Thursday, January 31, 2019

Movie review - "The Adventurers" (1951) **

The British film industry had some success making movies in Australia and East Africa but floundered in South Africa, with this and Diamond City. This is better than that second film but is still disappointing. The location footage is interesting, but it's in black and white and the story is incredibly uninvolving.

It's a version of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre with various people getting greedy looking for diamonds just after the Second Boer War. There's Boer Jack Hawkins, another younger Boer (Peter Hammond), slimy Dennis Price and shifty Gregoire Aslan.

They stuffed the story - it feels like one character too many (I'm guessing they didn't want Madre's three). If they wanted four really they should have brought along the Siobhan McKenna character - Hawkins' ex who married Price. She would've provided great conflict, with Hammond as the "good guy" and Aslan dumped. But having a woman along was probably too much for these filmmakers.

Hawkins and Price are good. McKenna is wasted. There's some good photography. But the pace is slow and the action slack.

Ugh. So frustrating. If you're going to rip off Sierra Madre just do it. Don't try to make changes that lessen it.

Book review - "Pictures Will Talk : the Life and Films of Joseph L. Mankiewicz" by Kenneth Geist (1978)

An extremely good look at the career of Mankiewicz, one of the best known writer-producer-directors from Hollywood's golden age. He had a remarkable career - he made it to the top relatively quickly and stayed there until the end. He managed to retire with his money, his respect and his marbles, which is pretty good.

Mankiewicz came from smart stock - dad was educated, so was mother. He got into films via his brother Herman, who was a journalist who became a screenwriter and was famous for co writing Citizen Kane and not living up to his potential. He drank and Joe didn't. Joe was also a better politician -he could charm, particularly actresses, many of whom he had affairs with. He found a good home at MGM and earned his reputation with Manhattan Melodrama.

I was surprised how many flops were on his resume but he always bounced back. He hit a sort of producing peak with Woman of the Year and The Philadelphia Story but Louis B Mayer wouldn't let him direct so he went to 20th Century Fox, where he thrived under Daryl Zanuck. He's best known for A Letter to Three Wives and All About Eve but made many other solid films, such as Five Fingers and The Ghost and Mrs Muir. Even misfires like People Will Talk are interesting.

Mankiewicz left Fox, whereupon a lot of Zanuck apologists say he never made another decent film. I think that's not true. He's work was always interesting, even when flawed - Guys and Dolls, Suddenly Last Summer, The Quiet American.  Of course the biggest "flawed achievement" was Cleopatra which almost killed Mankiewicz but has some great stuff in it - it's definitely one of the better epics, especially in the first half.

He hung on, managed to make a bunch of other films including Sleuth - this book features some fascinating observations of the making of the film, including Mankiewicz's directing technique.

There's lots of fantastic quotes, particularly from Mankiewicz who was very much alive when the book was written. Surprisingly little about his son Tom's career. The author admires its subject but not to the point of ignorance.

There are some annoying little errors - David and Bathsheba was actually a big hit - and some items where I questioned the writers taste (All the Presidents Men a bad screenplay?). Mankiewicz's power over women - they all fell in love with him apparently - seems a little more suspect to read about in the MeToo era, and also I note all the girls who loved him were neurotic actresses.

Still this is easily the best book on Mankiewicz out there.

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Movie review - "The Terror" (1963) **1/2

Watched this again because Dick Miller died. There is a lot of walking around. I mean a lot. Jack Nicholson, Boris Karloff do a lot of walking. There's also padding - people talking about what's happened or what might happen.

It does have atmosphere though. It looks great. I love the waves, and the credits, and the castle. I love the homey-ness of the old lady's place.

Jack Nicholson is very miscast but he's still Jack Nicholson. Sandra Knight is perfectly ethereal. Dick Miller is absurdly miscast. Jonathan Haze is fun. Boris Karloff is perfect.

This film has a magic. It is slow and confusing.

Movie review - "Village of the Damned" (1995) *

A great mystery of John Carpenter's filmography - how did one of the great directors of suspense, given a story that should have suited him down to the ground, a classic story, shot in his home town, go so horribly wrong?

It's a mess. Completely flat and involving. Very unscary. Clunky. Expensive looking. Astonishingly lacking in atmosphere - compare this to The Fog it was like it was made by a different director.

Kirstie Alley and Mark Hamill play the film with high camp, Chris Reeve is super awkward, Linda Koslowski is naturalistic and wins the film.

So many scenes seem silly - the kids with the eyes, people shooting themselves and stabbing themselves. It needed to be eerie. It's like they watched the rushes and went "oh this isn't scary" and added a bit more violence but it's silly.

There's no affecting relationships. You don't care when Reeve or Koslowski lose their partner. Or the couple who can't have kids have kids. There's too many broad acting character actors.

What happened? Did Carpenter not care? Was he distracted? Maybe it was too 90s - too much money or something. It's a mess.

Monday, January 28, 2019

Movie review - "Ghosts from Mars" (2001) ***1/2

Rewatched it, still really like it. In particular:
* the chemistry between Natasha Henstridge and Ice Cube
* Ice Cube channelling Snake Plissken
* the exotic support cast including Pam Grier and Jason Statham and Robert Carradine
* the wacky narration
* the fact the villains are genuinely scary and hard to beat
* the look of the film
* the twists and turns in the fight sequences.
I still didn't like the fact that Hestridge makes such a dumb mistake at the end in going back to the town.

Movie review - "Tremors" (1990) ***1/2

I never got into this the way others did but it's a really fun movie - quite logically worked out and full of action. You can guess Kevin Bacon will live but aren't sure about the others. Michael Gross is a lot of fun as a survivalist and the movie has some engaging small town characters. No mobile phones makes a big difference!

Impressive effects. Smart creatures.

Movie review - "Gotti" (2018) *

Much maligned biopic of the gangster - whose life has probably been filmed too many times already - isn't that bad for the most part. I mean, it is, but there's some okay moments and it looks snazzy.

John Travolta tries his heart out, as he normally does - but you're always conscious of him Acting with his hair and wacky accent. The same goes for Kelly Preston. It's like two parents play acting - even if one of the sequences (the death of Gotti's 12 year old son) must have had unbearable personal resonance for them.

Like many mafia films these days it's very much in the shadow of The Godfather and especially Goodfellas. It also owes a debt to Entourage - or maybe I was just reading that into it - but some of the party scenes and the use of well known tracks felt very Entourage-y. It feels more like a movie made by someone who watches a lot of movies instead of having a genuine feel for its topic.

Like a lot of biopics it tries to pack in too much - I couldn't follow what was going on a lot of the time. Really the story should have focused on Gotti and his son. That would've been a great movie - what is it like having your dad as a mafia dude, not telling mom that you want to get into the business, how do you work your way up, etc, etc.... But the film offers a stock version of Gotti and a beyond whitewashed version of the son.

That's when this film really lost me - the last half hour or so when it became  a propaganda film for Gotti Jnr. The cast an actor who looks like a little lost boy, completely whitewash any mafia involvement (we see him become a "made man" but no kidnapping or beating or anything). There's this horrendous end where we have slabs of Gotti Jnr's lawyer's testimony going on about how good he is and how the government wasted all this money going after him. And I thought the people associated with this should be ashamed of themselves.

Friday, January 25, 2019

Movie review - "Ocean's 8" (2018) **1/2 (warning: spoilers)

The trailer for this was fantastic - bright, fun, with a knock out cast, funky music and great one liners. It looked like it was going to be a great time in the cinema.

But it was curiously flat. It never had the energy or pizzaz of the trailer. The cast are all there doing their thing - you can't say any of them are bad. Sandra Bullock holds the lead with her star power, Cate Blanchett is a useful sidekick, Helena Bonham Carter and Anne Hathaway are fun in the showiest parts. I wish Mindy Kaling and Rhinanna had been given more to do. I wasn't sure what Sarah Paulsen's role in the heist was which is a shame since she was set up so promisingly.

The film lacks a romantic interest. There's the guy Bullock is getting revenge on - but nothing moving forward. It just would've been fun. Maybe use the James Corden character - expand that out. But they don't.

The last fifteen minutes things perk up when Hathaway comes more involved and so you see the film for what it could be. But it's really... ordinary. Some nice clothes.

Movie review - "The Thing" (1982) **** (warning: spoilers)

I didn't like this movie when I saw it as a kid - too gory too bleak. But time has been extremely kind to it, especially when seen on the big screen, as I managed to do.

It looks fantastic with those snowy vistas and cramped interiors. Big screen make it easier to differentiate the characters too, which is a problem looking at it on the smaller screen - in this one I fully got who was who and appreciated the sublety in many performances, such as Richard Dysart as the doctor.

