Showing posts with label dore schary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dore schary. Show all posts

Friday, April 24, 2026

Movie review - "The Blackboard Jungle" (1955) ****

 Dore Schary had mixed results at MGM but this is one of his better efforts - social realism done with flair. Works emotionally because the whole thing is about bullying - the kids bully each other and the teachers. Glenn Ford isn't much of a teacher, violent, and sulky. Anne Francis assumes a female teacher who was almost raped was asking for it, and gets jealous of Ford and the teacher.

Ford is well cast with his constipated Einsenhower Era tension.  Sidney Poitier is electric. Vic Morrow very good. The kids are great. Anne Francis whines. I enjoyed the weaker teachers.

Sunday, February 01, 2026

Movie review - "Lonelyhearts" (1958) *1/2

 Terrible. Dore Schary at his worst. I was going to give it two stars due to the professionalism of Myrna Loy, Robert Ryan, Dolores Hart and Maureen Stapleton but it's just too annoying.

Monty Clift's performance is full of ticks and eyes. He seems wasted. If Schary had leaned into that this might have worked.

Smug views. Everything heavy. Subplots about Ryan tormenting Loy because she once had an affair - she could've been cut out of the film. Lots of talking about reading letters. Terrible journalist characters crapping on. So much reportage. Only one story dramatised - Stapleton's husband is impotent in the war, she's horny, Clift roots her, doesn't want to to do it again, he pulls a gun... the one exciting bit. But doesn't kill Clift. Clift should have died.

Hart pines. Her dad tells her to stop looking after him and go and get married to Clift. You know like a real option. Even after Clift's lied about his dad being in prison (for shooting his cheating wife - this film is consistently misogynistic). And Clift has shagged Stapleton.

Hart tries. Ryan has a nothing character. 

I hated this film. 

Saturday, January 31, 2026

Book review - 'The Creative Producer" by David Lewis (1993)

 Lewis is best known as the boyfriend of James Whale. He also produced a number of films. Has some excellent credits at Warner Bros and MGM in particular. He struggled later in the 1950s - films like Raintree County and what not.

His memoirs are fascinating - a different insight from the Golden Age. Like everyone his memoirs are self serving - takes credit for things like coming up with the insanity angle for Kings Row rather than incest with Casey Robinson. But we hear different takes on films like Kings Row but also Each Dawn I Die, Four's a Crowd, Camille.

Interesting views of people like Irving Thalberg, Hal Wallis, Jack Warner, Dore Schary, Sam Wood, etc.

Monday, October 06, 2025

Book review - "Kubrick: An Odyssey" by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams (2024)

 Fantastic book. Big subject but superbly done, great research (access to archives) very thorough and fair. Deep dives on unmade films such as Napoleon and AI. Discusses Kubrick's interest in sex, often ignored by critics. Covers his arseholeness and eccentricities. The book is really fair.

Full of interesting stuff - his battles to make things, a daughter turning into anti-Semitic neo con, his dreams of moving to Australia, James Brolin was considered for The Shining.

Splendid.  

Friday, September 06, 2024

Movie review - "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof" (1958) ***1/2

 MGM's luck wasn't great in the late 50s but it held for this Tennessee Williams adaptation - Dore Schary bought it as a vehicle for Grace Kelly who then retired but Elizabeth Taylor stepped in and for all her vocal limitations was a perfect horny housewife. Paul Newman wasn't a big star at the time - rising but not big - but he was offered the male lead (I think Ben Gazzara may have turned it down) and it worked like gangbusters.

Newman doesn't sleep with Taylor because of guilt over his friend more than being gay for his dead friend but that works on its own terms. There's still Burl Ives' bombastic Big Daddy, and Jack Carson and Madeleine Sherwood as Taylor's dreadful in laws (because it's Williams she's more of a shrew, he's amiable but waeak).

It's a solid movie. Richard Brooks suits it, at that stage. Taylor, Newman and Ives all get a chance to monologue.

Sunday, May 05, 2024

Russ Tamblyn Top Ten

 

1) Gun Crazy (1950) - Tamblyn's breakthrough role as a child star was in Samson and Delilah but I go for this, because it's a more brilliant film and tamblyn's more believable as a young John Dall than as Saul (Samson is quite fun, though)
2) Seven Brides for Seven Brothers (1954) - a lot of MGM musicals were losing money around this time but this was a smash hit, in part due to its energy and colour, including a great turn from Tamblyn - this turned him into a dancing star. The story line is inherently dodgy ("let's abduct some women").
3) The Fastest Gun in the West (1956) - at MGM Tamblyn developed a niche playing keen teens in support of older actors, such as Glenn Ford - this is a good Western, and they put in a dance number for Tamblyn which Ford (one of the biggest divas of the 1950s) tried to get removed
4) Peyton Place (1957) - a triumph of adaptation to get this past the censor and make it cohesive (I've read the book)... the film is a lot of dodgy fun, including Tamblyn who is genuinely good as a weird teen (he turns "normal" in this which he didn't in the book but he should have played more weirdo roles)
5) Tom Thumb (1958) - charming musical fantasy with Tamblyn ideal in the title role.
6) High School Confidential (1958) - terrific fun with Tamblyn doing 21 Jump Street, as an overage undercover cop battling dope pushers, the seduction of Mamie Van Doren, and beatnik dialogue... this was a big hit, and other Albert Zugmith films for MGM weren't... maybe because they didn't star Tamblyn, who knows, he was in a lot of hits around this time.
7) West Side Story (1961) - Tamblyn was a little old to play Riff but he had tremendous energy - no George Chakiris but better than Richard Beymer, shall we say.
8 ) War of the Gargantuas (1969) - in the late 60s Toho would import American stars for their films (usually Nick Adams) - this had Tamblyn, looking stoned and ad libbing dialogue (as he would in his other cult classic, Satans Sadists) - lots of fun.
9) The Haunting (1963) - genuinely good film showing what Tamblyn could do - he didn't like acting that much though and went bohemian soon after.
10) Twin Peaks - Tamblyn makes a comeback as the eccentric Dr Jacoby, totally fitting in Lynchian world.

Book review - "Dancing on the Edge" by Russ Tamblyn

 I spoke with Tamblyn in 2004 and he said he wanted to write a book so it took him a bit of time but I think Tamblyn likes to go his own way in life. A genuine name in Hollywood in the 1950s - not a big star, but a regular lead player in studio films with a long term contract to MGM - he dropped out very quickly, via choice really (he moved to Topenga Canyon to pursue art). He never got his groove back, could never quite re-consolidate despite a stint in Twin Peaks but hung in there. Found love third time round.

I liked the book. Listened to audio version. Tamblyn did it. He sounds amiable, a bit spacey. The third section is mostly about his daughter and Neil Young - like many in Hollywood people try to stay relevant where they can.

Interesting vignettes. Jeff Richards was a boozehead and smashed up Tamblyn's place, Dean Stockwell was a good friend but eventually alcoholism destroyed him while Dennis Hopper of all people got over it, Tamblyn was a polyamorist in like 1960 at Malibu, his second wife was a boozer (she's a tragic figure), his first wife an interesting character (Anna Lee's daughter), Glenn Ford tried to get Tamblyn's dance removed from Fastest Gun in the West, Tamblyn and Yvette Mimieux went for a skinny dip and had sex one night making Brothers Grimm, Tamblyn had a fling with Regina Carroll making Satan's Sadists.

If you like that period and these movies this book is hard to resist, even if it does need an edit.

Friday, April 26, 2024

Movie review - "Seven Brides for Seven Brothers" (1954) ***1/2

 A lot of MGM musicals started losing money around this time - people still went to see them, but they cost a lot - a trend that only accelerated as the 50s went on. This one bucked the trend despite not being basedon a Broadway musical and having stars that never, to be honest, quite became the top - Howard Keel and Jane Powell (fine actors, and decent careers, they just were never Gene Kelly or Judy Garland). 

It had colour, some location work, plenty of energy. Howard Keel has a ridculous red beard. The red hair of all the boys is silly. Jane Powell is very cute and winning. The only other brother who'll register is Russ Tamblyn. Jeff Richards became a star for five seconds as another one but I got confused. You'll spot Julie Newmar.

Rousing dancing. Bold primary colours. Abduction as humour. Nice tunes. I didn't quite get the magic of this though.


Saturday, November 25, 2023

Movie review - "Please Believe Me" (1950) **

 One of the many (many) examples of why Dore Schary was not suited to run MGM. He took a fairly decent, basic idea (his, it must be admitted) - British girl inherits Texas ranch and is plagued by fortune hunters on the way over to the US - and piles bad decision upon bad decision. It's a vehicle for Deborah Kerr, not a natural comedian; Kerr has no set character to play other than placid (is she stuffy? bright? smart?); he assigns an ideal director (Norman Taurog) but a specutaculalr unsuitable producer (Val Lewton); he doesn't add colour or songs); foists his uninteresting support actors on it (James Whitmore).

Like that is the point? The fortune hunters hunting a fortune that doesn't exist makes the whole thing feel like a waste of time - we know up front there isn't a fortune. (Why not have them discover oil part way through.) The gangster to whom Walker is in debt is hardly a threat.

It's so dull. Strained. Charmless. Full of fake drama because it's all misunderstandings.

Kerr and Lawford show of their bodies in the pool I guess that's something. Maybe this plot would've worked with Esther Williams, colour, pools, dances and songs. Lawford suits it best - he was strongest as a second lead. Walker isn't quite comfortable but it's interesting to see Walker. Mark Stevens is dull - Van Johnson was cast then given a rest or something. The film needed his extra star power.

I think Dore Schary was ripping off RKO's Tom Dick and Harry. But that was simple - poor girl torn between current dull boyfriend, rich newbie and poor but exciting newbie.

Friday, August 25, 2023

Movie review - "Homecoming" (1948) **1/2

 Dore Schary hits MGM with a  very worthy, painfully liberal look at a Man at War, who is Greedy for Money and Ambitious and Won't Help the Nice Doctor Who Looks After the Poor but when in Europe falls for a nurse Whose Husband Died in China and Whose Child Died and who is a Good Person and he becomes a Good Person even though before the war he was a doctor and...

Oh, look, it's handsomely done. Made with care.  It's got stars. Clark Gable, looking old and tired. Lana Turner, who is excellent, even if they keep saying her character's name again. and again and again (we get it "snapshot" is a cute name, we get it).

Anne Baxter is the wife - I assume they wanted Turner for that part but the switch works. John Hodiak is the noble doctor.

Some scenes threaten to be good old trashy fun. -Turner and Gable so for a swim (he's probably too old for this to be fun even if she isn't), Gladys Cooper was Baxter's mother warning her daughter that hubby will root the wife. It doesn't go there though the essential dramatic situation is "will Gable hook up with Turner".

At the end it's kind of touching that Gable confesses all although you laugh when you see Baxter's face of relief that Turner is dead (died off screen... a waste of a good scene).

Hodiak's part feels very underwritten. I kept waiting for him to sleep with Baxter, or die, or turn up in the war, or be played by an elder actor (like why didn't he swap parts with Ray Collins).

Look not a bad movie. Just overly decent.

Friday, December 31, 2021

Book review - "Unsinkable" by Debbie Reynolds

Reynolds' second memoir. Covers her dud third marriage, adventures with Carrie, later films like Mother, construction of her hotel and casino. A lot of the financial misadventures make grim reading. I kept thinking "just invest in basic real estate and shares, Debbie. Stop trying to make a museum and hotels!"

It also goes film by film through her career with various anecdotes so the films get plenty of attention. Great anecdotes: Marjorie Main carried around an urn of her dead husband's ashes to talk to him; on Give a Girl a Break Stanley Donen had a man crush on Bob Fosse and a big fight with Gower Champion; she was taken off The Actress (they should've used her); Bundle of Joy was hard to film due to Eddie Fisher's insecurity making him cranky and Norman Taurog's memory loss; on Tammy Leslie Nielsen was a method diva and Walter Brennan full of tricks to steal scenes (like always turn your face three quarters in a two hander to get more exposure; Tony Randall (The Mating Game) had an enormous member; Richard Brooks bullied slapped Reynolds making The Catered Affair (which she otherwise liked... I think Brooks was a real bully); Glenn Ford actively chased Reynolds around a room (they became friends but Debbie... that's attempted assault); the budget of Molly Brown was cut during filming to pay for Zhivago but intense rehearsal meant they saved a dance number; Tony Curtis spread an Eddie Fisher rumour that Reynolds was a lesbian and lousy lay (and she's defensive about her love making abilities); the one time she was tempted to bang a co star was Maurice Ronet on How Sweet It Is; James Garner brought a vibrator as a joke into a bed scene with Reynolds; as an uncredited producer on Whatever Happened to Helen she was going to sack Shelley Winters for lack of professionalism and replace her with Geraldine Page but decided it would cost too much; Dennis Weaver is a great kisser up there with Frank Sinatra; Sean Patrick Flannery refused to rehearse.

Fun book.

Thursday, July 22, 2021

Movie review - "Raintree County" (1957) ** (re-watching)

 A flawed film. A bigger hit in its day than is remembered but it cost so much it lost money. It didn't have to cost a lot - it all could've been shot on the backlot (there was location filming in the US but the scenery isn't exploited). It didn't have to be as poor as it is.

Some good things. Gorgeous photography. Strong cast. And a decent story.

The story is actually simple - Montgomery Clift is an idealistic Northern teacher who falls in love with a Southern girl who goes mad during the Civil War. That's solid. You've got love, insanity, a war.

But the film stuffs it. It's got too much bloat - the version I saw ran at 2 hours 40 minutes and there's a three hour one. The story could've been dealt with in 90 minutes. It actually didn't need battle spectacle sequences. Clift ducks out from his war service to find Taylor and finds his son - that's all cheap.

Too many scenes are talked about rather than dramatised - all the exciting stuff about Taylor's father's relationship with the slave and dying in a fire. (This film might've been better if it had been from Taylor's point of view.)

Clift's character is vague and passive. He gets trapped into marriage by Taylor who fakes a pregnancy. Why doesn't he just love her? Want her? Dump Eva Marie Saint for her? Clift and Taylor's relationship have none of the passion that they showed in A Place in the Sun. Maybe it was Clift's accident. Maybe the actors weren't into it. Maybe it was the director. (It's not very well directed - Edward D lost something when he got out of B pictures.)

Clift's performance is... fine. Not bad. Not great. The accident is distracting - some scenes he seems truthful, others bashed up and tormented. His character doesn't have a drive. He just sort of drifts along. What's his passion? Teaching? Taylor? He doesn't seem to be in to anything. Clift in A Place in the Sun was into Taylor - why didn't they just make it that? A grand passion?

Taylor is beautiful and has her moments but for me she struggled with her voice and the accent and the role. She could deliver the goods but she needed more help.

Rod Taylor's opportunistic townsfriend of Clift has his moments. Nigel Patrick has a flashy character, the sleazy articulate "professor" but Patrick isn't that great. Lee Marvin shines as Clift's friend. He has easily the best scene - defending Clift and Clift's son who are escaping, being taunted by a Confederate soldier who calls out in the dark. I wonder if this came from the novel (which I haven't read) or screenwriter Millard Kaufman, a former marine. 

Eva Marie Saint has a terrible role - she just sits and stares at Clift. Compare it to say Melanie/Olivia de Havilland in Gone with the Wind - she did stuff, had a baby, stuck up for Scarlett. Saint here just hangs around; I guess she scolds Clift towards the end for not wanting to run for office.

The film's also racist. Clift's an abolitionist and Taylor is terrified of being black but there's hardly any black people in it. A few hang around. Only one gets some dialogue.

Simply not very good. A good movie inside, trying to get out.

Interview with Millard Kaufman I did on 3 December 2003 about Raintree County

I did it about Raintree County - we did it via phone. I put it up here just out of interest.

How Kaufman Got Involved

“I was under contract to MGM, they had this thing, this book called Raintree County and it had won a prize which Metro offered for fiction. I was a rare thing I don’t think they’d offered it to anyone before or after... Metro had this novel which ran over 1000 pages… once they got it they didn’t know what to do with it. They gave it to a couple of people who didn’t know what to do with it.”

How come you succeed it? 

“I’m a pain in the ass… I don’t know.”

“I was very taken with it [the novel]… It was very complicated in terms of literary form. It was complex and turned on itself in a number of ways which at that time which was unusual… Followed almost the construct of James Joyce.”

“It’s a very good book.” 

On  Ross Lockridge

"He was an English instructor at the Uni of Indiana, where those two people did v important sexuality in the US, Kinsey and woman he worked with. Kinsey seemed to be very fond of Ross Lockridge. Lockridge was a little strange. He’d spent 19 years writing this book. This is book that won the prize. Kinsey told him that now that he had some money he strongly suggested he try psychoanalysis. Lockridge who was unhappy person along with other difficulties approached his wife about what Kinsey said. She said ‘absolutely not too much of a disgrace for the family’. At that time there was something ungainly about psychoanalysis… Everyone a little goofy. He never did enter analysis. Not long after that killed himself."

What Kaufman thought of the film

“The main problem with picture was I kept too much.  I went on various tangents which should have been left out. I did this not because I lacked craft of screenwriter but I included too much of the novel.   I went on too many tangents. The screenplay was over 200 pages.”

On director Edward Dmytryk

“This apparently, and I’m not sure of this, was something discussed heads various studios…  Dmytryk one of Hollywood ten. Did six months in gaol, when got out of gaol he rather peculiarly turned on people he went to gaol with and named names. He became an informer. Because of that it was said he was rewarded to direct this picture, biggest picture at that time MGM had ever made.”

“Eddie was an enormously bright guy who wanted to be a mathematician and you know how many mathematicians are successful in this world so he became a cutter then a director… By the time he became an informer, some people would say he ratted on the people who were his friends… I didn’t feel that way. I was then and am now rather far to the left. I was rather contemptuous of people who had informed. That’s how he got that job. He was rewarded  for coming back into the fold…"

"Professionally he was fair, which is very good. He shot the script as it was.  Most of these crazy bastards won’t to that. Unfortunately it would have been better if he hadn’t.”

On Dore Schary

"The idea of making another Gone with the Wind might have been somewhere but only briefly and haphazardly in Dore Schary’s mind.. He thought Gone with the Wind was the best movie ever made… He never saw foreign pictures which I think where the best anywhere at the time.”, like Grand Illusion. " 

“Dore was a wonderful guy. Thoughtful, understanding of writers having been a writer himself, he had a great sense of humour which was rare – unique – amongst heads of studios. He was able to relax at all times.. He was younger than others heads… He had one problem – he was inordinately ambitious. I believe he was a bit preoccupied with his own fame. I think he wanted to increase it. There was a period where he thought he might be a diplomat, the US ambassador to Israel. That was when Adlai Stevenson running for President; he and Dore were great friends. Stevenson promised Dore the ambassadorship if he won. He took this very seriously, even to the point of learning Hebrew. In the Middle East he made a speech to the [didn't get name] in Hebrew. I said to him, ‘This is a pipedream, Eisenhower is going to kick the hell out of Stevenson. I’m not normally a political guru or anything but in this case I was right. Eisenhower was re-elected. Dore remained at MGM for a while, then he was kicked out.”

Dore was not not very involved with Raintree… He was very good with writers… He left them entirely alone. I think because of his experience and his breadth it would have been a better picture if he imposed more than he did.”

On David Lewis

“The producer of his picture didn’t know his ass… He was a guy who’d formerly been a producer and had met Dore’s sister on Elizabeth II coming back from Europe and they became friends. She’d been divorced and was on her own as an agent. She took him under her wing in a rather astonishing way.. I think she foisted him on Dore. He was a very nice rather inept man.”

The production

“I was the force behind the goddam picture and I think I screwed it up. If it was a bad picture the fault wasn’t Eddies, it wasn’t David Lewis and it sure wasn’t Dore. It was mine.”

“It was a big picture. It had a long shooting schedule. It was a costume picture with a large cast.”
 

“At that time it was the most expensive picture MGM had ever made. It cost $11 million. Today you can’t blow you nose for that.”

“The casting informal because of my relationship with Dore. We got along well, I liked him, he liked me. When you write a picture almost invariably characters come to mind. It’s different from a novel, all characters come from novelist’s heroic vision of himself… Film is active characters. Like Monty Clift, which he was. I suggested Clift and Elizabeth Taylor… I talked Eva Marie who’s a good friend of mine into it when she didn’t want to do it. She was going to be playing second fiddle to Elizabeth Taylor.” 

“When I suggested these people… Usually writers not in the position I was in MGM, because Dore thought of me very highly… I had the kind of power most writers never would have had in an American studio. Dore thought I was great.  It was because I’d been in the Marine Corp and been in combat. It had nothing to do with my ability to write. If they needed a combat picture I would write it.”

“Monty Clift accident was most unfortunate… The press all knew he goddam near had his head chopped off, and he was heavily criticised when he should have been applauded for his courage going through with the damn thing. He was a very nice young man, a very decent person.”

“The cast was exceptional. Everyone in it was so decent… Nigel Patrick was great, a wonderful guy - as they say in the New Yorker - as a human being.”

