Showing posts with label John Hughes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Hughes. Show all posts

Sunday, May 17, 2026

Book review - "The Book of Sheen" by Charlie Sheen (2025)

 Starts off interestingly - the son of Martin Sheen, growing up in Malibu, hanging out with the Penns (Chris more than Sean), being on set in Philippines for Apocalypse Now, discovering paid sex on the streets of Santa Monica (!), a rapid rise to acting work - a part in Grizzly 2 (which meant he had to turn down the lead in Karate Kid), a strong experience on Red Dawn and Ferris Bueller then the casting in Platoon. After that the book wobbles with Sheen whining incessantly about his work on Wall Street then it goes into free fall with tales of drugs, and women, and rants. Sheen comes across as a completely unpleasant person - a narcissist like so many junkies who brags about all the drugs they took and interventions they've had and wagons they've fallen of, who dribbles away about his suffering.  He clearly lives in a world with too many jesters and has little respect for his craft of acting. He's constantly disparaging the films he appears in - ego trips, badly written, etc - though he has some nice words for the writers and co stars of Spin City and Two and a Half Men. He owns some of his mistakes but only some and basically just dribbles.

Despite the people he's worked with some character sketches come through - Johnny Depp trying to seduce him into smoking on Platoon, Oliver Stone's tension trying to make the movies, Chris Penn, his parents. But so many people are vaguely drawn incuding his own brother. The book also assumes the reader knows about many of the incidents - maybe that's true for a typical reader but some context wouldn't go astray. Also the spelling of "dood" and "fukken" gets wearying. Like Sheen and this book.

Sunday, June 01, 2025

John Candy Top Ten

 1) Stripes (1981) "well, we were on our way to bingo..."

2) Splash (1984) - "I could never be that happy..." 

3) Home Alone (1990) - a wonderful eleventh hour cameo

4) Only the Lonely (1991) - he would have had a long rich career as character actor

5) JFK (1991) - see above

6) Cool Runnings (1993) - an ex-athlete, no, as a wonderful performance, yes

7) Planes Trains and Automobiles (1987)

 8) Uncle Buck (1989)

9) National Lampoon's Vacation (1983)

10) Summer Rental (1985) - yes I know but I have fond memories of it 

I acknowledge these are mostly cameos. 

Sunday, January 12, 2025

John Hughes Top Ten

 1) Some Kind of Wonderful (1987) - great pain and empathy, maybe doesn't nail the ending

2) Pretty in Pink (1986) - Hughes blossomed as a writer with this, sensitive about class, I like the re-done ending

3) Breakfast Club (1985) - a lot of comedy, great juggling, beautifully cast

4) National Lampoon's Vacation (1983) - funny, dark, sly, feels real

5) Home Alone (1990) - I didn't like this much once but now I love it

6) Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986) - in some respects made too fast but great heart and humour

7) Mr Mom (1983) - has it aged? I'm too scared to find out - I used to love it though

8) Planes, Trains and Automobiles (1987) - career best work from John Candy, very sweet moments

9) Uncle Buck (1989)-  as above

10) Sixteen Candles (1984) - look, I know. I just remember how funny it was and all the strands came together.

Saturday, June 15, 2024

Brat Pack Top Tens

In honour of the new Brat pack doco here is my top ten films that wrecked the Brat Pack