Some random observations:
* I think it would've been better if the bulk of the action had played out over one night instead of several days.
* They should have covered why Macready can fly to the Norwegian base and where the spaceship was found but not to help.
* I love Wilford Brimley going nuts.
* Many ideas of Macready turn out to be bad eg locking Brimley in the tool shed (so he can build a space ship).
* I realised one of the guys, the radio dude, is played by the actor whose character was killed off on The Warriors because he was annoying.
* A stoner character is useful in sci fi because they can make really outlandish claims as comedy, which helps sell the reality of the world you are creating.
* The quality of acting is very strong - there are no bad performances. It wouldn't have hurt to have two females though.
* The creepiest bits are the quiet ones... the dog entering someone's room and it fading to black, the creature moving under the blanket without the others knowing.
* There's a very American quality to the actions of the group. No thought of quarantining a strange dog even after people kill it. A lack of hygene. A tendency to pull out the flame throwers when things get testy. And the decision to blow things up before considering other possibilities.

Still, a wonderful movie. See it on the big screen if you can.

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

Movie review - "Queen of Blood" (1966) ** (re-watching)

I love this poster - have fond recollections for the movie, but really it's not that good. It's cute and has some genuinely creepy moments. It takes too long for the ship to get to the planet and for the alien to go amok. The alien is creepy.

Basil Rathbone looks as though he's about to drop dead. John Saxon and Dennis Hopper are fine. Creepy open credit titles.

How I Would Fix the 1954 film "The Egyptian"

I'm talking the 1954 20th Century Fox film, which I think would have troubles even if Marlon Brando had starred in it. (He didn't make Desiree a classic).

Firstly I think films in Ancient Egypt struggle if they don't feature mummies. They happened simply too long enough. Cleopatra was late Ancient Egypt and is around the time of early Christianity - just before it. Early Christianity is familiar from the Bible. Before that it's hard to get resonance for audiences today - unless, say, it's about the human race struggling for survival against dinosaurs.

But it was based on a best seller, so let's assume that's non negotiable. Anyway there's no reason a film in Ancient Egypt couldn't work.

Here are the main things I feel could have changed:

* The relationship between Edmund Purdom and Victor Mature (I'm just going to use actor's names) should've been stronger.  I would've made them brothers if possible. (Mature's dad could've been the guy who adopted Purdom). Or at least really established the link.

* I would've combined the Bella Darvi and Gene Tierney role.  Darvi's role I got... she was a vixen who while being upfront made Purdom go ga-ga. But Tierney felt like she repeated her part -another femme fetale. Have Darvi/Tierney as the great love of Purdom's life. The woman she can't resist. So at the end when she offers him the throne it's even harder to resist.

* Purdom needed to be more selfless - tending the poor and what not. It's kind of there, but I think they should've simplified his goal... "everyone is entitled to a doctor" or something. The stuff about worshipping the one god felt so vague. I think the theme of this was ambitious, but overly ambitious. Maybe "there is one good" would have worked but Michael Wilding craps on so much.

* They needed to do more with Purdom's son. This is partly Purdom's fault but the guy looks as though he could barely care about his son's existence. I feel Purdom should've been driven more by wanting to help his son - make the world a better place, etc. And have him meet his son at the end instead of never having tracked him down. That's just slack.

* Michael Wilding shouldn't have been such a crap Pharaoh. He' so weak. There's no reason you can't believe in one god and be nice and also defend your country against the Hittites. It's stupid.

Still a gorgeous looking film and not without interest.

Saturday, January 19, 2019

Movie review - "Captain from Castille" (1947) ***1/2 (warning: spoilers)

20th Century Fox went on the make so many uninspired historical epics that either starred Tyrone Power or wanted to star him, that it was a jolt to rewatch this - the first of the cycle (he'd made some before he went to war eg Lloyds of London but this one kicked off the post-war-in-colour cycle) - and see how good it is.

Not a masterpiece, but very good drama, despite the inevitably dodginess of movie about Cortes' expedition to South America - and knowing all the genocide and destruction that the Indians would suffer.

The first part is extremely strong with Power as a nobleman whose family is tormented by the Spanish Inquisition led by John Sutton - an actor I loathe in heroic parts but who makes a great villain. Power decides to hotfoot it to the New World, along with recovering boozer Lee J Cobb (a lot better than I thought he'd be) and peasant Jean Peters. They make a decent trio - Cobb has a character to play as well as wacky sidekick (someone haunted by a troublesome past who can't handle alcohol) and Peters is excellent in her debut. Yes, she plays an adoring peasant who just wants Power, but you go with it because of the class difference and Power is very handsome. It's also cool how Power is in love with a high class lady so Peters is always insecure.

Cesar Romero has one of his best chances as Cortez, a rogue who is a bit handsy with Peters. He's no saint that's for sure, quite ruthless, and it's not hard to imagine him devastating South America.

The ending has Sutton come back and though we miss a big confrontation with him and Power there's a great melodramatic moment where Peters stabs Power so he won't go to prison. Really that should have been the ending - it has such symmetry. But I guess they don't deserve to die.

Movie review - "The Lost Empire" (1984) ***

Deliriously fun and over the top debut feature (as director) from Jim Wynorski, who clearly was worried he'd never get the chance to do it again so shoved the film full of everything he could possibly think of. The first shot is of a woman's cleavage and there's plenty of that; there's also a lost idol; a team of sexy women crime fighters; a homage to the Dr No spider scene (with a woman in underwear); a deserted island; terrorists taking hostages at school; religious cults; fortresses.

There's plenty of action and cleavage and silly humour. Occasionally it's too much of a smorgasbord, but the cast are game and it's fun.

Friday, January 18, 2019

Movie review - "A Force of One" (1979) **1/2 (warning: spoilers)

I'm having increasing respect for the way Chuck Norris kicked off his movie career - he surrounded himself with good actors (this one includes Ron O'Neal, Clu Gulager, James Whitmore Jnr) and had a decent story. This one he's a cop investigating a drug ring and one of his fellow cops may be involved.

Norris steered away from karate for his first two films as star, but he makes up for that here - the character fights in tournaments and runs a school and the plot is him up against a mysterious other ninja.

There's some tropes so overused that it can't help induce laughs - like when Norris introduces a kid "who's like a son" he practically has "this person will die by the second act" tattooed on his end. There's some over the top "drug addiction" acting to reinforce the point that Drugs Are Bad. And at times the film feels like a blending of various movies (part martial arts flick, part serial killer movie, part cop film) rather than a cohesive whole.

But there's lots of action, Jennifer O'Neil gets to play a smart cop, the support cast is strong as mentioned. This is pretty good.

Movie review - "Way of the Gaucho" (1952) **1/2

You have Westerns, and Westerns set in the north called Northerns, and Westerns set in the Middle East called Easters... I'm not sure what a Western set in South America should be called? Southerns? But I always figured that was a Western set in the Southern states (that weren't Texas).

This was one of a series of movies 20th Century Fox made overseas after the war to use frozen funds - Captain from Castile, The Black Rose, Kangaroo. They usually starred Tyrone Power or were clearly meant to star Tyrone Power - he isn't in this one, instead they use Rory Calhoun has a substitute, and Calhoun isn't bad. At least he looks interested in women and can handle the action stuff well enough.

There's some really fantastic views of Argentina - the deserts, snow capped mountains, plains, gauchos. It looks fantastic.

The story is dull. Calhoun is a gaucho who kills a man in a duel, then goes into the army as opposed to prison, then deserts, then meets Gene Tierney, then leaves, then becomes a bandit, then goes on a trek, then gives himself up.

And it's annoying because the piece has so much potential. A gaucho worried about a changing world, a world of increasing automation and loss of his way of life - that's a great theme. But the way the material is presented here, the story is just dull - and there's no sense of catharsis at the ending. It's like writer-producer Philip Dunne got too caught up in doing location work he forgot to do the script.

The gaucho having a lifelong bond with a childhood friend who works for the railways - that's got heaps of potential. But not only is dull Hugh Beaumont cast, the character is flat. He just sort of pops up to help out Calhoun - and he does it so often it's like "are they in love"? Beaumont should have been Calhoun's actual brother - I thought he was until re-reading a synopsis.

The Tierney-Calhoun romance starts off interestingly - she's this high class girl who is saved by the gaucho. But she just ends up as this weak sap who hangs around the gaucho, wanting him to get married. She's got no spirit, no spine - the whole she's rich-he's-poor thing barely makes a mention. We needed to see more of her living high class - being with Beaumont, having him be rich too. Make it a real love triangle. There needed to be another female character too as a counterpoint to Tierney.

Richard Boone starts off promisingly as the army sergeant who gives Calhoun a hard time. Then he spends the rest of the movie chasing Calhoun around, like he's in love with him too. Why not just make Boone a villain? The film badly needs one

Things that sound exciting are minimised - like Calhoun becoming a bandit. Everett Sloane livens up a few scenes as a gaucho but there's too little of him.

It's a shame. You know a lot of this exotic Fox location adventure movies aren't very good - King of the Khyber Rifles, Lydia Bailey.

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Movie review - "Spiderman: Homecoming" (2018) ****1/2

I really loved this movie. Part of Marvel's success has been their ability to reinvent themselves and with this Spiderman film they did what in hindsight seems obviously but is rarely actually done - quietened down, went back to the source material, went back to character.

Tom Holland's Peter Parker is the first one who actually genuinely seems like a high school student. They make him 15 and he seems young - he acts young, he wants to impress "dad" (Tony Stark), and is constantly and annoyingly enthusiastic, gets distracted by school and the girl he likes. It's very well done.

The girl in the film is a dream girl - she's not even a manic pixie, just a dream - but she's at least smart and diverse. It's brilliant how baddy Michael Keaton is her dad and he's a fantastic villain - very scary, and given decent motivation (a working class guy who's entitled - a Trump voter). I liked the alternate girl and Peter's best friend who gets to achieve his dream of being "the guy in the chair" (this was lovely screenwriting set up and pay off)

Robert Downey Jr and Jon Favreau had a lot of spice, the action scenes are done with Marvel's typical expertise but the strength of this is in the character work and the depiction of the world. It's a shame Marisa Tomei didn't have more to do.

Movie review - "King of the Khyber Rifles" (1954) **

1954 feels a bit late in the day for a British Empire epic, but I guess Kim had been a box office hit and Fox were keen to do something which was ideal to exploit CinemaScope, their new big screen process. They have Tyrone Power play a half caste (they slap on a bit of brown make up), which have it some novelty. Still, it's a bit whiffy.

Its set in 1857 just before the Indian mutiny and the last act concerns an uprising - it's not terribly exciting. The screenwriters (its credited to the team of Ben Roberts and Aussie Ivan Goff) raid some Indian history (there's stuff about the sepoy rumour that the cartridges were dodgy)... it's a shame they didn't do more. The best bit about this movie is the final act, which involves a raid on an Indian compound - this is suspenseful and well done.

But the first two thirds is a hard slog. It's stuff at the fort with Power romancing Terry Moore, daughter of commander Michael Rennie. Moore is about as convincing in British India as Power - but has more spunk and energy about her. And she seems in to him - whereas Power doesn't seem that in to her. (It strikes me that it's been a few times that I've written that - Power never seemed that interested in his female co stars, but he worked as a lust object for them eg The Razor's Edge).

There's also stuff about prejudice faced by Power which seems uncooked, in part because Power so so unconvincing.

I wish there had been two other big action set pieces instead - the opening patrol, for instance, they could have made more of that attack sequence. And I think they missed a trick not doing a siege sequence - there were some serious sieges during the mutiny, and all that Moore-Power romance would have played a lot better if they'd been, say, holed up at a fort, with people outside trying to kill them.

There are pleasing vistas - it's nicely shot. But there's too much dead time on screen.


Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Margaret Lockwood Top Ten

1)The Wicked Lady (1946) - may as well get this over and done with - great fun
2) The Lady Vanishes (1938) - classic film, one of Hitchcock's best, so different from Wicked Lady - she's good in Night Train to Munich as well but really playing the same sort of role (she has more to do in the Hitchcock)

3) A Girl Must Live (1939) - Lockwood is bright and vivacious for Carol Reed
4) Bank Holiday (1938) - another good performance by Lockwood for Reed
5) I'll Be Your Sweetheart (1945) - fun musical with Lockwood in an Alice Faye type role
6) Cast a Giant Shadow (1955) - Lockwood is almost unrecogniseable in this very good film
7) The Man in Grey (1943) - the film that changed her image and she's very good
8) Love Story (1944) - Lockwood is a goody here and very effective
9) The Stars Look Down (1939) - she tries some different stuff, in a decent film
10) Madness of the Heart (1949)

I realised I did an earlier top ten for here. Basically the same only Sweetheart got in.

Movie review - "Blue Denim" (1959) *** (warning: spoilers)

Teen pregnancy drama was very much a film of its time - the Clutter kids from In Cold Blood saw it before they murdered, and I gather it was a cool thing to see.

It's actually aged surprisingly well. Absolutely, its a period piece but misunderstanding between the generations doesn't age - there's some good moments with parents wondering why their kids won't communicate with them, then the kids trying to communicate and the parents missing the point.

It helps that the stars Carol Lynley and Brandon de Wilde look so young. Most movie teens are played by young adults - these two look like teens and naive teens what's more. It makes the drama more effective - you can sense they had sex without really knowing what they were doing and are totally in over their heads.

Lots of scenes have power - like going off with the abortionist who puts a blindfold over Lynley's eyes, or where de Wilde and his friend Warren Berlinger smoke and drink and play poker. There's some nice family scenes - Philip Dunne who co wrote and directed was a family man and I think you can tell; he has affection for his characters. It also helps he wrote the script with a woman - there's plenty of female POV including the mothers and the sisters.

De Wilde looks so perfect but is fairly terrible as an actor. Given too many lines and too much emotion he falters. But he's great when just looking like a lost puppy dog. Lynley is better. MacDonald Carey smokes a pipe and looks befuddled in what much have been an audition for Days of Our Lives.

There's too much Warren Berlinger, who can act, but is annoying - he's got so much energy he blows de Wilde off the screen but there's too much indicating and moral indignation at de wilde. He gives a "stage"y performance. I did quite like the musical number he sang with another girl at the dance.

Props to the piece for honesty - parents and kids are at fault, the kids are respected. Also at the end when de Wilde goes off to be with Lynley I liked how de Wilde's parents both just sort of went "well his life's stuffed."

Movie review - "Flight of the Lost Balloon" (1962) *1/2

Hard slogging. I admitted watched a poor quality print but this was not fun. It's an el cheapo attempt to do a Jules Verne story - it beat Five Weeks in a Balloon to the punch. So you've got three people in a balloon - and they don't meet any weird creatures (except a tall dude) or have very interesting adventures. There's some cannibals, random other natives, torture... that's about it. Really you shouldn't make this film on a super low budget.

The basic premise is dumb. This Hindu baddy wants the location of a treasure from a captured prisoner. So goes all the way to England to persuade a rescue mission to come, so he can get the guy's fiancee to act as leverage to get the prisoner to tell. It's robs the story of all mystery and adventure because we start at the destination - the whole thing is a trick. (Would've been better to not have had the opening sequence and explained it later). It also makes travelling seem easy - I know they have a rough time in the balloon but the Hindu managed to go the other way easy enough.

Marshall Thompson and Mala Powers offer some C list star power.


Movie review - "Delta Force 2: The Colombian Connection" (1990) **1/2 (warning: spoilers)

My expectations were low going in to this film - it doesn't have much of a reputation - but it was a solidly made action flick with plenty of bang bang and good stunts: climbing up/sliding down mountains, jumping out of planes, fights, etc. It was shot in the Philippines (substituting for Colombia) which gives great production value - there's jungle and lairs and mountains. It's a good looking film.

A couple of gripes. The plot isn't very original - in fact, it's very close to the Bond film Licence to Kill which came out the year before, and even that seemed unoriginal (cop captures drug lord who gets off, drug lord kills cop's friend and wife, cop goes looking for revenge in drug lord's home country which is run by corrupt general). In 1990 this stuff was old - it feels like it was made five years too late.

It's not very Delta Force-y - the original film was very much about a team, but this is really mostly about Chuck getting personal revenge, with the team then tagging along at the end. To be fair, they pull their weight - blowing up a lot of stuff, and coming to the rescue... but it doesn't feel like a Delta Force movie. It's like a movie was written separately then they added Delta Force elements. It would've been great if they'd Delta Force-d it up a bit more - had more prominent other members in the team, talk about the team's role in combating drugs, had differing attitudes towards revenge (because the guy killed was part of the force).

Billy Drago plays the drug lord as beyond evil - but that's not as scary as John Ryan's performance as Norris' superior. Ryan is supposed to be a good guy but plays him like this cackling psycho - a little like Buck Turgidson from Strangelove. Once I accepted these performances on their own terms it was okay but they clashed with the rest of the film, which was more competent, professional. It did make me wish that John Milius had done a draft of this - really gone over the top with Americans saving the day. (Milius should have worked with more of the 80s action star crowd, eg Seagal, Norris, Van Damme - I think he would have done good stuff).

I wasn't a fan of the subplot of that female villager. Her husband is killed, her baby is killed, she helps Norris, then she is killed by Drago. Really she should've been allowed to live or at least been allowed to kill Drago before dying. It just felt unfair.

Still, a solid action film and it gave me fresh appreciation for the talents of director Aaron Norris.

Monday, January 14, 2019

Movie review - "Lydia Bailey" (1952) **

Darryl Zanuck's biggest male star at Fox was Tyrone Power and as time goes on he constantly tried to created new Tyrone Powers who he'd put in movies that Power didn't want to be in: Rob Wagner, Jeff Hunter, Rory Calhoun and, in this one, Dale Robertson. His female co star is Anne Francis in a role that badly needed Susan Hayward or Linda Darnell. So its very much the B team.

Really Zanuck shouldn't have made it without stars because there's no real reason for this to have been filmed otherwise. Oh I guess it was a best seller and all that. And its fascinating culturally because it concerns the Haitian Revolution - how many other films are set in that period? I'm guessing nil.

But it feels so pointless. Robertson turns up in Haiti trying to get local slave owner Francis to sign over her dead father's property to the US, as he wanted.  They wind up doing a lot of running around and escaping from various fighting forces - it's one of those movies where you get the impression the lead duo could be cut out of the film, and nothing would change to the overall plot, which isn't great. Neither Robertson or Francis do anything that key - I guess he helps William Marshall into the compound to kill a traitorous general. And Robertson is a spokesperson for Touissant. But that's about it.

The interesting things about this movie are the bits on the side of the central couple. The black roles are really good - William Marshall gets to play a driven, polygamous, charming revolutionary, very sympathetic; Ken Renard's Touissant gets the halo treatment of, well, white freedom fighters; Roy E Glenn plays a vicious killer. It's got more diversity among its black support characters than any "A" Hollywood film I can remembers.

There's a voodoo ceremony, Napoleon's sister being saucy, the villainous white guy accidentally shoots his on. There's lots of scenes with Robertson in blackface - Francis joins in as well.

Robertson and Francis are disastrously undercast but it's a movie with many fascinating things about it.

Movie review - "Ten North Frederick" (1958) **1/2

Ah, the Buddy Alder regime at 20th Century Fox. CinemaScope. Best selling novel source material. Lush photography. Young players under contract of various quality.

This was written and directed by Phil Dunne, who had many major successes when working just as a writer, but none as a director, not really - and he directed ten films. This is perhaps his best known.

Its part of that genre of 50s novels about angsty middle aged men - often their wives were bitches and they had affairs and were unhappy at work and had a lot of money: The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit, Executive Suite, Patterns, From the Terrace.

In this one Gary Cooper is a successful lawyer whose wife Geraldine Fitzgerald is a bitch who wants him to go into politics, whose daughter Diane Varsi marries a musician (Stuart Whitman), whose son Ray Stricklyn wants to be a musician, and who has an affair with his daughter's flatmate, Suzy Parker.

Spencer Tracy was originally cast in the lead but Cooper is far more appropriate. Cooper specialised in playing weak, impotent neurotics so he's totally at home here - he punches out someone but it's not very convincing. He's more handsome than Tracy and was a noted cocksman so its more believable that Parker goes for him.

This actually was the best bit of the film - Cooper comes alive in these scenes, he's charming and decent. Parker is a bit wooden but I liked them as a couple. At least Cooper is active in these scenes - he's weak and passive for the rest... which I've got to say is what the role requires. I normally loathe Cooper and can't say I'm a massive fan even after this but he is, as I've said, well cast.

Fitzgerald does what she can. In fairness the character is given some depth because Cooper and her daughter have thrown away his political career - so she suffers and because the times are what they are she can't go and get a career.

I'm not a big Diane Varsi fan - her hysterical performance is okay, but I kept wishing, say, Hope Lange (also under contract to Fox at the time) had the role. Ray Stricklyn is terrible - what did they see in that guy? Did they imagine he was a sort of junior Jack Lemmon? He has this awful drunk acting scene where he tells everyone off.

In a weird way this film feels British - Parker and Cooper do act on their feelings but then pull back. There's no confrontation with the mother, with the sister while dad is alive, with the brother, with the girl's boyfriend or father.

It's a star vehicle - it needed someone like Cooper. It also needed better actors to play the kids. After a slow start where Cooper's character was really pathetic this got better, and I found the end where he drank himself to death quite touching.

Sunday, January 13, 2019

Movie review - "The Haunting of Hell House" (1999) **

Not even Roger Corman could recapture the success of his 1960s Poe films, as proved by this late 90s attempt, shot in his short-lived Irish studio near Galway. It actually wasn't a bad idea to have a go though because the beautiful albeit gloomy Irish countryside was ideal for a Poe film - I should say Poe-esque, because this is based on a Henry James short story.

Corman produced, but he doesn't have the collaborators - Michael York adds some class but is no Vincent Price, the authors are no Richard Matheson/Robert Towne/Charles Beaumont, the set design is no Daniel Haller, the female lead is no Hazel Court/Barbara Steele, the cinematographer no Floyd Crosby, the music no Les Baxter and the director is no Corman. The male lead is weak but I admit that is in keeping with many of those films (eg John Kerr).

It's an okay film - the basic story is good, there are spooky moments. It looks alright. I didnt mind it - it just lacks the magic and atmosphere of those 60s Poe movies.

Movie review - "The Unborn" (1991) **1/2

Roger Corman gets his hands on a decent script and miracles ensue - well maybe not "miracle" but this is a massive step up from the bulk of New Horizon/Concorde films... at least, until the last half hour when things go wonky.

Up until then this was a pretty smart, creepy horror film - in my eyes anyway, the film has received some hysterically bad reviews. I wonder why? Because it involved pregnancy? The piece is flawed to be sure - some wonky handling - but it is not a terrible film. It has imagination and its the spots in some key scenes. The writers are good and have done research, the lead is played by Brooke Adams, which automatically elevates things, there's lots of creepy moments with babies crawling around in stomachs.

It does go off the boil in the last act, when things should accelerate, and get more condensed, it seems to "spread out" - too many time jumps, it becomes too confusing. I wasn't sure of the role of the husband or his relationship with his wife. And there wasn't nearly enough of the mad doctor or his motivation. In my opinion anyhow - I accept these are the decisions the filmmaker made. But it meant that it wasn't finished off with a flourish.

Still above average for New Horizon at the time and not coincindentally one of the few post 83 Cormans where the alumni went on to achieve major things - the DOP went to work for Chris Nolan for instance, and Kathy Griffin (as a lesbian parent) and Lisa Kudrow have small roles.

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Movie review - "Kocking on Death's Door" (1999) **

Absolutely fine haunted house film from Roger Corman's Irish operation. Not a classic but its competent. A young couple move into a house that's apparently haunted and weird stuff happens. That's about it.

There's only a few support roles - David Carradine in a doctor (shooting most of his scenes in the one spot), a local redneck, a slimy professor. There's some "sexy" moments that slightly clang - Kimberly Rowe and Brian Bloom have soft core-ish make out sessions (no nudity in the version I saw it just was filmed like a soft core), she masturbates. They should've gone further with this or pulled back altogether - because the amount that's there is off putting.

No classic, not even a good film, but solid and professionally done and it is set in Ireland.

Thursday, January 10, 2019

Movie review - "Flight of Fury" (2007) **

In the Steven Seagal oeuvre, this one is probably best described as "the one where he plays a fighter pilot" which to be fair is a decent point of difference.

The story line is clear and simple, which wasn't the case for many Seagal films  - a stealth jet has been stolen and Seagal has to get it back. There's some decent support characterisations - the main villain is an American pilot who got greedy, and Seagal is helped by a sassy girl (Ciera Payton) and a cocky pilot who earns his respect (good work from Mark Bazeley). The villain ha an interesting motivation - his parents were killed by a US strike during desert storm.

Reading back all that it's a shame the film isn't better than it is. It's not terrible or offensive, it just feels by the numbers. Being Seagal there are one or two whacko moments - like when Ciera Payton seduces female terrorist Katie Jones to get out of a tight spot before pulling a gun on her. (Segal's name is down as co writer which may explain that). There's also Seagal walking slow motion towards his plane a la The Right Stuff. He does look too fat to be a pilot.

There's some crusty old general types which made me assume the filmmakers had dreams of another Under Siege. I think they could have gotten there, the story was decent enough, but the execution isn't up to it.

Wednesday, January 09, 2019

Script review - "Giant" by Ivan Moffatt and Frank Guignol

This apparently was George W Bush's favourite film and many other Texans love it which bewildered Larry McMurtry who thought it showed them in an unflattering light. But I get why he'd love it - it's a film about family, and proud men struggling with changing times, and sons in the shadow of their father, and race.

The writers know how to focus the story - making it about Bick and Leslie the mismatched couple who fall in love and go to Texas, and their marriage over the years, as Leslie tries to soften Bick. These two are the heart and soul of the piece - and while Bick has the bigger journey Leslie is still a decent role. There are some showy support parts - the sister Link, Jett the surly ranch hand who becomes super rich, the trashy daughter and sensitive son. There's also a dull daughter but she doesn't matter.

The script is solid. Many scenes end with a visual flourish that were surely written with the input of George Stevens the director.

It's a very human story - about family, and changing times. Texans come across as idiots it's true - boorish, stupid, self centered - but you can see why so many of them relate to it.

You wonder why adapters of Edna Ferber novels which followed - Cimarron, Ice Palace - didn't follow this more closely.

Script revie - "Black KKKlansman" by Charlie Wachtel, David Rabinowitz, Kevin Willmott, and Spike Lee,

Passionate. Angry. Relevant. Funny. A surprisingly large amount of typos in the edition I read. The main female role - a black activist, is, like most of Lee's female characters, not very well drawn. The lead guy is better, but still a bit bland - in part I'm guessing because he's still alive. The support characters are good. Lots of rich, twisted humour. Very relevant - the parallels to Trump etc are put in but it works better as a result.

Movie review - "School Spirit" (1985) *

One of the first films from Roger Corman's new distribution company, Concorde, can in hindsight be seen to give a clear indication that the great days were gone. It makes Screwballs look like a masterpiece - it's shockingly badly constructed, awfully unfunny and has this horrible rapey vibe.

It should be a simple idea - a Lothario is killed and comes back as a ghost. But it's hopelessly confused - the guy is a ghost yet he can walk around, talk and touch people... just occasionally turn back into a ghost. Or be invisible. I think.

The first 30 minutes is devoted to Lothario trying to get this girl into bed (she's toity toity but kind of into him, she just insists on a condom). We meet the Lothario's friends - he's got two housemates, the girl has a yen for the guy... There's also a stuffy guy who is the Lothario's rival and the Lothario has a dead old uncle who is meant to be his nephew's guide in his new life.

Then 30 mins in these characters are basically dumped and we go off on a plot where we spend all this time with a businessman (played by Larry Linville from MASH), and his nubile daughter and this French woman, who the Lothario falls for.  Everyone is reunited at a finale involving this party. It's a mess.

It's also very rapey. The lead dude is constantly molesting women... sometimes they go with it, other times they seem genuinely annoyed. One time he undresses a woman while she's asleep. I get it's an 80s sex comedy but even by those low standards this is full on.

It's shot  on film at least. And the acting is quite good, it has to be said. At times I liked some of the characters. The dodgy lead becomes nice when he romances the French girl - but he's such a turd during those first 30 minutes he never wins you back.

Roberta Collins pops up as Linville's wife but it's real blink and you miss it stuff.

Tuesday, January 08, 2019

Movie review - "Piranachonda" (2011) **

So-so sci fi mash up which is done with professionalism but lacks flair - genuine scares, or sexiness, or genuine cleverness. The bar is low I know - I just felt Wynorski would hve done a better job in the 1980s. There's not that much creature stuff - most of the storyline involves kidnappers.

The "name" Michael Madsen looks unhealthy.  Rib Hillis and Terri Ivens are very good as the main heroic duo - solid action stars.  Shandi Finnessey is a lot of fun as a starlet. Rachel Hunter pops up in a small role.

The Hawaiian locations are pleasing.

Script review - "Destroyer" by Matt Manfriedi and Phil Hay (warning: spoilers)

Great script which hasn't gotten the attention it deserved from critics - sparse, tight, yet rich, with a knock out central character but some nice support ones too like the super manipulative Silas (the villain) or the FBI agent who goes to Bible readings or the gang member trying to redeem himself with good legal work or the rich girl gone wrong.

I loved the structure which has a twist in that we're not investigating a murder, it's about seeing how the murder came about. Some great action sequences like two bank robberies, one which you know is going to end badly, the other which you're not sure.

Really great work.

Movie review - "It Came from Connemara" (2014) ****

Roger Corman's 80s and onwards career isn't as well documented as his 50s to early 80s glory years so it's great to see this look at one of the most interesting chapters from his later years... when he set up a studio in Ireland. The Irish government wanted to build filmmaking in that region because... oh I'm guessing because it's cool... and figured that Corman would be a good person to learn from.

And you know something? That's not a bad idea - because Corman is famous for giving people chances out of cheapness, promoting from within. I would have loved an opportunity like that myself - a little bit of money was better than nothing.

The studio became controversial when critics got a look at some of the output - then it became an issue of whether tax payers dollars should do into supporting exploitation. (My view - its fine as long as the stories touched on Irish culture and the key creatives were Irish). It's not very well known today because none of the films are well known - I mean none, despite occasionally featuring people like David Carradine, and James Brolin - and no really well filmmakers graduated from that particular "class".

Corman says the studio closed because of the end of an EU loophole, rising wages in Ireland, and decline in the film market. I have read that the company had some tax troubles - these aren't really addressed in this documentary which is mostly sympathetic to Corman (maybe that's how they got him to agree to be interviewed).

It's not a white wash - the film is upfront about the erratic quality of the films, the difficulty sourcing good actors and talent, the troubles with unions, the snobbish atittude of Dublin (where Corman really should have based the studio - simply more talent eg all those Abbey Theatre actors).

Other talking heads include James Brolin (who directed a film), Corbin Bernsen, Alexandra Paul, plus some locals - several of who speak in Gaelic which was cool!

The films look all terrible - I had no enthusiasm to seek them out. This is probably the best movie to come out of it - its extremely entertaining.

Monday, January 07, 2019

My Top Ten Depictions of Australians in Hollywood films

1 - “Donovan’s Reef” (1963)

The last feature film teaming of John Wayne and John Ford which I’d always thought was a buddy film between Wayne and Lee Marvin is actually more a “Quiet Man”/“McClintock”/“Taming of the Shrew” Rom com between Wayne and the (surprisingly good but little known) Elizabeth Allan - which ends like many Wayne rom coms with him spanking her on his knee for comedy.

It’s set In French Polynesia and Aussies appear at the end - a visiting ship from the Australian navy turns up, resulting in the crew chasing the local women down the Main Street in a pack (not making that up) and a couple of lower ranks starting a brawl with Wayne and Marvin. They all have Irish accents - the playing is v typical of the sort of comic drunken sergeants played by Victor McLaglen who turned up in Ford movies (McLaglen was dead by this stage and Chips Rafferty off making Mutiny on the Bounty so Ford got Dick Foran to play the main Aussie) Wayne’s son Patrick turns up as an Australian officer. They all sing Waltzing Matilda and Wayne snr brings up the fact we were all on the same side during the Battle of the Coral Sea.

Well at least we were in it (at a time when v few films were made in Australia)

Nb Ford later agreed to the casting of Australian Rod Taylor as Irish playwright Sean O’Casey in Young Cassidy in part bc he figured as an Aussie Rod might be part Irish.

 2.. "Botany Bay" (1953)

Starring Alan Ladd as an American who , in the 18th century is unjustly convicted of a crime in England and sentenced to the brand new penal colony of Botany Bay... on a ship that just follows the first fleet. The director (John Farrow) was Australian and one or two bit players were as well as a few imported koalas but that's it. Some African Americans play indigenous Australians who pop up at the end to spear baddies ("they're like our Indians," says Ladd, "if we don't bother them they won't both us"). James Mason is a sadistic captain and Cedric Harwicke is Governor Phillip. Based on a novel by Nordhoff and Hall, who wrote the novel on which "Mutiny on the Bounty" was based - like that, this has sadistic captains and heroic sailors and a mutiny.

Judged by the standards of its day it's not that a great movie (the Farrow/Ladd sailing film "Two Years Before the Mast" is more interesting) but it remains the only First Fleet movie ever (I think) and it's got Dr Smith from Lost in Space in it!

3 - Captain Fury (1939).

Hal Roach, best known for comedies, occasionally made other films like this bushranger epic. Brian Aherne, a sort of poor man's Errol Flynn, the actor you'd cast when you couldn't get George Brent, Pat Knowles or Ian Hunter, plays the title role, an Irish convict sent to Australia who escapes to become a good bushranger who helps the local settlers fight against a villainous land owner (George Zucco). The Australian setting is not really emphasised, it's just the usual immigrant settlers and evil land baron that you'd see in the old West. The cast includes Victor McLaglen, John Carradine, Paul Lukas and Douglas Dumbrille, which is cool. It's awkwardly directed but interesting - bushranger films were absurdly banned in NSW for several decades so its interesting to see Hollywood's take.

Part 4  - Million Dollar Mermaid (1953) and Interrupted Melody (1955)

I grouped these together because they're both biopics of Aussies made at MGM within years at each other, both had opening scenes in Australia but drop the country pretty quick into the story after depicting it as a kind of version of England (to be fair, the films are set in MGM land rather than anywhere else), both ended up being among the best movies their stars ever made - Esther Williams plays Annette Kellerman in Mermaid, with Walter Pigeon as her dad and a cameo from a boxing kangaroo... In Melody, Eleanor Parker plays singer Marjorie Lawrence with Cecil Kellaway as her dad and Roger Moore as her brother (!).... Both are superior to other biopics of Aussies around this time made by foreigners -to wit, Sister Kenny (1946) and Melba (1952)

5- "The Man from Down Under" (1943)

To understand why this film was made, you need to know that Wallace Beery was once a film star: Beery was a beefy, big actor who specialised in playing lovable lunks who got up to comic antics with character actors and cute kids; often there was a woman who wanted to marry him. He had the vibe of James Gandolfini . Anyway for a long time his act was very popular and he was often ranked in the top ten box office stars in the US and MGM originally developed this story as a vehicle for Beery.

It's an original story but I'd love to know where the writers got their inspiration - I have a theory it might be the tale of Digger Tovell, a French orphan adopted by diggers during WW1 who was smuggled to Australia and grew up to be a young man (tragically dying in a car accident). If it wasn't that exactly it probably was a similar real life tale.

