Showing posts with label Cate Blanchett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cate Blanchett. Show all posts

Saturday, June 22, 2024

Movie review - "Otto by Otto" (2024) ***1/2

 Moving, well done doco about Barry Otto from his daughter Gracie. I met Barry once or twice - he was off with the pixies then as his own family admit in the doco so his dementia was hard to pick up... although it was notable that he struggled with a script. 

I was really moved by this - in part because he reminded me of my grandmother, one foot in fantasy land, house full of crap, painting, eventually second foot goes off with dream land. 

Lovely for Brisbane people too to see the artistic community of Twelfth Night. His wife (second) helped set up the Nimrod but gave it up to be a parent... there is more story to be told there.

Appearances (or, rather, vocals) from people like John Bell, Gillian Armstrong (who does have to stop staying Australian stories started to be written in the 70s), Baz L, Cate Blanchett. A Bob Ellis review quoted. Excellent home movie footage and fascinating glimpses of Nimrod, Belvoir etc.

Thursday, October 22, 2020

Play review - "Nothing Personal" by David Williamson (2011)

 Williamson once claimed Robyn Nevin felt this was based on Cate Blanchett taking over from Nevin at the STC. That would have been amazing. Nevin, who survived the atmosphere of the 70s and marriage to the charismatic wife basher Jim McNeill to become the giant of Australian theatre; replaced by Blanchett, blessed with greater beauty and talent... that's an amazing jumping off point.

But he didn't. 

I was apprehensive at a Williamson play focusing on two women, they've never been his strong point, and that proves to be the case here. I didn't buy his take on th book publishing world; maybe it was accurate and well researched, but it didn't feel like it, at least not to me. It's also got too much tired overused Williamson stuff - an older male alpha who the younger woman can't resist fucking, a career striving woman who neglects her daughter, obsession with good reviews and making a career out of art, clunky dialogue.

Like all Williamsons though it can tell a story and has some funny lines. There's a genuinely moving scene where the younger girl's mother dies.

I wish he'd made it more about himself. Set this story in the theatre - a young playwright snapping at the heels of Davo. Or make him an artistic director. If worry about Cate/Robyn make the artistic director male. That would've been great.

The play did inspire a very amusing hatchet job from Bob Ellis and a highty entertaining subsequent correspondence between he and the Williamsons on Ellis' blog.

Friday, January 25, 2019

Movie review - "Ocean's 8" (2018) **1/2 (warning: spoilers)

The trailer for this was fantastic - bright, fun, with a knock out cast, funky music and great one liners. It looked like it was going to be a great time in the cinema.

But it was curiously flat. It never had the energy or pizzaz of the trailer. The cast are all there doing their thing - you can't say any of them are bad. Sandra Bullock holds the lead with her star power, Cate Blanchett is a useful sidekick, Helena Bonham Carter and Anne Hathaway are fun in the showiest parts. I wish Mindy Kaling and Rhinanna had been given more to do. I wasn't sure what Sarah Paulsen's role in the heist was which is a shame since she was set up so promisingly.

The film lacks a romantic interest. There's the guy Bullock is getting revenge on - but nothing moving forward. It just would've been fun. Maybe use the James Corden character - expand that out. But they don't.

The last fifteen minutes things perk up when Hathaway comes more involved and so you see the film for what it could be. But it's really... ordinary. Some nice clothes.

Thursday, October 25, 2018

Movie review - "Thor: Ragnarok" (2016) ***1/2

Marvel demonstrate a memorable ability to reinvigorate their films by bringing in Taika Waititi to direct this. There's still the action, and special effects (this is all set off earth) but there's more of a sense of humour.

Chris Hemsworth is clearly having fun and he has enjoyable banter with Mark Ruffalo. Cate Blanchett isn't a particularly memorable villain but Jeff Goldblum is great fun and Tessa Thompson outstanding as a drunken warrior. A lot of fun.

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

Movie review - "Thank God He Met Lizzie" (1997) ***1/2

Excellent Australian romantic comedy which isn't really a rom com - more a drama with humour and romance, but its bittersweet. There's some broad comedy around the edges - montages, wacky best friends - but at it's heart this is a truthful drama with nice, decent Richard Roxburgh falling for Frances O'Connor but the spice eventually goes out and they break up when they probably shouldn't, and he goes on to marry the One After (Cate Blanchett).