1) Blue City (1986) who better to star in a Walter Hill written adaptation of a Ross MacDonald noir novel than... Ally Sheedy and Judd Nelson??? Michelle Manning copped the blame for this but the script is terrible and I love Walter Hill
2) Wisdom (1986) - Emilio Estevez and Demi Moore in a film written and directed by Emilio who was the same age as when Orson Welles made Citizen Kane but Emilio didn't have Herman Mankiewicz, Gregg Toland, the Mercury players, ten years experience in theatre, the life of Randolph Hearst...
3) Kansas (1988) - Matt Dillon, Andrew McCarthy under the direction of Australia's own David Stevens
4) Fresh Horses (1988) - props to Molly Ringwald giving this a go, based on a play which made a name of Suzy Amis, it showed that audiences only really wanted to see Molly as the girl next door and then only at high school
5) The Pick Up Artist (1987) - Molly R has had a lot to say about the dodginess of John Hughes films... I haven't been able to find much she's said about James Toback (google him)... I would genuinely be interested to know her thoughts
6) For Keeps (1987) - another Molly film that under performed... although she was a high school kid... possibly the issue was the lack of star power via Randall Batinkoff
7) Illegally Yours (1988) - Peter Bogdanovich tries to get Rob Lowe to do Ryan O'Neal in a film which is perhaps the strongest argument that Peter B should have stayed away from the type writer
8 ) Square Dance (1988) - Rob Lowe goes the Simple Jack route and got a Golden Globe nom in a film no one went to see - he's still around though so who's laughing (my take on Lowe... as in most of the bratpackers... only Demi Moore was a proper star the rest were better in ensemble films)
9) Maid to Order (1987) - it is harder for female stars than male stars as shown by the fact Ally Sheedy had a huge hit with Short Circuit then made this then wasn't a star anymore - ditto it killed Amy Holden Jones' directorial career. (Compare this to Robert Downey Jnr who had the lead in something like twenty flops)
10) Out of Bounds (1986) - Anthony Michael Hall leaps to fame as a nerd then plays a tough guy in this, followed by a tough jock in Johnny Be Good,
And for fun here are ten Brat Pack movies not known for being Brat Pack movies that are actually really good
1) From the Hip - Judd Nelson lawyer comedy from David E Kelly script
2) Catholic Boys/Heaven Help Us - genuinely good coming of age teen film from Andrew McCarthy with people like Kevin Dillon and Patrick Dempsey in it
3) Bad Influence - Lowe and Spader and Curtis Harrington - underserved flop
4) Youngblood - decent hockey film with Lowe, Swayze and young Keanu and Cynthia Gibb should've been a bigger star
5) Maximum Overdrive - to lunaticly insane to not be fun
6) Masquerade (1988) unofficial remake of Hithcock's suspicion from script by Dick Wolfe... decent film
7) About Last Night (1986) - maybe cheating to have this but it's a good movie, the leads handle Mamet dialogue v well and showed how the Brat Packers could have evolved - keep co starring in films, have better writers..
8 )That Was Then This is Now - (1986) not bad SE Hinton film from Emilio
9) Rumble Fish (1983) - think The Outsiders counts as a Brat Pack film but Rumble Fish doesn't seem to but Rumble Fish is also awsome
10) Red Dawn (1984) - John Milius makes a proper Brat Pack action film

Monday, November 27, 2023

Movie review - "Home Alone 2: Lost in New York" (1992) ***

 Better than I thought in part because while it remakes the first film in terms of structure it has enough points of difference: New York rather than the suburbs, a hotel rather than the house, a bird lady rather than old man (this story felt as though it lacked a beat - her being reunited with someone).

Creepy Trump is in it alas but I liked Eddie Bracken, Pesci and Stern and Culkin was such an amazing star.

Friday, November 17, 2023

Movie review - "Home Alone" (1990) ****

 No kidding. Four stars. I think it ages well. Big late 80s hair of course but Culkin is tremendous and the film has wonderful heart. That old actor got the role of a lifetime and delivered. Dan Stern and Jo Pesci are fun, Catherine O'Hara a lovely mother, John Candy brings it home. The little kids are so awful! It all works.

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

Book review - "A Long time ago in a cutting room far away" by Paul Hirsch

 Entertaining editor memoir. Close up accounts of collaborating with famed directors like Brian De Palma, John Hughes and George Lucas and composers like Bernard Herrman. There's also depictions of working with Charles Shyer (nice but could never make up his mind), Duncan Jones, Herbert Ross (a great experience for Hirsch), Brad Bird.

Hirsch seems to be upfront and honest - I'm sure it's biased in his favour and those criticised will go "that's not how it happened" but he has great credits. He made a lot of genuine contributions to cinema history - persuading de Palma to hire Hermann, the credits and 'Let's Hear It For the Boy' sequences of Footloose, 'Twist and Shout' for Ferris Bueller. He tried to be a director for a bit but not too hard.

This is full of fun stories: having to cut out the bad actor who played Jabba in Star Wars, dealing with temperamental yet brilliant Herman, offending Brian de Palma on Mission to Mars, the moods of John Hughes, the indecision of Charles Shyer on the money pit of I Love Trouble, extracting the juice out of John Hughes movies, what went wrong on Pluto Nash (apparently the original script was funny), James Cameron sledging him on the day Titanic overtook Star Wars at the box office.

Occasionally gets a bit nerdy with talks of splicing and dubs and stuff but consistently interesting. Composers - get to know editors and be nice! They can wreck you with the wrong temp track/edit.

