


Saturday, February 06, 2021

Movie review - "When the Daltons Rode" (1940) **1/2

 Presumably Universal were hoping for their own Jesse James after the 1939 success of that movie, for this shares many of the same elements: based on the story of outlaw brothers who are pushed into crime by evil developers, a worried mother. Universal splashed the cash, provided a decent cast (including Randolph Scott, Kay Francis, Broderick Crawford, Brian Donlevy and Andy Devine) and budget, as well as one of their leading directors, George Marshall.

The action scenes are well staged, particularly a train robbery and the final shoot out, and it moves at a fair clip.

It doesn't entirely work. There's a dramatic flaw at the centre of the movie: it lacks lead characters for us to hook into. I guess Randolph Scott is meant to be the star but he doesn't do much: he's a fictitious character, a childhood friend of the boys who is working as a lawyer and tries to help them but doesn't (they go to crime in the movie). There's a plot where he falls for Broderick Crawford's gal (Francis) but it doesn't mean much since Scott and Crawford spend barely any time together (the brothers don't even remember him at the beginning when he comes into town) so Scott doesn't feel torn.

Crawford is excellent. Andy Devine is effective (I like these women fighting over him) and has a moving death scene. Brian Donlevy is wasted in his part - he looks dynamic and you expect him to play an important part but he doesn't. Francis doesn't have much to do but I did enjoy seeing someone with her star power in the role - and her acting is fine, she conveys "tormented" well.

Really the film should have been about brothers in love with the same girl and they all wind up dead. I wonder if that was the original concept.

Saturday, January 02, 2021

Book review - "Cary Grant" by Scott Eyman

 Typically excellent biography by Eyman of the legendary Hollywood star. Discussion in recent years has centered around Grant's sexuality - this one presents the evidence rather than making conclusions (some dicey... who cares what Budd Boetticher thought?) and basically leaves it for the reader to decide. He mentions Grant's physical beating of his first and fourth wives without comment.

Grant's father married above his class; the mother would pester him and was a bit eccentric - dad got jack and had her sent to a lunatic asylum, which he could. No wonder Grant became a bit odd and wanted to reinvent himself.

It's a tribute he turned out so normal. He was genuinely smart and charming,capable of kindness. Open minded about sex. As mentioned Eyman quotes a number of people who insist Cary was straight but quotes a bisexual dude who said Grant was open about that to him and the evidence seems to imply otherwise. Loved kids (he should have had more than one and he knew it - he tried).

He had his flaws. Stinginess, if you count that as a flaw (he would present house guests with a bill). He hit his first and fourth wives. Controlling.

A superb actor. Didn't push himself as much as he should have. A great friend of Clifford Odets.

Possible movie in this... Cary Grant married to Besty Drake, who came up with the idea of the film Houseboat. Grant sold it with Drake to co star but then fell for Sophia Loren, had the film rewritten for her, Loren and he had a fling but she refused to leave Carlo Ponti, Grant is left alone, but finds happiness via LSD.

Saturday, May 18, 2019

Book review - "Full Service: My Adventures in Hollywood and the Secret Sex Lives of the Stars " by Scott Bowers (2012)

Exhausting to read. Fascinating in parts. Not particularly well written. The sort of book where the good articles about it are more entertaining than the book itself. Bowers has no problem being molested as a young boy or a young teen under priests - which I know is the attitude of some people.

There's plenty of choice gossip, and to be honest a lot of it seemed plausible - Vivien Leigh was a wildcat in bed, Charles Laughton and Tyrone Power liked shit in their sex, Cole Porter was into oral, Montgomery Clift and Roddy McDowall were exceedingly fussy with their tastes, John Carradine was kinky, Errol Flynn liked girls but very very young, Cary Grant and Randolph Scott liked dudes, Rock Hudson is in there. The Duke and Duchess of Windsor. Gore Vidal was a friend.

Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn both being gay does surprise me - I guess it makes sense. Who knows?

Some stuff felt true because the people weren't famous eg producer Frank MacArthur being gay. Some stuff was just funny like Steve Reeves turning tricks for George Cukor. Some of it I did struggle with - like Bowers being around J Edgar Hoover. Maybe it happened, I'm not that wordly, I just struggled with it.

The best bits of the book are where it stories feel more detailed and authentic - like getting Nestor Almederos to the Oscar ceremony. Bowers had a full life!

Thursday, June 21, 2018

Movie review - "Alburqueque" (1948) **

Pine Thomas took a tentative step into the big time with this Western - it's got a decent budget, colour, Randolph Scott and Gabby Hayes.