“Elizabeth Taylor - she was great. People constantly underestimated her because she was beautiful… Quickest study I ever knew. She’d come on set two minutes before hand, ask a director what are we doing today, and memorise scenes in two minutes… She was wonderful.”

Clift’s accident. “We shot around him as much as we could, then maybe shut down for a few days…"

 On Lee Marvin 

“Lee and I go back to the Marine corp… his death scene and all the exuberant alive scenes… He swings around the post in the middle of the room. We had a stunt man to do that, he couldn’t do it, so Lee did it… He was a very bright man… The scene of the race he could run maybe ten times faster than Monty Clift and he did it in such a way you could swear both running at full stop.. He was a very good athlete. He got shot up in the Marine Corp.”
 

“I had contract MGM as a writer-director-producer. Of jobs I hated producer, I hired a friend of mine, he could hardly read a script. I found out getting on stage every morning and telling a group of people how to behave… I hated directing.”

What would you do differently? 

“I would have concentrated much more on the relationship between Monty and Elizabeth. I brought in I think too many extraneous relationships”

Thoughts on the American South. 

“It’s been mythologised, not history it’s a sacred text. They’re still refighting that war. What you had and still have with this business of the Confederate flag it’s an insult to black people… They were still fighting that war when we made Raintree County. It was one of few pictures dealing with Civil War which had a hero fighting with Federalists, the north… When word got out we were doing this picture they raised hell. Thought it was placing an unseeming burden on the South. They didn’t want to be involved in situation where they had a film which thought freeing slaves was a good idea… There was something which I didn’t manage to keep in the script… I had Clift going off to fight for the Federalist forces. I had Clift shooting his mouth off in anti-slavery way. People in South didn’t like idea. Dore then had the idea the reason Clift goes into the army was because his wife, Elizabeth, who was a nut had disappeared into the south where she came from, so he has to go looking for her, which was ridiculous. There was nothing I could do. It was a question of finance. They didn’t want to lose the Southern markets. And in movies, greed wins.”

Casting of Rod Taylor

"He did a rather smart thing, a truly Hollywood sense of interaction. He read the script – I don’t know where he got it, he didn’t get it from me, it was around the studio…  He went to Dore Shcary and said he’d like to play that part, Dore gave it to him. He actually got it himself.”

“I do remember he and I being on location together and spending some time together… I knew he was an Australian and that he had a good sense of humour. He was outgoing, and had a lot of energy, which is always good in an actor.”

“I had heard stories, the fact he’d had some difficulty in Australia something to do with his wife… He was very much still apparently taken by her or so I remember.”

“His character was the antithesis of Clift’s character – aggressive, outgoing he made bad jokes, he was terribly politically ambitious. This made a terribly good character when put against Clift’s character who was sensitive, decent, almost plodding. He was almost a complete characterisation with his job, he was a school teacher… Can’t remember what Rod’s job was but he went into politics…  [His character] He was hardly a villain. He wasn’t vicious or brutal or any of that. He was an antagonist but not a stereotypical American villain.”
 

Was Rod nervous? 

“Not in the least or at least he didn’t show it… He had a great gift of brass. He knew what he wanted and he got it. Became a hell of a movie actor… It was the only picture I had anything to do he was in…”

“I liked him very much. On location we had dinner with him.”
 

“The only time [Dore] talked about him [Rod] was to tell me how he got the part… He walked in and got it. Dore was susceptible to that sort of thing - I guess you call it filmic romance. The stand-in goes on for the star who breaks her leg, that sort of thing.”

Friday, January 31, 2020

Movie reivew - "Dangerous When Wet" (1953) ***

Fun Esther Williams movie which has an enjoyable family feel - she's part of a super athletic family who decide to swum the English Channel. Fernando Lamas is the lecherous Frenchman she meets when he's yachting in the channel - he goes the grope but it's tempered because they married in real life and Lamas looks like he can swim.

William Demarest is dad, Jack Carson is Williams' manager and Charles Walters directs with a nice light touch. There's not much conflict except swimming the Channel - I like that Williams did this and Lamas supported her (the writer was a woman, Dorothy Kingsley).

Williams has a friend who is played by Denise Darcel another non-discovery of Dore Schary's. It feels as though it was written for Debbie Reynolds - and it was! There's not too much Jack Carson (a little of him goes a long way for me). The mood is bright and cheery. Tom and Jerry do a number with Esther.