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Script review - "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" by John Hughes

This John Hughes film always felt as though it belonged in a slightly different universe to this others - you could see the kids of Breakfast Club, Pretty in Pink and Some Kind of Wonderful all going to the same... not so much Ferris. Partly the optimism, partly because of breaking the fourth wall... he seems to fit in more with Sixteen Candles or even Weird Science.

Like most of the Hughes classics it has a brilliantly simple, universally identifiable idea - who didn't want to take the day off school? Or even work? There are many memorably moments, and characters - Ferris, tormented Cameron, jealous sister Jeanie, the drug selling teen, antagonist Rooney. Dream girl Sloan isn't that memorable.

Fascinating to see what's in the script that was cut from the final film - Ferris and his friends visit a strip bar, Ferris talks about a girl he knows who sleeps around, Ferris steals money from his sister and parents,Ferris mocks the baby boomers for being ex hippies. All really, really good cuts. (Some of Ferris' whingeing and racism still makes the final film eg complaining about not having a car, asking the car valet if he speaks English).

It has the energy and pace of a script written very quickly - unfortunately also the flaws... the plotting isn't the best. Jeanie and Rooney are both set up to go after Ferris but they don't do much other than go to the home. (NB that end credit sequence of Rooney getting on a bus is revealed to have taken place a lot earlier in the script).

A lively, energetic, flawed script - but still, I think few writers have come near Hughes when it comes to making entertaining teen films.

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Script review - "Some Kind of Wonderful" by John Hughes

Hughes' last teen film is a re-do of Pretty in Pink with the sexes changed around - but by this stage he was really digging into character so it feels fresh. There's some strong protagonists - Keith the art loving mechanic from the poor side of town, Amanda Jones the stunner who is poor but also dates the rich and popular Harvey, and Watts (here called "drummer girl" in character headers) the tomboy dummer with the lousy home life who loves Keith.

The support character includes Hughes' best ever villain, Harvey Jenns, who has a superb line in passive aggression, and Keith's sister, who gets some superb lines, Duncan the eloquent skinhead, and Shayne, Amanda's friend, who turns on her. I would've liked to have met more of Amanda's family to get more of a fix on her.

I've always loved this movie.  The plotting is a bit iffy - after Keith asks Amanda out, he kind of hangs around her a lot; and I never bought it that he fell for Watts. I know they kissed but really the last date is all about Amanda rather than Watts... It would have been nice had he had a realising-he-liked Watts moment before the end. It felt as though it came in a rush.

Some interesting things in the script that were different in the film - here Harvey gets his comeuppance by asking his friends to beat up Keith at the party, which results in everyone turning their back on him and leaving... which feels unbelievable and not real; the film changed it for the better by having Duncan and his friends arrive. There's more stuff between Shayne and Amanda (we see their reunion), and a sequence where Amanda and Shayne see Watts buy some clothes before the date (which felt like an odd scene especially as it was after Shayne had kicked Amanda to the curb). Also there's a line where Watts says she's going return the earrings so Keith can go to art school, which relieved me.

Still, a very fine script and it's easy to see why it was loved. Marvellous dialogue; some brilliant scenes like the kissing one.

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

Script review - "Pretty in Pink" by John Hughes

I remember not loving this film when I saw it at the cinemas - too serious, I think, a lot of the issues went over my head - but it was Hughes' best teen script to date. There's no 16 Candles style broad comedy or racism/date rape, no Breakfast Club  caricatures.

Maybe it's because I'm older now but I really appreciated the complex adult characters - Andie's father, still wiped out emotionally after his wife left (dramatically Hughes may have missed a trick not having the mum in the film but it's truer this way), hopeless with money and life but trying his best; Iona, the aging hippy, brain fried with drugs, in constant unhealthy relationships. Even the minor adult characters were nuanced here - the bouncer at the club, the teacher who knows about the class war and is sympathetic to Andy but kind of makes things worse by punishing girls who are mean to her.

The teen characters were, with one exception, vivid and real - Blane's weakness in the face of adversity makes his dreamboat existence more realistic; Ducky is one of the great characters in teen fiction, adolescent, panting, semi-stalking; Steff is an awesome, flawed atagonist (driven by desire for Andie). Even smaller parts like Steff's girlfriend and Andie's friend have nuance.