It's not very interesting though. Scott is a cowboy who comes to the title town to work for his uncle who turns out to be a baddy so Scott ends up helping the goodies. There's an insipid female lead but a more meaty other female lead part (played by Barbara Britton) - a conwoman who causes trouble and romances Scott's ally, Russell Hayden.

Scott smokes in a few scenes which feels weird. He's polite and good natured, looks at home in the saddle. I wasn't wild about him. Gabby Hayes does his thing. Theres an okay support cast - I really liked seeing Lon Chaney (who has a fist fight with Scott!) and George Cleveland was effective as the main baddie, with a soft spoken voice.

Still, it was all a bit underwhelming.

Saturday, January 06, 2018

Movie review - "She" (1935) ** (re-watching) (warning: spoilers)

A second viewing of this big flop from the team that made King Kong. Despite a best selling source novel and talented people, it's a mess. I love the novel, I love King Kong, I wanted this to be good, but it isn't.

The main problems:

- The character of Holly is pointless. You could remove him from the whole film and it wouldn't matter. As played by Nigel Bruce he's not that interesting. I mean he doesn't have to be like he is in the book - ugly, falling in love with She - but at least he has a point in the book. Here he does nothing. If he was removed Helen Mack's character could do everything he does.

- Leo/Randolph Scott doesn't fall for She. He's tempted by her for a couple of minutes but quickly comes to his senses and dislikes her. He falls in love with Helen Mack too which is dull (Scott's performance is awkward but he does have the right look). At the end he doesn't want to go into the flame because of Ayesha he does it so Mack isn't killed. That's dumb.

- The film has this awful bias towards Helen Mack (as Tanya a combination of a few women who annoyed She) - she's a loving dopey idiot who just wants to hang around Leo. To be fair she was that in the book too but at least in the book she was killed, here she gets the guy.

- The natives look silly. I know this is a problem for many films of this era but the locals of Kor look particularly dopey in their sub-Egyptian outfits.

- Helen Gahagan isn't up to the part. She doesn't have the looks - she's pretty enough but Ayesha needs to be captivating.

- There's this massive production number towards the end, before everyone goes off to the Spirit of Life, which is completely pointless. Lots of dancing and singing and carry on - as if the filmmakers were worried there wasn't enough spectacle. They could cut it out of the film and nothing would have mattered.

- There's not enough action. Just a lot of jumping around. The movie is dull.

What I did like:

- some of the sets

- shifting the action to the Arctic, this worked fine - things like discovering corpses in the

- the make up when Ayesha disintegrated was fine.

It has a sort of King Kong feel - it's about an expedition to an exotic part of the world, there are three key players, one of whom is lusted after by a foreign beast, another one who loves the lustee. But Kong had a genuine sense of wonder. You have the Robert Armstrong character driving a lot of the action - he had something to do. You felt for Kong - he beat up other creatures on the island, and fell in love (they give nothing heroic for She to do). It feels as though the filmmakers didn't like Ayesha

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Movie review - "Christmas Eve" (1947) *

Benedict Bogeaus tries to get bang for his buck with three stars in individual, though linked storylines. This has a pretty good basis for a film - Ann Harding is an old lady who wants to contact her three estranged sons. Reunited families works very well - look at say The Sons of Katie Elder. And the combination of George Brent, George Raft and Randolph Scott gives great contrast.

But it's a lousy movie. Very badly written. It's stuffed with plot - there is so much on, none of it interesting. It's like they took three separate films, truncated the scripts and stuffed them into this one. George Brent is a womaniser trying to marry for money who is loved by Joan Blondell; George Raft runs a nightclub in South America and tries to fight former Nazis and femme fetales; Randolph Scott is a rodeo rider who gets involved in an attempt to bust a baby adoption racker.WTF?

On top of this is the plot where Harding's relatives try to get her declared insane so they can get her money. If she was such a great mum why are they all estranged from her? Would Raft really have taken the fall for a weasel? so the brothers have nothing to do with each other?

I know Bogeaus wanted to shoot stories individually but it means we don't have many scenes of the brothers together, which should be part of the fun - and the stories tend to be back stories. This is a bad movie that annoyed me the more I watched it.

Tuesday, August 01, 2017

Movie review - "Follow the Boys" (1944) **1/2 (warning: spoilers)

I'd known about this Universal musical for many years because it had a small appearance from Orson Welles. Indeed, a whole bunch of stars appear in it doing musical acts, but because it was Universal in the 40s the stars are pretty second tier: Ted Lewis, the Andrews Sisters, Turhan Bey. (The studio's big musical money makers however - Deanna Durbin, Abbott and Costello - aren't in it.)

This sort of movie was popular during the war, studios trotting out their talent roster in some quasi variety show plot - Warners did Thank Your Luck Stars, Paramount had Star Spangled Rhythm. Presumably performers donated their talents, or at least gave at discount rates.

I was surprised how much screen time was devoted to George Raft, who wasn't under contract to Universal. But he had just made Broadway for the studio - and had left Warner Bros, and seemed keen to re-launch himself as a musical star. Now Raft got his break as a dancer, and he can dance - but he's not a fantastic musical star. He doesn't really "sell" a dance number, at least not here (maybe he could have with more rigorous handling). His acting persona doesn't really suit musicals and/or patriotic domestic dramas either - too stiff and tough. Really, his natural milieu was thrillers and action films.

But his character drives the "book" of the film. The first half hour focuses around Raft, and his courtship of Vera Zorina (as stiff an actor as Raft but they dance nicely together). Then war comes and the film starts to focus on Raft organising shows for the troops and the stars appear and do their acts. Occasionally we go back to Raft and his dramas. The conflict in the second half is really contrived: Zorina falls pregnant but Raft is impatient organising a show and she doesn't get around to tell him so they wind up separated. She makes a crack about him not serving and he doesn't tell her he tried but got not back. It's a weak reason for a separation and is lazy writing. You wonder why they bothered - why not have them fall in love on the road and have some other fight? (Did Raft want to re-do his history-of-vaudeville schtick from Broadway?)

But the acts are interesting - there's something for everyone. You've got the Andrews Sisters singing twice - once in concert, one on a boat that is hit by a torpedo. Some old broad Sophie Tucker does a few numbers. That creepy Ted Lewis does a number. Donald O'Connor and Peggy Ryan do their cut-price-Mickey-and-Judy routine. Jeanette MacDonald came out of retirement (or whatever she was doing) to sing two songs. Dinah Shore sings a few songs, very well (she's pretty and likeable - I wonder why she wasn't more of a film star). Arthur Rubenstein plays on the piano. Louis Jordan, a black band leader, performs for the black troops (depicted a little child-like but at least they're in the film... there's a few black performers actually) - and then Raft does a Charleston for them in the rain to "Sweet Georgia Brown" which is fun. W.C Fields looks in terrible shape as he does a very unfunny comedy sketch involving a pool cue. There's an unexpectedly touching bit where Jeanette McDonald sings to some injured soldiers in hospital including one bloke who is blind.  Some Latina type does a fantastic dance act.

Most of all there's Orson Welles doing a version of his Mercury Magic Show, which he performed during the war. Orson is handsome and charismatic and you wish he had the lead; he's clearly having fun, bantering with the audience and sawing Marlene Dietrich in half. (During this period Orson tried to set himself up as a sort of comedian - he had his own sitcom on radio and everything).

There's a meeting of a whole bunch of performers - Universal contract stars - being addressed by Raft and George Macready. They pan across the room and some people I recognise - Marlene Dietrich, Maria Montez, Orson Welles, Dinah Shore, Randolph Scott, Nigel Bruce, Donald O'Connor, Lon Chaney Jnr, and Andy Devine. Some people I didn't recognise at all. I think Susannah Foster was in there. But it's fun to see them all together.

The end is quite sweet when there's a speech (done in voice over - I'm not sure who by) about the importance of being a "soldier in greasepaint" - performing for the troops. It touches on the risks involved - Raft's character dies and at the end they go to the "honor roll" which lists Carole Lombard, Leslie Howard, Roy Rognan, Tamara, Charles King and Bob Ripa - killed performing for the troops. That's a good basis for a film - the camraderie, the risks. This isn't that film though - Raft feels a bit bad about being rejected for the army but most of the time is wasted on their dull marriage and contrived troubles.

It's frustrating because there's lots of good things about this movie - all the talent involved, the world of theatre performers in wartime. I loved the real footage of concerts, and servicemen in crowds, and little bits like a blonde girl swearing an oath promising she wouldn't divulge any military secrets. There's a great movie in here struggling to get out.

Aussie audiences will get a kick out of the Delta Rhythm Boys singing a song in New Guinea (on the backlot I presume). Also at the end Raft and his dad and sister travel to Brisbane when their ship is sunk. They don't get there unfortunately.

Grace McDonald is very pretty and lovely as Raft's picture but has nothing to do. George Macready pops up in a sympathetic role but is still creepy.

Lots of stars are mentioned who don't appear - John Wayne, Frederic March, Bob Hope, Cary Grant etc. They even show pictures of some of them at the end. Maybe they were sucking up.

Thursday, December 18, 2014

Movie review - "Follow the Fleet" (1936) ****

Astaire and Rogers were at their peak here, creatively and financially - yet RKO didn't feel confident giving them the whole movie - so a great slab of this is taken up with a romance between Randolph Scott and Harriet Hilliard. To be fair, the filmmakers probably had the tremendous success of Roberta in mind - that spent a lot of time on a Randolph Scott romance as well.

Not that it makes it any more interesting: this has a whole bunch of plot about Hilliard (who is a bit of a charisma free zone - she became Harriet Nelson) being an ugly duckling who blossoms into a swan and Scott not noticing and blah  blah blah. Fred and Ginger's own romance is, once again, relatively stress free although there is a bunch of misunderstandings about a Broadway show.

They do have some squabbles and superb dancing, which achieve genuine art status. You get a real range of them - "Let Yourself Go", which starts in a comic fashion but builds in intensity (I love it how Ginger matches him leap for leap - Fred is clearly a genius but she's in there, going for it, never letting him beat her); the dramatic intensity of the climactic "Let's Face the Music and Dance", Ginger's solo (her only one in these films), Fred's solo, Fred playing the piano.

The film could have done with a genuine comic actor or two in there - the equivalent of Edward Everett Horton.

Friday, December 12, 2014

Movie review - "Roberta" (1935) ***1/2

A silly story about a football player running a dress shop in Paris is given a lift by some incredible Astaire-Rogers dance numbers. Fred and Ginger don't actually drive most of the action in this one - that job is taken up by jock Randolph Scott, who inherits the dress shop, and Irene Dunne who runs it. Another big role is taken up by Claire Dodd, as Scott's snooty ex. Fred basically plays Scott's sidekick, with Ginger as his ex - neither actually necessary for the plot.

There's lots (and lots) of fashion on display, and Irene Dunne sings opera which may get on your nerves (or not - I'm not a fan of her singing), and plenty of talk about being a snob. Dunne and Randolph Scott aren't a great team. There's an unexpectedly moving moment when Helen Westley dies. (Watching this I got the feeling this heavily influenced Dad and Dave Come to Town - a hick inheriting a fashion store, a climax involving a beauty show).

But all is forgiven when Fred and Ginger dance - there's "sex dancing", with the dancing standing in for sex, both of them flirting around each other, getting into it and building to a climax. I laughed how little thought was put into their romance - they were once a couple and don't really have any obstacles to getting back together again - they don't even really do anything with the fact that Ginger is impersonating a Polish countess; far more time and complication is given to Scott-Dunne. (I'm assuming the reason Fred and Ginger play essentially support roles is that no one would believe Fred as a footballer).

Songs include "When Smoke Gets in Your Eyes".

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Movie review - "Susannah of the Mounties" (1939) ***

Kids who were the sole survivor of an Indian massacre were an old Western standby so in a way its kind of surprising it took 20th Century Fox a while to get around to using that as a plot for a Shirley Temple film. Or maybe not... it does mean this is a more serious vehicle for the moppet, beginning with her severely traumatised after her family and friends have been wiped out.

But this enables her to be an orphan and charm a military outpost, something she was very experienced at doing. For variety it's set in Canada and the cowboys are mounties; there is Randolph Scott wearing a mustache that makes him look really old as the main mountie dude, whom Temple kind of seems romantically keen on; a young Indian is held hostage for Shirley to have tween urst with; Margaret Lockwood (looking not very comfortable) pops up as Scott's love interest, who Temple spends most of her time trying to separate; the Indians are extremely whimpy except Victor Jory and a few firebrands; Shirley puts her head into the lion's den by visiting the Indian camp at the end to save the day. Shirley also takes a few drags on a peace pipe and gets a head ache.

There are many echoes of Wee Willie Winkie; it isn't as good but there's action and novelty.

Friday, July 12, 2013

Movie review - "Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm" (1938) **1/2

A surprising number of Western stars wound up supporting/co-starring with Shirley Temple: Gary Cooper, Joel McCrea, and here Randolph Scott. They actually worked a lot better than some of the whimpier male leads because they seemed less dodgy.

Like Poor Little Rich Girl this is a remake of an old Mary Pickford movie with a show biz subplot shoved in. Even with that the movie feels padded - Shirley wins a radio singing competition but doesn't know it, goes to live on a farm with an aunt who doesn't want her to sing, the singing comp organiser (Randolph Scott) happens to be a neighbour and recognises her, but she does it on the sly to not upset the aunt.

