Saturday, January 06, 2018

Movie review - "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" (2001) ***1/2

I think the filmmakers on this one did a really good job. They had to be faithful to the book and made a lot of smart decisions - cast young actors who actually suited the roles (they couldn't act but were well cast), surrounded them with some superb British talent, ponied up for some gorgeous photography and art design.

It's a visual treat for the eyes - all those sets and effects and interesting buildings. It's not particularly well directed (I think Chris Columbus is a better producer than director) and John Williams' score feels wearying - it's something we've heard too many times.

But the set pieces work - visiting Hogwarts and the alley, the battle against the troll, the Quidditch game, the final battle. The film has a good heart - like Star Wars, which it resembles in many ways, some in story (innocent boy is of royal lineage, there's a force which attracts good and bad, colorful comic relief) but also in being a lively rehash of old tropes.

Daniel Radcliffe's acting at this stage was really the look, a smile and a double take - but he is a pretty good Harry. The same could be said for all the young actors.

I wish Richard Griffiths had more screen time, he was such fun, as was Fiona Shaw. Robbie Coltrane and Maggie Smith are terrific value, and Alan Rickman is superb as Snape. Ian Hart is a little undercooked but I guess that's the point of the role, to not notice him (I remember when I first saw the movie I couldn't recognise the actor... he really needs that turban for individualisation).

No comments: