Showing posts with label Shirley Ann Richards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shirley Ann Richards. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 26, 2024

Movie review - "Mr Chedworth Steps Out" (1938) ***1/2

 Ken G. Hall wanted to fashion a film vehicle for Cecil Kellaway so came up with this (adapted from a novel). Kellaway plays Chedworth, a little man, likeable, with a useless gambling son, a nice daughter who is dating an aged idiot, a comic son, and a chirpy young daughter who can sing (Jean Hatton). Apparently Kellaway played these sort of roles on stage all the time back in the day. He's very good in these sort of parts (only in his forties but he looks older).

His character gets fired (excellent direction from Hall, lingering on Kellaway), he's kept on as a nightwatchman, discovers some money, it's forged, wins money on a bet, wins money in share investments that he's conned into by Sydney Wheeler who's also associated with the forgers, and who is the boss of son Peter Finch, and there's John Warwick as an old looking treasury man who likes Kellaway and romances Kellaway's eldest daughter, and daughter Jean Hatton enters a singing contest.

It's a bit all over the place but a lot of old 30s Hollywood star vehicles were - check out some of MGM's efforts.

I wonder why Shirley Ann Richards didn't play Kellaway's hot daughter. Maybe Hall felt he'd done that in It Isn't Done and didn't want to repeat himself. It's not a very big part - he's not in it very much. I did like how she dated a dodgy older guy, a shonk. But was there no better looking man than John Warwick as the treasury guy?

Rita Pauncefort has a high old time as Kellaway's greedy wife - the sort who was caricatured but when you think about it, suffered because she couldn't work. He tells her off early on but then she doesn't seem to change, spending all his money. 

Hatton is very likeable and engaging. No wonder Hall used her again in Ants in His Pants. Peter Finch is excellent and full marks to Hall for giving him a decent role. He's so skinny - no wonder Hall struggled to see him as a romantic lead. 

Frank Harvey juggles it well enough in his script. You can laugh at the gangsters but it does provide an element of pace. The film has a serious subtext and glimpses of Australia's class system and life.

Monday, June 03, 2024

Movie review - "Ants in His Pants" (1939) **1/2

Recut from the original Come Up Smiling - I'm not sure what was added. Maybe another song? I'm guessing the bit at the end when the kid shoves ants in Will Mahoney's pants.

Half a good film. Slick. Mahoney is engaging. Clearly talented.

Script a bit of a mess. It's a bunch of incidents and bits. Mahoney at the circus. Mahoney looks after soprano Jean Hatton (why not make them father and daughter? Why make Sid Wheeler Hatton's dad?) Mhoney raising money to help Hatton's voice. Gets in the boxing ring. There's something about gangsters. Mahoney in blackface with a lamb. Mahoney at a snobby party. Mahoney in love with Shirley Ann Richards who is with John Fleeting. Why? Richards could've been cut out of the movie. And Fleeting.

They should've made Richards into Mahoney's daughter. Or sister. She's helping raise Hatton - give her stakes. She's just in the film. Have her fall in love with Fleeting not be with Fleeting.

Evie Hayes is in it - Mahoney's wife. She helps him train, I think. Sings a number. There's a few numbers.

It's slick. Technically. Not story wise. Frank Harvey didn't write this and you can tell. 

Chips Rafferty is an extra but good luck spotting him.

Monday, April 01, 2024

Shirley Ann Richards Top Ten

 1) Dad and Dave Come to Town - her best role, best performance, very funny and lovely

2) It Isn't Done - great debut and a pretty good role even if she was mostly required to bat her eyes at John Longden she displayed an innate intelligence

3) Lovers and Luggers - a "girl" part but she gets points for wearing men's clothes, and it's thus better than Tall Timbers

4) Sorry Wrong Number - not an awesome part but probably her best film apart from Dad and Dave and she's very good

5) Badman's Territory - a girl part, but she gets to ride horses, point a gun and run a newspaper

6) Breakdown - flawed film, lacks focus, but Richards' husband gave her a decent part as a good girl in love with a bad boy

7) Lost Honeymoon - a good role as a protagonist, and she's great - it's just the story is so dumb

8) The Searching Wind - she's better than the play and her two co stars, a very believable "let's let it slide" type

9) Love Letters - flawed film, but Richards is very good as a loyal friend 

10) Dr Gillespie's New Assistant - she has two scenes but is sparky and lovely and should have played Richard Quine's role

Thursday, March 28, 2024

Movie review - "Three Hearts for Julia" (1943) **

 Comedy of remarriage, which like many such tales these days comes across as a bit creepy and rapey for all the charm of Melvyn Douglas and Ann Southern. He's a journo back from Europe to reclaim wife Southern who works in an orchestra. He's been away for two years so she's had the arse - he keeps taking off on trips, and wants to move on with Lee Bowman, rich guy, and Richard Ainley, critic. This is very sympathetic. But Douglas wants her back. And because it's 1940s MGM we'll know he'll succeed.

He tries charm and then inevitably "charmingly" kidnaps her. The issues of their marriage aren't resolved, it's her giving in.

The most interesting thing is Southern plays in an all female orchestra. The conductor is a refugee from the Gestapo and briefly struggles with the notion of an all female band but that's presented cutely. The all female orchestra would've been enough for a film - make it a three-girl movie, say.

Southern is sweet. Douglas has charm. Shirley Ann Richards is in it briefly as one of the gals in the orchestra.

Richard Thorpe directed. I'm sure it came in on time and under budget.

Movie review - “Sorry Wrong Number” (1948) ***1/2

The original radio play is a pretty much perfect 30 minutes - how do you expand it to a feature? You could have kept it with the main lady (Barbara Stanwyck) on the phone, added more twists and turns, or you go more into the motive... which is what this film does. It fleshes out the characters of her husband (Burt Lancaster), who grows to resent his wife’s money, controlling nature and ill health. There’s also her rich dad who is a great character, and her old friend (Ann Richards) who saw Something Suspicious.

It’s not a bad mystery, with William Conrad on hand to provide menace. Richards has another thankless best friend role but get some decent screen time and a suspenseful scene where she follows her husband out to a beach.

Not as good as the play but pretty good - probably Richards' best American film.

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

Movie review - "Dr Gillespie's New Assistant" (1942) **1/2

 I've never seen a Dr Kildare movie - this was made after Lew Ayres had been given the boot for conscientiously objecting. So you had Lionel Barrymore interviewing three assistants - you kind of know that it's going to be Van Johnson, who got an early break in these movies, because he's the most regular guy, and he has charm. The other two are foreigners - Richard Quine as an Aussie (the movie's chief point of novelty, IMHO) and Keye Luke as an Asian (though born in Brooklyn).

Barrymore does his Barrymore thing in a wheelchair - kind of progressive to have a handicapped lead actor in a way, along with a prominent Asian actor. To make sure things don't get too commie Luke makes a joke about men being able to hit their wives and the doctors routinely betray female patient confidentiality.

There's a few subplots, a crusty old nurse, an admin guy, some orderly (nat Pendleton) up to no good. It's like a Student Nurses movie only without nudity.

The main plot involves patient Susan Peters - who is lovely - having memory loss, interfering with her marriage to some dude who I thought was going to be gaslighting her but it's benign and the docs figure it out via cobbled psychology.

Quine plays a doctor from Woolloomooloo and murders the Australian accent. I mean, he literally wrestles it to the ground. It's appalling and fascinating. He's studying tropical diseases. Cripes what a shocker of a performance.  But you can't stop watching. 

As an added bonus Shirley Ann Richards (billed without the "Shirley") pop up as an Aussie nurse. They meet, talk in slang, bond over how Americans can't understand them, which is funny actually, and fall in love straight away. I wish her part had been bigger or she'd played Quine's part. She's gorgeous and fun.

Luke is energetic. The handling of the film is clunky but it's done with MGM polish. Some attractive starlets in the background.

Monday, March 25, 2024

Movie review - "Love from a Stranger" (1947) **

 Gaslighting melodramas always work - the husband trying to kill the wife, driving her man, with malevolent intentions. It's all solid stuff.

But it's odd why Eagle Lion wanted to film this especially as it had been done in Britain in 1937. Maybe they wanted a vehicle for a British star - they didn't get one. Unless you count Aussie Ann Richards, who is nice, as Sylvia Sidney's friend, but barely in the film. Indeed, she could be cut out. John Howard, as Sidney's whiny ex, does all the worrying about Sidney stuff.

John Hodiak is the charming psycho husband.

The story lacks a twist. Naive Sidney marries dashing Hodiak. Everyone thinks he's bad, eventually she does too, he is bad. Richards and/or Howard needed to be in cahoots with him.

Eagle Lion provided a decent budget, it's a period tale with costumes and houses by the coast. But it was money wasted. Why not set it in present day America? Differentiate it from the original? You could still make it so no one had a photo of the guy.

Sometimes films like this can be saved by A list actors but the collection here is B list - everyone can act, mind, but they don't have charisma.

Saturday, March 23, 2024

Movie review - "The Searching Wind" (1946) **

 Lilllian Hellman was a great writer and her stage play was a hit in 1944 but no one talks about it much and she didn't like it that much either. I can see its appeal on stage during war time - chat about diplomatics who charmingly went along with the rise of fascism. It's not really dramatised in the way that say Watch the Rhine was - in that film a fascist was on the run and he had to shoot someone. This doesn't have that.

Robert Young is the posh diplomat and Ann Richards (quite good) is his wealthy wife. Sylvia Sidney is his ex.

There's glimpses of where the drama is, which is this: Young is basically decent, or can be, but is too attracted to peace, and getting along, and his wife, who is rich and likes to hang with facsists. With Sidney as his conscience.

This story can work - look at The Way We Were. But this doesn't bring it alive. There's no heat/attraction between Young and Sidney. Robert Young's blandness suits the role I guess but isn't very compelling.I've never liked Sidney and while she's got a great character - feisty journalist, telling the truth, drawn to a married man - Sidney never gets there, at least not for me. If these two had had some real heat it would've been so much better. Like , I don't know, Robert Cummings for someone charming and Barbara Stanwyck for someone to be tough. Joseph Cotten was offered the lead - he would've been better.

Dramatically someone needed to die - like Sidney really. To die for her conscience. It's weird that Shirley and Richards go "you're staying with Shirley" then Dick gives the speech.

Douglas Dick plays the son of Richards and Shirley who lost a leg in the war - Montgomery Clift played the part on Broadway. He has a big speech at the end. Dick is best known for being killed in Rope.

Movie review - "Badman's Territory" (1946) **1/2

 I'm not super familiar with the mid-period Randolph Scott cycle - the ones after his first Westerns, where he normally co starred with bigger names, and before the Renown cycle. This was a solid hit for RKO, who had a decent record making Westerns. The copy I saw had a gloomy feel to it but it may have been the print. 

Scott is a marshall chasing outlaws into a lawless territory. The feisty local newspaper editor is a woman - Australia's own Ann Richards, who was under contract to RKO. I think this is the only movie she made for that studio. There is definite novelty seeing her introduced on a horse with a gun. She's not entirely comfortable but is at home in a newspaper office. I like how she had a character to play - brave, crusading editor; jealous of Belle Starr.

The gimick of the story involves Scott trgint to find his brother who has been taken by real life outlaws - the Jameses, the Daltons,  Belle Starr. There's also some Indians.

Plenty of plot and action and spectacle. Shiny support cast including Lawrence Tierney, very good as Jesse James, and Tom Tryon as Frank.

Gloomily shot but I enjoyed it more as it went on.


Friday, March 22, 2024

Movie reviews - "Love Letters" (1945) **

 I read this was a knock off of Cyrano de Bergerac and there's elements of that but really it's a reverse of Random Harvest with Jennifer Jones as the amnesiac who doesn't realise that she once loved Joseph Cotten. Cotten knows it and hangs around being her friend, with Ann Richards (who was in Random Harvest) providing the exposition and pining at Cotten. 

There's other Random Harvest elements - Cotten has shellshock, though so does Jones; Cotten and Jones get married even though she doesn't realise she's his true love, Cotten doesn't tell Jones the truth, the ending results in Jones getting her memory back.

There are differences - Jones and Cotten fall in love off screen via letters, the Cyrano influence. It's not as good a movie.

I think it was a mistake not to see Cotten and Jones fall in love via letters and to build up the part of the loathsome guy who passed on the letters and was an abusive husband. He's seen at the beginning and the end... but a little more would've been ideal (or even just more evocative build up).

Richards is very good, as a decent, pretty loyal person. It's one of her better parts. She was up for the lead then was gazumped by Jones who was a bigger name. Jones is better because Jones had a whiff of insanity about her - the crazy eyes.

There's a lot of character names in the script. Anita Louise's character (Cotten's ex) is kind of pointless. The script is choppy.

It's done classily though - decent budget looks nice. Cotten suits this material. Cecil Kellaway, Richards' old Aussie co star, pops up as a colourful local.

Thursday, March 21, 2024

Movie review - "Lost Honeymoon" (1947) **

 This is brightly handled with some skilled playing - Franchot Tone was adept at light comedy and Tom Conway livens things up; (Shirley) Ann Richards actually gets a decent role and Frances Rafferty is beautiful and a lot of fun as the other woman.

But the story is so dumb and contrived. Richards was BFF of a woman who was married to Tone during the war in England (this was made by Eagle Lion and I think they were looking at co pros with England) then went back to the US. The woman has died leaving two kids. So Richards takes the kids to the US pretending to be the wife... because... ah... and Tone had amnesia during the war...

It doesn't make sense. Why doesn't Richards just tell the truth? If they'd come up with a better reason for her deception this would've been so much better.

The opening scene is clunky and feels as though maybe it was shot at a later date. More could've been made of Conway finding Richards attractive and Tone and his kds.

In a few scenes Richards flirts and sparkles and it's just like she's back at Cinesound. Rafferty, like Richards, should've had a bigger Hollywood career.

Leigh Jason directs with a nice light touch. I hadn't heard of him before. Just so dumb a story though.

Movie review - "Breakdown" (1952) **1/2 (warning: spoilers)

 Shirley Ann Richards' last movie was produced and directed by her husband Edmond Angelo - after which both quit the biz and he went into engineering. It's a sort of Warner Bros style movie set in the world of boxing, with no real one star and heaps of subplot.

William Bishop is a boxer out of prison for a crime he didn't commit. He wants to find out who framed him and falls in love with good girl Ann Richards. But leading man duties are shared with Wally Cassell, as the pathetic guy who gets him out of prison and is attached to Bishop and get jealous of Richards. And Cassell's brother Sheldon Leonard.

And Leonard has a girlfriend Anne Gwynne who hates Cassell because he promoted Gwynne's earlier boyfriend Richard Benedict who is now brain injured and eventually dies.

It's written by a former boxer and benefits from that inside feel. It just kind of is all over the place with a melodramatic ending of Bishop almost getting killed in the ring and last minute confessions and Cassell having a stroke.

The acting is quite good. Leonard's voice reminded me of a cartoon character, I'm not sure which. Richards has essentially a support part but not a bad one - a good girl attracted to Bishop, she gets to be lively and pretty. Bishop is a little dull. Cassell is excellent as is Gwynne.

Movie review - "An American Romance" (1944) ** (re-watching)

 King Vidor must have had a lot of prestige to get this through MGM - it cost millions. I'm sure he pitched it well "it's about industry! Immigrants! America!" It's so dull.

Metro stumped up for colour - pointless, it may as well have been black and white. What's the story... immigrant arrives. Works in mine. Works in steel. Builds cars. Along way marries nice woman. Has children. Becomes rich car manufacturer. One son dies in World War One. Another gets married. Another works for his dad, becomes involved in the union.

The union conflict at the end is the most interesting thing about the film because this was made by MGM but Vidor was a little more progressive and it's wartime. Also the son gets involved in the union so there's drama.

There's no drama in the marriage - no conflict. Or with the immigrant's best friend. Why not a love triangle? Why not have the guy driven? Why not have some drama, King? Because the way was on.

Vidor blamed the leads - and it's true that if his original choices, Spencer Tracy, Joseph Cotten and Ingrid Bergman had been in it, it would at least have had some star power. But instead he's got - how's this for B list - Brian Donlevy, Ann Richards and Walter Abel. Richards was really pretty but is devoid of sex or spark here she's just nice. It's not very good work. Abel is fine, just lacking charisma - why not cast some young spunk? Donlevy's performance is dreadul with his immigrant accent and dumb acting. He was a second lead, not a lead. It's painful to watch.

The film needed a big injection of soap. Richards was with his best friend who died of an accident. He raised other people's kids. He has daughters who root around.

This is like a Dore Schary movie made by MGM before Schary went to MGM.

Vidor whinged about the half hour taken out of it. He's lucky it wasn't more. But the cuts don't really help, just shorten it. It was two and a half hours and they made it two!

Monday, May 01, 2023

Movie review - "It Isn't Done" (1937) ***1/2 (warning: spoilers)

 The film that marked a new dawn at Cinesound - the Frank Harvey era, when he started writing scripts. There were other elements too but basically the whole studio became much more professional.

It's a little creaky, the pacing is off sometimes, but it's a warm affectionate movie. Cecil Kellaway is a lovely star - affable family man, slyly comic, fond of a drink, a little ditzy but not dumb. I enjoyed his impression of a koala bear. The vehicle adjusts around his persona - a Bert Bailey or George Wallace version of this would be far broader.

The film pokes gentle fun at the culture clash - Kellaway struggling to deal with a butler (Harvey Adams), getting drunk in the manor. Nellie Ferguson doesn't have much to do as Kellaway's wife. Shirley Ann Richards is green but lovely as Kellaway's daughter - photogenic, looks pretty, has a lovely warm relationship with her dad.

John Longden is a little too old for the love interest but at least he can act. He's a writer hero (Frank Harvey's influence? Carl Dudley's?)

There's impressive spectacle with a fox hunt and a ball. The film is actually best in its dramatic moments - the snobbery encountered by the family, whether the meanness from Frank Harvey's lord (shoving them in a library during a dinner party when they realise who they've invited - this is well done), the casual snobbishness of Aussies abroad (Campbell Copelin and his mother are tremendous fun), Harvey and Kellaway realising their sons died in the same day (lovely moment with a little lonely lady also putting down a wreath - she's not attached to the story, it's just lovely flavour) and bonding. Harvey Adams is funny as the butler and its great he goes to Australia at the end.

Thursday, December 02, 2021

1984 interview with Shirley Ann Richards

 Link is here. Another one is https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20080721102440/http://www.nfsa.gov.au/the_collection/collection_spotlights/shirley_ann_richards.html

Among the bits in the interview

- during making Tall Timbers Richards sang a song "tosti's (?) goodbye" on a train (she was studying singing) which apparently was bad luck and horrified the theatrical types in the cast (Richards didn't know at the time) - also Frank Leighton was appearing in The Student Prince with Glady Moncrieff - he was so run down he got boils on his neck which had to be camoflaged - Richards called him a "very precise" actor;

- she was very close to Frank Harvey - he would run her lines - when she went away to US he wrote her a letter of advice about professionalism and life in general - she said she would pass on the advice to her sons - she still had the letter - said Frank wrote "I am writing to you as though you are another daughter" (he had a daughter, Helen);

- Ken Hall could be a bit aloof directing but he was busy;

- she enjoyed the romanticism of Lovers and Luggers, and dressing as a boy;

- adored Harvey Adams who would bring crabs and shrimps for lunch - "most charming" ;

- Ken G Hall used lots of rehearsal - everyone had excellent raaport, she never worked anywhere else where it was the same crew day in day out;

- got along Lloyd Hughes... remembers making Lovers and Luggers nearly asphxiated on a lugger because of smoke; 

- George Yates v protective of Richards - when she was bullied by an actress Yates sabotaged a door for Richards;

- says cast of It Isn't Done were "marvellously kind" to her and helped her enormously;

- Campbell Copelin was "very much in love" with Elaine Hamill during the making of the film - they went to England together (a few weeks apart);

- she didn't have a good rapport with Bert Bailey who was a bit distant - this was in contrast to her work with other actors at Cinesound like Cecil Kellaway, they'd discuss the scene - she didn't have any sort of chat about the scene with Bailey, suggests maybe it was because he was shy, or had played the role for so many years, doesn't know if he'd do it with other actors - it was her only experience as an actor where she didn't have any sort of rapport with a co star - didn't get to know him even professionally;

- Ken Hall sent a film with Richards when she went to America... this went missing so she had nothing to show when over there - they had to get film on her while over there - she got lucky though with the film The Woman in the House - no one else suitable for MGM, she got the part, that was seen, she was put under contract;

- found MGM very big - she was used to same faces and same actors - but got used to it - you could do tests as well - she did one with Philip Dorn;

- her husband didn't care for movies as much as the stage - he could do everything for himself on stage... different with film - he gave away showbusiness, he was a scientist;

There's a very good look at Richards' life here.

Saturday, April 18, 2020

Movie review - "Tall Timbers" (1937) ***

Enjoyably silly melodrama which benefits from vigorous handling and excellent technical quality. There's always something going on, whether it's Shirley Ann Richards being plucked out of the ocean by Frank Leighton, Joe Valli's comic flirting with Letty Craydno and antics with George Lloyd, Frank Harvey and Campbell Copelin teaming up to be dastardly for Ron Whelan, Harvey's sister Aileen Britten sleeping with Copelin, union agitators, a timber drive.

I saw the shortened version - 74 minutes - which flies along. Ken G Hall's handing was very sure. Impressive special effects though it doesn't always mesh well with the back projection. Likeable leads - two fisted Leighton probably should have gone to Hollywood rather than Britain, and made Westerns; I wish Richards had more to do, but I love how she and Britten became friends. The reunion between Leighton and Harvey Adams feels undercooked. Harvey and Britten are excellent and Copelin is wonderful fun.

Saturday, February 22, 2020

Movie review - "Dad and Dave Come to Town" (1938) ***1/2 (warning:spoilers) (re-viewing)

This was on the plane on a Qantas flight. Good old Qantas. It was fun to see again.

It doesn't start particularly well - the opening reels creak, the pacing isn't quite there, it's not that well conceived or edited. Hall was a better producer than director. Some of the gags didn't work for me - the busman's holiday and what not.