The character of Andie is the exception for me - she's basically perfect; nice and plucky and hard working and decent etc etc. But she does provide an important center for the film and casting the pretty-but-not-too-pretty Ringwald was of course the masterstroke.

The central concept is brilliantly effective and simple - many Hughes scripts were like this, which is why I feel his work as lasted so long and resonated with so many, because they are so simple yet universal. There's first rate dialogue, and good dramatic scenes. The comedy comes from character and lines rather than big moments.

The big thing that doesn't work for me in the script - the ending. I get how some people didn't like the movie ending, with Andie winding up with Blaine, thinking she should have been with Duckie... but I can so see why test audiences didn't like the first cut, which shot the script. Blane goes to the prom with another girl, Andie turns up with Duckie, Blane just sort of nods to them in defeat, then Andie and Duckie go and have a fun dance i.e. who needs romance when you've got friends (though the film hints at a romance between Andy and Duckie by describing Duckie turning up having transformed into a super hottie - but, I don't know, if she's friend zoned him this long do they really have a chance?)

The retakes are a lot better. Blane goes alone (his date was cut out of this sequence), which shows even though he's weak he truly loves Andie. He tells friend Steff to f*ck off, which is good justice - important for feeling of audience satisfaction. He goes up to Andie and does a complete mea culpa to her and Ducky - because he kind of owed Ducky an apology as well. He prostrates himself to her, thereby becoming deserving of her love. Then he leaves... and Ducky gives his blessing. Even though it's Andie's film, we see Ducky love her so much that I feel this is super important. Then Andie chases after Blane and they kiss - but not before a good looking girl bats his eyes at Ducky so we feel less bad about him being left alone.

Monday, January 15, 2018

Script review - "The Breakfast Club" by John Hughes

Famously written in a very short space of time and you can tell in a lot of places - there's not a lot of story, it's full of energy and pace, some bits probably could have done with some more work.

The central idea is brilliantly simple and effective - and by making the lead characters come from different social groups ensures differentiation. Most of the plot or at least the conflict is driven by Bender (the delinquent) with Claire (the popular girl) and Andy (jock) as the main antagonists and Brian (nerd) as a complicating factor and Alison (the basket case) only contributing occasionally.

The characters aren't, to be honest, of great depth. Everyone's secret feels stock - Claire's parents are mean and use her as a go between, Andrew's father is mean and competitive, Brian feels pressure, Bender's father beats him. But they are sympathetically depicted, they come from archetypes that work and provide inherent conflict (they could form the basis of a TV show today).

The Claire-Bender romance is believable even if you get the sense it will turn abusive and nasty soon - I mean, Bender is a nasty piece of work, he will be trouble.  The Andrew-Alison romance wasn't convincing on screen and isn't on the page - they're just sort of thrown together. Brian-Alison might have made more sense.

Vern the teacher is a believable tired mean little man. The wise old janitor isn't as bad a figure as some people say - he's just a sympathetic guy.

Plot wise the film is really sequences - meeting everyone, Vern vs Bender, confession times, dancing, some pot smoking, sneaking out.

Some random notes:
- John Hughes was into Molly Ringwald's panties in 16 Candles and there's a panties scene here too (Bender with his head between Claire's legs)
- the team really are mean to the geek - he's teased a lot, and at the end they still make him  do the essay

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Script review - "Sixteen Candles" by John Hughes

The John Hughes teen movies everyone likes are Breakfast Club, Pretty and Pink, Ferris Bueller and Some Kind of Wonderful. People forget Weird Science and Sixteen Candles is mixed.

Candles was the first and you can see plenty of what was great about later Hughes here - the depiction of strong female friendships (Randy - who people forget - and Sam, Caroline and her friends when they're drunk and one cuts her hair), the quiet chats between people (Sam and her dad, Sam and the Geek, even Jake and the Geek).

The humour is really broad - you have to see it as a transitional piece from 80s teen sex comedies to more mature work. This was made at a time when Private School and Porky's were the touchstone comedies.

So you've got a lot of racist jokes - the groom's father is in the Mafia, the Chinese exchange student is a horny idiot. There's also a fair bit of rape humour - Jake offers his girlfriend to the Geek...and the Geek takes advantage of her pretty much.... and then she enjoys it and they start going out. (Presumably the Geek went on to become a millionaire so many Caroline's smart but she did not give consent.)