I liked the structure - around the wedding, with flashbacks - and the use of devices to tell the story, like the kid Roxburgh sponsors. Bright colours, and some excellent actors.

A very very good film, and it's a shame Alexandra Long didn't do more films (that were made, at any rate). Bob Ellis wrote lovingly of this film - his tryst with Long livened up the Sydney scene for a bit in 1999.

Friday, March 04, 2016

Australian Film Stars

It's my contention that one of the big problems of the Australian film industry is too many people don't understand what constitutes a film star. The term "star" gets flung about with great abandon and winds up over-used and distorted. Entire books have been written on the concept of movie stardom but I think Ken G Hall had it best when he referred to movie stars being people who were actually worth something at the box office, i.e. actors who helped draw a significant number of people into theatres by virtue of their presence alone.

The Australian film industry is so small that the most successful movie stars are ones who have made their names in other mediums - usually theatre, radio, and/or TV. They develop popularity there, transfer to film, and their public follows them. It is possible to be a film-only star, it is just extremely difficult. I thought I'd run through a list of some actors who I consider to have been genuine stars - plus a few others who sometimes described as such, but aren't, really.

Silent Era

Definite box office draws:

* Nellie Stewart - she's little remembered today but in her day was an internationally famous stage actor and singer. Her most popular role was the title part in Sweet Nell of Old Drury and repeating it on screen helped turn that film into a monster hit.

*Snowy Baker - one of the most renowned sportsman of his era, Baker represented his country in swimming, boxing, rugby, diving, etc etc before trying his hand at the movies. He stuck to action/adventure tales (five in all) most of which appear to have been greeted with public enthusiasm. Baker has a clear claim on the title of Australia's first action movie star.

See him in "The Man from Kangaroo" here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8ht1lwY2Nk

Maybes:

* Lotte Lyell - she was often described as Australia's first film star and certainly played the lead role in a number of popular movies: The Fatal Wedding, Margaret Catchpole, The Sentimental Bloke, etc. Her contribution to Australian cinema was immense, as an actor, director, writer, editor and producer. However I would hesitate to classify her as an out-an-out star - she lacked a defined screen persona, she was too versatile, too under publicised. She didn't have a great stage reputation, her name was given respectful but not prominent billing in advertisements; even her death was not overly publicised, which you assume it would be for someone so young. I don't get the impression from reading about this time that Lotte Lyell was a genuine box office draw. Maybe if she'd specialised in more of the one kind of role or genre, eg the squatter's daughter - but she didn't. I feel Lyell was more a respected leading lady and filmmaker. Still a giant our industry.

* Arthur Tauchert - a vaudevillian who became nationally famous after being cast in the role of a lifetime, The Sentimental Bloke. This led to Tauchert playing the lead in a number of other movies which put him in similar parts, kind of Australia's Wallace Beery. One contemporary account described him as the biggest box office star in Australia in the 1920s. I think he has more claim to being a genuine draw than Lyell, if only because he tended to play the same kind of role - a lovable knockabout - so audiences knew what they were getting with him. A modern day equivalent would be Michael Caton.

You can see Lyell and Taucher in The Sentimental Bloke here - https://archive.org/details/Sentimental_bloke

Not Reallys:

*Alfred Rolfe and Lily Dampier - a married couple who played opposite each other on stage many times, usually in support of Alfred Dampier, Lily's father. They recreated their stage roles in several movies, including Captain Midnight and Captain Starlight, and thus received prominent billing - especially Lily - but I would not count them as stars.

Sound Era Until the Revival

Definite box office draws:

*George Wallace -  one of the most popular theatre performers of his day, Wallace brought his audience with him to the cinemas for several movies in the thirties. The first ones, by FW Thring, weren't very good but still made money; the later ones from Ken G Hall, were better and also lucrative. Eventually Wallace grew old, and his later appearances in Rats of Tobruk and Wherever She Goes are sad rather than funny, but in his heyday he was the biggest thing in Australian films.