Thursday, November 28, 2019

Movie review - "That Forsyte Woman" (1949) ** (re-viewing)

Overproduced - the settings are stuffed with props and everyone's wearing too many clothes. I haven't read the novel but you cans see as here there is a basic love triangle that could work - but it doesn't. Errol Flynn is very  good as Soames, Greer Garson is alright as Irene, Robert Young is awful as  Philip and Walter Pidgeon not very good as Jolyon. Janet Leigh is too American. Bad support players.

The film needed better handling. Compton Bennett the director doesn't rise to the occasion. There's no feel, no atmosphere. No sense of family.

Monday, September 23, 2019

Movie review - "Skirts Ahoy" (1952) **1/2

This MGM musical doesn't really have the star power to go over, it feels haphazard in the way some of them did under Dore Schary, but is full of so many song and dance acts it is endearing.

It's also surprisingly feminist - not overly, there's a song 'What Use is a Girl without a Guy'. but it is about three girls who join the army and want to stand on their own feet; Joan Evans gets rid of her patronising fiancee and Esther Williams chases Barry Sullivan.

The actors aren't up to it. Well Esther Williams is likeable - she has a nice presence - and throws herself into singing and dancing. It's a real musical number for her - it feels conceived for someone else and then she's put in it. She does a little bit in the pool but not much.

Joan Evans was groomed for stardom by Sam Goldwyn but she's bland. Vivian Blaine was a hit on Guys and Dolls but is too broad - at least she can sing and dance. Barry Sullivan is dull and I can't recall who the other guys were and I just saw the movie. I wish they'd gotten singer/dancers in the Evans and Sullivan roles. Sullivan plays an over age prat who is smug about women. Esther would have been better off without him.

Debbie Reynolds has a cameo and you wish she played one of the girls. Keenan Wynn had a cameo - he should have played Blaine's love interest.

It has colour and movement and some funny gags. I didn't mind it.

Friday, August 30, 2019

Movie review - "Rogue Cop" (1954) *** (warning: spoilers)

I've been critical of a lot of Dore Schary's actions while head of MGM but he did greenlight some good, tough thrillers such as this one. It's very much in the vein of The Big Heat (same writers) and while Roy Rowland isn't Fritz Lang he does a solid job.

Robert Taylor's acting always took on an extra dimension when he played a tough baddy/anti-hero and some MGM starlets are given the chance to act and step up - Anne Francis as the alcoholic moll of gangster George Raft and Janet Leigh as a former gangster moll now going out with Taylor's brother Steve Forrest.

The film was a return to A movies for Raft... he's very good, or at least effective, as a gangster. He's not in the movie a lot but he makes his scenes count and he brings history with him. I'm surprised this didn't kick off more of a comeback for him. He did appear in some "A"s like Black Widow but couldn't make it consistent.

There's lots of scenes of detective Taylor getting informed by the little old lady who runs a newstand... did this movie invent this trope? I really liked how Steve Forrest is killed off screen that's very effective.

The film occasionally falls into dull bits - self righteous scolding of Taylor by a priest and also by another cop. But it gets double points for being an MGM movie where the lead is a corrupt cop (even if he does come good).

Crisp black and white photography. I think it's all shot on the backlot. It was a hit too.

There should have been some resolution with Janet Leigh's character. The last ten minutes this random good cop becomes important. Leigh should be there.

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

Movie review - "Mogambo" (1953) ***1/2

Remake of Red Dust which works on its own terms - they keep the basic story but give it a fresh location, in Kenya, and while Clark Gable is back, his age means the interpretation of the role is very different.So too does the casting of Ava Gardner as Jean Harlow and Grace Kelly as Mary Astor.

This film needs stars to work and has great ones. Gable is perfect as an aging old rogue. I like Gardner as a shady lady off to see a Maharajah - her character is softened from Harlow, who was just a hooker; Gardner is given this backstory how her husband was killed in the war, and is basically a decent person. It's not as fun as the original but it does work on it's own terms.

Kelly is superb - the good girl with a fire in her loins. She really comes alive in her kissing scenes with Gable - she clearly wants him. It's very sexy. You can see why this turned her into a star and it's amazing MGM could never find her another role as good (she would be wasted in decorative parts and play her great roles outside the studio).

The location shooting in Kenya helps and it's nice that Kelly's husband Donald Sinden is on a science exploration not shooting people. Africa seems genuinely dangerous here - snakes everywhere, rain, hot weather. The blacks of course don't get much of a look in.