It's surprising how passive Sam is - the only real act she does is write that she fantasizes about Jake on a form, which she means to show to her friend but Jake reads. I guess she goes to the dance.

The active ones are Jake - who tries to see if Sam likes her - and the Geek - who is chasing after Sam.

The world though is rich - there's a lot of characters but it's easy to follow who is who: the wisecracking brother Mike (who gets many of the best lines), the parents, the two sets of grandparents, the wasted sister (this movie is part teen romance but about 25% Father of the Bride style family wedding comedy - National Lampoon's Wedding... which actually would've been a a good movie), you've got the jocks and their world and the cool kids and their world and the geeks and their world (Love the references to floppy disks!).

There's warm, farce, insight, laugh out loud jokes, satire and moments of extreme dodginess.

Monday, March 07, 2016

Movie review - "Nate and Hayes" (1983) **

An unsuccessful attempt by the Kiwis to storm the world market, based on a script co written by John Hughes of all people, but it has it's charms. It's a throw back to those Burt Lancaster South Sea swashbucklers of the 1950s such as His Majesty O'Keefe, with Tommy Lee Jones as a kind of pirate, based on a real dude who was apparently much nastier than his screen depiction here.

The plot has Jones in rivalry with Max Phipps, also playing a real life character, only here really evil. Goody two shoes Michael O'Keefe arrives in the islands with fiance Jenny Seagrove; Seagrove gets kidnapped by Phipps and O'Keefe and Jones go off to rescue her. It's actually the same plot as was used years later in Pirates of the Caribbean... mind you it is the same plot as Star Wars (i.e. good guy and anti hero try to rescue girl).

Lots of other scenes and moments in this are reminiscent of other movies: the opening sequence recalls Raiders of the Lost Ark, the German villains recalls The African Queen, the ending reminded me of Cat Ballou. Tommy Lee Jones does pretty well in the lead, Phipps chews the scenery as required, and Seagrove is an ideal pirate movie heroine.

O'Keefe is dull, and the movie never quite "clicks" and gets the charm it's looking for. But there is pretty scenery and decent production value.

Wednesday, May 02, 2012

Book review - "You Couldn't Forget Me If You Tried" by Susannah Gora

Not the definitive account of the Brat Pack/80s teen era, but more a look at specific films: Sixteen Candles, The Breakfast Club, Ferris Bueller's Day Off, Some Kind of Wonderful, St Elmo's Fire and Say Anything. So we get a lot on John Hughes (though it's not a bio), a bit on Cameron Crowe, and a fair amount on the actors. Basically this feels like six long individual pieces stuck together - there's kind of the link of Hughes, but a third of it deals with films he didn't make, and it pretty much ignores Weird Science. So there is something slightly unsatisfactory about it.

Still, what's here is pretty good, helped by interviews with most of the key players - well, actors, mostly, and a few executives, critics, academics and record company people, not so much from editors, cinematographers, etc. There were a lot of things I didn't know - the extent of troubles on Some Kind of Wonderful (which sounds hellish to make), the casting process of the various movies, the story of the writing of the Brat Pack article in New York magazine, the fact that all the actors blame that article for ruining their careers.

I have, like so many, strong memories of the John Hughes films. I had heard about Sixteen Candles  before it hit cinemas - the advance word was it was a more serious teen movie. I first saw it on VHS and was delighted to find most of the comedy was very broad, like Meatballs or Vacation - there was a bit of sap but not too much. The others I saw in a cinema (including Weird Science) - except Some Kind of Wonderful which didn't get much of a release. The Breakfast Club blew me away - I remember talking about it with total strangers at McDonalds after seeing it in the cinema. Pretty in Pink was less impressive, though good - it was incredibly serious (like Breakfast it seemed to be a drama, only with a lot less laughs). Ferris was comedy with some great dramatic bits; Some Kind of Wonderful remains my favourite with great personal resonance. These movies were all flawed (e.g. broad racist caricatures in Candles, unconvincing romantic pairings in Breakfast, overly smug hero in Some Kind of Wonderful) but they all had wonderful moments, even Weird Science.

They were all beautifully cast too - Hughes seemed to have a knack of picking young actors who'd done maybe one memorable role before hand e.g. Anthony Michael Hall (Vacation), Mia Sara (Legend), Matthew Broderick (Wargames), Andrew McCarthy (Class). But also he took people who seemed to come out of nowhere, e.g. Jon Cryer, Alan Ruck. And the music was always great - Yello, OMD, Spandau Ballet, Simple Minds, Psychedelic Furs...