See a copy of His Royal Highness here - https://archive.org/details/HisRoyalHighness

*Bert Bailey -his films were even more popular than Wallace's, though his range was more narrow - people were only interested in Bailey if he played Dad Rudd. The result were four highly popular films which cashed in on the years Bailey spent playing Rudd on stage around the country. Bailey did have a stab at a non-Dad Rudd role in South West Pacific but it was still pretty Rudd-esque. He was a genuine box office draw, in the way no other actor who played the role (and there's been a few) have been.

See On Our Selection here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1SjeWCuyDk

*Cecil Kellaway - Kellaway was a popular theatre star who appeared in three Australian films, two of which were specifically constructed as a vehicle for him: It Isn't Done and Mr Chedworth Steps Out. He was a little battler type, less broad than Wallace, quieter than Bailey, more dramatic. A minor star with a less strongly defined public persona it was still there (dim, decent, a father) and he appears to have been a box office draw.

A clip from It Isn't Done is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/it-isnt-done/clip1/

*Pat Hanna - like Wallace, Bailey and Kellaway, Hanna spent years and years plugging away at his act on stage, which meant there was a ready made audience for his first features. Hanna's three movies were not massive successes but his popularity saw them perform well enough and he clearly constituted a genuine draw at the box office.

A clip from Diggers is at https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/diggers/clip1/

Maybes:

*Chips Rafferty - a gangly type who seemed destined for a career as comic relief support until thrust into the lead of The Overlanders, and he was put under contract to Ealing Studios. Any lasting box office pull this and Bush Christmas gave Rafferty was undermined by subsequent miscasting in Eureka Stockade and failure of Bitter Springs. Still, Rafferty had enough of a name to raise money to make his own movies in the 1950s which exploited his persona - The Phantom Stockman, King of the Coral Sea, Walk into Paradise - and were reasonably successful. He then stopped doing that and the films failed - in particular he should've played the lead in Dust in the Sun. Rafferty was unlikely to ever be a convincing romantic lead and he was hampered by opportunities at the time but you get the sense he could've been a bigger star if handled better - he would've been great as a comic lead, and an action hero. Still he was definitely the closest thing we had to a home-grown movie star in the fifties.

A clip of him and Grant Taylor is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/forty-thousand-horsemen/clip1/

 *Roy Rene - his one film is regarded as a failure, Strike Me Lucky, but Rene's tremendous stage popularity initially brought in sizeable audiences. It was a shame Ken G Hall never had another go at making a Rene vehicle because I think he, of all filmmakers, could have eventually cracked it, and Rene's later success on radio proved his appeal had "legs". Admittedly this doesn't change the fact that Strike Me Lucky is hard to sit through.

A clip from Strike Me Lucky is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/strike-me-lucky/clip3/

Not reallys:

*Shirley Ann Richards - she got a lot of publicity as a star, including being put under long term contract, but she wasn't. She almost always played the ingenue, rarely driving the plot and mostly being called upon the flirt with the leading man. Her best part, in Dad and Dave Come to Town, was a support role. She was delightful, charming, pretty and talented but she never got the chance to carry a movie. (NB This applied in Hollywood as well.) The One That Got Away for me was 100,000 Cobbers - a terrific short and it's a shame it wasn't expanded into a feature with Richards pairing marvelously with Grant Taylor.

100,000 Cobbers is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oalKwbuQDKI

*Grant Taylor - a dazzling star debut in Forty Thousand Horseman meant Taylor really should have inherited Snowy Baker's mantle as local action star. And war time meant his persona - the cocky, brave digger - should have been showcased in a number of films. But feature production almost ceased altogether and Taylor only starred in a few other movies.  He still had charisma in 100,000 Cobbers and Rats of Tobruk but he aged rapidly (he was fond of a drink) and his time as a cinematic leading man was really over by the 1940s. Taylor was really the forerunner of the tough Aussie star that would later be picked up by Rod Taylor, Mel, Bryan, etc and it's a real shame he didn't get to make as many star vehicles as say George Wallace because I think they would've done well.

*Peter Finch - an unusual case. During his Australian years I got the impression everyone respected Finch's talent as an actor, which saw him play numerous lead roles in radio, film and stage... but that he was never that popular with the public. He was a "prestige star", say like Cate Blanchett would be later. However when he began starring in British films in the 1950s, there was a period where he seemed to have genuine pull at the box office, making some popularity lists - in particular starring in some Australian themed works: A Town Like Alice, The Shiralee, Robbery Under Arms. So while he wasn't a genuine film star in Australia, he was playing Australian roles in Britain.

Peter Finch in Dad and Dave Come to Town is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/dad-and-dave-come-to-town/clip1/

The early years of the revival (1970s-1990s)

Definite stars:

*Jack Thompson - In the late 1970s Ken H Hall declared that Thompson was the one actor whose name actually meant something at the box office in Australian cinema, and there was something to it, his hits including Petersen, and Sunday Too Far Away. These were star vehicles, as was the less popular Scobie Malone, pushing an image of Thompson - tough, ocker, sexy - that had been developed on TV in Spyforce, very much in the vein of Grant Taylor. Thompson did not follow this up though, and quickly went into character/support parts, though often in quality works - Caddie, The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith, Breaker Morant, The Man from Snowy River. The one film to be built around his persona, The Journalist, was a disaster. Was the Australian film industry of the 1970s capable of supporting "Jack Thompson, star"? Could a real impresario like, say , Ken G Hall made it work? Was Thompson even interested? His career and persona remains an under-studied topic in Australian cinema.

See him in The Journalist here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGw9iF7qf7o

*Mel Gibson - Gibson had "star" written all over him from the early days, on stage as well as the screen, and enjoyed one of the few guaranteed home grown franchises in Mad Max. He has one of the best Aussie CVs of all time: three classics (the first two Mad Max movies, Gallipoli), some damn fine movies (The Year of Living Dangerously, Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome), an entirely decent weepie (Tim) and some cult faves (Summer City, Attack Force Z). Rare in that he is a film-only star too (although he appeared a lot on stage).

He's in Summer City  here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvdoQKiXDnc

*Paul Hogan - an incredibly popular comedian, whose appeal saw big audiences for not just the Crocodile Dundee flicks but also later, less well remembered films, such as Lightning Jack, Strange Bedfellows and Charlie and Boots. He's lost a lot of lustre but in the right role I think Hogan could still draw them in.

A trailer for Lightning Jack is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWkFm6FKLEY

*Yahoo Serious - unlike the other comics on this list, Serious came out of nowhere with Young Einstein but it was so successful (in part because of a massive marketing push) that for a time he was a genuine box office draw via Reckless Kelly and Mr Accident (the audiences weren't as large as for his first film but they did come). Not prolific enough to maintain his following.

The Reckless Kelly trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIZ5xAXo-Y0

Maybes

*Russell Crowe - Russell Crowe had "next Mel Gibson" stamped on his forehead since The Crossing  and he eventually came good but it's useful to be reminded how many of his Aussie movies made little noise - The Crossing, Love in Limbo, Hammers over the Anvil, Heaven's Burning. He kept getting cast because everyone knew he was going to be a star, then he was one... just in Hollywood, not here. The Water Diviner however has shown there is a lot of appeal left among local audiences for Rusty in the right sort of role. He's made too many odd sort of movies for me to classify him as a definite local star though.

The trailer for The Crossing is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBfxerP68Ss

*Tom Burlinson - star of the two biggest hits in 80s Australian cinema, The Man from Snowy River and Phar Lap, showed that Aussie audiences adored Burlinson with a horse. When he strayed from this however - Windrider, The Time Guardian - they stayed away in droves and Man from Snowy River II seemed to kill off his career as an Australian leading man. To Burlinson's credit, he's revived his career as a singer. But still, one can't help thinking he might have had a few more hits in him if he'd been more carefully managed - he had a boyish earnestness and likeability that surely could've been better exploited. Moral of story - who cares if you're typecast if the projects are good?

The Time Guardian trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fN0InnC2POo

*Sigrid Thornton - there's few more iconic images of 80s Australian cinema than Siggie being feisty in period costume: Man from Snowy River, All the Rivers Run. Even at her peak however she was wasted in girlfriend roles - Street Hero, The Lighthorsemen - her career is a great argument that Australian cinema had even less idea what to do with female stars than male ones. It was different on TV where Siggie at least got some of the roles she deserved, especially in Sea Change. She's still around and remains a draw on stage and the small screen

All the Rivers Run trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsstHWyC49s

*Graeme Blundell - Blundell's casting helped turn Alvin Purple into a box office phenomenon, turning into a temporary sex comedy star eg Pacific Banana, all those Alvin sequels. A very fine actor, he's remained in demand, but I don't think anyone wants to see him in a sex comedy any more.

Melvin the Son of Alvin's trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qu5G0gGhqw

Not reallys

*Bryan Brown - in the 80s it was common to call Bryan Brown a film star but was he, really? People seemed to like him best in showy support roles - Breaker Morant, Two Hands, Dirty Deeds, Australia - rather than as the lead. On TV he was a definite draw as proved by the popularity of A Town Like Alice and The Shiralee but feature films starring Brown tended to tank - The Empty Beach, Sweet Talker, Dear Claudia, Dead Heart. An icon, absolutely, a good actor, yes, a charismatic leading man, certainly, loved in supporting roles (eg Two Hands) yes, but a real film star...?

A clip from The Empty Beach - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFcXHTurWNw

*Judy Davis - there was a period there in the 80s when Davis was a "prestige" star, someone who would ensure your film would get looked at: Winter of our Dreams, Kangaroo, Hide Tide. She's never been hugely popular, though always respected - I wish she'd work more.

Here she does a scene with Baz Luhrmann in Winter of Our Dreams - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TTPaHXWSRk

*Wendy Hughes - Bob Ellis once claimed he needed to cast Hughes in Warm Nights on a Slow Moving Train to get it financed, such was her reputation in the 1980s. She was incredibly beautiful and talented and did appear in some hits (Careful He Might Hear You, My First Wife, Return to Eden, Lonely Hearts) and there was that late 80s period when it seemed she might brake through interntionally (she had the lead in a Hollywood film Happy New Year) but this ended with a rash of flops: Warm Night, Echoes of Paradise, Boundaries of the Heart, Luigis Ladies. Still, she remained in demand as an actor until her depressingly early death.


Here's a trailer from Touch and Go - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXxLXSRfkXA

Later Years (1990s - present)

*Nick Giannopolous - perhaps the biggest stage star in 90s Australia, his immensely popular Wog shows saw an impressive box office for the highly mediocre Wog Boy. As is far too common in Australian cinema, he waited too long to make a sequel, but nonetheless figures for Wog Boy 2 weren't bad. Giannppolous' appeal in non-Wog roles is doubtful, though The Wannabes actually had a terrific idea, it was just terribly executed. If I ran an Aussie film studio, one of the first this I would do is see if Giannopolous would make a third Wog Boy movie - but only if he toured the country with a stage show immediately before release and kept the budget down.

A clip of him is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xql6L85GEk

*Mick Molloy - the break out star of The Late Show, he grew even bigger when he and Tony Martin became radio giants, then he became a film star via the cleverly crafted Crackerjack. Having established himself as a genuine box office draw, Molloy fumbled with his next two films, Bad Eggs and Boy Town, though both had good things and could (and should) have been awesome. Bad Eggs badly needed to have put Molloy opposite Tony Martin instead of the talented but little-known-outside-Melbourne-comedy-circles Bob Franklin; Boy Town didn't live up to it's concept. Molloy remains kind of well known but is probably no longer a box office draw; a shame since he had genuine broad appeal and with careful handling he could've starred in five-to-six big local comedy hits.

A Boytown clip is here - http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2008/boytown-i-cry/

*Jimeoin - a very likeable actor with a national profile, he brought them in with The Craic but struck out with The Extra even though it had a fantastic central idea. Jimeoin still tours heavily, keeping him in the public eye and I actually think people would still turn up to see him in the right vehicle.

The Craic trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYG9YXSPqds

*Paul Fenech - perennially unfashionable but he has a devoted following who have ensured decent box office figures, although they dropped off a little for Fat Pizza vs Housos. Fenech keeps his budgets down and his audience in mind, using live shows to supplement his filmed ones. He remains a decent draw at the local box office.