This is about Jocko Wilson, an Aussie digger who at the end of the war decides to smuggle to Belgian orphans back to Australia and raise them as his own. Then the film leaps forward twenty years or so and the kids are grown up - the girl is sent to finishing school, the boy is a boxer.

The subsequent plot goes all over the shop, in a manner reminiscent of more than a few MGM star vehicles with it's feel of a producer going "oh we should add this... and that... and I saw this movie last night and it was great and we should put that in as well." The boy/man, called Nipper, participates in a big fight and wins but is injured; his winnings enable Jocko to buy a pub in the country... really Australia's north, thus enabling it to be bombed by the Japanese when the Pacific War starts; the girl and boy have hots for each other but can't do anything about it because they think they're related; an American journalist sniffs around the girl but her "brother" jealously punches him out; there are some Catholic Priests near the pub ("quick, Catholic priests are popular, put that in"); a barmaid abandoned by Jocko in France turns up to torment him; World War Two starts and Jocko tries to enlist but is too old and unhealthy, so joins the Land Army; then the Pacific War starts and the pub is turned into an orphanage (I think) which is bombed by Japanese and the Japanese crash and some pilots attack the orphanage ("quick Mrs Miniver had them fight off enemy pilots put that in") but luckily Jocko and Nipper turn up and help fight off the Japanese (along with their friend Ginger who machine guns one to death!); Nipper and the girl discover they're not blood relatives and hook up; Jocko gets a commission in the army thanks to the intervention of the former barmaid.

It's a complete mess really, with the film never settling on what it wants to be about. I felt the real focus should have been on Jocko smuggling the kids back into Australia - there's a movie in just that - but that was only the starting point. There's all this narrative, the big romance plot being yucky because most of the time Nipper and the girl believe they're related but still want to hump each other. I so didn't want them to get together.

Still it is a perfect role for Wallace Beery - ex boxer, brave, rowdy, tough, prone to brawling, irreverent, running away from a woman who wants to marry him (the Marie Dressler part), doing lots of schtick with kids and dodgy mates, gambling, running pubs, mugging.

The only problem is Charles Laughton plays the role. Now Laughton was a brilliant actor, and his Aussie accent attempt here isn't bad, and he makes a decent rogue. But he's never convincing as an ex boxer, or successful former soldier (I know Laughton was one in real life but he doesn't look like the tough two fisted hero described here). Throughout the whole movie he feels like a superb performer who is miscast.

No one has a decent Aussie accent though people do try - mostly people sound cockney, though the priests are Irish. For Aussies this is fascinating because of it's depiction of Australia and Australians - most of the movie is set in Australia: Melbourne at first, where Jocko has a pub, then where Nipper fights his bout, then somewhere in north Australia. We get to see some pubs, a boxing venue, the country, lots of priests.

Dramatically it's a mess. There are lots of good actors and decent production values so it's easy to watch. Historically its fascinating. (And you know something, at least Hollywood made a film set in Australia during the war - Australians hardly ever did).


6 - Random Australians Who Pop Up in War Films

Mark Hartley would never forgive me if I didn't bring up Richard Harris' accent-strangling performance as the RAAF pilot at the beginning of "Guns of Navarone" but he was only one of a series of Aussie characters who popped up in war films of the 50s and 60s... a little reminder of our contribution. Most of you have probably seen James Coburn in "The Great Escape" (1963) (accent wrong but dialogue and attitude first rate... maybe the contribution of Aussie Paul Brickhill who wrote the book?) there was also John Gregson in "Above Us the Waves" (1955)... sometimes real Aussies would play them too like John Meillon in "Guns at Batasi" (1964)... and we get a whole film about an Australian platoon in "The Desert Rats" (1953) (although it focuses on two Poms, Richard Burton and Robert Newton), Chips Rafferty in "The Wackiest Ship in the Army" (1960), Peter Finch in "The Wooden Horse" (1950), Michael Pate as the coastwatcher who rescued a young JFK in PT 109 (1963)

It wasn't much of an acknowledgement, but then that's why we need our own industry - and it was a lot more recognition than that given to say, African or Indian troops who fought for the Allies

7 - Australia as a place to escape to

In the mid 1940s there was a subgenre of American war film called "stories of glorious defeat" - for the one time in Hollywood history it made a series of movies about a bunch of battles that America lost, mostly because during the early days of the war America lost all its battles (something the film constantly puts down to "treachery"). And in the bulk of these movies you had the characters trying to escape to Australia - "So Proudly We Hail" (1943) (which has Allied nurses as suicide bombers), "Air Force" (1943), "The Story of Dr Wassell" (1944). Australia does feature at the end but pretty much just as a back drop.

(A flip side to this - "The Sea Chase" (1955) which features John Wayne as a German sea captain (!) fleeing Sydney in 1939 to escape the allies.)


8 - Famous Australian Stars

Prior to Mel Gibson, the biggest Australian film star was probably Errol Flynn who only played an Australian twice on screen in his career - "Desperate Journey" (1942) a war film, where he plays an Australian pilot shot down in occupied Europe. He whistles "Waltzing Matilda" and at the end of the film says "now for Australia and a crack at those Japs". That's about as Australian as it gets. In "Montana" (1950), a Western, he plays a sheep farmer who grew up in Australia. In his one Australian film, "In the Wake of the Bounty" (1933), he played the British Fletcher Christian.

The biggest star after him was Rod Taylor who only played an Australian on screen four times in his entire career (which went for over fifty years) - "The VIPs" (1963), "The High Commissioner" (1968), "On the Run" (1982) and "Welcome to Woop Woop" (1996). He made three Australian films where he played foreigners - "King of the Coral Sea" (1954), "Long John Silver" (1954), "The Picture Show Man" (1977) (I write about this at length in my book on him).

The big star after him was Peter Finch, who got to play Aussies a bunch of times, in Australian movies and overseas - notably "A Town Like Alice" (1956) and "The Shiralee" (1957)... I think because he was based in Britain, which cared a little more about Australia than the US.

Of course along with other Aussie stars at the time (eg Judith Anderson, Mary Maguire, Ron Randell) it's still fun to hear the Aussie accent slip in no matter what role they're playing.

9 - Unfilmed Australian stories.

Very very occasionally an Australian novel/play will get the Hollywood treatment - "Stingaree" (1934), "On the Beach" (1959), "Summer of the Seventeenth Doll" (1959), "The Sundowners" (1960)... (I'm talking stories set in Australia, not films based on novels by Australians which are a separate thing, eg The Great Escape, The 7th Dawn, The Shoes of the Fisherman)

But several novels were contemplated back in the day. 

"The Fortunes of Richard Mahoney" by H H Richardson, that classic novel a lot of Australians feel guilty about not having read yet, was bought by MGM who wanted to turn it into a Greer Garson vehicle in the late 1940s. The film never happened (though MGM did turn another Richardson novel into the Elizabeth Taylor film "Rhapsody" in 1954.) 

Diane Cilento bought the rights to Darcy Niland's novel "Call Me When the Cross Turns Over" in 1962 and Fox were going to film it with her then husband Sean Connery but it didn't happen. 

Neither did a proposed version of "Careful He Might Hear You" which Josh Logan wanted to make with Elizabeth Taylor in the 1960s (it was later filmed in the 1980s). 

Joseph Kaufman wanted to make a film of "Come in Spinner" in the 1950s (it was filmed in the 1980s).

Its fascinating to wonder what these films would have been like and how they would have depicted Australia - in the hands of a good director, as in "The Sundowners" it probably would have been good - I'm more inclined though to think they would have grabled it... which is why its important to have our own industry, etc etc

10 - Point Break

There's a lot I could have chosen (the Aussies in "Pacific Rim") but I thought I'd end with my favourite... the bit part actor at the end of Point Break (1991 of course) when it goes to Bells Beach Australia... No not Peter Phelps but the cop at the end who goes "What the f*ck, Utah? You let him go!" Gary Roberts and Owen Rutledge are listed in the credits as cops. I don't know who said what line but honestly these two should be household names.

Movie review - "Kill Switch" (2008) **1/2 (warning: spoilers)

A real surprise - the bar of Steven Seagal films is very low (I don't even know why I'm working my way through the back catalogue at times... I think I blame that superb book by Vern, it was so  much fun it made me want to replicate it)... but this one is good. Mostly.

The main reason is there's plenty of tough action - lots of hard core fights, where Seagal excels, as opposed to gun fire and stunts, where his record is more patchy. The fights are well done, brutal, loud, intense. Segal is just slim enough still to get away with it.

The plot is simple - he's a detective investigating a serial killer in Memphis. There are two serial killers. And the serial killers take out women, which is depressingly bleak - it's why I gave this two and a half stars not three. There's implied torture and knives involved.

One poor woman hangs around Seagal's loft in a shirt trying to entice him to have sex but he's too driven. Then she winds up dead!

I did wish the support cast was better. It does include Isaac Hayes who is a lot of fun but his part isn't that big.

There's a truly bizarre ending where loner Seagal is revealed to have a hot blonde wife and a kid living in a house some distance away.  The blonde wife does a strip tease dance for him and roll credits. WTF???

But considering most of his films around this time, this was pretty good.

Sunday, January 06, 2019

Movie review - "Capricorn One" (1978) ****

Really great fun - perhaps Peter Hyams' best film, a terrifically entertaining combination of conspiracy thriller and action film. The thesis is bold, simple and effective - NASA fake a landing on Mars. Astronauts James Brolin, OJ Simpson and Sam Waterston are forced to go along with it but Elliot Gould, a journo, figures out something is going on.

The first half of this barrels along like a freight train - there's not an ounce of fat on it. It sags a little in the middle with some repetitive scenes - in particular the Brenda Vaccaro moments felt like padding, or extra bits to give her. All she really needs is to tell Gould about the camp they went to which she could do in one scene, but she has two scenes with Gould and one with Hal Holbrook. Also there's two scenes with Gould and his editor whereas they only need one.

But it recovers for a splendid climax with two helicopters chasing Brolin around the desert. One of my favourite moments in action cinema is when the two stories interconnect and Gould lands in the desert in the plane piloted by Telly Savalas (who almost steals the film in a great cameo) and waves for Brolin to jump on board. It's a fantastic moment. That and running to the funeral.

If you think about the story too hard it gets wonky - I mean they go to a lot of trouble to erase the existence of Gould's friend (someone living in his apartment for a year? Why not just cause a fake accident/) and it's a bit slack to leave the studio where it was all filmed unoccupied.

But there's so many good things - the rousing score, the all star cast (people like Karen Black shine in small parts), the desert sequences where the astronauts get pummelled (this helps make the climax so satisfactory), the slangy dialogue.

Great fun.

Movie review - "Barbarian Queen" (1985) ***

One for the gals. Roger Corman often did a twist on his old formulas by making it "one with girls in it" - so here Lana Clarkson and Katt Shea are two ladies who go about rescuing Clarkson's fiancee. That's right, the girls come to the rescue of the guys.

This gives it a lot of freshness and this is a fun movie. Clarkson in particular is good value - she didn't have that huge a role in Deathstalker (she was the permanently topless warrior queen) but here she's front and center. I felt quite melancholy watching her run around, give it her all, seemingly having a blast. This would be her best role, I guess. It's a shame she never, I don't know, wound up playing a cop on a nice long running series.

Of course there are the usual rapes and tortures - in one long not particularly pleasant sequence Clarkson is tortured on the rack. It clashes with the subplot involving a little kid.

Shea is fine - I wish she'd had more of a unique character to play, like telling one liners or be cowardly or lecherous or something. Just something distinctive.

The guy who plays the love interest is good. The production values are decent. This is hokey but fun.

Saturday, January 05, 2019

Book review - "The High Window" by Raymond Chandler

Number three in the Marlowe series - one of the less highly regarded ones. The plot is relatively simple - it's chasing after the Brasher Doubloon, a valuable old coin. The characters aren't as memorable in the first two books - there's no Moose Malloy, for instance. And some bits feel like rehashes - instead of being hired by an old general, for instance, he's hired by an old lady. And there's no really vivid scenes, such as being locked up in a sanitarium, or raiding a gambling boat.

It's well written, of course, and well paced. There's some very spooky moments, like discovering corpses and getting mysterious phone calls.

I did get confused with so many characters being named with words starting with "M" - there's Marlowe, Merle, Murdock, Magic, Morny. I did like the slightly crazy secretary and wish she had gone crazier. The ending was a jolt with Marlowe uncovering murder and not turning them in. Maybe this prompts Marlowe to do all that self righteous drinking he does - including one where he checks himself into a hotel room to do it.



Movie review - "Wizards of the Demon Sword" (1991) *

I like the story of the making of this - Fred Olen Ray saw some sets left over from the 1989 Masque of the Red Death and used them to shoot a few days of a movie, then went and shot the rest in a couple of days. It is impressive you can knock out a film in a few days but it will impact on quality and that's the case here.

Corman quickies like Little Shop of Horrors and The Terror stand the test of time because you've got elements like Charles Griffith's script, Boris Karloff,  Jack Nicholson and so on. They also are set pretty much in the one place. This is a "quest" movie so doesn't adapt as well to quickie locations.

I also don't think Ray is a very good filmmaker. I love the idea of him, love his books, and it's always fascinating to see how he gets production value - for instance Russ Tamblyn, Lawrence Tierney and Lyle Waggoner, the "names", are all based in one or two locations but referred to throughout the film so their parts seem bigger.

The actual leads are Heidi Paine and Blake Bahner - he rescues her from an attack and they go to rescue her dad, who is Tamblyn.  These performances are weak but in the actors defence they don't have characters to play  -Ray doesn't even do something simple like make the girl hoity toity and the guy swashbuckling, to get some character conflict.

Scenes are awkwardly staged, shot and acted - I kept thinking throughout "that bit's amateurish... and that bit".

It's fun to see Tamblyn and Tierney, some of the sets are okay and one or two bits I didn't mind... but it felt like a bunch of amateurs on the weekend throwing something together, like in a country town or something.

Movie review - "Stripped to Kill" (1987) **1/2

Roger Corman's output from the 50s to early 80s tend to be well known by buffs in part because they were released theatrically and often made by people who went on to better things. From the early 80s onwards he aimed more at straight to video and his alumni became less distinguished.

This is one of the better known entries - in part because it was a hit and kicked off a cycle of films set around strip clubs, which still continues today (eg After Midnight), in part because it was directed by a woman, Katt Shea, who had a brief vogue with the critics in the early 90s.

And Shea does a pretty good job, as a director and writer (she wrote it with Andy Ruben). The basic idea is very strong: a female cop goes undercover as a stripper, to track down a serial killer of strippers. The end twist is good too (spoilers) - it's a guy who impersonates a stripper. I didn't pick it. It is transphobic but it is a solid twist.

I'm trying not to be too smart-arse-y here but you can tell it's from a female director, I feel. The stripping numbers are filmed more like dance numbers. The female characters have more dimension - there are scenes of friendship as well as rivalry among the dancers. There are many lecherous men.

The star is Kay Lenz who looked vaguely familiar - she was in Corman's Moving Violation. She is introduced a little late in the story - I think they would've been better off having her straight away. She's older than you might expect (she was 34) but it adds to the believability of the story.

TV stars Greg Evigan (as her partner and love interest) and Norman Fell (as the red herring club owner) pop up.

Sometimes this is flat and, to be honest, from my shallow point of view, could have done with more sexiness, or at least what I feel is sexy - for instance a lesbian love scene is shot rather perfunctorily rather than erotically (or, like I say, what I feel is erotic). But there are good moments and the last third is very strong.

Friday, January 04, 2019

Movie review - "Deathstalker" (1983) **

The first (I think) in a series of films Roger Corman made in Argentina, mostly sword and sorcery type things to cash in on Conan the Barbarian (he had made Sorceress but that was in Mexico).

It's cheap but not cheapy-cheap - it was shot on film, was clearly intended to be seen in theatres, and some scenes have quite a lot of extras such as the finale at the markets and in the stadium. Corman would go on to make a lot cheaper product.

These films had a rape-y vibe and there's plenty of rape in Deathstalker. There's also an unexciting lead in Rick Hill who has the body but a sort of odd face and isn't that much fun to be around. It doesn't help that he does things like save women from rape and then have sex with them or have sex with a woman who is asleep or have sex with a woman he's just met (not knowing she was converted into a woman by magic just recently).

The film did have a sense of adventure - the quest and all that - and it moved along; there was always something happening. But Deathstalker himself wasn't much fun to hang out with and there wasn't anyone else to hook into. Actually, that's not fair - the guy who plays his buddy (who turns treacherous) is pretty good. Lana Clarkson is in it as a female warrior who is constantly topless - I mean, she fights topless. I wish her character had stuck around more.

The effects, costumes, etc are hokey but not bad - part of the film's charm. The sword fighting and some of the action was pretty good. I just Deathstalker himself had been more likeable.

TV review - "A Very British Scandal" (2017) ****

A triumph for Hugh Grant, who gives one of his best performances - and I hope the acclaim encourages him to keep trying parts like this. He's showing his age, but still has the charm and skill as the leader of the Liberal Party in England who wound up accused of murder - I'd never heard of this scandal but it's bizarre. It feels all too real - the romance with a young man, the paranoia that comes after they break up, the upper class English twit belief that he'd get away with murder. Because that's what this series pretty much spells out - he tried to kill him.

Ben Whishaw is also superb as the young drifter who is fairly hopeless - he beds various men and women, has a kid but is a terrible father, can't hold down a job, yet seems to inspire loyalty in friends and love in Grant.

The two lead characters are rich and complex. The support parts are pretty good too - it's very well written and doesn't outstay its welcome and everyone acts so ridiculously it feels extremely true.

Script review - "The Front Runner" by Jason Reitman, et al

This film didn't do much business when it came out - maybe everyone's weary of politics in the age of Trump, at least not without very strong reviews - but I found it a smart, entertaining, thought provoking script. It looks at the 1988 Presidential campaign by Gary Hart, a charismatic democrat whose career was derailed by reports of infidelity.

Interestingly the film doesn't flat out confirm this - it does imply it, I mean she's hanging around at all hours, and Hart is cagey. He doesn't come across terribly - but he's not a hero. He's cranky and a bit of a dill. I don't think the film says "coverage of private lives is bad". I think it's more complex than that.

It's a smart movie and I wish it had done better.

Movie review - "The Warrior and the Sorceress" (1984) **1/2

David Carradine adds some badly needed star power to Roger Corman's Argentinian-shot sword and sorcery opuses. He's got that relaxed charisma down pat as well as fight skills and is entirely believable as a soldier of fortune on a distant planet/wherever who walks into a town dominated by two feuding gangs. He plays them off against each other until he falls in love with a girl, Maria Socas.

It's Yojimbo once more. It's not bad - not amazing. But Yojimbo gives is a solid structure - like it forces it to be smarter.

I really wish the support cast had been better. There's some decent sword fights and dodgy direction. The dancer with four breasts made me laugh. There's a lot of breasts - they should have been better integrated.

It has a charm. I wish the handling had been more vigorous. There's a few rapes, as per usual - these things are not fun to watch.

Movie review - "Out for a Kill" (2003) **

This Seagal film has a decent basic idea - he's an archeologist who finds out his operation is being used by bad guys, who kill his wife and frame him for a crime so he goes looking for revenge.

But it's not a very good movie. Seagal's character is murky - he never spends much time with the wife or talking about her, she feels convenient. The archeology stuff is used a little but not enough.

The action feels silly and the story is a bit of a mess. I didn't like all the evil Chinese triads sitting around a table.

Michelle Goh and Corey Johnson add some okay support. Vern - the guy who wrote Seagalology - liked this film but I didn't. It's silly and not in a fun way.

Wednesday, January 02, 2019

Movie review - "The Delta Force" (1986) ***

In hindsight this was a high water mark for Cannon Films and Chuck Norris. They must have thought this was a sure thing - Norris was coming off a series of successful films (Code of Silence even got good reviews), it was a rescuing-hostage drama which was pertinent and also tends to work. the director had experience in the genre making Operation Thunderbolt. So they ponied up for some big (ish) stars - they tried Charles Bronson but he turned it down (not wanting to share the spotlight?) and got Lee Marvin, who is a pretty good plan B.  The support cast includes Shelley Winters, Martin Balsam, Robert Forster, Bo Svenson (a star for a bit in the 70s), George Kennedy, Kim Delaney (very pretty as a nun), Joey Bishop (!), Lainie Kazan, and Susan Strasberg - that's pretty good.

And the film has some good moments. It's very over the top and the Arabs are caricatures. And sometimes you can't help but laugh - such as when Shelley Winters cries out to the other passengers as the terrorists take her husband away ("there's only two of them!... it's like the camps").

But the fact is this sort of thing did happen -terrorists taking out the passports of the Jews, and killing the American soldiers. It is makes for decent drama.

The real problem with the movie is that its two films. First part (after  a brief introductory sequence that is in the wake of Operation Eagle Claw in Iran 1980) is a hostage drama with what happens on the plane - Robert Forster leading the baddies, and a blonde German stewardess trying to be heroic, and George Kennedy giving himself up for Jews, and Martin Balsam giving a fine understated performance and Shelley winters playing to the back row.

The second part is cartoonish stuff with Norris, Marvin and his gang hooning around Beiruit on motorcycles, firing rockets and killing Arabs with the help of Israelis. To make things worse the terrorists have released the women and children by now lessering the stakes. Indeed at the end you kind of forget there are any hostages it's like people playing war games. Now I don't mind this sort of movie - but it's a cartoon and is based on cartoons whereas the first half is based on reality and the two sides do not mesh.

Marvin's part actually isn't that big but he still moves around a bit - he'd be dead soon. Norris isn't in the film that much either but kicks some but towards the end. They pump up the role of Norris' blonde friend played by William Wallace, so he can die and it can mean something and we can have a poignant moment as his friends stand around his corpse while the others sing "America the Beautiful".

It's a film which wears it's heart on it's sleeve, I'll say that for it.

Movie review - "Sorceress" (1982) **

The success of Conan the Barbarian kicked off a cycle of copycat sword and sorcery films from Roger Corman, starting with this one, where he hired his old comrade Jack Hill. Hill disliked the experience and result so much he took off his name as writer (Jim Wynorski gets sole credit) and director, but kept it on as producer.

It's about two identical twin women of royal lineage, which actually is a great idea, but the film doesn't do anything with it - instead of using the stock Corsican Brothers route of having them grow up apart as different people, this one has them grow up together, so they're basically the same person, so you get no conflict. Literally they are identical. This for me is the biggest problem in the movie. The Corsican Brothers has a great concept - twins grow up separately, one rich and one poor, and unite to take on the baddies.

There's some funny silly moments like the girls being so naive they don't know what a naked man looks like, and quite a sexy one where one girl is having sex and the other one feels it - more of this stuff would have been great.

The special effects are hokey but I didn't mind. There are some spooky scenes towards the end in a cave - given a lower than expected budget director Jack Hill would have, in hindsight, been better off doing more scenes like this. (I realise that's easy to say from this point of view.)

It is undercast - the leads are twins and good looking, they are fine, but they needed stronger support and don't get it. There's too much emphasis on the dull male hero with a weird perm and I get where the comic viking was meant to be coming from but the actor doesn't get there. The satyr is just creepy.

The story should be simple but winds up needlessly complex. Why kill off that guy at the beginning and have him come back? Why not just keep him alive? The lead girls aren't central to the action enough - they're saved too often.

And yet... there is action, it looks good set on film (much better than later Corman productions) and it was shot a lot on location (in Mexico). It has a sense of adventure. Not as bad as I had been led to believe, more frustrating because it could have so easily been better. It's such a waste Jack Hill hasn't made a film since this time.

Tuesday, January 01, 2019

Movie review - "Raptor" (2001) *1/2

I wanted to enjoy this more than I did - truly. It's got Eric Roberts and Corbin Bernsen, plus Lorissa McCommas giving quite a sweet performance as Roberts' daughter. I'm partial to stories about escaped dinosaurs and I liked how the last act turned into Aliens with squabbling teams of special forces.

But it's a bit flat. The film feels built around stock footage of earlier Carnosaur films which is fine but what's here isn't that great. Roberts is professional, Bernsen wears a silly cap which got on my nerves but is accomplished - actually the acting by the main players is pretty good including Harrison Page from Vixen. The bit part players aren't very good - security guards and what not. A lot of them look silly holding their rifles.

I feel it's the sort of movie Jim Wynorski would have had more fun with earlier in his career. This feels more like a paycheck movie. Maybe if McCommas had been the lead and there had been more sexy girls?

I did like the bit where Roberts goes to Bernsen "I found out X on the internet" and Bernsen goes "well someone's been doing their research". Ah, 2001... when the internet was all knowing...!

Movie review - "Into the Sun" (2005) *** (warning: spoilers)

Maybe the three stars is a little too high but stuff it - Steven Segal's 21st century output is generally so bad this film's virtues come as a relief. On the simplest level it has a great poster, with bold primary colours. It's set in Japan and apparently is based on a story by Seagal so he's animated and energetic, and committed.

It's not a bad story idea, I kind of riff on The Yakuza. Yakuza are killing people and the CIA send in Seagal, who has a History with the country, including old friends, a daughter and a lover.

There's a really strong support cast of Japanese actors - I didn't recognise them but they were all very good, particularly the villains.

I also liked how the villains were a genuine threat. And they did things with real stakes - we spend a bit of time with Seagal's partner so when he's killed it means something. Ditto with Seagal's love interest. Seagal shares hero duty with a Japanese dude, a tattoo artist seeking revenge - it's a shame more time wasn't spent on their relationship.

But there's decent action -  some sword fights! It's well done - such a relief.

Movie review - "Code of Silence" (1985) ***1/2

I think Lone Wolf McQuade is the best "Chuck Norris" Chuck Norris film but this is probably the best movie starring Chuck Norris - it's King Creole vs Viva Las Vegas if you get my meaning.

This is a genuinely good film and Norris gives a strong performance as a cop in Chicago taking on drug dealers. There's a bunch of subplots - the best known one involves Chuck giving evidence against a cop who irresponsibly shoots a kid, but there's also one where he forms a relationship with the innocent daughter (Molly Hagan) of a drug dealer.

There is good action, which comes about logically and a very strong support cast - including Dennis Farina, and Henry Silva. There's no romance between Chuck and Hagan (she's quite young) which was surprising - I guess it's more realistic though it does rob the piece of some emotional impact when he's coming to the rescue. I feel her character should have been a love interest or been made younger so she could be like a "daughter interest" if that makes sense.

A strong film, which makes you wish Chuck Norris had done more work for Orion or at least worked with Andrew Davis again. He really didn't work enough with good directors.