But as it went on it got better. There were so many subplots but they were well juggled - Dad taking over the dress shop, Dad's squabbling with a neighbour, the neighbour's son (Peter Finch) romancing Dad's daughter, Dad's other daughter wanting to run a dress shop, the housekeeper being possessive of the house, Dave lecherous in the dress job, the gay floor walker, the treacherous manager, the opposition dress shop owner, the PR guy who changes sides.

The film has a nice heart - Dad is very inclusive as long as you're not a treacherous snot (and wear a moustache - two villains have moustaches). Shirley Ann Richards is chirpy and talks like she went to a post school. Bert Bailey, Fred MacDonald, Sidney Wheeler and Alec Kellaway all act like they've done a  LOT of theatre. Which is part of the film's appeal. Billy Rayes plays possibly the most sympathetic PR guy in film history.

Saturday, September 03, 2016

Top Ten K G Hall Films

My top ten films from Ken G Hall, in no particular order
1) Dad and Dave Come to Town (1938) - Hall's most charming, likeable film
2) It Isn't Done (1937) - the film that marked the big leap in professionalism for Cinesound's product, a great Cecil Kellaway star vehicle
3) Orphans of the Wilderness (1936) - was Hall Australia's most versatile director? This is a charming animal film with a great tough undertone.
4) 100,000 Cobbers (1943) - the best of Hall's featurettes during World War Two, this is a great Aussie version of The Way Ahead which so should have been a full length feature.
5) Kokoda Frontline (1942) - maybe I'm pushing it to call this a Hall film; the real genius is of course Damien Parer but Hall produced it, and it's great.
6) Smithy (1946) - slick biopic of the famed aviator - perhaps Hall's most polished film.
7) Dad Rudd MP (1940) - surprisingly more of  drama than the other Rudd films but quite well put together.
8) Mr Chedworth Steps Out (1939) - gentle comedy-drama which gave another fine role for Kellaway; full of silly bits (gangsters, singing daughters) but a lot of sensitivity and insight.
9) Lovers and Luggers (1937) - enjoyable junky south seas melodrama notable for some fun character performances especially.
10) Let George Do It or Gone to the Dogs (1938) - I tend to see Hall's George Wallace films as the one movie - well crafted entertainments that showcase Wallace's abilities far better than Frank Thring's did.

Friday, March 04, 2016

Australian Film Stars

It's my contention that one of the big problems of the Australian film industry is too many people don't understand what constitutes a film star. The term "star" gets flung about with great abandon and winds up over-used and distorted. Entire books have been written on the concept of movie stardom but I think Ken G Hall had it best when he referred to movie stars being people who were actually worth something at the box office, i.e. actors who helped draw a significant number of people into theatres by virtue of their presence alone.

The Australian film industry is so small that the most successful movie stars are ones who have made their names in other mediums - usually theatre, radio, and/or TV. They develop popularity there, transfer to film, and their public follows them. It is possible to be a film-only star, it is just extremely difficult. I thought I'd run through a list of some actors who I consider to have been genuine stars - plus a few others who sometimes described as such, but aren't, really.

Silent Era

Definite box office draws:

* Nellie Stewart - she's little remembered today but in her day was an internationally famous stage actor and singer. Her most popular role was the title part in Sweet Nell of Old Drury and repeating it on screen helped turn that film into a monster hit.

*Snowy Baker - one of the most renowned sportsman of his era, Baker represented his country in swimming, boxing, rugby, diving, etc etc before trying his hand at the movies. He stuck to action/adventure tales (five in all) most of which appear to have been greeted with public enthusiasm. Baker has a clear claim on the title of Australia's first action movie star.

See him in "The Man from Kangaroo" here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8ht1lwY2Nk

Maybes:

* Lotte Lyell - she was often described as Australia's first film star and certainly played the lead role in a number of popular movies: The Fatal Wedding, Margaret Catchpole, The Sentimental Bloke, etc. Her contribution to Australian cinema was immense, as an actor, director, writer, editor and producer. However I would hesitate to classify her as an out-an-out star - she lacked a defined screen persona, she was too versatile, too under publicised. She didn't have a great stage reputation, her name was given respectful but not prominent billing in advertisements; even her death was not overly publicised, which you assume it would be for someone so young. I don't get the impression from reading about this time that Lotte Lyell was a genuine box office draw. Maybe if she'd specialised in more of the one kind of role or genre, eg the squatter's daughter - but she didn't. I feel Lyell was more a respected leading lady and filmmaker. Still a giant our industry.

* Arthur Tauchert - a vaudevillian who became nationally famous after being cast in the role of a lifetime, The Sentimental Bloke. This led to Tauchert playing the lead in a number of other movies which put him in similar parts, kind of Australia's Wallace Beery. One contemporary account described him as the biggest box office star in Australia in the 1920s. I think he has more claim to being a genuine draw than Lyell, if only because he tended to play the same kind of role - a lovable knockabout - so audiences knew what they were getting with him. A modern day equivalent would be Michael Caton.

You can see Lyell and Taucher in The Sentimental Bloke here - https://archive.org/details/Sentimental_bloke

Not Reallys:

*Alfred Rolfe and Lily Dampier - a married couple who played opposite each other on stage many times, usually in support of Alfred Dampier, Lily's father. They recreated their stage roles in several movies, including Captain Midnight and Captain Starlight, and thus received prominent billing - especially Lily - but I would not count them as stars.

Sound Era Until the Revival

Definite box office draws:

*George Wallace -  one of the most popular theatre performers of his day, Wallace brought his audience with him to the cinemas for several movies in the thirties. The first ones, by FW Thring, weren't very good but still made money; the later ones from Ken G Hall, were better and also lucrative. Eventually Wallace grew old, and his later appearances in Rats of Tobruk and Wherever She Goes are sad rather than funny, but in his heyday he was the biggest thing in Australian films.

See a copy of His Royal Highness here - https://archive.org/details/HisRoyalHighness

*Bert Bailey -his films were even more popular than Wallace's, though his range was more narrow - people were only interested in Bailey if he played Dad Rudd. The result were four highly popular films which cashed in on the years Bailey spent playing Rudd on stage around the country. Bailey did have a stab at a non-Dad Rudd role in South West Pacific but it was still pretty Rudd-esque. He was a genuine box office draw, in the way no other actor who played the role (and there's been a few) have been.

See On Our Selection here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1SjeWCuyDk

*Cecil Kellaway - Kellaway was a popular theatre star who appeared in three Australian films, two of which were specifically constructed as a vehicle for him: It Isn't Done and Mr Chedworth Steps Out. He was a little battler type, less broad than Wallace, quieter than Bailey, more dramatic. A minor star with a less strongly defined public persona it was still there (dim, decent, a father) and he appears to have been a box office draw.

A clip from It Isn't Done is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/it-isnt-done/clip1/

*Pat Hanna - like Wallace, Bailey and Kellaway, Hanna spent years and years plugging away at his act on stage, which meant there was a ready made audience for his first features. Hanna's three movies were not massive successes but his popularity saw them perform well enough and he clearly constituted a genuine draw at the box office.

A clip from Diggers is at https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/diggers/clip1/

Maybes:

*Chips Rafferty - a gangly type who seemed destined for a career as comic relief support until thrust into the lead of The Overlanders, and he was put under contract to Ealing Studios. Any lasting box office pull this and Bush Christmas gave Rafferty was undermined by subsequent miscasting in Eureka Stockade and failure of Bitter Springs. Still, Rafferty had enough of a name to raise money to make his own movies in the 1950s which exploited his persona - The Phantom Stockman, King of the Coral Sea, Walk into Paradise - and were reasonably successful. He then stopped doing that and the films failed - in particular he should've played the lead in Dust in the Sun. Rafferty was unlikely to ever be a convincing romantic lead and he was hampered by opportunities at the time but you get the sense he could've been a bigger star if handled better - he would've been great as a comic lead, and an action hero. Still he was definitely the closest thing we had to a home-grown movie star in the fifties.

A clip of him and Grant Taylor is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/forty-thousand-horsemen/clip1/

 *Roy Rene - his one film is regarded as a failure, Strike Me Lucky, but Rene's tremendous stage popularity initially brought in sizeable audiences. It was a shame Ken G Hall never had another go at making a Rene vehicle because I think he, of all filmmakers, could have eventually cracked it, and Rene's later success on radio proved his appeal had "legs". Admittedly this doesn't change the fact that Strike Me Lucky is hard to sit through.

A clip from Strike Me Lucky is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/strike-me-lucky/clip3/

Not reallys:

*Shirley Ann Richards - she got a lot of publicity as a star, including being put under long term contract, but she wasn't. She almost always played the ingenue, rarely driving the plot and mostly being called upon the flirt with the leading man. Her best part, in Dad and Dave Come to Town, was a support role. She was delightful, charming, pretty and talented but she never got the chance to carry a movie. (NB This applied in Hollywood as well.) The One That Got Away for me was 100,000 Cobbers - a terrific short and it's a shame it wasn't expanded into a feature with Richards pairing marvelously with Grant Taylor.

100,000 Cobbers is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oalKwbuQDKI

*Grant Taylor - a dazzling star debut in Forty Thousand Horseman meant Taylor really should have inherited Snowy Baker's mantle as local action star. And war time meant his persona - the cocky, brave digger - should have been showcased in a number of films. But feature production almost ceased altogether and Taylor only starred in a few other movies.  He still had charisma in 100,000 Cobbers and Rats of Tobruk but he aged rapidly (he was fond of a drink) and his time as a cinematic leading man was really over by the 1940s. Taylor was really the forerunner of the tough Aussie star that would later be picked up by Rod Taylor, Mel, Bryan, etc and it's a real shame he didn't get to make as many star vehicles as say George Wallace because I think they would've done well.

*Peter Finch - an unusual case. During his Australian years I got the impression everyone respected Finch's talent as an actor, which saw him play numerous lead roles in radio, film and stage... but that he was never that popular with the public. He was a "prestige star", say like Cate Blanchett would be later. However when he began starring in British films in the 1950s, there was a period where he seemed to have genuine pull at the box office, making some popularity lists - in particular starring in some Australian themed works: A Town Like Alice, The Shiralee, Robbery Under Arms. So while he wasn't a genuine film star in Australia, he was playing Australian roles in Britain.

Peter Finch in Dad and Dave Come to Town is here - https://aso.gov.au/titles/features/dad-and-dave-come-to-town/clip1/

The early years of the revival (1970s-1990s)

Definite stars:

*Jack Thompson - In the late 1970s Ken H Hall declared that Thompson was the one actor whose name actually meant something at the box office in Australian cinema, and there was something to it, his hits including Petersen, and Sunday Too Far Away. These were star vehicles, as was the less popular Scobie Malone, pushing an image of Thompson - tough, ocker, sexy - that had been developed on TV in Spyforce, very much in the vein of Grant Taylor. Thompson did not follow this up though, and quickly went into character/support parts, though often in quality works - Caddie, The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith, Breaker Morant, The Man from Snowy River. The one film to be built around his persona, The Journalist, was a disaster. Was the Australian film industry of the 1970s capable of supporting "Jack Thompson, star"? Could a real impresario like, say , Ken G Hall made it work? Was Thompson even interested? His career and persona remains an under-studied topic in Australian cinema.