Fat Pizza vs Housos trailer - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udTm5CejuCo

*Cate Blanchett - is Cate Blanchett a film star? She's too beloved, wins too many Oscars, is too famous, too beautiful, and has been in too many hits to not be a star. On a local level though, she seems to be the queen of expensive, critically acclaimed box office disappointments - Oscar and Lucinda, Charlotte Grey, Paradise Road, Little Fish, The Turning - which may explain why she doesn't make too many Australian films. I do think however her name does guarantee at least a certain amount of audience which would qualify her as a local star... she just doesn't justify her budgets.

The Turning trailer - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U1r401xxSQ

Maybes:

*Hugh Jackman - it's hard to judge Hugh Jackman as a local film star because he makes so few Australian films. His first ones, Erskinville Kings and Paperback Hero were not massive hits and since then he's belonged to Hollywood, with the exception of Australia. I think if Hugh did make something close to home audiences would turn up in droves, such is his popularity, but because he doesn't, I classify him as a "maybe".

The Erskinville Kings trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECwdc-7Z5IY

*Shane Jacobsen - became nationally famous with Kenny and has managed to sustain his appeal since then with some great choices: Charlie and Boots, Oddball. I don't know if the words "Shane Jacobsen starring in" would automatically mean a certain amount of punters turning up on that opening weekend, but if he keeps choosing well it may do.

Oddball trailer is here - http://www.shanejacobson.com.au/projects/film/oddball.html

*Nicole Kidman - in the right role, they'll come, as The Railway Man and Australia proved, but there is a limit, as shown in Strangerland. I know, you could say that about any star but Nickers has never been a massive draw in local films - even her classics (BMX Bandits, Dead Calm) weren't that big. But she's a superb actor who is normally associated with quality.

The Strangerland trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3Kj1VmbJiw

*Michael Caton - he's not often thought of as a star, but he's nationally known/loved and people do tend to come to his movies: The Castle, Strange Bedfellows, Last Cab to Darwin.

The Last Cab to Darwin trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hypCdpjTMDI

*Toni Collette - obviously an outstanding character actress, her limits as a box office attraction were proven by Diana and Me and Lilian's Story. Because she's so good and gets some great parts, she'll stick around a long time, and a lot of her movies do some business - eg Mental, Japanese Story.

*Eric Bana - if there's anyone who should come back here and make a good Aussie film it's Eric, who probably has some residual popularity here. For a while he was genuinely popular off the back of Chopper with Romulus My Father doing ok and Love the Beast performing well. Personally I think he's wasted doing American films though presumably his accountant disagrees. Hopefully The Dry will lead to more roles here.

Chopper's trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKgvs9uqPJo

My conclusions from the above? Australian filmmakers are probably better off getting the rights to some awesome material rather than a star - say a best selling book like Red Dog, or popular play like Last Cab to Darwin. The exception is comedy, where the popularity of a Paul Hogan or a Nick Giannopolous will help your returns. Of course I could be wrong about all of the above - like so much in the film industry, it's just an educated guess...

Sunday, July 26, 2015

Movie review - "Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull" (2008) ***

I'm going out on a limb here and saying that this maligned sequel - so maligned it inspired a very funny South Park episode - is actually not the worst in the series, being better than Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. It's definitely not perfect, but at least it tries different things and has some great moments, whereas Crusade merely re-heated old ingredients.

I'm aware of the flaws - Shia Le Bouf is never going to replace Harrison, the CGI is annoying compared to the real stunts of the first three, and I missed the feeling of exotica that came from the US bound shoot, Ray Winstone felt at times to be extraneous. I felt it was also a mistake to not reveal Indy had a son from the get go - sure it would have robbed the piece of surprise but would have given greater emotional underpinning to everything.

But the 1950s setting gives it freshness, with nods to Marlon Brando and the high school bop; Cate Blanchett camps it up to the right degree, Shia and Harrison work well together, there's lots of crazy arsed imagination, it's lovely to have Karen Allen back. Maybe I'll change my mind about how much I liked it but I did like it.

Monday, February 17, 2014

Movie review - "Blue Jasmine" (2013) ****

Woody Allen does A Streetcar Named Desire - the lead is a faded beauty who has fallen on hard times (Cate Blanchett) who arrives in a sweltering coastal city (in this case San Francisco) to live with her younger sister (Sally Hawkins) who has taken up with a loudmouth but sexy brute (Bobby Cannavale), who introduces the lead to his amiable but not very good looking friend (Max Casella). We also flash back to the lead's past, including the uncovering of a secret and her marriage to a handsome man - in this case a dashing, very rich crook (Alec Baldwin).