It's a dodgy flimsy script stuffed with musical numbers - Shirley even does a medley of her old hits from earlier films as well as a dance with Bill Robinson (in his last appearance with her - he's a servant but this is the least racist Temple movie to feature blacks). It kind of feels lazy story wise, with nasty relatives turning up to take her away (including William Demarest who is too likeable for his role - he should have played a Shirley ally), and a romance, and a kindly aunt whose heart is melted.

But the cast is excellent (including players like Helen Westley and Slim Summerville), Jack Haley adds some comedy, Scott has a fun romance with Gloria Stuart, Phyllis Brooks is a pretty rival love interest.

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Movie review - "Last of the Mohicians" (1936) ***1/2

In making his own version of the famous novel, Michael Mann paid tribute to Philip Dunne's adaptation for this one, saying he really knocked the book into shape. He did too, focusing the drama on the clash between Hawkeye and the Heyward, making the action flow logically, and creating believable romance.

I noted Mann made some changes - for instance, here the movie ends with Hawkeye and Heyward going to rescue Cora (both determined to die for her) and not the fight between Magua and Chingachook, and also here Heyward is allowed to live (so too is the colonel); this movie is a bit more sympathetic to that character and the British although the American-British tension is still shown. It also puts more emphasis on the Alice-Uncas romance.

It's a very exciting movie - I didn't expect to keep watching but I did. Randolph Scott is fine as Hawkeye (there's not much you can do about those fur caps), Binnie Barnes is bland as Cora but Herbert Wilcoxon is ideal as the stuffy Heyward, Robert Barrett and Heather Angel are likeable interracial lovers (as if they're going to be allowed to live) and Bruce Cabot a wonderful villain. Not particularly well directed - imagine if John Ford had been able to have a go - but great fun.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Radio review – SGP – “Pittsburgh” (1942) **

The war made coal manufacturing sexy so we have Marlene Dietrich, John Wayne and Randolph Scott in this rehash of Boom Town. They both love her; Wayne has the inside track until he becomes over ambitious and starts only caring about money. Anti-capitalism! Well, not really – it just pleas for capitalism with a heart. Interesting to hear Wayne in a non-sympathetic part (he does turn good but not til the end).

Friday, May 01, 2009

Radio review – Lux#309 – "Virginia City” (1941) **1/2

Action stories don’t adapt well to radio for obvious reasons – this one at least has a decent story. Flynn repeats his film role but you do miss Alan Hale and Big Boy Williams; you don’t miss Miriam Hopkins but Martha Scott isn’t that great as her replacement. Some other guy takes Randolph Scott’s role – not a star, and I think that role needs a star. Still, quite entertaining, and a reminder that Bob Buckner could be counted on to come up with a good story.

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Movie review - "The Spoilers" (1942) ***

After Stagecoach it took John Wayne around ten years to really rise to the top rank (with Red River) but his films during this part were consistently enjoyable, none more so than this, made at Universal in that studio's unpretentious way. Almost 20 years before North to Alaska the Duke is running around Nome during the Gold Rush trying to fight off claim jumpers and being involved with a "fast" woman (Marlene Dietrich who teams marvellously with Wayne - so well, in fact, that Randolph Scott, as a con man antagonist, is hardly a threat).

There is a fast pace, plenty of grizzled character actors, a slightly distasteful portrayal at how bad the judicial system is opposed to good old fashioned just taking over land and fighting people off, a really distasteful scene where Wayne puts himself in black face to hide the baddies and Dietrich's black maid thinks he's a black and flirts with him (seriously), a famous brawl between Wayne and Scott at the end (which I thought would be an all-in one along the lines of Dodge City but is actually just the two of them slugging it out while everyone watches, but is still well done).

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Movie review - "Jesse James" (1939) ***1/2

The reasons why the James boys turned to crime are famously whitewashed in this sympathetic version - nasty railroaders led by Brian Donlevy terrorise local farmers and kill their ma with dynamite (which has basis in truth), so no wonder they go bad.

But to be fair, it's shown Jesse James goes too far - very well played by Tyrone Power whose dark good looks suit the part, its clear he turns mean and bitter through crime, makes his wife's life very hard, and Randolph Scott is a very sympathetic law man (the businessmen eg Donald Meek, are almost all bad).

Henry Fonda complements Power excellently, the colour photography is divine. The middle section gets a bit repetitive - Jesse-is-bad-Jesse-is-bad - but perks up for the "oh isn't it just so ironic" death scene. You haven't seen scenery chewing til you've watched Henry Hull as a newspaper editor here.