See him in The Journalist here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGw9iF7qf7o

*Mel Gibson - Gibson had "star" written all over him from the early days, on stage as well as the screen, and enjoyed one of the few guaranteed home grown franchises in Mad Max. He has one of the best Aussie CVs of all time: three classics (the first two Mad Max movies, Gallipoli), some damn fine movies (The Year of Living Dangerously, Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome), an entirely decent weepie (Tim) and some cult faves (Summer City, Attack Force Z). Rare in that he is a film-only star too (although he appeared a lot on stage).

He's in Summer City  here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvdoQKiXDnc

*Paul Hogan - an incredibly popular comedian, whose appeal saw big audiences for not just the Crocodile Dundee flicks but also later, less well remembered films, such as Lightning Jack, Strange Bedfellows and Charlie and Boots. He's lost a lot of lustre but in the right role I think Hogan could still draw them in.

A trailer for Lightning Jack is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWkFm6FKLEY

*Yahoo Serious - unlike the other comics on this list, Serious came out of nowhere with Young Einstein but it was so successful (in part because of a massive marketing push) that for a time he was a genuine box office draw via Reckless Kelly and Mr Accident (the audiences weren't as large as for his first film but they did come). Not prolific enough to maintain his following.

The Reckless Kelly trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIZ5xAXo-Y0

Maybes

*Russell Crowe - Russell Crowe had "next Mel Gibson" stamped on his forehead since The Crossing  and he eventually came good but it's useful to be reminded how many of his Aussie movies made little noise - The Crossing, Love in Limbo, Hammers over the Anvil, Heaven's Burning. He kept getting cast because everyone knew he was going to be a star, then he was one... just in Hollywood, not here. The Water Diviner however has shown there is a lot of appeal left among local audiences for Rusty in the right sort of role. He's made too many odd sort of movies for me to classify him as a definite local star though.

The trailer for The Crossing is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBfxerP68Ss

*Tom Burlinson - star of the two biggest hits in 80s Australian cinema, The Man from Snowy River and Phar Lap, showed that Aussie audiences adored Burlinson with a horse. When he strayed from this however - Windrider, The Time Guardian - they stayed away in droves and Man from Snowy River II seemed to kill off his career as an Australian leading man. To Burlinson's credit, he's revived his career as a singer. But still, one can't help thinking he might have had a few more hits in him if he'd been more carefully managed - he had a boyish earnestness and likeability that surely could've been better exploited. Moral of story - who cares if you're typecast if the projects are good?

The Time Guardian trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fN0InnC2POo

*Sigrid Thornton - there's few more iconic images of 80s Australian cinema than Siggie being feisty in period costume: Man from Snowy River, All the Rivers Run. Even at her peak however she was wasted in girlfriend roles - Street Hero, The Lighthorsemen - her career is a great argument that Australian cinema had even less idea what to do with female stars than male ones. It was different on TV where Siggie at least got some of the roles she deserved, especially in Sea Change. She's still around and remains a draw on stage and the small screen

All the Rivers Run trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsstHWyC49s

*Graeme Blundell - Blundell's casting helped turn Alvin Purple into a box office phenomenon, turning into a temporary sex comedy star eg Pacific Banana, all those Alvin sequels. A very fine actor, he's remained in demand, but I don't think anyone wants to see him in a sex comedy any more.

Melvin the Son of Alvin's trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qu5G0gGhqw

Not reallys

*Bryan Brown - in the 80s it was common to call Bryan Brown a film star but was he, really? People seemed to like him best in showy support roles - Breaker Morant, Two Hands, Dirty Deeds, Australia - rather than as the lead. On TV he was a definite draw as proved by the popularity of A Town Like Alice and The Shiralee but feature films starring Brown tended to tank - The Empty Beach, Sweet Talker, Dear Claudia, Dead Heart. An icon, absolutely, a good actor, yes, a charismatic leading man, certainly, loved in supporting roles (eg Two Hands) yes, but a real film star...?

A clip from The Empty Beach - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFcXHTurWNw

*Judy Davis - there was a period there in the 80s when Davis was a "prestige" star, someone who would ensure your film would get looked at: Winter of our Dreams, Kangaroo, Hide Tide. She's never been hugely popular, though always respected - I wish she'd work more.

Here she does a scene with Baz Luhrmann in Winter of Our Dreams - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TTPaHXWSRk

*Wendy Hughes - Bob Ellis once claimed he needed to cast Hughes in Warm Nights on a Slow Moving Train to get it financed, such was her reputation in the 1980s. She was incredibly beautiful and talented and did appear in some hits (Careful He Might Hear You, My First Wife, Return to Eden, Lonely Hearts) and there was that late 80s period when it seemed she might brake through interntionally (she had the lead in a Hollywood film Happy New Year) but this ended with a rash of flops: Warm Night, Echoes of Paradise, Boundaries of the Heart, Luigis Ladies. Still, she remained in demand as an actor until her depressingly early death.


Here's a trailer from Touch and Go - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXxLXSRfkXA

Later Years (1990s - present)

*Nick Giannopolous - perhaps the biggest stage star in 90s Australia, his immensely popular Wog shows saw an impressive box office for the highly mediocre Wog Boy. As is far too common in Australian cinema, he waited too long to make a sequel, but nonetheless figures for Wog Boy 2 weren't bad. Giannppolous' appeal in non-Wog roles is doubtful, though The Wannabes actually had a terrific idea, it was just terribly executed. If I ran an Aussie film studio, one of the first this I would do is see if Giannopolous would make a third Wog Boy movie - but only if he toured the country with a stage show immediately before release and kept the budget down.

A clip of him is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xql6L85GEk

*Mick Molloy - the break out star of The Late Show, he grew even bigger when he and Tony Martin became radio giants, then he became a film star via the cleverly crafted Crackerjack. Having established himself as a genuine box office draw, Molloy fumbled with his next two films, Bad Eggs and Boy Town, though both had good things and could (and should) have been awesome. Bad Eggs badly needed to have put Molloy opposite Tony Martin instead of the talented but little-known-outside-Melbourne-comedy-circles Bob Franklin; Boy Town didn't live up to it's concept. Molloy remains kind of well known but is probably no longer a box office draw; a shame since he had genuine broad appeal and with careful handling he could've starred in five-to-six big local comedy hits.