There are other variations on Streetcar - the sister is revealed to have gone out with another brutish guy (Andrew Dice Clay) and has a fling with another man (Louis C K), the lead has another love interest, a charming man who actually offers her the hope of a future (Peter Sarsgaard), as well as a step son.

I still can't get over the improvement in Woody Allen's films in the last decade once he got out of New York City and stopped making movies about men romancing women young enough to be their granddaughter. This does have some scenes in New York as well as Alec Baldwin chasing after some younger tail, but those scenes are in the minority.

The movie is a bit flabby and derivative in places (it also invokes Ingmar Bergman) but is intelligent and powerful, with some superb acting, particularly from Cate Blanchett in a very showy role. She looks beautiful, gets to be regal and funny, is sexually harrassed, seductive and goes barmy. There are pleasures which seem more precious in this day and age of CGI fantasy: gorgeous production values ("poor" Sally Hawkins has a great apartment) and views of San Francisco and the Hamptons, impressive costumes.

Saturday, August 10, 2013

Movie review - "The Turning" (2013) **

Can a film be judged a success if you need to read a booklet afterwards to really appreciate what you saw on screen? Maybe it didn't matter for those who had read Tim Winton's original collection of short stories, but I hadn't, so I found most of the (long) running time heavy going. Seventeen different stories, many with the same themes and incidents: two amputated fingers, two marks on the face, lots and lots of young boys gazing adoringly at women they don't have the courage to approach, several alcoholics, a law student and a lawyer, some wife beaters, lots of boring life in small town WA where you'd better fish or surf or you'll wind up a boozer.

Then, reading the booklet, I discovered that the repetition was deliberate and there were several times were different actors were meant to be playing the same character. Looking back there were hints at this but I would have enjoyed the movie a hell of a lot more knowing it going in.

But at the time I didn't, and I found this agonisingly slow - the segments kept coming over the mountain, like watching one AFTRS short after another, with similar AFTRS virtues (stunning photography, excellent locations and set design, the occasional famous person) and faults (lack of narrative). Very few stories had a beginning middle and end, which I think may have been the point but I think if you go in to watch it you should beware of that. Has there ever been a feature film with seventeen segments? Seventeen? And where the segments kept hitting the same beat?

The ones I thought were good: the opening animation, Rose Byrne finding religion, and Cate Blanchett and Richard Roxburgh have a day out with Robyn Nevin, and the one where the little kid kept tuning out and living in his own world; Warwick Thornton and Justin Kurzel's were at least stylistically different. Some were amateurish, such as Susie Porter and the missing earrings (it felt like a scene from a soap), others felt undercooked like the cop and journo looking for the missing hiker, and others pointless, such as Hugo Weaving as the drifter.

This does get points for at least trying something different, it looks marvellous and there are some terrific actors; hopefully it will launch some new film careers. But I found it a hard, hard slog to get through.

Sunday, March 04, 2012

Movie review - "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" (2008) **1/2

Far more Forrest Gump than F Scott Fitzgerald - which maybe explains why it was a hit when so many cinema versions of Fitzgerald flop. Like Gump (the films share the same writer) here is a tale that goes on for ever, covers generations, hits on key pop culture moments ("the day that will live in infamy", ushering in the sixties listening to Twist and Shout), is set in the South, has a hero who works for a period of time working on a boat, fights in a war in which his friend dies (even if in this one he isn't a soldier), has a long running romance with a girl he ultimately can't be with because of factors beyond his control (in this case his reverse ageing process rather than intelligence) yet they still conceive a child together, he makes lots of money, gets along well with blacks (who are family figures for him), demonstrates incredible special effects (in this case ones for ageing instead of missing limbs), wise mother, folksy narration, etc etc. It's got Gump's flaws in it's lead characters - neither

Like Gump it's also reassuring - you experience the fantasy about getting younger but ultimately realise that it's better to age normally. And some of it is very good - the effects are stunning and the image of Cate Blanchett nursing a baby, senile Benjamin really hits home.