Gora is an engaging writer and doesn't deify the films. She could have perhaps put them in a more historical context - while she's strong on the films that Hughes influenced (Kevin Smith, Judd Apatow, etc) she's not as good on the films that influenced him. Surely he was affected by teen tales like Summer of 42 and American Graffiti - or was it the Sandra Dee movies of the 60s? The Hughes tales didn't just drop from the sky.

On one hand you feel some sympathy for the actors being labelled as part of a pack. But did it wreck their careers? A label surely didn't send Molly Ringwald to France, or drive Anthony Michael Hall, Judd Nelson, and Rob Lowe to drinking problems, or Ally Sheedy to an eating disorder. Do they really think the label made Ringwald turn down Blue Velvet and Pretty Woman and Some Kind of Wonderful, Hall and McCarthy Some Kind of Wonderful? Also most of them had one or two post Brat Pack hits - Nelson (From the Hip), McCarthy (Mannequin), Lowe (About Last Night, Bad Influence), Sheedy (Short Circuit), Estevez (Young Guns), Jennifer Grey (Dirty Dancing) - they just had trouble sustaining it. But most of them had decent careers - Nelson, Lowe, Hall, Ruck and Cryer all enjoyed a successful run on the small screen, none of them are washed up junkies.

 A great read but you can't help wishing there was something more.

Friday, October 08, 2010

Book review – “Backstory 5” Ed Patrick McGilligan

An interesting collection of interviews, but probably the weakest in the series so far, mainly because it includes too many writers turned directors (Albert Brooks, John Hughes, Nora Ephron, John Sayles, Barry Levinson), thus their careers have already achieved decent PR - Backstory was all about shining a light on people who hadn't received enough notice. Also a lot of the interviews aren't as thorough. 

I found the most interesting interviews were with people who aren't that well known: Jean Claude Carrier, Ronald Harwood, Barbara Turner, Rudy Wurlitzer.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Movie review – “National Lampoon’s Vacation” (1983) ****

Made when John Hughes kept the venom in his scripts all the way through. So much of it has the whiff of authenticity about cross-country family vacations – the crappy motels, squabbling kids, moronic relatives you have to visit, even the fantasy of the hot chick you meet cross country. Hughes really pushes the envelope here – the fate of Aunt Edna and her dog, the rustic relatives. A deserved classic.

Monday, July 21, 2008

Movie review – “Maid in Manhattan” (2001) **

Jennifer Lopez makes an ideal Cinderella because she can both drab down and glam up to a considerable degree, so she is totally well cast as the maid who romances her “prince” – a Republican Senator. A Republican Senator as a prince? You mean like a George W Bush or Nelson Rockefeller figure? Yuck!

But they steer clear of establishing his positions on gun control or birth control; Ralph Fiennes isn’t quite naturally charming enough just to play a rich guy (cf Hugh Grant in Two Weeks Notice). Some talented actors huff and puff in an attempt to blow life into the proceedings – Chris Eigmann, Joely Richardson, Bob Hoskins – but it never happens.

The most enjoyable scene is where Fiennes and Lopez stroll through Central Park: this bit is charming. Oh and the kid who plays Lopez’s son is good.

Sunday, November 05, 2006

Movie review – “Some Kind of Wonderful” (1987) ***

Last of the John Hughes films and perhaps the least known – it didn’t do as well at the box office, probably because the sensitive protagonist was a boy… although there are many girls who love the film for that reason, just not as many who love films about sensitive girls and handsome prince charmings.
The greatest strength of the film is Mary Stuart Masterton’s stand out star making performance as the tom boy drummer – it’s a terrific turn, one that looks even better now and makes one wish she had a bigger career.
Lea Thompson and Eric Stoltz are likeable in their roles, though Stoltz’s character becomes increasingly creepy as the film goes on: lecturing Thompson during his final date, blowing his college money on earrings (that plot development is really irritating), conveniently running after Masterton when Thompson essentially gives him the flick.
The plot of this is the weakest – a big date wasn’t enough, it needed to be the prom or something. Plenty of good things around, though: the support performances of Elias Koteas as a kindly skin-head, Candance Cameron as an annoying kid sister and Scott Coffey as a boy with a crush on Masterton, the music, any scene involving Masterton (particularly the practising kissing scene).