It doesn't feel obviously like a John Ford movie. But it is enjoyable.

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Book review - "He's Got Rhythm: The Life and Career of Gene Kelly" (2017) by Cynthia Brideson and Sara Brideson

Kelly never quite got the respect he deserved as a dancer and an artist - always under the shadow of Fred Astaire, Arthur Freed, Vincente Minnelli... even Stanley Donen. But he was a giant in his field. This is an affectionate and comprehensive book.

Kelly was from Pittsburgh and came up the long way - he loved dancing but instead of running off to Broadway he stayed home for a bit and ran his own dance studios. This turned into a nice little earner... but he didn't go to New York until his late twenties. It turned out to be the right decision - he was ready to go, and made it relatively quickly, then came film offers. He was actively recruited by Arthur Freed of MGM, and although it was Selznick who got him first, MGM was where he wound up - the absolute perfect studio.

The first decade of Kelly's career was a dream - from For Me and My Girl to Singing in the Rain. His career stumbled when he went to Europe for tax reasons - the films became less good, his musicals less polished away from Donen and the MGM studio, musicals became less popular. He had married teenage Betsy Blair who cheated on him and left him (she was more left wing than he was). He fell in love with his former assistant and they had a happy life til she died of leukemia. He later married a third time to a woman who hasn't always had the easiest relationship with his kids.

Kelly always found employment - he directed Flower Drum Song on Broadway, played a straight part in Inherit the Wind. He ever seemed to recapture his late forties/early fifties triumphs - no one much seems to like Gigot or his version of Hello Dolly. It's a shame he never made more swashbucklers - The Three Musketeers is fabulous.

He seems to have been a hard working decent person, a little obsessive, highly competitive - at heart he was a jock, a hard task master, a master of his craft of dancing. The book hints at perhaps a more complex figure - he married people below him in a way (a much younger woman, his former employee), was prone to anger. Maybe there wasn't more to him. A fine book.

Friday, June 21, 2019

Movie review - "Green Fire" (1954) **

Pretty much every film Grace Kelly starred in was popular - this one has a reputation as a dud but in fact it made a profit. No one likes it though and it isn't very good.

It's bewildering what went wrong. It has a lot of things going for it - Kelly of course, but also an ideally cast Stewart Granger (stepping in for Clark Gable, who was meant to star, but the studio took it away when he wouldn't renew his contract), Paul Douglas in support, location filming in Columbia, CinemaScope, great color, and a plot about looking for jewels in Columbia. There's elements which sound exciting - bandits, cave ins, fights - and it looks good, but it's all... flat.

Part of the problem is the story is stagnant. Granger turns up looking for emeralds, and finds them very quickly... near the coffee plantation of Grace Kelly. He spends most of the film hanging around the coffee plantation. They have meals on the verandah, walks in the garden, then they do some mining but it's next door - it's not like say King Solomon's Mines where he was moving around.

There are some villainous bandits but they just sort of turn up whenever need to. Paul Douglas feels extraneous - a sidekick who is Granger's moral conscience, I think. But Kelly is also his moral conscience. They should have made Douglas a villain, or at least funny.

There's also John Ericson as Kelly's brother. He sort of hangs around, then overrules Kelly in helping Granger build the mine, then is killed... to... make Kelly annoyed at Granger, I guess. But Ericson feels pointless. Why not make him a villain too?

Instead we've got this boring drama about Granger being greedy, digging  a mine (though the script tweaks it so that Ericson pushes the idea on Granger).

I would have made it that Granger's partner, Paul Douglas, was more ruthless than Granger. I would have had Kelly as an innocent abroad - she has nothing to play as it is, she's just this dim woman hanging around a coffee plantation. If you wanted to keep the stupid coffee plantation I would have had Kelly come out to take it over, and if you wanted to keep Ericson, have him run it into the ground because he was lazy and useless. So Kelly is this hoity toity miss trying to fix her coffee plantation while Granger is swagging around digging for emeralds - this gives Kelly something to do.

I would've added more sexual tension too. The hottest bit is when Granger and Kelly kiss in the rain - at the end. Have this stuff throughout. Make her prim and proper, wanting to be rogered but afraid at the same time etc etc. Not rocket science.

But MGM under Dore Schary struggled with these sort of meat and potatoes broad appeal entertainments.