Thursday, January 06, 2011

Play review – “Uncle Vanya” by Anton Chekov via Andrew Upton (STC production Nov 5 2010)

Names, names, names – Cate Blanchett, Hugo Weaving, Richard Roxburgh, John Bell, Jackie Weaver, Sandy Gore, etc. No one gives a bad performance but honestly you’d hope not. It’s a not-very-good adaptation (what year is it set in? I could never get a fix) and wasn’t very well directed. Too many of the cast mugged and did all sorts of business to get laughs. Someone once told me the problems with Chekov productions was either they’d be played for drama and they were never dramatic enough or done as comedies and they were never funny enough; this one definitely falls into the latter box. Still, it was exciting to see all those famous people on stage.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Movie review – “Robin Hood” (2009) **1/2

Originally this was to be called Nottingham and have the Sheriff as the hero – which totally went against the DNA of what is one of the all time popular stories in the English language. Then they replaced it with a new story which also goes against that DNA.
 
I think why Robin Hood always works is that every little boy (and girl) at some stage dreamed of living in the forest with your mates, robbing from the rich to give to the poor, and fighting in a good cause. Here Robin is an archer, getting on a bit in years, fighting for Richard in Europe – who pretends to be a knight in order to get home (shades of A Knight’s Tale, also written by Brian Hegeland), including hooking up with the dead knight’s wife (Cate Blanchett, who gives a good performance – but honestly who cares if Maid Marian is played by a good actor, it’s a waste). There’s only one incident of robbing from the rich to give to the poor – he doesn’t get outlawed until the very end. Richard I dies at the beginning so Robin isn’t fighting for restoration of the monarchy, but rather a bill of rights – the Magna Carta (used in Bandit of Sherwood Forest); as presented here it feels a bit tacked on. 
 
It’s hard to tell some of the support cast apart, although the quality of acting is strong (William Hurt makes a surprisingly effective decent noble). Mark Strong, a bald Andy Garcia look a like, is a good villain. Plenty of action including a brilliant final battle and Rusty is a great tough guy hero but it never quite comes alive.

Saturday, May 26, 2007

Movie review - "The Aviator" (2005) ***1/2

Enjoyed this enormously and could have happily watched it for another couple of hours, with loving period detail, fascinating lead character and Leo di Caprio strong in the lead. How do you tackle the life of someone like Hughes which was so extraordinary? They've decided to focus on his career as an aviator, which is a great idea, as it gets to cover Hell's Angels, his flight records, major crash, troubles with Pan Am and the Spruce Goose attempt; it even allows to incorporate his romance with Katie Hepburn, by having him take her flying. It's a great spine.

But Scorsese (or the producers or whoever) seem to have then gone "but the other stuff is so interesting..." so they shove in a bit about Jane Russell in The Outlaw and Faith Domerge and Ava Gardner and one too many party scenes with a band playing. Cate Blanchett is marvellous as Kate H and watching it I was thinking "but of course it's a great role, easy to play"... until I saw Kate Beckingsale as Ava Gardner which you would also think "great role, easy to play"... but she's average. So snaps to Cate.

NB I enjoyed the little cameos - Jude Law as Errol Flynn (though I think it was really Cary Grant who was a closer friend), Gwen Stefani as Jean Harlow, etc.

Movie review - "Little Fish" (2005) **1/2

Made with much love, care and talent it might have been more enjoyable(and popular) if it was a bit schlockier i.e. just accepted the fact that it was basically a story about Cate Blanchett having to raise $X in three days or whatever, and done all the character stuff in and around that. But Rowan Woods wants to go the long way round, so there are lots of scenes and bits of stuff which is all excellently done it just sort of meanders. (Like did we need to see the whole school reunion thing.)There are a few too many shots of Cate (who is quite good though she can't quite shed the Hunters Hill aura) walking around Cabramatta looking wistful. Noni Hazlehurst is totally perfect as is Martin Henderson and Hugo Weaving and I also loved the actor who played the corrupt cop, he's a real find. Very suspenseful ending, makes you wish they'd just turned it all into a thriller, and put everything else in the confines of the genre, I think it would have been a terrific movie.