A Boytown clip is here - http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2008/boytown-i-cry/

*Jimeoin - a very likeable actor with a national profile, he brought them in with The Craic but struck out with The Extra even though it had a fantastic central idea. Jimeoin still tours heavily, keeping him in the public eye and I actually think people would still turn up to see him in the right vehicle.

The Craic trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYG9YXSPqds

*Paul Fenech - perennially unfashionable but he has a devoted following who have ensured decent box office figures, although they dropped off a little for Fat Pizza vs Housos. Fenech keeps his budgets down and his audience in mind, using live shows to supplement his filmed ones. He remains a decent draw at the local box office.

Fat Pizza vs Housos trailer - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udTm5CejuCo

*Cate Blanchett - is Cate Blanchett a film star? She's too beloved, wins too many Oscars, is too famous, too beautiful, and has been in too many hits to not be a star. On a local level though, she seems to be the queen of expensive, critically acclaimed box office disappointments - Oscar and Lucinda, Charlotte Grey, Paradise Road, Little Fish, The Turning - which may explain why she doesn't make too many Australian films. I do think however her name does guarantee at least a certain amount of audience which would qualify her as a local star... she just doesn't justify her budgets.

The Turning trailer - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U1r401xxSQ

Maybes:

*Hugh Jackman - it's hard to judge Hugh Jackman as a local film star because he makes so few Australian films. His first ones, Erskinville Kings and Paperback Hero were not massive hits and since then he's belonged to Hollywood, with the exception of Australia. I think if Hugh did make something close to home audiences would turn up in droves, such is his popularity, but because he doesn't, I classify him as a "maybe".

The Erskinville Kings trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECwdc-7Z5IY

*Shane Jacobsen - became nationally famous with Kenny and has managed to sustain his appeal since then with some great choices: Charlie and Boots, Oddball. I don't know if the words "Shane Jacobsen starring in" would automatically mean a certain amount of punters turning up on that opening weekend, but if he keeps choosing well it may do.

Oddball trailer is here - http://www.shanejacobson.com.au/projects/film/oddball.html

*Nicole Kidman - in the right role, they'll come, as The Railway Man and Australia proved, but there is a limit, as shown in Strangerland. I know, you could say that about any star but Nickers has never been a massive draw in local films - even her classics (BMX Bandits, Dead Calm) weren't that big. But she's a superb actor who is normally associated with quality.

The Strangerland trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3Kj1VmbJiw

*Michael Caton - he's not often thought of as a star, but he's nationally known/loved and people do tend to come to his movies: The Castle, Strange Bedfellows, Last Cab to Darwin.

The Last Cab to Darwin trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hypCdpjTMDI

*Toni Collette - obviously an outstanding character actress, her limits as a box office attraction were proven by Diana and Me and Lilian's Story. Because she's so good and gets some great parts, she'll stick around a long time, and a lot of her movies do some business - eg Mental, Japanese Story.

*Eric Bana - if there's anyone who should come back here and make a good Aussie film it's Eric, who probably has some residual popularity here. For a while he was genuinely popular off the back of Chopper with Romulus My Father doing ok and Love the Beast performing well. Personally I think he's wasted doing American films though presumably his accountant disagrees. Hopefully The Dry will lead to more roles here.

Chopper's trailer is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKgvs9uqPJo

My conclusions from the above? Australian filmmakers are probably better off getting the rights to some awesome material rather than a star - say a best selling book like Red Dog, or popular play like Last Cab to Darwin. The exception is comedy, where the popularity of a Paul Hogan or a Nick Giannopolous will help your returns. Of course I could be wrong about all of the above - like so much in the film industry, it's just an educated guess...

Sunday, August 16, 2015

Book review - "Directed by Ken G Hall" by Ken G Hall (1977)

Perhaps the most important memoir written by an Australian filmmaker because of Hall's contribution to Australian cinema. He remains our most consistently commercially successful filmmaker of local movies (i.e. Australian ones, not Hollywood), with a series of hits from 1932-46 only really interrupted by the stumble of Strike Me Lucky and to a lesser extent Come Up Smiling. (NB It should be pointed out that hard data supporting this is not readily available but contemporary newspaper accounts and the extent the films were distributed back him up). Yes, Hall made movies at a time before TV and with the backing of a big cinema chain, but other filmmakers had similar advantages (eg Chauvel) and stumbled.

I don't think he was a natural writer - the prose in this is often stilted and several portraits of colourful people don't really come alive (eg Stuart Doyle, George Wallace). But he has such great stories to tell: early cinema going experiences; working as a journalist and moving into publicity; the surprise appointment as director; the hard slog of making On Our Selection and it's massive success; his admiration for Bert Bailey and George Wallace; the disappointment of Strike Me Lucky; the solidification of Cinesound in the 30s; war work; the desperate struggle to reactivate filmmaking in Australia and subsequent heart break.

I thought there would be more on TV, in which Hall worked for a decade. He's also sketchy on his personal life, probably figuring people weren't interested.

His criticism of the Australian film industry remain valid and his proposed solutions actually still make sense (basically he offered up a studio model with an artistic director... kind of like theatre companies). I don't think temperamentally he would have been at home in feature filmmaking of the 70s and 80s but it's a shame he never got to be say head of drama at a TV network.

IIt's an important book - probably the most vital personal account of Australian filmmaking in the 30s and 40s. Though Hall could still go with a good biography as well.